Ant wrote:
In any case I recommend NoScript 5.19 and latest uBlock classic (legacy).
I will have to check out NoScript. Why no uBlock Origin instead of classic?
I deleted Adblock Plus and added uBlock Origin. I think things are
better, but I cannot put numbers on it. White listing seems
On 7/25/2020 3:01 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/25/2020 4:49 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
...
There are reports of 20 GB or more on startup and crashes when using
streetmap and specific websites. I can not reproduce this neither on
Linux nor Windows. Memory goes u
Ant wrote:
On 7/25/2020 4:49 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
...
There are reports of 20 GB or more on startup and crashes when using
streetmap and specific websites. I can not reproduce this neither on Linux
nor Windows. Memory goes up but also goes down moderately. In some cases I
On 7/25/2020 4:49 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 7/24/2020 3:07 AM, Ant wrote:
Wow, yesterday I saw v2.53.3 process go over 4 GB (about 83% used on
my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC's 6 GB of RAM)! :O
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2020-07-26 says
"S
Ant wrote:
On 7/24/2020 3:07 AM, Ant wrote:
Wow, yesterday I saw v2.53.3 process go over 4 GB (about 83% used on my
decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC's 6 GB of RAM)! :O
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2020-07-26 says "Some users
report heavy memory usage compared to 2
On 7/24/2020 3:07 AM, Ant wrote:
Wow, yesterday I saw v2.53.3 process go over 4 GB (about 83% used on my
decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC's 6 GB of RAM)! :O
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2020-07-26 says "Some
users report heavy memory usage compared to 2.49.5 but no
10 or so with some google video stuff.
But putting fix after fix in has made 2.53.3 and 2.53.4 well behaved here.
Goes down too. 2.53.4 seems to be even smoother.
If you enable service workers in about:config you can do this test suite which
should drive memory up quite good. Grashes 2.49.5 b
Wow, yesterday I saw v2.53.3 process go over 4 GB (about 83% used on my
decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC's 6 GB of RAM)! :O
--
Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, illnesses (e.g.,
COVID-19/2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP), interruptions, stresses,
heat waves, fires, ou
derbuffer-count
0.00 MB ── webgl-renderbuffer-memory
0 ── webgl-shader-count
0 ── webgl-texture-count
0.00 MB ── webgl-texture-memory
End of Main Process"
I had to exit and kill stick huge seamonkey.exe process (SeaMonkey asked
me to close it first durin
On 6/12/2020 2:04 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
...
What?? Can't your brain multi-task, Paul??
Sorry, Paul, I forgot the ;-P after my last! ;-(
That's ok. I had assumed so and thought it was quite funny!
:)
I have no brain. :(
--
Life is so crazy! ..!.. *isms, sins, devil, illness (e.g.,
Daniel wrote:
Daniel wrote on 11/06/2020 7:20 PM:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/06/2020 12:11 PM:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its
On 6/12/2020 10:00 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 6/11/2020 9:12 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
Well, youtube is supposed to be for watching videos, so I can't
imagine why you'd need more than one tab open
I watch many daily. ;)
Yes, but if you open multiple videos in multip
Ant wrote:
On 6/11/2020 9:12 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
Well, youtube is supposed to be for watching videos, so I can't
imagine why you'd need more than one tab open
I watch many daily. ;)
Yes, but if you open multiple videos in multiple tabs, what is
supposed to happen, do they
Daniel wrote on 11/06/2020 7:20 PM:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/06/2020 12:11 PM:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its
peak working
On 6/11/2020 9:12 AM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
Well, youtube is supposed to be for watching videos, so I can't
imagine why you'd need more than one tab open
I watch many daily. ;)
Yes, but if you open multiple videos in multiple tabs, what is supposed
to happen, do they all start p
Ant wrote:
Well, youtube is supposed to be for watching videos, so I can't
imagine why you'd need more than one tab open
I watch many daily. ;)
Yes, but if you open multiple videos in multiple tabs, what is supposed
to happen, do they all start playing at once?
--
Gerry Hickman (London U
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 4:07 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 1:17 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
...
Ever tried about:memory ? I then clicked "Measure" under "Show memory
reports". My Seamonkey version - on this machine - is a bit older than
yours but that should
Paul in Houston, TX wrote on 11/06/2020 12:11 PM:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its
peak working set, and almost 30K of page faults. I
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 11/06/2020 9:07 AM:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 1:17 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
...
