Hi Vili,
V On Sep 16 I write several messages related to buggy/not finished
V message list features. Should I send you a summary about them?
Waitalittle, we'll release new version in some hours so
you'll need to update the list :)
--
Hi 9Val,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:53:56 +0300 (9:53 AM here), 9Val [9] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
V Write a BT, I support it.
9 No need, already fixed :)
Thank you ... and belated happy birthday.
--
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA
Using TB! v3.61.04 beta under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
Hello 9Val,
V On Sep 16 I write several messages related to buggy/not finished
V message list features. Should I send you a summary about them?
Waitalittle, we'll release new version in some hours so
you'll need to update the list :)
Hopefully I have to delete some items from
to
selecting View Only Read messages if I want to see what's in the
folder. It never used to be this way. When I open TB all the messages
are viewable. The problem only occurs when changing the view.
--
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA
Using TB! v3.61.05 Echo (Beta) under Windows XP 5.1.2600 SP2
display. I have to resort to
KC selecting View Only Read messages if I want to see what's in the
KC folder. It never used to be this way. When I open TB all the messages
KC are viewable. The problem only occurs when changing the view.
Have you been playing with Message Tabs. Once selected you seem
Hi Stuart,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:17:52 -0500 (6:17 PM here), Stuart Cuddy [SC]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SC Have you been playing with Message Tabs. Once selected you seem to
SC need to Unselect and then reselect to get things back to normal.
No, I was unaware of how to setup Tabs until
Hi Stuart,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:17:52 -0500 (6:17 PM here), Stuart Cuddy [SC]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SC Have you been playing with Message Tabs. Once selected you seem to
SC need to Unselect and then reselect to get things back to normal.
After some testing, I think its a bug. Using
Hallo Greg,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:42:56 -0500GMT (19-9-2005, 3:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Confirmed. (Sort of)
In the account properties it says that it's using regular pop3
authentication, but my mail server logs that I'm using APOP.
So I guess it's the interface that is at fault,
Hello Greg Strong everyone else,
on 18-Sep-2005 at 18:14 you (Greg Strong) wrote:
Well maybe it has something to do with the fact that the interface in the
Account | Properties | Transport NO LONGER accepts APOP for
authentication for receipt of email.
Confirmed. Seems like the setting does
Hallo Greg,
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:14:33 -0500GMT (18-9-2005, 18:14 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GS Well maybe it has something to do with the fact that the interface in
GS the Account | Properties | Transport NO LONGER accepts APOP for
GS authentication for receipt of email.
Confirmed.
Hi list
Some GPG problems are fixed now with 3.61.05 (thanks!) - but I think I
found a new one.
If the signature isn't in the loacal database gnupg goes online to
search the key on a key server.
This worked until 3.61.05 - not with this version. The only text I get
in the GPG window:
gpg:
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 12:45:29 [GMT +0200] (which was 12:45 where I
live) Martin Schoch wrote:
Hi Martin,
Some GPG problems are fixed now with 3.61.05 (thanks!) - but I think I
found a new one.
If the signature isn't in the loacal database gnupg goes online to
search the key on a key
Hello Henk,
Saturday, September 17, 2005, 1:13:14 PM, you wrote:
This worked until 3.61.05 - not with this version. The only text I get
in the GPG window:
gpg: Signature made 09/17/05 11:22:32 using DSA key ID XXX
gpg: requesting key XXX from ldap server horowitz.surfnet.nl
What
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 13:23:55 [GMT +0200] (which was 13:23 where I
live) Martin Schoch wrote:
Hello Martin,
What is in your gpg.conf?
Didn't chance anything after 3.61.05 - but here
keyserver ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
load-extension
Hello Henk,
Saturday, September 17, 2005, 1:41:17 PM, you wrote:
I have:
keyserver hkp://pgp.surfnet.nl
And that is working on this side.
You are right - so it turnes out that TheBat has problems when GnuPG
as to use LDAP protocol...
ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370
--
Best regards,
Dear Henk,
@17-Sep-2005, 13:41 +0200 (17-Sep 12:41 here) Henk M. de Bruijn [HMD]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What is in your gpg.conf?
Didn't chance anything after 3.61.05 - but here
keyserver ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370
keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve
load-extension
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, at 23:01:39 [GMT +0100] (which was 0:01 where I
live) Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
gpg: Signature made 09/17/05 12:41:17
gpg:using RSA key 0xB464DD0F
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
Hmmm...
Hi
Dear Henk,
@18-Sep-2005, 01:14 +0200 (18-Sep 00:14 here) Henk M. de Bruijn [HDB]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
... snip
HDB See:
HDB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
Mea culpa -
in my folder tree
which I hesitate to start deleting since I don't know whether
deleteing the folder on my desktop might delete the folder at my IMAP
location. And the biggest problem I have is that unsubscribing,
subscribing, syncronizing etc have been successful in getting any new
mail to show up
I had, I tried a few times
more) Now, I have multiple instances of the folder in my folder tree
which I hesitate to start deleting since I don't know whether
deleteing the folder on my desktop might delete the folder at my IMAP
location. And the biggest problem I have is that unsubscribing
account using another
client to see if all that mess is in fact duplicated on the server.
Problem is only on my end.
If it's just TB!, then deleting and recreating the account may be what
you have to do in the end.
I think you are right. No sense struggling more with a fix.
Fortunately with IMAP
On Tuesday, September 06, 2005, at 09:05 AM, Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
I think you are right. No sense struggling more with a fix.
Fortunately with IMAP this can be done without backing up first, etc.
Thanks for the input.
You'd need to backup the quick templates associated with the account.
I
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 2:35:28 PM, you wrote:
Now, I have multiple instances of the folder in my folder tree which
I hesitate to start deleting since I don't know whether deleteing
the folder on my desktop might delete the folder at my IMAP
location.
Frankly, your best
Hello Greg,
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 23:02:08 -0500GMT Greg Strong wrote:
GS ,- [ https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5080 ]
GS | From the main window the tab cycle is the following:
GS | 1) folder pane,
GS | 2) message list pane,
GS | 3) search box,
GS | 4) message pane,
GS | 5) lost focus
You will notice that after reaching the last header in the header
pane the tab cycle stops.
Confirmed
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.4, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70,
MyMacros 1.11a.
I signed up for an
Hello all,
I'm sorry, I noticed this problem on Aug. 2nd (so it is not new to
3.60.07) but I put the message aside and forgot all about it till now.
I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message. When
displaying it either in the preview pane or folder window, clicking
MAU wrotes on 02/09/2005 at 20:16:50 +1100
subject Problem with tabs in mutipart message :
I'm sorry, I noticed this problem on Aug. 2nd (so it is not new to
3.60.07) but I put the message aside and forgot all about it till now.
I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached
Hello, MAU.
You wrote 02.09.2005 @ 16:16 in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
using mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional
M the 'report.txt' or 'part.txt' tabs does absolutely nothing. In order to
M see their contents I have to double click on the attachments to open
M them.
Confirmed
--
Sincerely,
9/2/2005 7:11 AM
Hi Hendrik,
On 9/2/2005 Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
HO MAU wrotes on 02/09/2005 at 20:16:50 +1100
HO subject Problem with tabs in mutipart message :
HO Same problem here in 3.51.10
Works OK here.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.60.06 Forerunner (Beta) on Win2k SP4-Rollup1
Hello!
M I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message.
Confirmed. 3.60.06.
--
Best regards, Volodymyr V. Shvets [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14:09:54, Friday, September 2, 2005
Current beta is (none
Hello tbbeta,
Someone reported sometimes a similar behavior, I remember, but I cant
find it...
So, expand your account list until the scrollbar will appear, plus
expand one more account. Pull down the scrollbar completely so you
will see the end of the account list but you dont see the
Vili,
On 02-09-2005 16:46, you [V] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
V So, expand your account list until the scrollbar will appear,
V plus expand one more account. Pull down the scrollbar completely
V so you will see the end of the account list but you dont see the
V first some accounts.
