Hello MaXxX!
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 2:00:43 PM you wrote:
No. It would make them look for the reasons behind such behaviour,
though it might lead them the wrong way.
Anyone remember that the awesome post was triggered by the awful
thread?
Neither praising TB nor bashing it are that
Hello Marck!
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 1:09:13 PM you wrote:
I always have trouble closing TB and I *do* use VFs.
Same here, plus the occasional start-up trouble (process is there but
neither TB nor any indication of it showing), which I couldn't
pinpoint, yet.
--
Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas,
snipped quite a bit
NB: I know my number of filters and conditions is unusually high, but
shouldn't TB v3 be able to handle it as gracefully as v2.12 did? At
least you get a clue why I said in the beta phase that filtering is
crucial to me, I couldn't handle over 300 messages
Hello Avi,
A reminder of what Avi Yashar typed on:
29 October 2004 at 16:17:32 GMT +0200
AY Yes I do: *Recent* and *Flagged*.
Then try 3022 without them and see if that cures it.
--
Best regards,Tony.
_
The
Hello Tim!
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 5:06:35 PM you wrote:
Yes your right just very tiring clicking ignore for all the
misspellings that are not mine.
Why not just ignore them?
BTW, just tested it (with TB's classical free caret editor) and had no
spell check in quoted text (I
Hello Ben,
A reminder of what Ben Allen typed on:
29 October 2004 at 16:41:56 GMT +0200
BA In case you wondered I have 5 VFs.
Have a word with Allie, he may be able to prescribe some cream :)
BA Is that the same experience as others are having or is this different?
Similar, it stayed
Hello Marcus,
A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on:
29 October 2004 at 16:43:34 GMT +0200
MO It's the opposite: He uses VFs but still can exit TB! normally.
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
29 October 2004 at 13:38:44 GMT +0200
9 I use VFs and have no troubles on exiting
Hallo tbbeta,
Finally I got BayesFilter catching spam, but whenever it catches
something my CC gets stuck. I disabled BF and everything is running
smooth again.
Sounds familiar to anybody?
Haven't tried yet whether this behavior can be reproduced with other
versions than 3.0.2.2
--
Hello All,
The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Rush is now available from
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[-] suggestion of non-closing
[-] VF: no automatic update
[-] AV on d'n'd filter to empty list
[*] IMAP: some optimizations
Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if
Hello MAU,
A reminder of what MAU typed on:
29 October 2004 at 17:42:32 GMT +0200
M Are we using the same product? My spell checker never (I quite sure)
M tries to spell check quoted text. Hm, very strange indeed.
Could it be that all the text you quote has already been spell checked
Dear 9val,
@29-Oct-2004, 20:21 +0300 (29-Oct 18:21 UK time) 9Val [9] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to All:
9 The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Rush is now available from
9 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
9 Here is a short list of changes:
9 [-] suggestion of non-closing
First test ... this worked! Exiting
Hello Kevin,
A reminder of what Kevin Coates typed on:
29 October 2004 at 18:23:43 GMT +0200
KC I'm not brave enough to try your experiment ... I'd hate mess up a good
KC thing over here.
That's what I thought so I ran a backup batch file, backed the whole lot up
to my SD card just in case
Tony Boom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello MAU,
A reminder of what MAU typed on:
29 October 2004 at 17:42:32 GMT +0200
M Are we using the same product? Mqwes spell checker never (I quite sure)
M tries to spell check quoted text. Hm, very strange indeed.
Could it be that all the
On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 09:44 AM, Ben Allen wrote:
Is this an IMAP issue with the ticker because I haven't noticed any of
this behaviour. (To those of you who prefer plain English that meant:
Cant Confirm)
It may well be only IMAP related, yes. It's usually while TB! is busy
syncing
Hi 9Val,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:21:04 +0300GMT, you wrote:
9 The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Rush is now available from
9 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
9 Here is a short list of changes:
9 [-] suggestion of non-closing
It closes now at once.
9 [-] VF: no automatic update
Works now! :-)
9 Un-closable
On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 12:21 PM, 9Val wrote:
[*] IMAP: some optimizations
What are these?
Additionally, I'm getting an AV on startup followed by an IMAP server
error message
- Unable to retrieve message because of processing error.