Ever tried about:memory ? I then clicked "Measure" under "Show
memory reports". My Seamonkey version - on this machine - is a bit
older than yours but that should not make any
On 6/10/2020 4:07 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 1:17 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
...
Ever tried about:memory ? I then clicked "Measure" under "Show
memory reports". My Seamonkey version - on this machine - is a bit
older than yours but that should not make any
On 6/10/2020 7:11 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
...
Why would I want to watch more than one youtube vid at a time?
:) I don't belong to Link, Face, or Twit.
So, you can watch them later. :P
--
This ant finally went out far after 2 months and 23 days / 12 weeks / 84
days / 0.23 years. :O ..!.
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in
Ant wrote:
On 6/10/2020 1:17 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
...
Ever tried about:memory ? I then clicked "Measure" under "Show memory
reports". My Seamonkey version - on this machine - is a bit older than
yours but that should not make any difference.
Wow, I saw a lot of ghost windows w
On 6/10/2020 2:20 PM, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade o
On 6/10/2020 1:17 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
...
Ever tried about:memory ? I then clicked "Measure" under "Show memory
reports". My Seamonkey version - on this machine - is a bit older than
yours but that should not make any difference.
Wow, I saw a lot of ghost windows with previous
On 6/9/2020 3:52 PM, Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC (6 GB of RAM). :(
Well, youtub
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC (6 GB of RAM). :
Gerry Hickman wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC (6 GB of RAM). :(
Well, youtube is supposed to be f
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by
many tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1
PC (6 GB of RAM). :(
Thank you for reading and ho
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by many
tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC (6 GB
of RAM). :(
Thank you for reading and hopefully answering. :)
I ha
Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by many
tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC (6 GB
of RAM). :(
Well, youtube is supposed to be for watching videos, so
On 6/9/20 3:16 PM, Ant wrote:
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by many
tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC (6 GB
of RAM). :(
Thank you for reading and hopefully a
Mine went over 3 GB of RAM for its working set, 4.5 GB for its peak
working set, and almost 30K of page faults. It was mostly caused by many
tabs of YouTube.com in my decade old, updated 64-bit W7 HPE SP1 PC (6 GB
of RAM). :(
Thank you for reading and hopefully answering. :)
--
This ant finall
in windows task manager, just the seamonkey's window
very long to come). Normally the delay is some seconds.
I identify windows defender to be the cause of it, yesterday i add
seamonkey.exe as an "authorized" application for both local and public
area (i start with local only
seamonkey's window
very long to come). Normally the delay is some seconds.
I identify windows defender to be the cause of it, yesterday i add
seamonkey.exe as an "authorized" application for both local and public
area (i start with local only but without any result, adding public area
&
On 4/25/2020 6:42 PM, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I experienced that problem many times when I was on Windows 7. But when
I moved to Windows 10, it seems to have gone away completely.
Interesting. Did you have not this problem before v2.53.1 like me? It
must be a bug with W7ers. Now, how can we cap
I experienced that problem many times when I was on Windows 7. But when I
moved to Windows 10, it seems to have gone away completely.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seam
I exit and restart my 64-bit SeaMonkey v2.53.1 often because of bloated
web sites (YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) to regain its speeds and
memories (seen it go up to 2 GB!). It seems to get stuck once a day. I
have to tell SM to close itself when booting it up because it got stuck.
I can't
On 8/12/2012 1:21 PM PT, Chris Ilias typed:
Does the Mozilla Crash Reporter come up? If so, open SeaMonkey, go to
the address "about:crashes" (without the quotes) and tell us your latest
crash IDs. We can then look at the data specific to your crash and have
a better idea of what is causing the
On 12-08-11 9:49 PM, Ant wrote:
Hi again.
I have had my SM v2.0.10.1 (v2.11 now) clean installed onto my old
updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 7/14/2012. I reinstalled all the
extensions/addons and plugins that I need. So far, SM is pretty stable.
All crashes from v2.0.14 and earlier were mostly from
FYI: http://i.imgur.com/JGyLK.gif from 7/27/2012 hang/freeze.
On 8/11/2012 6:49 PM PT, Ant typed:
Hi again.
I have had my SM v2.0.10.1 (v2.11 now) clean installed onto my old
updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 7/14/2012. I reinstalled all the
extensions/addons and plugins that I need. So far, SM is
Hi again.