Hello tbbeta,
Someone reported sometimes a similar behavior, I remember, but I cant
find it...
It has been mentioned in here before and not just with the account
tree IIRC.
If it's not on BT then it's your turn to post. 8-)
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hallo Miguel,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:16:50 +0200GMT (2-9-2005, 11:16 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
M I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message. When
M displaying it either in the preview pane or folder window, clicking on
M the 'report.txt' or 'part.txt' tabs does
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, September 02, 2005, 9:57 AM, you wrote:
Someone reported sometimes a similar behavior, I remember, but I cant
find it...
It has been mentioned in here before and not just with the account
tree IIRC.
If it's not on BT then it's your turn to post. 8-)
I did write a
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4805
Your report seems to be pointing at 4290 which I can see but seems to
be something else entirely.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.4, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal
.
Not sure if it was Stuart Hemming, Stuart Cuddy, or some other
reporter named Stuart.
Anyway, the issue mentioned in BT 4290 is Confirmed but not fixed.
The Stuart who is the reporter noted that the problem is still present
in beta v. 3.60.02.
And, of course, it's still present in release version
Hello Stuart!
On Friday, September 02, 2005, 11:25 AM, you wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4805
Your report seems to be pointing at 4290 which I can see but seems to
be something else entirely.
No, I brought it up, also.
It does discuss the scrollbar issue.
And, as I've just
Good day, MAU.
M I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message. When
M displaying it either in the preview pane or folder window, clicking on
M the 'report.txt' or 'part.txt' tabs does absolutely nothing.
Confirmed.
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Hendrik,
Same problem here in 3.51.10
That's probably the first version with which I noticed the problem,
since it was released on July 25th and I received the message on Aug.
2nd.
I have logged BT report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5083
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Miguel
Hello Paul,
HO Same problem here in 3.51.10
Works OK here.
With 3.60.06? Strange!
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current beta is (none) | 'Using
Hello Alexey,
M the 'report.txt' or 'part.txt' tabs does absolutely nothing. In order to
M see their contents I have to double click on the attachments to open
M them.
Confirmed
Thanks, I have opened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5083
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Ian,
snipped quite a bit
As to your problem message, the chances are that the message that came
back does not contain the message you sent.
Thanks for your long explanation, but that is not my problem. I _did_
-not- send any message to NASA, it was probably a spam using spoofed
From
Hello Volodymyr,
M I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message.
Confirmed. 3.60.06.
Thanks. I have opened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5083
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Roelof,
Confirmed here with 3.60.07, but I can switch to the tabs just fine
with 3.0.2.10
Thanks for confirming and for trying good old 3.02.10. How could I
forget about it?
I have opened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5083
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello Vladimir,
M I have seen this problem, so far, only with the attached message. When
M displaying it either in the preview pane or folder window, clicking on
M the 'report.txt' or 'part.txt' tabs does absolutely nothing.
Confirmed.
Thanks, I have opened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php
On Thursday, September 1, 2005 @ 3:07:17 PM [-0700], Greg Strong wrote:
Confirm?
Confirmed.
--
Matt
Current beta is 3.60.07 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Ian,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 7:57:23 PM, you wrote:
IAW If you go to a folder and pick the folder, then tabbing takes you to
IAW the message list, then the message preview, through any links in the
IAW message preview, to any attachments, somewhere I cannot see, then the
IAW quick
Hello,
If Reply to HTML in plain text is not check reply quoting selecting text
to an html mail, is not working. Either the whole text will be quoted either
nothing.
And If the html mail to which I reply contain images I got AV if I select
Message/Cancel without clearing the text first.
