Re: Dragging from message list to Knujon e-mail: AV

2007-01-06 Thread James Senick
ace. But I believe you need to be registered to use either. More info on reporting methods is buried within Knujon's CastleCops forum: <http://www.castlecops.com/f240-Knujon_General_Discussion.html> -- Best regards, James Senick The Bat! v.3.86.11 beta Windows XP build 2600 Service Pa

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Nick, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 18:32:14 [GMT +] (which was 1:32:14 PM in NY, USA) Nick Dutton wrote: > Surely an answer (if there is to be one) is to add, rather than modify? > If each stored message was given _extra_ fields: Subject(modified) and > Body(modified), these could then be a

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Miguel, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 19:18:20 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:18:20 PM in NY, USA) Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> >> Not easy enough for those who have to do it often. > It should be fairly easy to do with PowerPro. I'll try it later or > during the weekend. Allie was kind enough to write a

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Spike, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:33:24 [GMT -0500] (which was 9:33:24 AM in NY, USA) Spike wrote: Export -> Edit -> Import. That easy :) JS>> Not easy enough for those who have to do it often. > Easy enough for something that should not be easily done! Point taken. But you can't ve

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

2003-02-27 Thread James Senick
Hello Thomas, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:55:49 [GMT +0700] (which was 9:55:49 PM in NY, USA) Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> Export -> Edit -> Import. That easy :) Not easy enough for those who have to do it often. > I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was referring > to: Should it

Re: (SOT) Use of Re: in the subject line

2002-11-22 Thread James Senick
Hello DG, On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, at 11:33:26 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:33:26 AM in NY, USA) DG Raftery Sr. wrote: > Again, and I'm sure this subject will hit the dead topic instruction > soon, I would not consider Re: being utilized in a business > correspondence nor memo as "Regarding". My reasoni

Re: Where to find Virus protection plugins

2002-11-19 Thread James Senick
Hello Daniel, On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, at 22:52:11 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:52:11 PM in NY, USA) Daniel Dekany wrote: > I don't understand why people who uses on-access scanner (and you do, > if I don't misunderstand you) want integrate Virus protection with > TB!, but perhaps I miss something. I ca

Re: Splash Screen?

2002-10-25 Thread James Senick
Hello Anne, On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, at 03:42:27 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:42:27 PM in NY, USA) Anne wrote: JS>> For a goof, try this: > Just for fun I tried creating another batch file which runs the > original batch file which has the /nologo parameter. I programmed the > hotkey to run the second

Re: Splash Screen?

2002-10-23 Thread James Senick
Hello Adam, On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, at 17:45:12 [GMT -0230] (which was 4:15:12 PM in NY, USA) Adam wrote: JA>> cd\progra~1\ JA>> then type JA>> dir JA>> and see what it tells you "The Bat!" folder is. Mine shows as JA>> thebat~1... > Will that be the same in Windows XP? I can't duplicate the a

Re: Splash Screen?

2002-10-23 Thread James Senick
Hello Anne, On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, at 02:31:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:31:16 PM in NY, USA) Anne wrote: > However, I tried this and it didn't work - I still have a logo showing > when TB launches even though the hotkey is now pointing to the batch > file. For a goof, try this: -Open Windows Expl

Re: Splash Screen?

2002-10-21 Thread James Senick
Hello Anne, On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, at 04:28:20 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:28:20 PM in NY, USA) Anne wrote: > Is there a way of getting round this - apart from not using > the mail key which I won't not do - does anyone know? Create a shortcut to the shortcut with the NOLOGO switch? -- Best regard

Re: Sending HTML with The Bat!

2002-10-21 Thread James Senick
Hello Tim, On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, at 10:13:32 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:13:32 AM in NY, USA) Tim Musson wrote: > Could you keep this on the List? I don't want to send HTML mail, but > would like to know how if I *need* to in the future. No way, man. It's mine...j/k Personally, I have no problem

Re: Regarding TB! Internet Presence & Support

2002-10-20 Thread James Senick
Hello Don, On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, at 20:41:24 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:41:24 PM in NY, USA) Don Zeigler wrote: > People seem to like the community feel of a message board. Not to mention > that a board offers yet more pages for indexing by search engines, > increasing a program's visibility. Good

Re: Antivirus Programs.