I have had my SM v2.0.10.1 (v2.11 now) clean installed onto my old
updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 7/14/2012. I reinstalled all the
extensions/addons and plugins that I need. So far, SM is pretty stable.
All crashes from v2.0.14 and earlier were mostly from annoying Flash!
However, I h
HenriK wrote:
Advice on how to repair the problem without losing all of her stored
bookmarks and address book would be appreciated as well as advice on
what could have caused the problem so we can avoid it in the future.
Uninstall SeaMonkey, then re-install it. This does not remove the user
pr
d identify itself.
Assuming you're on a Windows machine, navigate to C:\Program
Files\SeaMonkey\ and RIGHT-click on the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and look at the last
entry, "Product Version." If the value is 2.0.14, tha
re on a Windows machine, navigate to C:\Program
Files\SeaMonkey\ and RIGHT-click on the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and look at the last
entry, "Product Version." If the value is 2.0.14, that should be what's
installed.
error message to get Seamonkey to open and identify itself.
>>
>> Assuming you're on a Windows machine, navigate to C:\Program
>> Files\SeaMonkey\ and RIGHT-click on the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
>> dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and
the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and look at the last
entry, "Product Version." If the value is 2.0.14, that should be what's
installed.
FWIW, on my system (I have 2.0.14), the BuildID is 20110420224920 and
the File Version i
Windows machine, navigate to C:\Program
Files\SeaMonkey\ and RIGHT-click on the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and look at the last
entry, "Product Version." If the value is 2.0.14, that should be what's
installed.
FWIW, on m
\Program
Files\SeaMonkey\ and RIGHT-click on the file named seamonkey.exe. In the
dialog that pops up, choose the "Version" tab and look at the last
entry, "Product Version." If the value is 2.0.14, that should be what's
installed.
FWIW, on my system (I have 2.0.14), the
HenriK wrote:
WLS wrote:
HenriK wrote:
HenriK wrote:
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks,
HenriK wrote:
WLS wrote:
HenriK wrote:
HenriK wrote:
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks,
WLS wrote:
HenriK wrote:
HenriK wrote:
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks, in advance, for
HenriK wrote:
HenriK wrote:
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks, in advance, for any assis
HenriK wrote:
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks, in advance, for any assistance, guidance,
For reasons that are not at all clear, my wife's WinXP PC suddenly
displays the error message:
'Seamonkey.exe not a valid Win32 application'
Anybody have any idea what has caused this? A bit of Microsoft revenge?
Thanks, in advance, for any assistance, guidance, or info
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
Several thoughts...
Make sure that SM's edit/pref/advanced/quicklaunch is off
Make sure that Task Managers "All Proc
Ray_Net wrote:
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
Several thoughts...
Make sure that SM's edit/pref/advanced/quicklaunch is off
Make sure that Task Managers "All Processes" is checked
Cl
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 7/29/2010 9:29 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 7/28/2010 1:25 PM, Roger Fink wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
>> I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
>> The XP problem - "Launch Folder Windows in a Separate Process" <<
Thanks... this actually makes sense...
The "makes sense" comes from the likelihood that SM is the computer'
Attention Beverly and Others
>> I have killed the process (making sure
it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
Re: seamonkey.exe and the XP problem
>> I have killed the process (making sure
it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared h
On 7/29/2010 9:29 AM, Rick Merrill wrote:
> Mark Hansen wrote:
>> On 7/28/2010 1:25 PM, Roger Fink wrote:
>>> Rick Merrill wrote:
>>>> Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
>>>> (Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
>>>>
&
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
Several thoughts...
Make sure that SM's edit/pref/advanced/quicklaunch is off
Make sure that Task Managers "All Processes" is checked
Click Task Manage
>> I have killed the process (making sure it was the LAST one). One
time I just stared hard at it - and SM started! <<
Several thoughts...
Make sure that SM's edit/pref/advanced/quicklaunch is off
Make sure that Task Managers "All Processes" is checked
Click Task Managers image name column he
Beverly Howard wrote:
>> Very often seamonkey.exe shows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs. <<
This has been discussed here before... seems to be related to running
the email section of sm.
It occurs consistently on one XPPro box of the four XPPro boxes her
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 7/28/2010 1:25 PM, Roger Fink wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
sort of software unrelated to SeaMonkey.