Can
Hello Stuart,
Monday, August 29, 2005, 12:57:29 AM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 6:41:41 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:30:58 PM, you wrote:
SR I am in Ireland but I cannot see what difference it makes if I use a
SR fastmail address and server
I'm
Hello,
I have started antivirus checking of my base with NOD32 plugin and
after 3 checked messages, more than 18000 were counted as
infected. This is impossible, I have only 900 infected message in
Quarantine folder. When I stopped checking and opened logfile, not
infected messages were
8/29/2005 11:17 AM
Hi Marek,
On 8/29/2005 Marek Mikus wrote:
MM Hello,
MM I have started antivirus checking of my base with NOD32 plugin and
MM after 3 checked messages, more than 18000 were counted as
MM infected. This is impossible, I have only 900 infected message in
MM Quarantine
Hallo Marek,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:10:52 +0200GMT (29-8-2005, 17:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MM I have started antivirus checking of my base with NOD32 plugin and
MM after 3 checked messages, more than 18000 were counted as
MM infected. This is impossible, I have only 900 infected
.
It will be retried until it is 1.0 days old.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The Postfix program
tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com
Hello Paul Van Noord everyone else,
on 29-Aug-2005 at 17:19 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
Hurry and get avast!, you'll be glad you did!
What is the basis for this recommendation? Its detection rate is 90.81%
compared to NOD32's 95.50% (according to the May proactive scanning test at
that NOD32 gets fed up with you accessing infected files
and blocks access.
I had never problem with this in previous versions, BTW TB didn't
checked this Quarantine folder during checking I was talking about,
my first folders are SPAM folders.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http
Hello Vili everyone else,
on 28-Aug-2005 at 20:43 you (Vili) wrote:
Sorry, not on mine... I have Celeron 1100T + 256MB RAM with Windows
Server 2003 on it. And I have to wait a coule of seconds everytime when
I open folder with 800+ threaded messages. I have to wait about half a
minute
Het was op maandag 29 augustus 2005 om 17:48 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Problem with The anti-virus has reported an error, the object cannot be
checked for viruses error not solved' :
Hoi Alexander,
Hurry and get avast!, you'll be glad you did!
ASK What is the basis
Hello Cees everyone else,
on 29-Aug-2005 at 17:59 you (Cees) wrote:
for starters: Avast is just perfect!
Ah, I see.
It never left me with a virus
You're sure? How would you know that? Do you have another system with a
perfect (non-existent:-) virus scanner to prove what you are saying?
8/29/2005 12:11 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 8/29/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK What is the basis for this recommendation? Its detection rate is 90.81%
ASK compared to NOD32's 95.50% (according to the May proactive scanning test at
ASK http://www.av-comparatives.org) - why would anyone want to
Het was op maandag 29 augustus 2005 om 18:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'Problem with The anti-virus has reported an error, the object cannot be
checked for viruses error not solved' :
Hoi Alexander,
for starters: Avast is just perfect!
ASK Ah, I see.
you don't, apparently, _I_ DO
Hallo Cees,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:27:44 +0200GMT (29-8-2005, 18:27 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
for starters: Avast is just perfect!
ASK Ah, I see.
C you don't, apparently, _I_ DO
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being
Hello Paul Van Noord everyone else,
on 29-Aug-2005 at 18:15 you (Paul Van Noord) wrote:
there has been zero infections
Or so you think. ;-)
The point I want to make is: please, do not easily recommend security
related products.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
8/29/2005 1:08 PM
Hi Alexander,
On 8/29/2005 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK The point I want to make is: please, do not easily recommend security
ASK related products.
It was an assumption on your part that I have no experience in this
matter and that your perception of value is the only valid
Hello Dwight,
Monday, August 29, 2005, 3:44:56 PM, you wrote:
On Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:30:58 PM, Sean Rima wrote:
I had to switch my smtp server to my local one to send mail to this
list, for some reason the gray listing is not working for the
fastmail servers
confirmed. i got a
Hello Peter,
V I have the Display sender and the Fit headers to image clicked (it
V should be, I guess, more likely Fit image to headers, not?)
No. If you check Fit headers to image, TB displays the image in its original
size and adjusts (fits) the header pane to it. If you uncheck this
Hello Thomas,
V So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see
V stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can
V still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open a mail with the
V photo shown in the header, there are two pictures shown for a
Hello Greg,
It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be
looking for it.
Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine?
I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards.
But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz
Celeron...
--
Hello Greg Strong everyone else,
on 28-Aug-2005 at 01:14 you (Greg Strong) wrote:
2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards
Mhz? Definitely! My first Amiga had 7.16MHz back in 1986. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Knowledge may give
Good day, Vili.
It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be
looking for it.
Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine?
I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards.
V But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz
V Celeron...
Hello Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov everyone else,
on 28-Aug-2005 at 18:47 you (Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov) wrote:
Sorry, not on mine... I have Celeron 1100T + 256MB RAM with Windows
Server 2003 on it. And I have to wait a coule of seconds everytime when I
open folder with 800+ threaded
Hello tbbeta,
I had to switch my smtp server to my local one to send mail to this
list, for some reason the gray listing is not working for the
fastmail servers
Sean
--
+---+
|VOIP= FreeWorldDial: 689482 VOIPBUSTER: thecivvie |
|GPG Key
Hello Vladimir,
It is there only for a fraction of a second. Yes, you have to be
looking for it.
Maybe this can only be verified on a slower machine?
I guess 2.4 Mhz with 500 MB of ram is slow by today's standards.
V But not for an email client... TB! should FLY even on a 1 GHz
V Celeron...
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:30:58 PM, you wrote:
SR I had to switch my smtp server to my local one to send mail to this
SR list, for some reason the gray listing is not working for the
SR fastmail servers
Where are you located. I cannot send using one of my local ISP's using
Hello Stuart,
Monday, August 29, 2005, 12:39:56 AM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:30:58 PM, you wrote:
SR I had to switch my smtp server to my local one to send mail to this
SR list, for some reason the gray listing is not working for the
SR fastmail servers
Where
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 6:41:41 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:30:58 PM, you wrote:
SR I am in Ireland but I cannot see what difference it makes if I use a
SR fastmail address and server
I'm sorry, in my case I do not have access to fastmail's smtp server
Hello tbbeta,
So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see
stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can
still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open a mail with the
photo shown in the header, there are two pictures shown for a while (a
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:00:07 +0200 GMT (28/08/2005, 05:00 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V So, my TB! is very slow after it runs for a while, so maybe I see
V stuff you dont really can observe. (However, I restarted it, and I can
V still observe.) After installing v.3.60.05, if I open
that off, that is not
the problem ... just an observation.
The problem occurs when I then go to Option menu and select Plain
text Micro-Ed from the Format list in the reply window.
The message changes to plain text with all the correct quoting and
such ... and it *seems* to be the Micro-Ed
message, it now defaults to
M2 opening an HTML reply. I am sure I can turn that off, that is not
M2 the problem ... just an observation.
M2 The problem occurs when I then go to Option menu and select Plain
M2 text Micro-Ed from the Format list in the reply window.
M2 The message changes
Hello beta testers.
I this beta series I have had several instances where drafts in the
remote outbox are not deleted when a new version is auto-saved. Even
when the message is sent, there remains a number of previous versions
there as parked versions. This is for Exchange and MailMax. Anyone
Hello 9Val,
The Bat! 3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
It appeared in v3.60, because it was not in 3.51.10: when using
Hungarian interface, our o and u characters are messed up in the
header, see attached pic.
--
Viliattachment:
Hi Greg Strong,
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
See attached BT entry per
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5044.
Added a supporting note.
--
kind regards
Charlene Ferrara
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.60.03 Forerunner (Beta) on
Windows
Hallo Greg,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:51:03 -0500GMT (24-8-2005, 20:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
GS The header pane problem still exists with both 'Display Sender' 'Fit
GS Headers to Image' selected in 'Sender Photo' when you right click the
GS header pane from either the 'Main' or 'View
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 7:55:58 AM, you wrote:
Hello TBBETA,
In my personal smime cert I see that TB! says it cannot find the
issuer cert for Thawte. How do i fix this, using it's own
implementation of SMIME
Sean
Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my
8/21/2005 6:38 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 8/21/2005 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PVN You didn't do it until sometime _after_ v. 3.0.2.10 which is only a
PVN few months.
