Some here would say that when the publisher indicates their interpretation
of the license then we can rely on that instead going with our
interpretation of the license, but I am not a lawyer.
If they can sign the LWG waiver it makes things a lot easier, but it's not
the only option.
On Fri, 23
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:21, wrote:
> Andrew
> Thanks, I hadn't considered life cycle prefixes. There might be
> problems with disused or abandoned if those reopening the trails
> argued that they used the trail last week so it was neither disused
> nor abandoned.
>
I
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 21:51, wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I am intrigued by your suggestion of lifecycle.
>
> For a mountain bike trail thats just had its berms and jumps dug out
> and scattered and lots and lots of branches dragged across it and a
> sign put up at the head a
On 23/10/20 3:38 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
You could also find (shock, horror!) that that tag has been used for
rendering purposes.
Or, even more shockingly, the tag has been used because they are nature
reserves.
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 16:08, wrote:
> I am writing as someone who does voluntary work for a Parks Service. I
> have personal experience with the loop: people use a path because its
> mapped, the path is mapped because it exists because people use it
>
> It takes an enormous amount of work
Yeah generally Landgate data, when published as "open data" is personal use
only. I'll raise a DWG ticket and try to seek clarification on what data
was used, and roll back where needed.
Andrew,
on behalf of the DWG
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 10:08, nwastra nwastra wrote:
> H
Greg's description matches mine. Used for recreation, not conservation,
usually just grass, maybe a few trees scattered, sometimes there could be a
playground there, maybe benches, maybe bbqs, ie.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park.
National Parks, Marine Parks etc would be
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 11:28, Brendan Barnes wrote:
> Thanks Phil, I appreciate your insights on this.
>
> On the side issue, yes I definitely agree "informal path" track-tracing
> can have an effect on human use in the local, often wilderness,
> environments where they are recorded. However I
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 19:39, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Personally, as an ex Parks Track Management Officer, I have actively
> removed unformed, off track tracks from OSM. There are frequently
> management plans for such areas where active promotion of the “tracks” is
> discouraged and book authors
Plus on the existing mapped path you can add informal=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:informal to say it's not a formal
path.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 22:11, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> Generally I'd just leave a gap in the highway=footway/path where it
> starts/ends, but others mig
Generally I'd just leave a gap in the highway=footway/path where it
starts/ends, but others might add a path here "tagging for the router" so
that routing works, but if that's done it must have trail_visibility=no (
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility) which says it's a
model simply missed many of these. @Andrew Harvey
> - can you shed some light on this?
>
Looks pretty complete to me, I converted it into FlatGeobuf with OGR and
then opened the whole country in QGIS (you should be able to load the whole
GeoJSON in QGIS, but FlatGeobuf gives
it does do well is actually identify buildings, I haven't found
any false positives, only a few false negatives where a building is hidden
under dense tree coverage.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 12:52, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:20, Simon Poole wrote:
>
>> Just
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 21:20, Simon Poole wrote:
> Just as a comment: there is nothing so time consuming as fixing badly
> mapped buildings (essentially drawing them from scratch is nearly always
> faster), I would only import building outlines that are at a quality level
> that you would not
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
> https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
>
> As fun as hand tracing data is; I'd be pretty keen to swap to small scale
> imports of this, suburb by suburb in my area.
>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I was wondering how mapbox had coverage of areas that hadn't been traced
> into OSM; and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
> https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
>
Not relevant to OSM here,
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 13:54, Benjamin Ceravolo
wrote:
> I understand the principal being explained above as to why Vire rows are
> wanting to be mapped, but my question is is it even practical within the
> use of the map considering that viren reos are approximately 1.5m apart and
> all but the
I think it's fine to map these in OSM, like all other things in private
property it does make it harder to validate and determining the exact crop
from imagery might be a stretch, but I don't think this is enough of a
reason to not map.
I agree with the suggestion of natural=tree_row +
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 11:16, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> Which tracks were you looking to name? Maybe the list can collectively
> chime in with their local knowledge of its name.
>
Ahh I just read the quoted correspondence now which I can see one of them.
It's a tricky one, for many mounta
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 08:13, David Wales wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I like to walk tracks with my GPS running, and trace them into OSM
> afterwards.
>
> A long time ago, I sent an email to Robert Sloss, who makes lots of
> bushwalking guides in my region. I asked if it was OK for me to use the
> track
of the process on how to do
that, which is why I'm emailing this group.
--
Andrew (andrepoiy on OSM)
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
eme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> Thanks again, both Andrews!