Typically I will
>> Very often seamonkey.exe shows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs. <<
This has been discussed here before... seems to be related to running
the email section of sm.
It occurs consistently on one XPPro box of the four XPPro boxes here and
I have found
On 7/28/2010 1:25 PM, Roger Fink wrote:
> Rick Merrill wrote:
>> Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
>> (Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
>>
>> This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
>> sort of software unrelated to SeaMo
Roger Fink wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
sort of software unrelated to SeaMonkey.
Typically I will have to shut down and restart twice!
What to
Rick Merrill wrote:
> Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
> (Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
>
> This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
> sort of software unrelated to SeaMonkey.
>
> Typically I will have to shut down and restart tw
Very often seamonkey.exeshows in the process list
(Task Manager) BUT the GUI never runs.
This happens after uninstalling or installing some other
sort of software unrelated to SeaMonkey.
Typically I will have to shut down and restart twice!
What to look for that could be causing this
On 9/12/2009 11:59 PM PT, Ant typed:
FYI a screen shot: http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/4316/screenshotb.gif
that I reproduced again for kicks. Also, the %temp%\32ce_appcompat.txt:
[snipped] Oops, dupes. For some reason, my posts didn't show up but they
came very late! :(
--
"... Ooh, we ha
:N/A
Computer:FOOBAR
Description:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
: 41
XP, Pentium 4 -- just installed SM 1.1.18 -- reference Firefox page
loads in < 5 Seconds.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Phillip Pi wrote:
On 9/11/2009 11:55 AM PT, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b.
usp10.dll doesn't sound like a SeaMonkey file, and apparently that one
has a pr
Ant wrote:
Hello.
After a long session in SeaMonkey v1.1.18 in my updated Windows XP Pro.
SP3, I go to http://getfirefox.com/ and SeaMonkey crashes with usp10.dll
v1.420.2600.5512 (Uniscribe Unicode script processor):
...
Page loads quickly and uneventfully here (SM 1.1.16, WinXP Pro SP3).
: Application Error
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1000
Date: 9/10/2009
Time: 9:20:25 PM
User: N/A
Computer: FOOBAR
Description:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b
On 9/11/2009 11:55 AM PT, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b.
usp10.dll doesn't sound like a SeaMonkey file, and apparently that one
has a problem. You need to co
Ant wrote:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b.
usp10.dll doesn't sound like a SeaMonkey file, and apparently that one
has a problem. You need to contact whoever delivered that bugg
Error
> Event Source: Application Error
> Event Category: None
> Event ID: 1000
> Date: 9/10/2009
> Time: 9:20:25 PM
> User: N/A
> Computer: FOOBAR
> Description:
> Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
&g
: 1000
Date: 9/10/2009
Time: 9:20:25 PM
User: N/A
Computer: FOOBAR
Description:
Faulting application seamonkey.exe, version 1.8.20090.16977, faulting
module usp10.dll, version 1.420.2600.5512, fault address 0x0003d60b.
For more information, see Help and
.. 1.1.7 or
1.1.8, can't remember for sure. I will be upgrading him this weekend
to the most current version.
Thanks, John
Some AV are not very considerate with Seamonkey.exe. Shorting of dumping
such stupid AV, just tell AVG this is a false positive. I have not used
AVG for a long tim
On 03/21/2009 04:27 PM, John Reinders wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 03/21/2009 07:49 AM, John Reinders wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
>>> Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
>>> his computer and opens Se
NoOp wrote:
On 03/21/2009 07:49 AM, John Reinders wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I have run
On 03/21/2009 07:49 AM, John Reinders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
> Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
> his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
> consistent.
>
> I have run
John Reinders wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
John Reinders wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns
on his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I ha
Rick Merrill wrote:
John Reinders wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I have run multiple scans
Rick Merrill wrote:
John Reinders wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I have run multiple scans
John Reinders wrote:
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I have run multiple scans of his system using A
, can't remember for sure. I will be upgrading him this weekend to
the most current version.
Thanks, John
Some AV are not very considerate with Seamonkey.exe. Shorting of dumping
such stupid AV, just tell AVG this is a false positive. I have not used
AVG for a long time, so hopefully so
Hi,
I have attached a link to a .jpg showing an Avg error message that my
Dad is periodically getting. Sometimes every morning after he turns on
his computer and opens Seamonkey, sometimes every other day - not
consistent.
I have run multiple scans of his system using Avg, also Malware progr
90 matches
Mail list logo