The AV is reproducible with each restart, as well
Hello 9Val,
A reminder of what 9Val typed on:
29 October 2004 at 19:21:58 GMT +0200
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
Absolutely superfine, great, wonderful. Created me a VF as before and it
works a treat. Opens, closes with no problem at all and is just
Hello Tim,
But maybe I'm just doing something wrong, thats why im asking.
I have just noticed that what you are doing wrong is using a quite old
beta.
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.0.19) Professional
Please clearly state this fact if you do report something on this list.
I wouldn't even have
Hello Tony,
A reminder of what Tony Boom typed on:
27 October 2004 at 23:06:18 GMT +0200
TB Would be nice to be able to change the font colour and make the background
TB completely transparent so that just the text scrolls along.
I know this is very low priority compared to some issues
Hello 9Val,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 5:36:41 AM, you wrote (at least in part):
I hold down alt while dragging a folder from incoming folder to read
folder. Anyone else repro this?
Can't reproduce, is it 100% reproduceable for you?
I know I am not alexander but it is reproducible for me and
HelloGeorge,
OnFriday,October29,2004at15:34:27GMT+0300(whichwas14:34:27whereIlive),
GeorgeM.Menegakiswroteandmadethesevaluablepointsonthesubjectof"My
experienceswithv3.0.2.2":
3.Ididn'tnoticeanyslowdowns.WhatIdidnoticeisthe.exesize,isis
10101832byteswhile3.0.2.1is8943176.
Hello MAU,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 1:44:25 PM, you wrote:
Please clearly state this fact if you do report something on this list.
I wouldn't even have paid any attentions if I had known this.
Believe I did yesterday when I said 22 was too unstable for me to use
and i was going back to 19 as
Hello tbbeta,
Upgraded to 3.0.2.3 replaced the executable but the program is still
showing the beta 30019 that I was using before the upgrade.
--
Best regards,
Tim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is
Hello Kian,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 1:34:34 PM, you wrote:
My quoted text is not spell checked!
I tried using Danish on this message and only my text is spell checked!
I also tried the different Message Formats
and still no spell checking of quoted text!
Sorry let me clarify as I was
On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Peter Ouwehand
wrote:
But, now got an AV during msg counting for folders/accounts:
Notifying VFs EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00404F00 in
module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 83EC8B4D
That's the AV I got, and yes, it occurs during
Hi Alexander,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:04:48 +0200GMT, you wrote:
And what was wrong with my headers?
ASK They're missing the threading information, and that is not your fault.
I knew there was a solution for this problem some time ago. Found it
at
Hello Peter,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 7:48:03 PM, you wrote:
PO Guess what, 3.0.2.2 closed fine for the first time here just before
PO upgrading . . .
No doubt that was out of sheer fright. ! :-
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 3.0.2.1
MyMacros 1.11
Hello Tim,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 2:00:28 PM, you wrote:
Upgraded to 3.0.2.3 replaced the executable but the program is still
showing the beta 30019 that I was using before the upgrade.
Disregard fixed thanks Bat guys!
--
Best regards,
Timmailto:[EMAIL
Hi Tim,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:00:28 -0400GMT, you wrote:
TC Upgraded to 3.0.2.3 replaced the executable but the program is still
TC showing the beta 30019 that I was using before the upgrade.
Maybe it might help to run the 3.0.1 MSI installer once, before going
from 3.0.0 to 3.0.2. Just a
Hello 9Val,
[-] VF: no automatic update
Fixed :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.3 Rush on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Current beta is 3.0.2.3 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Allie,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 1:42:33 PM, you wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone seeing the mail-ticker flickering soon after startup? Mine
is set to always show and there's some transparency applied. The
flickering doesn't last for long, but it's there.
Sometimes mine displays with around an
Hello Tim,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 2:00:28 PM, you wrote:
Upgraded to 3.0.2.3 replaced the executable but the program is still
showing the beta 30019 that I was using before the upgrade.
Disregard fixed thanks Bat guys!
--
Best regards,
Timmailto:[EMAIL
Hello TBBETA,
I installed the NOD32 pluggin that someone mentioned on here. I already
use NOD32, it already checks both incoming and out going mail so what
advantage is there to have the pluggin?
--
Best regards,Tony.
9Val [9], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can
--
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
We are born princes, and the civilizing process makes us into
frogs. ERIC BERNE
Hello Beta-Bats,
This is the very first time I experienced TB! using such a huge amount of
memory.
Windows even decided to change the size of the virtual memory.
Experienced this only one time, while The Bat! was checking mail.
I'll keep an eye on it.