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 23:06, Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I guess now is a good time to point out the post import items at
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Bou
Hi Eugene and Erwin,
Thanks for the feedback and the tips for doing multiple tasks at once! Eugene,
can you share an example task or two that are duplicated, I can share them with
our team to see if we can adjust the outputs going forward.
Thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone
On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 at 21:11, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
wrote:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
> sounds good.
>
+1 highway=emergency_access_point with ref=* for the number. I wouldn't use
assembly point on these if they are just a sign number and not
Thanks Andrew Davidson for seeing this through.
I believe NSW was complete already, but we could do a comparison for any
differences, though I think we're at the point in NSW where any work would
be mostly manual.
I guess now is a good time to point out the post import items at
https
On 30/9/20 2:51 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Thanks, whoever did it all! :-)
Thanks have to go to Andrew Harvey for persisting till we got approval
from PSMA, and also for his code for converting them to OSM format. I
thought his idea of using TopoJSON was great.
I've still got the NT
Keep Right flags web links that have gone offline.
--
Andrew
From: Philip Barnes
Sent: 27 September 2020 18:49
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hello world and automated change proposal: Add missing
URL scheme on UK's Pubs websites
On Sun
Abandoned is a tricky concept for a path, what make is abandoned? If there
is a sign up saying track closed or keep out for re-vegetation it's clear,
but otherwise it's less clear.
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 01:36, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Once it's definitely disappeared, I'd have no qualms about
On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 15:18, Sebastian Spiess wrote:
> I'm for using ref= or ref:xxx= as these would be references. Referencing
> or relating to the PSMA data set. I don't see comment as suitable when
> there is a reference tag for referencing identifiers.
>
If we use ref, then I feel it
On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 at 09:29, cleary wrote:
>
> In regard to ABS data ... I understand that it was added into OSM when it
> was the only data for which we could get permission. ABS statistical areas
> approximate suburb boundaries (perhaps 90% similarity). In the Sydney
> suburb where I live,
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:25, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 17/9/20 5:36 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> >
> > So while I'd prefer using ref: I guess some psma specific tag
> > could be okay.
>
> Do you have a preference between ref: and note: ?
>
I can't decide,
On 17/9/20 5:36 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
So while I'd prefer using ref: I guess some psma specific tag
could be okay.
Do you have a preference between ref: and note: ?
So you're suggesting 1) uploading duplicate state borders, and then
cleanup after import or 2) doing the upload so
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 07:41, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> I think the other two we have 6 for LGA and 10 for Suburb/Localities are
>> well used already and reasonable and what's being proposed for the PSMA
>> import.
>>
>
> So the admin level table shows 10 as "Locality Border (Suburbs or
an admin_level at all.
I think the other two we have 6 for LGA and 10 for Suburb/Localities are
well used already and reasonable and what's being proposed for the PSMA
import.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 22:34, Ewen Hill wrote:
> Thank you Andrew H for your un-waivering (sic) efforts and chang
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 20:07, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> >
> > 1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
> > the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
> > then
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new
tags here when one already exists
On 15/9/20 10:53 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable ID that is used as a reference,
the existing ref tag is better for this. If we want to be more specific
then ref:psma or something like that would work. No need to invent new
tags here when one already exists
Other tools also listed at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services#Live.2Freal-time_edits_to_OSM_data
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 05:20, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
> It was called Show me the Way ( https://osmlab.github.io/show-me-the-way/
> ).
>
> Greetings
>
> Michał
>
> wt.,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 18:04, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> Yes, we do not map individual ownership of land and buildings generally,
> but unless the owner is a person, we could and privacy regulations would
> not prevent us from doing it. It also isn’t an argument for refraining from
> mapping
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 10:44, cleary wrote:
> Thanks to both Andrew Davidson and Andrew Harvey for their work as I see
> addition of PSMA administrative boundaries as an important improvement for
> our map.
>
> In regard to adding source tags to objects, I find them very helpful
Resurecting this old thread as Andrew Davidson has been working on this
import plan a bit more ->
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import%2FCatalogue%2FPSMA_Admin_Boundaries=revision=2034132=1918537
Surfacing a few points from my review:
1. psma:loc_pid. Where this is a stable
Hola a todos,
Este es Andrew de Apple, actualicé los desafíos de MapRoulette de Bolivia
nuevamente con nuevos datos de OSM. Los desafíos están todos en este proyecto:
https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/38986
¡Gracias!
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464
Hi Eugene,
Thanks for the feedback and for noting that, I just disabled the older
challenge to prevent that going forward.