PVN When reading a message the Tab sequence moves to the attachment after
PVN the message body. No problem here. The attachment is accessed
Hi Sean,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 08:14:12 +0100GMT (21.08.2005, 09:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my gpg keys between
SR the linux box and the XP one :)
Strange: clicking TB!'s security button returns No signed
attributes. The View button on this
Hello Paul,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 06:54:53 -0400 GMT (21/08/2005, 17:54 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
TF Important for me is that the message pane can be reached in the
TF tab sequence at all.
PVN [Shift][Tab] which is not an editing command will cycle you to the
PVN attachment pane when
Hello Peter,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 2:45:29 PM, you wrote:
Hi Sean,
on Sun, 21 Aug 2005 08:14:12 +0100GMT (21.08.2005, 09:14 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Switched to the MS one and it works, now to synch my gpg keys between
SR the linux box and the XP one :)
Strange: clicking TB!'s
8/21/2005 3:58 PM
Hi Mary,
On 8/19/2005 Mary Bull wrote:
MB Please support my BT report at:
MB https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5031
Finally took the time to do it.
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
Hello tbbeta,
since the new search-engine i have difficulties when
searching/filtering in mailheaders.
It seems that tb now doesn't include the header-identifiers (such as
From: or Received:) for searching.
If i search for something like From in headers, i get no results out
of 2.000 Mails.
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:14:19 -0400 GMT (19/08/2005, 03:14 +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
PVN IMHO the tab sequence should ignore the attachment pane.
I certainly disagree.
PVN Hotkey access is more appropriate. I do not think I have needed
PVN to tab into the attachment pane
Hello Mary,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:42:00 -0500 GMT (19/08/2005, 20:42 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
IMHO the tab sequence should ignore the attachment pane. Hotkey access
is more appropriate. I do not think I have needed to tab into the
attachment pane more than twice in the seven years I have
Hello Melanie,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:11:03 +0200 GMT (20/08/2005, 17:11 +0700 GMT),
Melanie wrote:
M It seems that tb now doesn't include the header-identifiers (such as
M From: or Received:) for searching.
M If i search for something like From in headers, i get no results out
M of 2.000 Mails.
. No problem here. The attachment is accessed _after_
the message which is appropriate.
When working with the editor you should know if there is an attachment
because you put it there and the most appropriate access is with a
hotkey. Why would anyone want to tab through the attachment to write a
message
Thanks.
PVN When reading a message the Tab sequence moves to the attachment after
PVN the message body. No problem here. The attachment is accessed _after_
PVN the message which is appropriate.
OK, I read in your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
IMHO the tab sequence should ignore the attachment pane
Hello Vili, Mary and Paul (sounds like Peter, Paul and Mary ;-),
But if we think about it, I guess, there must be a possibility to step
to the attach pane with Tab, regardless if it was possible before or
not. It is a necessary improvement, even if it is strange to use at
this moment.
8/19/2005 5:40 AM
Hi Martin,
On 8/19/2005 Martin Schuster wrote:
MS Currenty when pressing Shift-Tab the focus goes...uhm...I don't know.
MS So we could possibly use that shortcut...
MS BTW: has anybody found out where the focus goes when you press
MS Shift-Tab while editing the text???
In
Hello Paul,
MS Currenty when pressing Shift-Tab the focus goes...uhm...I don't know.
MS So we could possibly use that shortcut...
MS BTW: has anybody found out where the focus goes when you press
MS Shift-Tab while editing the text???
In my version [Shift]+[Tab] reverses the tabbing sequence.
Hello Martin!
On Friday, August 19, 2005, 7:34 AM, you wrote:
MS Currenty when pressing Shift-Tab the focus goes...uhm...I don't know.
MS So we could possibly use that shortcut...
MS BTW: has anybody found out where the focus goes when you press
MS Shift-Tab while editing the text???
In my
801 - 900 of 1585 matches
Mail list logo