2002-10-07 Thread James Senick
Hello Chris, On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, at 15:19:58 [GMT -0700] (which was 6:19:58 PM in NY, USA) Chris Weaven wrote: > Hi all, > As the subject suggests, I'm trying to find out what the preferred > anti-virus program is out there. I use two -- Panda AntiVirus Platinum and AVG. I have used and trust

Re: Watch Threads

2002-10-02 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 02:15:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:15:28 PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: JS>> IOW, if you leave it alone, TB never moves the message at all. JS>> But if you actively configure it to move the message to the JS>> inbox, then it actually does? > Manually

Re: Watch Threads

2002-10-01 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, at 00:06:08 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:06:08 PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MAU>> Like you, I don't understand why they are not moved. That is MAU>> what I find odd. A bug perhaps? A _useful_ bug? > No, an intended feature. It has always been so and desi

Re: Watch Threads

2002-10-01 Thread James Senick
Hello Miguel, On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, at 19:16:49 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:16:49 PM in NY, USA) Miguel A. Urech wrote: >> OK, I found what it was. What I did originally was neglect to >> set the folder to Inbox...instead it was set to TBDUL. So each >> time I used the hotkey combo on any thread a

Re: Wish list item

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Jonathan, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 14:03:20 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:03:20 PM in NY, USA) Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On Monday, September 30, 2002, Doug Weller wrote... >>> Here's the filter: >>> >>> BeginFilter >>> Name: Export for editing >>> Active: 1 >>> Source: \\alliem\Inbox >>> Targe

Re: Email Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Doug, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 10:48:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:48:28 AM in NY, USA) Doug Weller wrote: > What don't you like about Mailbag Assistant? > Has anyone tried Forkeeps? Reply to this message has been sent directly to you and to TBOT as well as this thread has been declared De

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 08:09:46 [GMT -0400] (which was 8:09:46 AM in NY, USA) James Senick wrote: >> Not necessarily. I just added as the hotkey for the >> filter and left the "Check the selected message against this rule" >> unchecked. It works perf

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 12:43:21 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:43:21 AM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: JS>> ... if you wanted to set a hotkey to apply this filter to JS>> already 'in-house' threads / messages, they'd be moved back to JS>> the inbox from the folder you were browsin

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 04:00:02 [GMT +0100] (which was 11:00:02 PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > You are. The watch filter works on the Inbox. It highlights any mail > you are currently watching, moving it to the Inbox (i.e. not moving > it at all). The mail is then filte

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-29 Thread James Senick
Hello Marck, On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 23:51:23 [GMT +0100] (which was 6:51:23 PM in NY, USA) Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Every time a new thread comes up that I want to watch, I just add > the subject as an alternative search. Works a treat! Every so often > I tidy the filter up and remove old su

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-29 Thread James Senick
Hello pmf, On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 15:34:49 [GMT -0400] (which was 3:34:49 PM in NY, USA) pmf wrote: J>> New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I J>> really miss an old "Watch Thread" feature that I think I came J>> across first in XNews. > The "Watch Thread" feature has be

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-29 Thread James Senick
Hello Scott, On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 12:31:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 1:31:57 PM in NY, USA) Scott McNay wrote: > Methinks you're missing the point. "Mark Thread" means you're > interested in the subject and want it highlighted or something so that > you can read it first, before any oth

Re: Watch Threads

2002-09-29 Thread James Senick
Hello Dierk, On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, at 19:23:27 [GMT +0200] (which was 1:23:27 PM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote: > Hello James! > On Sunday, September 29, 2002 at 6:52:34 PM you wrote: >> Is this worth pursuing to anyone else? > There is a difference in handling e-mail and news - XNews and Age

Watch Threads

2002-09-29 Thread James Senick
Hello Batters, New wish list item for consideration...or is it necessary? I really miss an old "Watch Thread" feature that I think I came across first in XNews. For lists, I'd really like to be able to highlight incoming messages of a thread interesting or important to me. Perhaps some would l

Re: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Jan, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 11:19:22 [GMT -0400] (which was 11:19:22 AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote: > A valid point but I think lobbying for > something that already exists in a > different form sort of belongs in the dept. > of redundancy dept. Redundancy? Redundancy? I'm

Re: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Jan, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 10:15:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:15:54 AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote: JS>> [...] There's simply no reason not to JS>> have this feature available. [/...] > Sure there is. > This is a different program & the > feature[s] you are talking about can

Re: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Jan, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:46:13 [GMT -0400] (which was 9:46:13 AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote: > Without commenting on the merits of your > position one way or the other, it strikes > me that you may be coming to this question > from a very different POV that some of the

Re: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Dierk, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 12:21:50 [GMT +0200] (which was 6:21:50 AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote: > What I cannot do is take your comments, adjust them as I like (even > for private use!) and then either say it is mine or it is yours. What > I can do, is write something that is cle

