hardware can do this too.
FRG
WaltS48 wrote:
On 3/20/19 4:20 PM, Hawker wrote:
So my SM installation seems to have reset itself in some way I do not get.
It changed the theme and disabled all add ons somehow. It may have done
other things I have yet to discover.
I fixed most
On 3/20/19 4:20 PM, Hawker wrote:
So my SM installation seems to have reset itself in some way I do not
get. It changed the theme and disabled all add ons somehow. It may have
done other things I have yet to discover.
I fixed most of that but User Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 says
So my SM installation seems to have reset itself in some way I do not
get. It changed the theme and disabled all add ons somehow. It may have
done other things I have yet to discover.
I fixed most of that but User Agent Switcher 0.7.3.1 says it is not
compatible and won't let me turn it back
Hello,
I hope I did not miss this hint somewhere ...
THE first address where you should look for such "classic" addons is the
Classic-Addons-Archive!
For details (how to use, test results) see
https://unofficialseamonkeynews.wordpress.com/tag/ca-archive/
The repository also contains
Hi all,
here
<https://unofficialseamonkeynews.wordpress.com/2019/01/06/classic-add-ons-archive/>
you find some hints concerning the great archive for "classic" add-ons,
many of them will be suitable for SeaMonkey after conversion.
It would be great if some of you wou
dev wrote:
Yes, I realize that the developer appears to be long gone. And I
can also relate to other views expressed in this thread. Those
notwithstanding, the main reason for
sticking with FF has been plug in capabilities. As they are
crippled, the FF advantage erodes and the
Chris Ilias wrote:
> On 13/02/2017 3:56 AM, dev wrote:
>> Updates for security are needed. But, after warning of risks, impairing
>> or disabling add-ons - whether signed or not - should IMO be left to the
>> user's discretion.
>> The signed Research Word add on shortc
On 19.03.2016 15:43, »Q« wrote:
(There's a minor typo ...
Hi,
THx, is fixed.
CU
Rainer Bielefeld
(SeaMonkey QA volunteer)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
d about that stuff?
>
> You should read this:
> <https://unofficialseamonkeynews.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/amo-browsing-add-on-eases-conversion-and-installation-of-ff-and-tb-add-ons/>
I hate to use a word which Mozilla overuses to the point of absurdity,
but that is awesome.
-eases-conversion-and-installation-of-ff-and-tb-add-ons/>
CU
Rainer Bielefeld
(SeaMonkey QA volunteer)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
emes via the Add-ons Manager, the version numbers no
longer are displayed. I can get them one-at-a-time by selecting the
More link for each; but this does not give me a view of all of them
at once. One developer asserted that selecting [Tools >
Troubleshooting Information] from the menu bar p
On 29/09/2015 5:19 AM, Andreas Meyer wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
There is also:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/amversionnumber/
Thanks for this addon, but I agree with David:
I want my version numbers back in the core :-(
And there is a need to see them, otherwise there would be no
On 29/09/2015 7:57 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 29/09/2015 5:19 AM, Andreas Meyer wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
There is also:
https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/amversionnumber/
Thanks for this addon, but I agree with David:
I want my version numbers back in the core :-(
And there is a need to
Philip Chee wrote:
> There is also:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/seamonkey/addon/amversionnumber/
Thanks for this addon, but I agree with David:
I want my version numbers back in the core :-(
And there is a need to see them, otherwise there would be no plug-in, to
see the version numbers of
Philip Chee wrote:
On 27/09/2015 12:07, David E. Ross wrote:
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.38
I just now installed SeaMonkey 2.38. When I view the lists of
extensions or themes via the Add-ons Manager, the version numbers
On 27/09/2015 12:07, David E. Ross wrote:
> Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
> rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.38
>
> I just now installed SeaMonkey 2.38. When I view the lists of
> extensions or themes via the Add-ons Manager, the version numbe
Rick & Sharon wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On 27/09/2015 12:07, David E. Ross wrote:
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.38
I just now installed SeaMonkey 2.38. When I view the lists of
extensions or themes via the Add-ons Man
On 9/27/2015 9:04 AM, Yamo' wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rick & Sharon a écrit le 27/09/2015 17:56 :
>> And, of course, that web link shows this add-on is not available for SM
>> 2.35 (which I viewed it under.) Do I have to upgrade SM to see whether
>> this add-on will work then? Seems a bit of a leap,
Hi,
Rick & Sharon a écrit le 27/09/2015 17:56 :
> And, of course, that web link shows this add-on is not available for SM
> 2.35 (which I viewed it under.) Do I have to upgrade SM to see whether
> this add-on will work then? Seems a bit of a leap, really.
On 2.35 the numbers are displayed!