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
OnFriday,October29,2004at18:01:16GMT+0200(whichwas18:01:16whereIlive),
MarcusOhlstrmwroteandmadethesevaluablepointsonthesubjectof"SpellCheck":
OnFriday,October29,2004,17:06,TimCastenwrote:
Yesyourrightjustverytiringclickingignoreforallthe
misspellingsthatarenotmine.
Hi Tony,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:33:35 +0100 (1:33 PM here), Tony Boom [TB]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC I'm not brave enough to try your experiment ... I'd hate mess up
KC a good thing over here.
TB That's what I thought so I ran a backup batch file, backed the
TB whole lot up to my SD
9Val [9], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can delete
an IMAP request now without TB! hanging.
I have noticed a few AV while reading messages:
AV Read of address
0040407C
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:38:53 +0100GMT, you wrote:
TB I installed the NOD32 pluggin that someone mentioned on here. I already
TB use NOD32, it already checks both incoming and out going mail so what
TB advantage is there to have the pluggin?
I don't think there is any. I don't
Martin Webster [MW], wrote:
MW 9Val [9], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
MW That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can
That's interesting... I only sent the message once. I saved it a
couple of times as I had to restart TB! after
Friday, October 29, 2004, 12:21:04 PM, (Internet Time - @764) you wrote:
Hello 9Val,
9 Hello All,
9 The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Rush is now available from
9 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
9 Here is a short list of changes:
9 [-] suggestion of non-closing
9 [-] VF: no automatic update
9 [-] AV on
Hello Peter,
A reminder of what Peter Meyns typed on:
29 October 2004 at 21:04:51 GMT +0200
PM I don't think there is any.
Thank you very much Peter. I was just curious as to why there is an AV
pluggin when the AV program itself takes care of it.
I'll leave it there, it can't hurt can
Hi 9Val,
Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
Fixed! Runs smoothly now, even on exit. Great work.
Whatever your inspiration might have been, keep it as reliable source
for future tasks.
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:star:
Hello Charlene,
CF Whatever your inspiration might have been, keep it as reliable source
CF for future tasks.
LOL, I'd like to have that source of inspiration away from me :)
--
9Val
Hi Tony,
on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:12:51 +0100GMT, you wrote:
TB [AV plugin]
TB I'll leave it there, it can't hurt can it?
No, except that it uses resources unnecessarily. If that isn't an
issue, I don't see a problem here. :-)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.0.2.3 Rush on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0,
Hello TBBeta!
Using the recent GPG trial seems to cause some problems with TB. When
verifying signatures on clear-signed messages, pressing the verify
button the following message is displayed:
gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available
Anyone have any idea what this message means?
--
Hello Bat-personage,
When editing an email, and wishing to capitalize a word, ctrl+/ no longer
does so.
--
Best regards,
Gary
Current beta is 3.0.2.3 Rush | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Allie,
[*] IMAP: some optimizations
AM What are these?
Groupping some notifications which works faster (on big often changing
folders)
AM The AV is reproducible with each restart, as well as the 'unable to
AM retrieve message ...' error that soon follows.
During synchronization?
Hi Kevin,
gpg: Signature made 10/29/04 21:25:56 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit using DSA key ID
3A8E5CAD
gpg: Good signature from Kevin Coates (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka [jpeg image of size 2208]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:
Hello TBBETA,
I've had quite a few more AVs with the latest beta.
When I check all (Alt-F2 or using menu) I get an AV, which is
sometimes followed by the Windows (Please tell Microsoft about this
problem) error report window...
AV Read of address
00404F00 (thebat.exe)
Hello tbbeta,
Not all the time but often I will get a error message when sending
mail saying invalid pointer operation, if I click OK and then click
the send icon in the message again it will send the second time, but
leaves the first non successful try in my outbox.
--
Best regards,
Martin Webster [MW], wrote:
MW That's interesting... I only sent the message once.
More likely I hit Send instead of Save draft. Either way I can't
reproduce.
--
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
We don't see things as the are but rather as we are. ANAÏS NIN
Hello 9Val everyone else
29-Okt-2004 19:21, you wrote:
[-] AV on d'n'd filter to empty list
Confirmed as fixed here.
Thanks, Val.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using v3.0.2.3 Rush on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2
Hello.
MW 9Val [9], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
MW That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can delete
MW an IMAP request now without TB! hanging.