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
<mailto:andrew_wise...@apple.com>
> On Sep 8, 2020, at 8:27 AM, Eugene Alv
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 10:19, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> All of the search results that I've looked at so far have referred back to
> this Qld Health page:https://www.health.qld.gov.au/services, so I'm
> wondering whether we're allowed to use it, to access details of all Qld
> hospitals?
>
>
On 4/9/20 3:55 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
So does that make 2255 / 222 / or a different tally?
It's 222 but I'm not sure how you got that, I get 200. Did you use
"amenity=hospital in Queensland" in the wizard?
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:53 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> I did an Overpass search for Qld & found ~2100 "hospitals", which seems
> like a lot? https://overpass-turbo.eu/# (Don't know if that works or
> not?), & checking at random, found more Ambo's, Doctor's surgeries & so on
> also
On 2/09/2020 7:59 pm, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au wrote:
BTW, if he is serial offender why noone ever commented on their talk page?
Because people have been using changeset comments to try an engage with
the user:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=438078
On 2/09/2020 10:38 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
Did a bit of searching & it appears it was only changed on 15/7/20, but
no, I certainly don't remember any discussion?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_level_10=prev=2012028
Makes reference to "Australian
Hi everyone,
I updated the MapRoulette challenges with new OSM data again, they are all
posted here: https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39286
<https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39286>
Thanks!
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@app
Heads up, looks like their team has started to map in Perth, see on OSMCha
-> https://osmcha.org/?aoi=80b50a6d-6bb5-48cb-8ac4-4b2ddd9d5d76
Mostly looks okay to me, and mostly minor tweaks, though I raised a few
questions and issues on changeset comments but also listed most of them
here:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 11:21, cleary wrote:
>
> I looked at the Wiki. It is quite a while since I looked at the section on
> administrative boundaries. My recollection is that it used to have LGA as
> admin_level=6 and suburb as level 9 or 10. I do not recall any discussion
> of inclusion of
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 15:42, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Only a few Gold Coast suburbs, including these ones, have had their admin
> boundaries mapped (incidentally, as an aside, they've been mapped as
> admin_level=10 - should they be =9?) eg
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/973018.
>
Hello all,
This is Andrew from the Apple Maps team. We recently used our Atlas data
analysis tool to look at a few types of potential issues related to roads and
routing in Ethiopia.
I've posted the results of those checks on MapRoulette, a tool that lets you go
through potential issues one
Hello all,
This is Andrew from the Apple Maps team. We recently used our Atlas data
analysis tool to look at a few types of potential issues related to roads and
routing in Bangladesh.
I've posted the results of those checks on MapRoulette, a tool that lets you go
through potential issues one
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 18:28, pangoSE wrote:
> Hi
>
> Mateusz Konieczny skrev: (22 augusti 2020
> 09:55:10 CEST)
> >"It a playground with half-ass quality more than an authoritative and
> >verified source of information (like e.g. Wikipedia)"
> >
> >I am not sure whatever you claim that
>
I think you can set this up with OSM Hall Monitor
https://github.com/ethan-nelson/osm_hall_monitor by tracking all the
objects you touch and setting them up as subscriptions.
Personally I found it easier to just subscribe to my whole city in OSMCha.
Nothing is stopping such a system being built
On 20/08/2020 12:28, Andy Townsend wrote:
Perhaps "opening_hours:covid19=open"?
Even that's a bit tricky - if an establishment is registered with the
scheme I guess it doesn't guarantee that it is _currently_ open.
This is (IMHO) part of a bigger problem that opening times are changing
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 11:11, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> Indeed, and by the time they get to us they are usually "rabbits of
> negative euphoria"* because of the less than stellar support experience
> they've had at AllTrails.
>
> Looking at e.g.
>
Hello all,
This is Andrew again with Apple. In addition to the road network improvements I
messaged about before, we are planning to work on some limited data corrections
and improvements to OSM in Costa Rica around coastal and water features and
land use and land cover polygons, such as parks
Okay. I'm interested to see what's missing as I know the Microsoft OpenMaps
team has been very active mapping roads in Australia already
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 14:26, OSM NextBillion. AI
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for the quick response. As of now we resort to manual editing,
If there is a degree of doubt, I'd suggest adding a note instead of
entering an AI detected road straight into the map. Often something might
vaguely look like a road from satellite imagery, especially in rural areas,
but might not actually be a road on the ground.