On 27/09/2015 06:07, David E. Ross wrote:
> Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.38
>
> I just now installed SeaMonkey 2.38. When I view the lists of
> extensions or themes via the Add-ons Manager, the version numb
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.38
I just now installed SeaMonkey 2.38. When I view the lists of
extensions or themes via the Add-ons Manager, the version numbers no
longer are displayed. I can get them one-at-a-time
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never Activate. I would like to delete one
S Slicer wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never Activate. I would like to delete one.
You have to do uninstall
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never
S Slicer wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never Activate. I would like
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never Activate. I would like to delete one
S Slicer wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Ooops! I meant to say PLUG INS. Choices are Always Activate, Ask to
Activate and Never Activate. I would like
On 08/28/2015 04:53 PM, S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
Which add-ons?
Extensions - Yes, there should be a Remove button to the right of the
Enable/Disable button.
Appearance - Same as above.
Plugins
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
S Slicer wrote:
I can easily see how to enable and disable add ons, but is there a way
to permanently delete an add on?
about:addons
Typically there are 2-3 buttons
[Options*] [Disable] [Remove]
Remove would do it.
*Not all addon have options...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
On 8/21/2015 11:37 AM, Sailfish wrote:
REF:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/
tl;dr
[excerpt quote=\
We are implementing a new extension API, called WebExtensions—largely
compatible with the model used by Chrome and Opera—to make
Hi guys!
I wanna make add-ons for Seamonkey but I don't know how to do it. I downloaded
the add-on SDK, try to convert for Seamonkey, even with basic examples codes
that's doesn't work. I know it is possible, I use myself some great add-on with
that browser...
Sorry to bother you with nooby
A Williams wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
(HTML5 may be great, but MLB.com is still Flash heavy, so I do need it)
try it without.
mlb started working without flash a few weeks ago.
not on my first try:
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130816content_id=57176276vkey=news_nyyc_id=nyy
Geoff Welsh wrote:
A Williams wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
(HTML5 may be great, but MLB.com is still Flash heavy, so I do need it)
try it without.
mlb started working without flash a few weeks ago.
not on my first try:
On 16/08/13 17:32, David E. Ross wrote:
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
How about a user-oriented interface?
Don't ask me. I'm just a user.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 8/16/13 3:51 AM, Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
How about a user-oriented interface?
--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/
Concerned about someone (e.g., the
On 08/16/2013 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/16/13 3:51 AM, Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
How about a user-oriented interface?
You have that with Always Activate and
WaltS wrote:
On 08/16/2013 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/16/13 3:51 AM, Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
How about a user-oriented interface?
You have that with Always
Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
oh that is awesome. I never saw that one before. It doesn't exist in
my SM 2.0 but does in TenFourFox 17 both of which are top o the line
for
Geoff Welsh wrote:
Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
oh that is awesome. I never saw that one before. It doesn't exist in
my SM 2.0 but does in TenFourFox 17 both of which are
On 8/16/13 8:54 AM, WaltS wrote:
On 08/16/2013 11:32 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/16/13 3:51 AM, Peter Nieman wrote:
On 15/08/13 13:46, W3BNR wrote:
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
Exists.
about:config - plugins.click_to_play - true
How about a user-oriented interface?
You
I notice that now we have two choices:
Never Activate and Always Activate
Java is set to 'Always Activate' by default.
How about a choice 'Ask to Activate'?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Hello.
Is it me or does SM v2.1+ add-ons does not automatically notify me of
updated addons for the ones I have installed? I remember it used to do
in the past on all of my machines. I cannot remember the last time it
did (months ago?) on four of my updated machines (two 64-bit W7, one old
stango wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager does
not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7 and
when clicking 'Check your Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version is shown and Apple System
PhillipJones wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:54 PM, M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7 and when clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version is shown and Apple System preferences
On 10/18/12 12:24 AM, M wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager does not
acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7 and when
clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:54 PM, M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7 and when clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version is shown and Apple System preferences
also
On 10/17/2012 06:54 PM, M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager does not
acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7 and when clicking
'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version is shown
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version is shown and Apple System
preferences
On 10/17/2012 08:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 08:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 06:54 PM, M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your
Plugins' shows, vulnerable/Update Now.