MW I have noticed a few AV while reading messages:
MW AV Read of
Hello Tim,
A reminder of what Tim Casten typed on:
29 October 2004 at 21:46:21 GMT +0200
TC Best regards,
TC Tim mailto:tcasten @ verizon . net
All these posts get archived to somewhere on the web where the address can be
harvested by meat factories, so it's not
Dear TBBETA,
Historians believe that on 18 October 2004, at 05:57:34 +0100 (which
was 05:57 where I live) David Elliott might have written
I am getting problems with the ticker showing messages that are read
but it thinks that they are unread.
Well it is strange. The messages that are in the
Hello Jan,
A reminder of what Jan Rifkinson typed on:
29 October 2004 at 22:06:42 GMT +0200
JR Hi Tony. Where did you get this plug-in? There was a very old one
JR available more than a year ago but someone was supposed to be
JR working on a new one. Is yours the new one? TIA
It is the new
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:40:23 +0200 (3:40 PM here), Peter Meyns [PM]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC Using the recent GPG trial seems to cause some problems with TB.
KC When verifying signatures on clear-signed messages, pressing the
KC verify button the following message is
Friday, October 29, 2004, 2:44:10 PM, (Internet Time - @864) you wrote:
Hello Martin,
MW Hello TBBETA,
MW I've had quite a few more AVs with the latest beta.
MW When I check all (Alt-F2 or using menu) I get an AV, which is
MW sometimes followed by the Windows (Please tell Microsoft about
Den Yafyasov [DVY], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
MW That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can delete
MW an IMAP request now without TB! hanging.
MW I have noticed a few AV while reading messages:
MW AV Read of
Hello all,
Friday, October 29, 2004, Tony Boom wrote:
JR Hi Tony. Where did you get this plug-in? There was a very old one
JR available more than a year ago but someone was supposed to be
JR working on a new one. Is yours the new one? TIA
It is the new one, that's why I got it. Someone posted
Hello Tony Boom everyone else
29-Okt-2004 22:13, you wrote:
TC Tim mailto:tcasten @ verizon . net
All these posts get archived to somewhere on the web where the address
can be harvested by meat factories, so it's not wise to leave your
address in the body of the
Hello.
MW Den Yafyasov [DVY], wrote:
9 Un-closable TB! problem should be fixed if suggestion was correct
MW That seems to be resolved with this release... moreover, I can delete
MW an IMAP request now without TB! hanging.
MW I have noticed a few AV while reading messages:
MW AV
Hello 9Val,
9 During synchronization? Heh, fixed, but a little bit later than beta
9 released. I'll try to upload new revision ASAP (perhaps tomorrow, at
9 home I have too slow connection)
Uploaded :) .24 is waiting for testing
--
9Val
Hello Alexander,
A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz typed on:
29 October 2004 at 22:25:40 GMT +0200
ASK The archive at mailarchive.com *does* protect the mail addresses.
I used to include the senders address in my replies to this list and I got
such a bollocking a few years ago about it
Hello All,
Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP
synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin
--
9Val
Current beta is 3.0.2.3 Rush | 'Using
On 2004-10-29 at 22:13:57 Tony Boom wrote:
All these posts get archived to somewhere on the web where the address can be
harvested by meat factories, so it's not wise to leave your address in the
body of the text. Unless of course your short on pork luncheon meat :)
Your email is going to
On Friday, October 29, 2004, 20:38, Tony Boom wrote:
I installed the NOD32 pluggin that someone mentioned on here. I
already use NOD32, it already checks both incoming and out going
mail so what advantage is there to have the pluggin?
From the TB! help file:
,-
| Currently, e-mail
Hello Tony Boom everyone else
29-Okt-2004 22:36, you wrote:
ASK The archive at mailarchive.com *does* protect the mail addresses.
I used to include the senders address in my replies to this list and I
got such a bollocking a few years ago about it
Dito! ;-)
so I've been a bit paranoid
Kevin Coates wrote:
Hi Peter,
Yes we're getting a little OT, so this is the end of this thread
unless someone can recommend a setting tweak in TB to fix my error.
Here's a list of the changes in the last few GPG test versions:
Noteworthy changes in version 1.3.90 (2004-10-01)
Hello Alexander,
A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz typed on:
29 October 2004 at 22:48:06 GMT +0200
ASK Thats always better if in doubt, but you can look at your own mail:
ASK http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg53728.html
ASK ...see? (phew!)
