Separate signatures for TXT and HTML

2010-11-15 Thread Akebono Translation Service
Dear all, If I have a signature A which I want to use in the TXT version of TXT/HTML e-mails, and a signature B which I want to use in the HTML version of TXT/HTML e-mails, how do I tell The Bat! in templates which signature to use when? Best regards, Loek van Kooten = Please subscribe to

[Feature request] disable auto-detection of S/Mime certificate to allow eID signatures

2010-01-05 Thread Stephane Bouvard
Hi, A small request i've already made a couple of time... just a hope that it could reach the right people at Ritlabs :) Could it be possible to manualy select a S/Mime certificate to sign an eMail ? In Belgium, we use an eID : the electronic identity card, with this card we can use an

Re: [Feature request] disable auto-detection of S/Mime certificate to allow eID signatures

2010-01-05 Thread MFPA
Hi On Tuesday 5 January 2010 at 9:52:56 PM, in mid:56429591.20100105225...@freenet.be, Stephane Bouvard wrote: Hi, A small request i've already made a couple of time... just a hope that it could reach the right people at Ritlabs :) I see you have asked on this list in previous years. Is

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-21 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 20 August 2009 at 7:10:39 PM, in mid:1606100060.20090820211...@gmail.com, Robert wrote: I checked it once again now. S/MIME-signed messages come and then I get that green checkmark showing the signature was verified. I just checked again and you are right (except it was an

Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Robert
Hello list, Is there a way to teach TheBat! to automatically check PGP signatures of the incoming messages the same way it works with S/MIME? Thank you all in advance. -- Robert Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 20 August 2009 at 11:38:31 AM, in mid:407612302.20090820133...@gmail.com, Robert wrote: Is there a way to teach TheBat! to automatically check PGP signatures of the incoming messages the same way it works with S/MIME? I was not aware TB! would automatically do

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, at 13:38:31 [GMT +0300] (which was 12:38 where I live) Robert wrote: Is there a way to teach TheBat! to automatically check PGP signatures of the incoming messages the same way it works with S/MIME? When I had Windows XP as operating system (and GPG) GPGrelay did

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Robert
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, 7:55:29 PM, Henk wrote: When I had Windows XP as operating system (and GPG) GPGrelay did that. Yes, I remember that nice piece of program. Perhaps I would have to check it again if I don't find any other solution. Thank you, Henk. -- Best regards, Robert

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Robert
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, 7:19:17 PM, MFPA wrote: I was not aware TB! would automatically do this with an S/MIME signed message - here I click a button to verify a PGP signature or an S/MIME signature. I checked it once again now. S/MIME-signed messages come and then I get that green

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Kyle
Test for On--- On Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 1:10:39 PM, Robert wrote: Hope it works this time. I've noticed that Auto-Format option does make some mess with the lines. :-( -- Best regards, Robert Nope, still not working. Apparently the space at the end is missing. -- Jim Kyle Using

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Robert
Hopefully, now it should work. -- Best regards, Robert Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Checking signatures

2009-08-20 Thread Jim Kyle
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, at 11:47:13 PM, Robert wrote: Hopefully, now it should work. Yep, you've fixed it. -- Jim Kyle Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 on VMWare Server 2 under Xubuntu 8.04.3 with AntiSpamSniper Version 3.0.1.2

Re: signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
is really called a Cut Mark. It is the point at which signatures are cut off for an orderly reply. In the case of top-posted email, that effectively ruins the thread. So, the cut mark or sig delimiter is incompatible with top-posting. While I rant a lot against top posting here on the list

Re: signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-16 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi Marck, As it happens, it does affect the actual. The so-called Signature delimiter is really called a Cut Mark. It is the point at which signatures are cut off for an orderly reply. This is remembering me for a question I already have a long time. Is there any contra-sign, that recovers

Re: signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-16 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Goos, @16-Mar-2009, 10:32 +0100 (16-Mar 09:32 here) Gunivortus Goos [G] in mid:1496543795.20090316103...@boudicca.de said to Marck: As it happens, it does affect the actual. The so-called Signature delimiter is really called a Cut Mark. It is the point at which signatures are cut off

Re: signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-16 Thread tracer
Hello AC, Monday, March 16, 2009, 11:41:33 AM, you wrote: My preference is to top-post when replying to emails. So, in my template for replies, there are typically three blocks of text: my new reply text my signature quoted text What I'm having a problem with is that the editor will

Re: signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-16 Thread MFPA
Hi On Monday 16 March 2009 at 10:15:01 AM, in mid:1369433354.20090316171...@gmail.com, tracer wrote: my problem is that often the email write ends up open in topmode. If that's not what's required, can they change the default??? A reply opens with the cursor wherever your reply template puts

signatures in top-posted replies

2009-03-15 Thread AC
My preference is to top-post when replying to emails. So, in my template for replies, there are typically three blocks of text: my new reply text my signature quoted text What I'm having a problem with is that the editor will format everything below the signature delimiter -- as part of the

Re:Speaking of signatures

2008-08-31 Thread Assad Kety
Hello Roelof, On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of Speaking of signatures: RO Place your 700 cookies in the cookie.txt file and TB will pick one RO randomly every time you call the macro. No need for an extra RO randomiser. In my

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-31 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Assad, On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:36:45 +0400 GMT (31/08/2008, 13:36 +0700 GMT), Assad Kety wrote: AK In my cookie.txt file, I have included a macro. The cookie would AK return the macro formula instead of executing the macro. How can I AK possibly solve this please? Thanks. The tag

