Re[2]: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread Michael Thompson
Hello ETM, Saturday, August 3, 2002, 5:35:38 AM, you wrote: E I was not successful in importing 3 gig of OE6 mail into TB, but E I did import addresses into TB. 3Gb? Jesus, that is quit a lot of email! :-) -- Best regards, Michael No one's tall anymore. They're vertically enhanced.

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi flash, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 08:54:26 [GMT +0700 (JAVT)] (02:54 where I live) you wrote: fwn On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 03:33:03AM +0700, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: I think what he meant to say was ...Who have access to e-mail but not the www. Yupe, it is common in big company.

problems installing new(ish) versions

2002-08-03 Thread David Pascoe
Hello TBUDL, I have found that on my win98 se2 machine I cannot install any of the more recent versions than 1.60c. The the_bat.exe just hour glasses for a couple of seconds and then nothing. The same for the intpack.exe I have tried uninstalled norton anti virus and even updated to the latest

Re[2]: No Exit

2002-08-03 Thread alists
Hello Thomas, Friday, July 26, 2002, 3:42:48 AM, you wrote: T Hello John, T On Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:46:28 +1000 GMT (25/07/02, 15:46 +0700 GMT), T John Phillips wrote: Some tasks are now active Do you want to exit when they are finished? Yes// No // JP IMO this is an annoying bug. In my

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
ETM, At 12:35 AM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you [E] wrote the following about [TUTORIAL]: E [...] I was not successful in importing 3 gig of OE6 mail E into TB, but I did import addresses into TB. [/...] I wonder if Mailbag Assistant would have helped in this transition. [fookes

TBOT??

2002-08-03 Thread Jason
Hi, Dear Bat's users I've already subscribed to the TBOT forum, thanks for the URL, guys! but, to my surprise I didn't received a single posting from TBOT forum for the whole day?? is it always been this quiet?? or.is that I gonna activate it somewhere to receive the posting thru TB?? sorry

Re: TBOT??

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 07:34, Jason wrote: Hi, Dear Bat's users I've already subscribed to the TBOT forum, thanks for the URL, guys! but, to my surprise I didn't received a single posting from TBOT forum for the whole day?? is it always been this quiet?? or.is that I gonna activate it

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread Daniel Grunberg
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 23:09:04[GMT -0300] (10:09 PM EDST) KoMpLoT wrote: looking for a good tutorial about how to config and use TB! at max! thanks! A way around a tutorial, per se: Menu Navigator will help you find out how to use the menu to accomplish the things whose name you can guess. Just

Re[2]: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hello Daniel, Saturday, August 3, 2002, 12:01:49 PM, you wrote: DG Fri, 2 Aug 2002 23:09:04[GMT -0300] (10:09 PM EDST) KoMpLoT wrote: looking for a good tutorial about how to config and use TB! at max! thanks! DG A way around a tutorial, per se: Menu Navigator will help you find out DG

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 12:15:44 [GMT -0300], KoMpLoT wrote: K alright, K Thanks to all of you for helping me with TB! Wow, bottom posted with TB! I wish the people I support at work were so responsive. We may have a new expert here soon.

Re: problems installing new(ish) versions

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello David, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:12:28 +0800 GMT (03/08/02, 18:12 +0700 GMT), David Pascoe wrote: DP I have tried uninstalled norton anti virus and even updated to the latest DP msi (Microsoft Installer engine) [not believing that TB! would need it of DP course] and still nothing. I don't

Re: No Exit

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello alists, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 04:03:44 -0700 GMT (03/08/02, 18:03 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JP Bat! will not close with this annoying message. T I confirm this bug. But then, is it a bug, or is just the third T button missing, the one called Kill the tasks? awc comeon! it's a

Re: TUTORIAL

2002-08-03 Thread Adam
Hello KoMpLoT, Friday, August 2, 2002, 11:39:04 PM, you wrote: K Hi ppl!, looking for a good tutorial about how to config and use TB! at max! K thanks! To the Max, you say. Well, we'll need to know where Max is! LOL! Try Help Topics/Contents... Gettings Started with the Bat/ Setup Does