Re: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-28 Thread James Senick
Hello Dierk, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:35:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:35:40 AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote: > Wrong. I do change occasionally the subject line *in conversation*. > That is, I assign a meaningful/changed subject line to a reply. I am > very particular when it comes to vital co

Re: Wish list item

2002-09-27 Thread James Senick
Hello Allie, On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 18:35:16 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:35:16 PM in NY, USA) Allie C Martin wrote: > This sounds so good that I think I'll go set this up now. :) And I'll save this message for when and if a "moving threads" option is ever available. If I had it, this is what I'd

Re: Wish list item

2002-09-27 Thread James Senick
Hello Gerard, On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 23:24:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:24:03 PM in NY, USA) Gerard wrote: > Hi James, > It amazes me that someone who wants to edit an received email is > worried about the time and date. It amazes me why many don't understand the need for it. If I had to gue

Re: Wish list item

2002-09-27 Thread James Senick
Hello brunson, Yes, that's a nifty workaround but certainly not a solution...and Allie already suggested this. Nevertheless, you forgot to mention that during this process, you have to save the edited message which, unfortunately, adjusts the date. But hey, I could just adjust my clock settings

Re: Wish list item

2002-09-27 Thread James Senick
Hello Jim, I added this to the list several months ago with the added wish that threads also be configurable i.e. dragging a message from one thread to another and having it inherit it's new thread's subject. I don't think anyone understood what I was talking about. On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 1

Re: AVG/TB limitations and issues

2002-08-31 Thread James Senick
Hello ETM, On Sat, 31 Aug 2002, at 17:17:31 [GMT -0400] (which was 5:17:31 PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote: > My current AV is notifying me when it receives Klez, etc., usually > cleaning and restoring mail. Do I understand correctly that AVG > does not have that capability? It will catch them. It's

Re: AVG/TB limitations and issues

2002-08-31 Thread James Senick
Hello ETM, On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, at 13:49:09 [GMT -0400] (which was 1:49:09 PM in NY, USA) ETM wrote: > Limitations > Plugin doesn't certify messages due to a nature of the > anti-virus plugin interface of The Bat!. The plugin is called > only on message attachments. Outgoing messages are scann

Re: TB Shut down on Periodical Check

2002-08-26 Thread James Senick
Hello Julian, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 21:11:10 [GMT +0100] (which was 4:11:10 PM in NY, USA) Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: > I think that Popcorn might do this - it works only on messages on the > server without downloading. It is no longer available from > the developers, but if you search for P

Re: TB Shut down on Periodical Check

2002-08-26 Thread James Senick
Hello Peter, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 20:05:19 [GMT +0200] (which was 2:05:19 PM in NY, USA) Peter Palmreuther wrote: > But ... is it really _one long line_??? That question has to be answered, > else there's probably something completely different that makes The Bat! > crash. It's hard to imagin

Re: TB Shut down on Periodical Check

2002-08-26 Thread James Senick
Hello Thomas, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 23:57:51 [GMT +0700] (which was 12:57:51 PM in NY, USA) Thomas F. wrote: JS>> That is the part that intrigues me--something that JS>> can take TB down. The question arises; what else could it do? > This is a very good question. Do you have any other access

Re: TB Shut down on Periodical Check

2002-08-26 Thread James Senick
Hello Peter, On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, at 17:37:52 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:37:52 AM in NY, USA) Peter Palmreuther wrote: > There's _no_ such limit in RFC-(2)822 that is near 150+ characters, the > only limit given is: 999 characters, and a recommendation to have lines no > longer than 78 or 80 char

Re: Direct Delivery

2002-03-04 Thread James Senick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Roelof, On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, at 16:39:26 [GMT +0100] (which was 10:39:26 AM in NY, USA) Roelof Otten wrote: Roelof Otten> Recently I found a program called postcastserver that Roelof Otten> does the same, but is freeware where ADR has to be paid after th

Re: How to temporarly stop Periodecally check

2002-03-04 Thread James Senick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Shahar, On Fri, 01 Mar 2002, at 18:46:33 [GMT +0200] (which was 11:46:33 AM in NY, USA) Shahar wrote: Shahar> I have few accounts and I check for new mail every X minutes. Shahar> Is there a way to temporarly stop Periodecally check for all the Shahar> a

Re: Scot Finnie's Newsletter

2002-03-03 Thread James Senick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello William, On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, at 13:02:51 [GMT +] (which was 8:02:51 AM in NY, USA) William Moore wrote: William Moore> Thank you for your email dated Sunday, March 03, 2002, 11:29:27 AM, in which you wrote: MAU>> Scot's article is anything but an i