When checking the site latest version
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 08:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your Plugins' shows, vulnerable
PhillipJones wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
WaltS wrote:
On 10/17/2012 08:02 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
M wrote:
I have downloaded and installed Java 7 Update 9 but Add-ons Manager
does not acknowledge the update. It continues to show Java 7 Update 7
and when clicking 'Check your Plugins
Yesterday, after upgrading to SM 2.7, I had a look at the Add-On Manager
and it showed my ten Add-Ons had all been disabled. (I think this
situation may have applied since SM 2.5, but I did nothing)
No great problem!! Just click on the Enable tab and, apparently, I'm
hot-to-trot, even though
Interviewed by CNN on 07/02/2012 08:17, Daniel told the world:
Yesterday, after upgrading to SM 2.7, I had a look at the Add-On Manager
and it showed my ten Add-Ons had all been disabled. (I think this
situation may have applied since SM 2.5, but I did nothing)
No great problem!! Just
On 2/7/12 2:17 AM, Daniel wrote:
Yesterday, after upgrading to SM 2.7, I had a look at the Add-On Manager
and it showed my ten Add-Ons had all been disabled. (I think this
situation may have applied since SM 2.5, but I did nothing)
No great problem!! Just click on the Enable tab
of this for SM 2.7 if the maxVersion
is at least 2.1. This is a new feature called compatible-by-default.
No idea why so many add-ons (including ones which are for sure
compatible out of the box!) appear disabled for Daniel; usually a check
for add-on updates and/or SeaMonkey restart helps to fix
It appears to work correctly in 2.5
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/18/11 7:46 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
Philip Taylor
this is now bug #703897 at
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
It appears to work correctly in 2.5
It does indeed, and if the page to which it took me would
stop wittering on about bl@@dy Firefox and realise that
I am a Seamonkey user (shout it from the rooftops), then
I would be positively ecstatic. Still only three levels
of zoom
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Rob Steinmetz wrote:
It appears to work correctly in 2.5
It does indeed
Please leave a comment on the corresponding bug so it can be closed. Thanks.
and if the page to which it took me would
stop wittering on about bl@@dy Firefox and realise that
I am a Seamonkey user
On 11/23/11 10:05 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
It appears to work correctly in 2.5
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/18/11 7:46 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
Philip Taylor
this is now bug #703897 at
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
If you enter http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ into the address
bar and go there directly does it show and check your plugins? On mine
it does, and of course the link is working for me also.
Rather disturbingly, no, Jim : it tells me it is
On 11/20/11 1:49 AM, Daniel wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
If you enter http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ into the address
bar and go there directly does it show and check your plugins? On mine
it does, and of course the link is working for me also.
Rather
David E. Ross wrote:
I have disabled Advertise Firefox compatibility. When I go to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/, it still says it's checking
Firefox.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. Says the same thing when visiting
the page with Opera!
It also says Warning, a newer
No difference, Hartmut : in safe mode, and with new
profile, exactly the same behaviour -- no effect when
clicking on Check to see if your plugins are up
to date. Incidentally, this string (and all those
below, in the Add-Ons manager) are not copyable --
this seems to be a new feature
therein. There is nothing to configure so the waste of time is bearable. ;)
It may be that you have found a bug in 2.4.1 which is fixed in my 2.8a1.
in the Add-Ons manager) are not copyable --
You are right. Yuck.
this seems to be a new feature of Seamonkey, ever
since its adoption of what appears
Hartmut Figge:
[...]
Some formatting errors. Annoying ones. Unfortunately a supersedes is not
possible because of the connecting with a mailing list. Sigh.
Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
and try
therein. There is nothing to configure so the waste of time is bearable. ;)
Already tried, Hartmut : see above (and with new profile).
It may be that you have found a bug in 2.4.1 which is fixed in my 2.8a1.
in the Add-Ons manager) are not copyable --
You are right. Yuck.
Indeed
Philip TAYLOR:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
No difference, Hartmut : in safe mode, and with new
profile, exactly the same behaviour -- no effect when
clicking on Check to see if your plugins are up
to date. Incidentally, this string (and all those
below,
You could create a test-profile with the
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Philip TAYLOR:
It may be that you have found a bug in 2.4.1 which is fixed in my 2.8a1.
That is still possible unless someone with a 2.4.1 can prove it wrong.
Hartmut
Works for me SeaMonkey 2.4.1 on Windows 7 Home Premium. Build
identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows
Jim Taylor:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Philip TAYLOR:
It may be that you have found a bug in 2.4.1 which is fixed in my 2.8a1.
That is still possible unless someone with a 2.4.1 can prove it wrong.
Works for me SeaMonkey 2.4.1 on Windows 7 Home Premium. Build
identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
Jim Taylor wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Philip TAYLOR:
It may be that you have found a bug in 2.4.1 which is fixed in my
2.8a1.
That is still possible unless someone with a 2.4.1 can prove it wrong.
Hartmut
Works for me SeaMonkey 2.4.1 on Windows 7 Home Premium. Build
identifier:
, however, 6 are indicated as Unknown plugin. Those unknowns
include 3 from RealNetworks (e.g., RealPlayer) and 2 from Micro$oft.