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jan, On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:30:08 -0400GMT (2-8-02, 23:30 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: JR Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click JR on the waste basket icon or DEL, the result is the same, JR my system locks up for a few seconds. Close TB Delete the

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Roelof. Thanks for replying to my msg. At 11:41 AM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you [RO] wrote the following about [a real mystery]: JR Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click JR on the waste basket icon or DEL, the result is the same, JR my system locks up for a few

Re: problems installing new(ish) versions

2002-08-03 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Thomas! On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 5:04:05 PM you wrote: I don't know what MSI is or should be good for. It's the worst way to install a software. Sadly lots of application - guess, which ones most - use it today to update themselves or even install themselves completely *on line*!

Re: TBOT??

2002-08-03 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Jonathan! On Saturday, August 3, 2002 at 3:38:05 PM you wrote: Yesterday was a quiet day on TBOT. Sometimes it gets like that, all mailing lists do. I'm on one where I've not had a post in over a month, One month, puh. I am subscribed to several lists (incl. FinePrint's and GRC's)

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Rifkinson [JR] wrote: JR I have msgs out to dell forums tech support. JR Anyone else have some thoughts on this situation. Only that I don't think your problem is TB! related and only

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Jan, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:53:52 -0400 GMT (03/08/02, 23:53 +0700 GMT), Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR Don't have scandisk/ used chkdsk reports file record JR segments unreadable 90276 thru 90287, unrecoverable JR problems. Here is your problem. Some disk utilities will mark those sectors as

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-03 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:12:25 +0100 Adam Rykala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think what he meant to say was ...Who have access to e-mail but not the www. Yupe, it is common in big company. fwn If that is the case, I consider subscribing to TB* lists using fwn such a company email

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Thomas. At 1:29 PM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you wrote the following about [a real mystery]: TF [...] Some disk utilities will mark those sectors as TF bad and will not allow the O/S subsystem to use them TF again. That's what you need, [/...] Can you suggest one that works with NTFS

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Allie. At 1:08 PM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you [ACM] wrote the following about [a real mystery]: ACM Only that I don't think your problem is TB! related and ACM only that TB! has suffered as a result of it. Sending ACM messages to Dell tech support is more the way to go. Yeah.

Re: TBUDL Bandwidth

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Syafril, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 00:45:31 [GMT +0700] (18:45 where I live) you wrote: SH On Sat, 3 Aug 2002 11:12:25 +0100 Adam Rykala SH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think what he meant to say was ...Who have access to e-mail but not the www. Yupe, it is common in big company.

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Jan, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 14:08:40 [GMT -0400] (19:08 where I live) you wrote: JR Hi Thomas. JR At 1:29 PM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you wrote the JR following about [a real mystery]: TF [...] Some disk utilities will mark those sectors as TF bad and will not allow the O/S

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread William Moore
Hello Jan Thank you for your email dated Saturday, August 3, 2002, 7:08:40 PM, in which you wrote: JR Can you suggest one that works with NTFS www.ontrack.co.uk have a product called EasyRecovery pro. Expensive, it's in excess of £100 but it's very good. They may offer a trial period. I

Size exceeding and autoreply

2002-08-03 Thread Shahar
Hello all. I need your help. I setup an account to delete message greater than 312K. Is there a possibility to send an autoreply to the original sender, inform the sender about this delete and kindly ask the sender to send me a message with the file description ? When I receive the message

Re[2]: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Jan, About the problem you mentioned: JR Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click JR on the waste basket icon or DEL, the result is the same, JR my system locks up for a few seconds. Did you try rebooting the computer? Also, check your hard disk space in that

Re[2]: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello again Jan, As I suspected, www.ontrack.com is a little closer to your location and http://www.ontrack.com/special/drquad1.asp is their Data Recovery Center. I see that what they offer is XP compatible so it shoukld work fine with NTFS, Ontrack says it can recover your data or sell you

Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Headless
I could use some help creating a few more spam filters, currently I have a high ascii filter that works well. I'd like to add a filter that filters all messages that have more than one addressee in the To: or CC: fields. Anyone know if this is possible and how do I do it? Other tips on spam