I've created a filter in OSMCha
ette.org/browse/projects/39078>
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
<mailto:andrew_wise...@apple.com>
> On May 5, 2020, at 2:00 PM, Andrew Wiseman via Talk-ht
> wrote:
>
> Bonjou tout moun,
> Sa a se Andre soti nan ekip la
Hello again,
I recently updated the challenges again with new OSM data, in case it is
helpful. https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39285
<https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39285>
Thanks!
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@app
Hola a todos, acabo de actualizarlos nuevamente con nuevos datos de OSM. Espero
que sean de utilidad, por favor avíseme si tiene alguna pregunta o comentario.
¡Gracias!
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
<mailto:andrew_wise...@apple.
Bonjour à tous,
Voici Andrew de l'équipe Apple Maps. Nous avons récemment utilisé notre outil
d'analyse de données Atlas (https://github.com/osmlab/atlas
<https://github.com/osmlab/atlas>) pour examiner quelques types de problèmes
potentiels liés aux routes et au routage en Burkina Faso.
if we don't actually have permission for these endpoints, we're
> going to either need to get permission somehow, or revert and restart with
> the correct endpoint! :(
>
> Some guidance would be good here!
>
> Regards,
> David Wales
>
> On 25/7/20 5:45 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
&g
It should still apply, but as always only the services listed at
https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/products_and_services/web_services/access_web_services
are
covered, the Property Address endpoint is not directly listed and therefore
cannot be assumed to be openly licensed.
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 at
Richard Fairhurst posted something very relavent to this topic at this
https://twitter.com/richardf/status/1285590975511957504 in particular
http://theodi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2020-05-Providing-data-to-OpenStreetMap.pdf
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 14:52, Greg Dutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
That's exactly how I see it working too. Eventually we could probably put
together a document of best practice, suggestions for the workflow as a
guide for anyone else looking to set this up.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 14:04, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We expect to encounter
Hi All,
We expect to encounter the same problem at the NHVR if we begin to use OSM.
My (possibly unfounded) initial thoughts are based around linking the OSM &
Source feature outside OSM in something similar to a "join" table. The join
might be on attribution (id), geometry or both. Then, you
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 12:33, David Wales wrote:
> Is there any reason against using a custom tag as a linking key?
>
> e.g. some_import_object_id=123456
>
> Then when you need to update the data, you can match the key in OSM with
> the key in the source data.
It can be a deterrent to mappers,
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 22:28, Greg Dutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for everyone's input.
> Sebastien best understood what I am trying to do.
> It seems inefficient for local government to make their data open and then
> hope the OSM community translates it to OSM tagging.
>
Better for local
On 18/7/20 8:13 pm, Sebastian Spiess wrote:
Hello,
is anyone else having issues with NSW LPI images not loading in JOSM?
This also seems to be the case for iD.
Their main website also seems to be down at present:
https://www.spatial.nsw.gov.au/
I thought the tagging would be similar to the US, where roads are tagged based
on its traffic volume and importance which is why I thought Yonge should be
Primary. I see now.
--
Andrew
Student
On Thursday, July 16, 2020, 08:31:48 p.m. EDT, Kevin Farrugia
wrote:
Hey Andrew,
I'm
Some other former
King's Highways in the Toronto/York area are tagged as highway=primary, such as
Highway 27, Highway 7, and Highway 48.
--
Andrew
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On 16/7/20 9:49 am, Bren Barnes wrote:
Morning, apparently it's amenity=licensed_club according to tagging
guidelines.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Licensed_Club
Thanks for that. A lot less painful than I was expecting.
A question for the brains trust: how do you tag a registered club?
There are a number of these in Canberra and they have been tagged
community_centre, pub, nightclub, restaurant, etc.
How are you tagging these? Does it depend on if the club is sports
based, RSL, ethnic group, and so on? Or
?
* --
* Andrew
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 14:52, Greg Dutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
> Bicycle Network Tasmania are trying to improve the quality of cycling
> infrastructure information in OSM.
> Much has been done by volunteers in various jurisdictions, and we have
> done lots locally, but the tagging is quite complex for
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 11:02, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> Hi Again All,
>
> We would like to investigate how we should store information which is
> related to ways given the following:
>
> + Some specific information we are looking to store is to meet our needs.
> We do have eve
l change our tactics and raise other questions... something I will
take up on another thread.
Thanks everyone for your help, much appreciated - look forward to speaking
with you next!
Andrew Hughes
p.s. Apologies to Andrew Harvey... two Andrew H's in here and he was here
first. Maybe I
constrained by which states make their data open data, so didn't
cover all states equally.