More important, going to [Tools Add-ons Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu
bar and selecting the Plugins icon in the left margin shows a list of
plugins. At the top
David E. Ross wrote:
More important, going to [Tools Add-ons Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu
bar and selecting the Plugins icon in the left margin shows a list of
plugins. At the top of the list, there seems to be a link Check to see
if your plugins are up to date. This is underlined
David E. Ross:
More important, going to [Tools Add-ons Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu
bar and selecting the Plugins icon in the left margin shows a list of
plugins. At the top of the list, there seems to be a link Check to see
if your plugins are up to date. This is underlined and in the color
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Time for a screenshot.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/pl19.png
That one. Dysfunctional here. If I do a full remove
and re-install of Seamonkey 2.4.1, what is the probability
that it will lose my settings in the process ?
Philip Taylor
Philip TAYLOR:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Time for a screenshot.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/pl19.png
That one. Dysfunctional here. If I do a full remove
and re-install of Seamonkey 2.4.1, what is the probability
that it will lose my settings in the process ?
You are using Win and i
On 11/18/11 7:46 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
Philip Taylor
this is now bug #703897 at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703897.
--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/.
Anyone
On 11/18/2011 10:39 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/18/11 10:16 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR schrieb:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
AFAIK, it should call up Mozilla's plugin check
do I, which was the reason for the question.
Philip Taylor
Sorry, I should have clarified. The following is from about:plugins
I find that I have to right-click on the link and either open in a new
tab (or window).
In add-ons manager, simply clicking the 'Check to see if your plugins
are up
NoOp wrote:
I find that I have to right-click on the link and either open in a new
tab (or window).
The following do not work for me :
{empty|ctrl|shift|alt}{left|right}click
As far as I know, there are no other possibilities.
Philip Taylor
___
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David E. Ross:
More important, going to [Tools Add-ons Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu
bar and selecting the Plugins icon in the left margin shows a list of
plugins. At the top of the list, there seems to be a link Check to see
if your plugins are up to date
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Time for a screenshot.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/pl19.png
That one. Dysfunctional here. If I do a full remove
and re-install of Seamonkey 2.4.1, what is the probability
that it will lose my settings in the process ?
Philip Taylor
Jim Taylor wrote:
If you enter http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ into the address
bar and go there directly does it show and check your plugins? On mine
it does, and of course the link is working for me also.
Rather disturbingly, no, Jim : it tells me it is checking Firefox
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Jim Taylor wrote:
If you enter http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ into the
address
bar and go there directly does it show and check your plugins? On mine
it does, and of course the link is working for me also.
Rather disturbingly, no, Jim : it tells me it is
Jim Taylor wrote:
I get that same page, it says Firefox, but it is checking my SeaMonkey
plugins (I don't have Firefox installed). Pasted below is what I get
from that page with SeaMonkey 2.4.1 (without the graphics of course).
OK, so presumably it's just wrongly-cloned text rather than
a
On 11/19/11 1:36 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Time for a screenshot.
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/pl19.png
That one. Dysfunctional here. If I do a full remove
and re-install of Seamonkey 2.4.1, what is the probability
that it will lose my
On 11/19/11 1:34 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David E. Ross:
More important, going to [Tools Add-ons Manager] on the SeaMonkey menu
bar and selecting the Plugins icon in the left margin shows a list of
plugins. At the top of the list, there seems to be a link Check to see
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Philip TAYLOR schrieb:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
AFAIK, it should call up Mozilla's plugin check website and there some
JS runs and analyzes your plugins, telling it newer versions are
available, and if so, giving
On 11/18/11 10:16 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR schrieb:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
AFAIK, it should call up Mozilla's plugin check website and there some
JS runs and analyzes your plugins, telling it newer
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/18/11 10:16 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR schrieb:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
AFAIK, it should call up Mozilla's plugin check website and there some
JS runs and analyzes your
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/18/11 10:16 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip TAYLOR schrieb:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
AFAIK, it should call up Mozilla's plugin check website and there some
JS
Philip TAYLOR:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
I am send to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ which will e.g.
update my mozplugger. Impossible because that would require root rights
and also i do not want that,
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Philip TAYLOR:
What should happen when I click on this apparent link ?
Seamonkey 2.4.1; Windows XP Professional/SP3.
I am send to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/ which will e.g.
update my mozplugger. Impossible because that would require root rights
and also
I just wrote:
When I visit about:addons, the status bar says Waiting for
static-cdn.addons.mozilla.net for the longest time... After about five
minutes, it finally displays a list of available addons. Then when I
click Plugins on the left, I instantly get a list of installed plugins,
plus the
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