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Douglas. At 3:18 PM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 you wrote the following about [a real mystery]: JR Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click JR on the waste basket icon or DEL, the result is the same, JR my system locks up for a few seconds. DH Did you try rebooting

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
At 3:41 PM on Saturday, August 03, 2002 Headless [H] wrote the following about [Spam filters]: H I could use some help creating a few more spam filters H [...] Other tips on spam filters most welcome. For starters, why don't you take a look @ FAQ. The URL to this page, which includes a good

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Patrick Hagemann
Hello Jan, [...] Some disk utilities will mark those sectors as bad and will not allow the O/S subsystem to use them again. That's what you need, [/...] Can you suggest one that works with NTFS rather than FAT32. AFAIK NTFS will remember bad sectors itself and won't use them again. So

Re: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello Jan, 3. avgust 2002, 20:08:40, you wrote: Can you suggest one that works with NTFS rather than FAT32. I had considered Spinrite v5 only to discover that it doesn't work w NTFS. I have a feeling that if I could do this, this particular problem would be solved. Any more of

Re[2]: a real mystery

2002-08-03 Thread Douglas Hinds
Jan said: JR ... I think my problem is not so much one of data recovery but a JR utility that works with NTFS [not FAT32] which I could use to JR block the few bad sectors I have fix the one file link which JR is what I think is affecting TB!. But to the best of my JR knowledge, I haven't lost

SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi list!, I would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order to get at the begining the newest mails (I've tried with received and created columns, but it doesn't order the mails properly) PS: As you can see I've moved to TB! =), thanks to all of you for your help! --

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:07:17 [GMT -0300] (00:07 where I live) you wrote: K Hi list!, KI would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order Kto get at the begining the newest mails (I've tried with received Kand created columns, but it doesn't order

Re: problems installing new(ish) versions

2002-08-03 Thread Scott Frederick
Hello David, Saturday, August 3, 2002, 4:12:28 AM, you wrote: DP I have found that on my win98 se2 machine I cannot install any of DP the more recent versions than 1.60c. The the_bat.exe just hour DP glasses for a couple of seconds and then nothing. The same for the DP intpack.exe I haven't

DIGEST

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi , -- 04 August 2002, 00:32 [ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ [new-wales] project : www.new-wales.net ] [ Public key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] The worst thing about censorship is

Re[2]: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi!, Adam, what? what's that? thanks -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam, wrote: AR Hi KoMpLoT, AR On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:07:17 [GMT -0300] (00:07 where I live) you wrote: K Hi list!, KI would like to know how can I sort the mails on a folder in order Kto get at

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:38:51 [GMT -0300] (00:38 where I live) you wrote: K Hi!, Adam, K what? what's that? K thanks All I had to do was click on the heading marked received on the message list view. It sorts mine correctly - how is it wrong? If its reverse - click it

Re[2]: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi!, Adam, alright, I will try with that... thanks! -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Adam, wrote: AR Hi KoMpLoT, AR On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 20:38:51 [GMT -0300] (00:38 where I live) you wrote: K Hi!, Adam, K what? what's that? K thanks AR All I had to do was click on the

USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi list! How can I use GnuPG with TB! ? thanks! PS: I have had it installed since long, and have all the keys created -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 21:03:53 [GMT -0300] (01:03 where I live) you wrote: K Hi list! K How can I use GnuPG with TB! ? K thanks! K PS: I have had it installed since long, and have all the keys created Is it installed in the default location c:\gpg? If so then go to Tools menu

Re[2]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Adam, Your headers and signature indicate / suggest you are using TB! with Linux. Is that correct? If so, what Linux and (I assume) win app drivers or emulation are you using? Thanks in advance. Douglas Hinds Current Ver: 1.61

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Arjan de Groot
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Headless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to add a filter that filters all messages that have more than one addressee in the To: or CC: fields. Anyone know if this is possible and how do I do it? Hint: addresses in the To: and Cc: fields

Re: Re[2]: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 18:57, KoMpLoT wrote: alright, I will try with that... thanks! Eugh... top replying... an 'awful feature' of outlook. Due to TB!s features, and automatic signature striping, if somebody was to try replying to your email, and keeping context, they'd have to copy and