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 23:37, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your responses. I'd love to speak more about our scenario but
> I'd end up writing a 10 page email. I'm not joking.
t;simple" roads. The granularity I encountered comparing
Govt and OSM data were worlds apart in populated areas where roads are more
complex (which is exactly what Andrew said). Expecting OSM to align with
Gazetted roads would be an exercise in dramatically downgrading OSM data.
A "map match al
Hi Andrew,
Just to add what others have said already,
> OSM adoption is largely dependent on a minimum correlation between the
OSM ways and the streets found in Government centerline/road datasets
(States and/or LGAs)
Could you elaborate on what exactly you mean by that or what specifica
-24 months through GIS and we are very enthusiastic to learn and contribute
to OSM. I hope to be speaking with you a lot more in the near future.
Thanks in advance,
Andrew Hughes
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstr
If there are more than 19 UPRNs for the same building the reference will be
longer than OSM’s tag value limit of 255 characters.
--
Andrew
From: Tony OSM
Sent: 03 July 2020 15:31
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] UPRN & USRN Tagging
As we
Ah yeah I originally wrote "either needs another waiver or some kind of
clarification from DELWP on what's covered".
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 22:45, Andrew Harvey
> wrote:
>
>>
>> If y
- VICMAP_FEATURES_OF_INTEREST
- VICMAP_HYDRO
- VICMAP_LITE
- VICMAP_PLANNING
- VICMAP_PROPERTY
- VICMAP_TRANSPORT
- VICMAP_VEGETATION
If you'd like to use other datasets, I'd say this needs either another
waiver.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 19:57, Little Maps wrote:
> Andrew, as far as I can
Just make sure that all those layers are in fact the same as the VicMap
data products that we have permission to use.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 17:24, Little Maps wrote:
> Thanks again Andrew. If anyone else is interested in viewing any of a
> myriad of Vic Gov maps as background images i
browse/projects/38878
<https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/38878>
Thanks and Mulțumiri,
Andrew
Andrew Wiseman | Maps | iPhone: +1.202.270.4464 | andrew_wise...@apple.com
<mailto:andrew_wise...@apple.com>
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 11:11 AM, Andrew Wiseman via Talk-ro
>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 17:10, Little Maps wrote:
> Hi folks, apologies for repeated queries... I asked a couple of weeks ago
> about the preferred tags for mapping production forests (i.e.
> landuse=forest), in preparation for mapping tree cover across SW Victoria.
> Thinking about this more,
A lightning talk could get some attention, including mappers with experience of
datasets elsewhere in the world.
--
Andrew
From: Rob Nickerson
Sent: 26 June 2020 20:49
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Land Registry INSPIRE data - 1 July OGL release
Hi all
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 23:30, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> Can you point to any of your research that says these are legally
> enforceable? I always thought these were advisory, or at least guidance for
> those using the cyclelane, if you're cycling in the traffic lane does that
>
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 22:59, Luke Stewart
wrote:
> G'day talk-au,
>
> Increasingly at major intersections, there has been an effort to improve
> cyclist safety, which has led to some cycle lanes terminating before the
> intersection and providing a ramp for cyclists to join a shared path and
>
Yeah exactly, I agree with this. An area used for forestry ie. to produce
timber, would still have natural=wood if there are trees there.
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 11:00, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/6/20 6:48 pm, Little Maps wrote:
>
> Many thanks Warin, that seems much more
+ Jan's diary post https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jesolem/diary/393358
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 09:22, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up.
>
> They’ve also posted a blog post about it:
> https://blog.mapillary.com/news/2020/06/18/Mapillary-joins-Facebook.html
>
> Supposedly no
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jun 17, 2020, 11:48 by mapslit...@gmail.com:
>
> source:geometry... etc.
>
> source is better tagged in changeset tag itself (or in description of
> changeset
> if you use iD)
>
Both are
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 19:50, Little Maps wrote:
> Hi folks, I’m planning on mapping tree cover in an area with lots of pine
> and eucalypt plantations as well as native forests, and want to check on
> the preferred way of tagging plantations in Australia before I begin.
>
> I realise that
ttps://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/13675
The full list is here: https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/39262
Salut à tous,
Voici Andrew de l'équipe Apple. J'ai récemment publié de nombreux nouveaux
défis MapRoulette pour cartographier les villes non cartographiées dans divers
pays du conti
Hi everyone,
This is Andrew from the Apple team. I recently posted a lot of new MapRoulette
challenges for mapping unmapped towns in various countries throughout the
continent.
It was created using data from Pascal Neis’s Unmapped Places site
(https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/unmapped) which
401 - 500 of 2531 matches
Mail list logo