Re: HTML viewer

2002-02-28 Thread James Senick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Dierk, On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, at 09:35:47 [GMT +0100] (which was 3:35:47 AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote: >> A source of regular frustration (of a minor sort, for sure) is that >> the HTML viewer in 1.53 does not show headers. Is this still true in >>

Re: filter for sent mail

2002-02-25 Thread James Senick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Peter, On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, at 20:15:51 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:15:51 PM in NY, USA) Peter Kerekes wrote: Peter Kerekes> Actually it would be even better, if possible , to use the Peter Kerekes> same filter I set up already for incoming mail and add Pet

Re: The Bat FAQ, "=" Navigation

2002-02-17 Thread James Senick
Karin, I sympathize with your situation as I am sure Marck does. What you may not be aware of is, if I'm not incorrect, Marck has developed the FAQ voluntarily - as in he wanted to help others without deriving any financial benefit. Don't take offense as my intent isn't to make you feel

Re: Just curious why ....

2001-12-12 Thread James Senick
Roberto, Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 9:49:30 PM, Roberto wrote: RP>>> Newsreader: "We still have not decided on what it will look like - RP>>> as a plug-in or as a built-in function..." MDP>> I have no idea what is happening with that. Roberto> I *really* hope it doesn't happen. If TB is a

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread James Senick
Hi Cyclon, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 1:35:06 PM, you wrote: Kris> Hello, I also have a question about HTML : I know that I can't create Kris> a HTML message, but what do I have to do when I want to reply to a Kris> HTML message, or when I want to forward it? Then the HTML structure Kris> is lo

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread James Senick
Sean, I got the same. But I think that was an auto generated send from the trojan. Possibly not. But that would be my first guess seeing how it was the BadTrans worm that was attached. Apparently it scans inboxes for new prospects. I think people in this list are far above that sort o

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-02 Thread James Senick
Hello Dierk, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 4:17:59 AM, you wrote: Dierk> The biggest problems for me are: Dierk> 1. People send HTML but *don't* use the HTML features, making Dierk> messages unnecessarily big. Those are the messages that look Dierk> exactly the same in HTML and PT.

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread James Senick
Hi Januk, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 12:31:38 AM, you wrote: Januk> Hello James, Januk> On Saturday, December 1, 2001 at 22:54 GMT -0500, a creature mimicking Januk> James Senick [JS] wrote: JS>> One would still want to be able to personalize mass e-mail JS>> messages a

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread James Senick
Hey Sean, N.> Hello James, N.> To my the problem isn't HTML, per-se...it's the fact that the features N.> of HTML can be misused by more unsavory types (such as spammers, who, N.> by merely including an external image, can determine whether or not your N.> email address is valid.) Good

Re: (SOT) Re: HTML-mail

2001-12-01 Thread James Senick
Alastair, Saturday, December 01, 2001, 4:50:43 AM, you wrote: Alastair> For what it's worth, my opinion is that TB! is doing the right thing Alastair> (read but not write). Alastair> The problem is that home and business have radically different Alastair> requirements. Good call. I'm glad t

Duplicate Addresses

2001-09-26 Thread James Senick
Does theBat automatically filter duplicate address book entries when performing a mass mailing? Thanks in advance and I apologize if this question was answered previously. -- Best regards, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Environment: theBat! version 1.54 Beta/9 Windows

Re: External Browser????

2001-03-23 Thread James Senick
Thursday, March 22, 2001, 10:39:01 PM, you wrote: Jim> Must be nice... even after deleting the WCT entry from the Registry, mine still show up Jim> as message.wct.. but on the positive side, when I double-click it, it shows up properly Jim> in Netscape - images and all!! :)) I still woul

Re: External Browser????

2001-03-22 Thread James Senick
My problem is fixed and I kind of understand how it happened. My html messages were arriving as attached .mv files which normally pertain to Miva Script files. I had recently changed the default handler for that extension to another program for editing (EditPlus). I simply deleted the extens

Re: External Browser????

2001-03-21 Thread James Senick
My HTML messages are listed as message.mv. -- Best regards, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : Moderators : TBTech List:

Re[2]: hiding group recipients

2001-03-20 Thread James Senick
dummy). DH> 2. Got to the address book and use the "New mass mailing" under DH> "File". for that you have to define a Quick Template. With this method DH> every one on your "list" will get a message personally delivered (TO = DH> addressee). DH> -

hiding group recipients

2001-03-19 Thread James Senick
Forgive me if this has been covered before. Is there a way to hide the recipients in a group mailing (mass)? -- Thank you, James Senick mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Mode