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Douglas, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 19:53:55 [GMT -0500] (01:53 where I live) you wrote: DH Hello Adam, DH Your headers and signature indicate / suggest you are using TB! with DH Linux. Is that correct? If so, what Linux and (I assume) win app DH drivers or emulation are you using? DH

Re[2]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Adam, Dimanche, le 4 août 2002 à 02h26 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à 03h26 ici où j'habite), Adam Rykala =[AR] a écrit à Douglas Hinds : DH Linux. Is that correct? If so, what Linux and (I assume) win app DH drivers or emulation are you using? As I know TB! works fine on WINE --

Re[2]: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Jim D
Saturday, August 3, 2002, 6:12:14 PM, Arjan wrote: Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these domains: .+aol\.com .+@yahoo.+ .+@msn\.com .+@.*mail.* .+@excite.+ .+@[0-9]+\. I am going to butt in here and ask a question. I am not sure how all the wildcards work

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread ETM
Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer) post. If I can't remember the original post, dropping to the bottom to read the original is nicer than

Re[4]: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi! Jonathan, I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read the first part to know what's on the e-mail... -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002, Jonathan, escribió: JA On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 18:57, KoMpLoT wrote: alright, I

Re[2]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi! Adam, well, I still can't use it!... I have it installed on the default folder c:\gnupg\ (that is the default folder), the problem is that I can't use my key with TB!, how to? thanks! -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002, Adam, escribió:

CONTACT LIST WINDOW

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi list! I just can't find a way to show the contact list window for rapid access... where can I find it? -- Regards, KoMpLoT mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe:

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:57:58 [GMT -0300] (02:57 where I live) you wrote: K Hi! Adam, Kwell, I still can't use it!... KI have it installed on the default folder c:\gnupg\ (that is the Kdefault folder), the problem is that I can't use my key with TB!, Khow to? K

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread ETM
A file folder (in the US) runs with the oldest paper at the bottom and the current papers proceeding in chronological filing order to the top of the stack. Is this a country thing? Elaine Hello Adam On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote Oh btw to answer another point, bottom posting

Re[3]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Douglas Hinds
Hello Alexis, You wrote: AH As I know TB! works fine on WINE That's good to know, because WINE is promoted by codeweavers as a way to run M$Office 97 2K on Linux (and the most popular Intel Unixes) and you know what Office includes. IAC, there are other and better Office Suites, which didn't

Re[2]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread KoMpLoT
Hi Adam Rykala, on Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002 you wrote: AR Hi KoMpLoT, AR On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:57:58 [GMT -0300] (02:57 where I live) you wrote: K Hi! Adam, Kwell, I still can't use it!... KI have it installed on the default folder c:\gnupg\ (that is the Kdefault folder),

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 22:22:55 [GMT -0400] (03:22 where I live) you wrote: E A file folder (in the US) runs with the oldest paper at the E bottom and the current papers proceeding in chronological filing E order to the top of the stack. Is this a country thing? E Elaine

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Douglas, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 21:24:35 [GMT -0500] (03:24 where I live) you wrote: DH Hello Alexis, DH You wrote: AH As I know TB! works fine on WINE DH That's good to know, because WINE is promoted by codeweavers as a DH way to run M$Office 97 2K on Linux (and the most popular

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 23:29:14 [GMT -0300] (03:29 where I live) you wrote: K Hi Adam Rykala, on Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002 you wrote: AR Hi KoMpLoT, AR On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:57:58 [GMT -0300] (02:57 where I live) you wrote: AR A K -- K well, maybe you're right...