I never knew that! They wasn't
9Val [9], wrote:
9 Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP
9 synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin
Cheers 9Val! So far so good... reported problems with syncronise,
check mail etc. gone. I'll do some more testing tomorrow.
--
.\\artin | ICQ
Hello TBBETA Members!
Anybody else seeing messages wrongly shown in Unread font?
The two PNGs attached illustrate what I see in the message list and
folder tree. The bold messages/threads aren't unread, and aren't
shown on the MT (they would be if unread).
The font style *is* for
Hello Dierk!
On Saturday, October 30, 2004 at 12:22:11 AM you wrote:
The font style *is* for unread messages on my installation.
First time I saw this was with 3.0.2.3.
Disregard this, don't look further. It's just a coincidence: Three
filters went haywire during the Common Filters
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 3:39:57 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote:
9 During synchronization? Heh, fixed, but a little bit later than beta
9 released. I'll try to upload new revision ASAP (perhaps tomorrow, at
9 home I have too slow connection)
Uploaded .24 is waiting for testing
Ok. I've
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 2:44:10 PM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster
wrote:
I've had quite a few more AVs with the latest beta.
That's almost certainly secondary to IMAP. There's an even later beta
that 9Val uploaded. So you can check that one. I haven't seen any AV's
with it.
--
-= Allie =-
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 3:43:50 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote:
Just finished uploading .2.4 Only change - some fixes in IMAP
synchronization problems reported by Allie and Martin
Though I'm no longer getting AV's, I've not been happy with TB! IMAP for
the last betas here.
Hello MAU,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 5:24:23 PM, you wrote:
[Alternative Beta! testing setup]
I know it's not hard to understand, it is that I want to do it the
way I do it now. Because it's simple and safe enough for me,
Sure, if it suits you, but running/testing on 2 machines on a LAN
is
Hello all!
Peter Meyns remembered in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the old version filters for thread manipulation. I re-worked them to meet NFS
requirements and include them here as text attachment.
The Add_Reference filter should be used if a message lost its reference,
i.e., due to improperly working
Hello Dick,
A reminder of what Dick H typed on:
29 October 2004 at 20:31:03 GMT +0200
DH I'm using the HTML/Windows editor and the quoted text is not spellchecked.
It may not be spell checked but since I followed that ClearType link and
set it up on this Laptop is 'aint half clear.
The
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:02:17 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 00:02 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M I must admit it looks like quite a slow process. Anyway, as a workaround
M if you are filtering on umpteen email addresses with umpteen OR
M conditions (as you seem to say),
Correct.
M I would suggest
Hello Alexander,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:48:22 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 03:48 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK Thats always better if in doubt, but you can look at your own mail:
ASK http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg53728.html
ASK ...see? (phew!)
It's also here somewhere:
Hello Tony,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:47:58 +0100 GMT (30/10/2004, 00:47 +0700 GMT),
Tony Boom wrote:
TB I know this is very low priority compared to some issues but who do I see
TB about the above idea?
Go to the bug tracker (issue tracker) and switch from bugs to wishes
(drop-down box at the
Hello Dick,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:18:09 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 01:18 +0700 GMT),
Dick H wrote:
?If?you?are?using?the?Windows?editor,?I?suppose?it?would?help?the
?developers?to?know?if?this?problem?was?introduced?together?with?the
?significantly?reworked?editor?released?with?v3.0.2.2.
DH I'm
Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck D Pearlstone typed on:
29 October 2004 at 14:14:20 GMT +0200
MDP But ... but ... but ... but ...
I know I know, you see that post AFTER you already tried it and reported
your findings to the list. My posts don't seem to appear in the order in
which I
Hello All,
I just want to say thank you to the makers of The Bat! for continuing
to work on this program. So quickly at that. I never hardly see a
program anymore that has 2-3 beta a week like The Bat!. Just a thank you for doing
a great job.
--
Thanks,
Chris
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.4 Rush
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 8:28:46 PM [GMT -0500], Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
See the question marks replacing each blank? I see this in the PTV on
all your messages. HTML messages sent from other mailers (AOL, Outlook
etc) don't show this (well, I have minor problems). So I think
somethng
At 14:02 [GMT-0400] on Friday October 29 (actual time - 2:02am on Saturday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
My quoted text is not spell checked!
I tried using Danish on this message and only my text is spell checked!
I also tried the different Message Formats
and still no
101 - 188 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