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi KoMpLoT, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 23:29:14 [GMT -0300] (03:29 where I live) you wrote: K Hi Adam Rykala, on Sábado, 03 de Agosto de 2002 you wrote: AR Hi KoMpLoT, AR On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:57:58 [GMT -0300] (02:57 where I live) you wrote: K

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello KoMpLoT, In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:29 PM PDT, I get no err!, that's the problem! I've installed PGP Freeware v7.0.3 and GnuPG v1.0.6 how can I use them with TB! If you are going to run PGP with TB,

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Adam Rykala, In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:34 PM PDT, You DON'T NEED TO IMPORT KEY if you are NOT using the inbuilt PGP implementation Why not? -- Nick Andriash Creston, B.C. Canada

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Nick, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 19:47:24 [GMT -0700] (03:47 where I live) you wrote: NA Hello Adam Rykala, NA In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:34 PM PDT, You DON'T NEED TO IMPORT KEY if you are NOT using the inbuilt PGP implementation NA Why

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread ETM
I generally read in real time (probably means I should get a real life grin) and so I usually remember the thread. Elaine Hello Adam On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote Reading a top posted email is like trying to have an argument with a clairvoyant..

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 22:54:01 [GMT -0400] (03:54 where I live) you wrote: E I generally read in real time (probably means I should get a E real life grin) and so I usually remember the thread. E Elaine E Hello Adam E On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote Reading a top

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 21:49:04 [GMT -0400] (02:49 where I live) you wrote: E Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't E often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must E be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer) E post.

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:49, ETM wrote: Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must be waded through in a reply to read the the current (answer) post. If I can't remember the original post, dropping to

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, 2:41:00 PM, Headless wrote: I'd like to add a filter that filters all messages that have more than one addressee in the To: or CC: fields I would like to filter all messages which are addressed to me in the CC or BCC line instead of the TO line. It seems that the

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Arjan de Groot
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these domains: .+aol\.com .+@yahoo.+ .+@msn\.com .+@.*mail.* .+@excite.+ .+@[0-9]+\. I am going to butt in here and ask a question. I am not sure how

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Adam Rykala, In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:51 PM PDT, I've never had to import my key to use PGP with the bat (6.5.8ckt beta 9) Oh, I see what you are saying. However, if someone was running GPG and decided to install PGP 6.5.8ckt, they would still have

PGP GPG

2002-08-03 Thread Jason
Hi, Dear Bat's users considered I'm a still a novice anyone here could spare their time to tell what is the difference between this two?? or point me to a URL that could have a detail coverage on this issue??? (not discussion forum) thanks n grateful to u all ya! TIA Best regards, Jason

Re: Re[4]: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:56, KoMpLoT wrote: I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read the first part to know what's on the e-mail... Just as a silly question, if it is a reply, how can you always know what is on the email? I mean, if I didn't have a clue what

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Adam Rykala, In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:57 PM PDT, E E Current Ver: 1.61 E FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com E Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..remainder of List

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Nick, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 20:08:47 [GMT -0700] (04:08 where I live) you wrote: NA Hello Adam Rykala, NA In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:51 PM PDT, I've never had to import my key to use PGP with the bat (6.5.8ckt beta 9) NA Oh, I see what you are

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread ETM
Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different countries, different views or top and bottom posting. Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the colorized portions of the replies laughter). Elaine Hello Adam On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote Consider another

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread ETM
But I have never retained any taglines or extraneous material. What is it that you all are seeing that I am not seeing on my receiving end? Is it something in TB that bothers people and I am not catching on to what it is? Eudora, Pegasus, Netscape, Outlook, Outlook Express, and whatever others,

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Jonathan, On 03 Aug 2002, at 22:09:30 [GMT -0500] (04:09 where I live) you wrote: JA On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 20:56, KoMpLoT wrote: I don't know, I still prefeer using this way, because I always read the first part to know what's on the e-mail... Take for JA example, the reply

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Nick, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 20:11:50 [GMT -0700] (04:11 where I live) you wrote: NA Hello Adam Rykala, NA In Reference to your Posting on Saturday, August 03 2002 at 07:57 PM PDT, NA Sorry, but your message is a bad example of bottom posting as well, seeing NA as you have included the

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 22:05, Dwight A Corrin wrote: I'd like to add a filter that filters all messages that have more than one addressee in the To: or CC: fields I would like to filter all messages which are addressed to me in the CC or BCC line instead of the TO line. It seems that the

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Etm [E] wrote: E Is it OE or is it USA programming? I prefer top-replying, don't E often re-read the original post, dislike the colorization that must E be waded through in a reply to read the the

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 22:08, Nick Andriash wrote: Oh, I see what you are saying. However, if someone was running GPG and decided to install PGP 6.5.8ckt, they would still have to import their Key(s) to PGP. The interesting thing is (not sure if this is right on windows), but PGP and GnuPG

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 23:10:15 [GMT -0400] (04:10 where I live) you wrote: E But I have never retained any taglines or extraneous material. E What is it that you all are seeing that I am not seeing on my E receiving end? Is it something in TB that bothers people and I E am not

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam Rykala [AR] wrote: AR Totally OT but... moderator Indeed it is. :) Please take this off-list since it has drifted. Thanks. /moderator - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 23:13:23 [GMT -0400] (04:13 where I live) you wrote: E Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different E countries, different views or top and bottom posting. E Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the E colorized portions of the

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 22:10, ETM wrote: But I have never retained any taglines or extraneous material. What is it that you all are seeing that I am not seeing on my receiving end? In this example, Nick's comment to Adam pointed out the problem as the list footers (the bit saying which

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Arjan de Groot
[Please ignore previous mail!] In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a really good one: Kill all e-mail originating from these domains: .+aol\.com .+@yahoo.+ .+@msn\.com .+@.*mail.* .+@excite.+ .+@[0-9]+\. I am going to butt in here and

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam Rykala [AR] wrote: AR However the convention for bottom posting for email is a very lon gestablished AR one, and one that MS had no compunction about breaking... AR The key to successful

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Etm [E] wrote: E A file folder (in the US) runs with the oldest paper at the E bottom and the current papers proceeding in chronological filing E order to the top of the stack. Is this a country

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Joseph N.
On Saturday, August 03, 2002, KoMpLoT wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: K How can I use GnuPG with TB! ? KoMpLoT, You have already received several responses, but no one has taken this route, so I'll jump in. If you have Windows, then my recommendation would be to get

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Allie, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:26:25 [GMT -0500] (04:26 where I live) you wrote: ACM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], ACM Adam Rykala [AR] wrote: AR However the convention for bottom posting for email is a very lon gestablished AR one, and one that MS had no

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Joseph, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:33:29 [GMT -0500] (04:33 where I live) you wrote: JNOn Saturday, August 03, 2002, KoMpLoT wrote in JN [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: K How can I use GnuPG with TB! ? JN KoMpLoT, JN You have already received several responses, but no one

Indent (was Re: SORTING THE MAILS)

2002-08-03 Thread Luc
Good morning Allie, It was foretold that on 4-8-2002 @ 22:16:39 GMT-0500 (which was 5:16:39 where I live) Allie C Martin wrote and spread these wise comments on SORTING THE MAILS: snipped a bit ACM This is so because the preferred format offers the ACM following advantages: ACMi)

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Adam Rykala
Hi Allie, On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, at 22:26:25 [GMT -0500] (04:26 where I live) you wrote: ACM I don't see the difference in the amount of clairvoyance required for ACM either forms of quoting. ACM Please note that you're a member of a moderated discussion list with ACM rules based on what

Re[2]: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Joseph N.
On Saturday, August 03, 2002, ETM wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: E Is it something in TB that bothers people and I E am not catching on to what it is? ETM, No, it's the people in the TB! mailing list who are guarding the gates against the heretics :-) I agree with the

Re: Spam filters

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote: DAC I would like to filter all messages which are addressed to me in DAC the CC or BCC line instead of the TO line. It seems that the DAC current filters are blind to

Re: DIGEST

2002-08-03 Thread Mark Wieder
Hi back atcha. Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Adam Rykala [AR] wrote: AR When you quote, you're doing it to provide context. Requiring your AR readers to scroll down and then back, repeatedly (as they attempt AR to figure out what the heck

Re: SORTING THE MAILS

2002-08-03 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 23:13:23 [GMT -0400], ETM wrote: E Ahh. Then that really is the problem. Different E countries, different views or top and bottom posting. E Okay, I will stop posting here and continue to read (skipping the E colorized

Re: USING GnuPG...

2002-08-03 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Allie C Martin [ACM] wrote: ACM I'm yet to see a reply message from you with the format: Upon deliberate review of your posts apart from the recent ones in this thread, I see that this is

  1   2   >