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Assad, On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:36:45 +0400GMT (31-8-2008, 8:36 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO Place your 700 cookies in the cookie.txt file and TB will pick one RO randomly every time you call the macro. No need for an extra RO randomiser. AT In my cookie.txt file, I have included a

Re:Speaking of signatures

2008-08-31 Thread Assad Kety
Hello Roelof, On Sunday, August 31, 2008, Roelof Otten wrote and made these points on the subject of Speaking of signatures: RO As Thomas wrote you, cookies are seen as text, compare %cookie with RO the %put macro. Indeed Thomas pointed this limitation of the cookie macro to me

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill, On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:18:37 -0700 GMT (29/08/2008, 14:18 +0700 GMT), Bill McQuillan wrote: That is already possible. I saw days until Christmas... or already living days and xxx hours on this list or on TBOT. Again, this is made an internal command (template macro)

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-30 Thread Jens Franik
am Samstag, 30. August 2008 um 19:31 schrieb Thomas Fernandez: But this is already possible. Am I still misunderstanding Jens' feature request in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or did he just not know it is already implemented? It's the second one, i thought of directly executing an external command

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:15:33 +0200 GMT (31/08/2008, 06:15 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: But this is already possible. Am I still misunderstanding Jens' feature request in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or did he just not know it is already implemented? JF It's the second one, i thought

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Thu, 2008-08-28, Thomas Fernandez wrote: That is already possible. I saw days until Christmas... or already living days and xxx hours on this list or on TBOT. Again, this is made an internal command (template macro) which requests the information from outside and puts it into

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Bill, Friday, August 29, 2008, 9:18:37 AM, you wrote: BM For instance, the text already living days and xxx hours probably BM needed to be updated just before the macro put it into the message. That's BM the use of an external program. %DaysTo(01/01/09) days remaining in 2008.

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Geoff Lane
On 29 August 2008, 03:07, Rick wrote: Interesting ... I have thought it would be interesting to have a counter - count down to an event for instance or count up (how many days since) in a cookie. I have not thought it a serious enough enough feature to suggest it :)) ~~~ That's fairly easily

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Mark Partous
Hello, Citing myself once more: BM For instance, the text already living days and xxx hours probably BM needed to be updated just before the macro put it into the message. That's BM the use of an external program. MP %DaysTo(01/01/09) days remaining in 2008. MP Actually it's

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, August 28, 2008, 4:01:25 PM, you wrote: Hi On Wednesday 27 August 2008 at 9:53:38 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: You can also do what I do, to install TB in a non-standard location, that is always backed up daily, including program, mail, cookies, etc, etc.

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-29 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, August 28, 2008, 8:07:56 PM, you wrote: Interesting ... I have thought it would be interesting to have a counter - count down to an event for instance or count up (how many days since) in a cookie. I have not thought it a serious enough enough feature to suggest it :)) I have a

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Jens Franik
am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 um 03:33 schrieb Thomas Fernandez: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... JF (i never did this) An internal command (%Cookie=) will insert the cookie. Why would you want to

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Jens Franik
am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 um 09:25 schrieb Geoff Lane: To insert the text output from an external command, use the PUT macro, in my case it's: %PUT=c:\temp\vtitlespy.txt Thank you, this is one step ahead, now i only miss the syntax to call the command bevor. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jens, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:18:06 +0200GMT (26-8-2008, 22:18 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... You've been told about the %Put macro that offers the optioon to

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread MAU
Hello Geoff, You might want to include some time-variable information, such as how many days remain to an epic trip, or something as mundane as what is currently playing on Winamp. See the last line of my sig? This was created with a Winamp plugin called VTitleSpy that generates a text file

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Geoff Lane
On 28 August 2008, 12:33, MAU wrote: The macro set MyMacros for The Bat! includes two macros specific for Winamp: %WinAmpStatus %WinAmpTitle You can download them from http://thebat.zetema.de/zip/mymacros.zip The ZIP file includes a 'readme' and a Help file which explains all

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Jens Franik
am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 um 13:32 schrieb Roelof Otten: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... You've been told about the %Put macro that offers the optioon to import text files into your

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, August 28, 2008, 5:33:09 AM, you wrote: You can download them from http://thebat.zetema.de/zip/mymacros.zip The ZIP file includes a 'readme' and a Help file which explains all macros available in the set and how to use them. See my signature :-) Is there a macro for iTunes?

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:49:23 +0200 GMT (28/08/2008, 17:49 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... JF (i never did this) An internal command (%Cookie=) will

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:54:14 +0200 GMT (28/08/2008, 18:54 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... You've been told about the %Put macro that offers the optioon

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Geoff Lane
On 28 August 2008, 16:36, Thomas Fernandez wrote: I see. I hadn't caught the gist of your question. I don't see how an external command could technically do that, I think the macro needs a command that requests the information. However, I don't know how the macros and templates really work

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Geoff Lane
On 28 August 2008, 17:08, Geoff Lane wrote: I know that the sorting office filters can create a temporary text file to contain the message content and pass the name of that file to an external command as the first formal parameter. As I write, I've no idea whether the external command can

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Rick
Ah well, I experimented to see whether the original or the changed text would be sent - and the unmodified version of my message made it. So, it looks like the answer could be the %Run macro (from MyMacros). Is there any easy way from within The Bat to cycle through cookies? Let's say I didn't

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Rick, on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:23:24 -0400GMT (28.08.2008, 18:23 +0200GMT here), you wrote: R Is there any easy way from within The Bat to cycle through cookies? R Let's say I didn't want the one that was randomly attached to this R email ... R (It's in a file in an address book template)

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi, on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:42:28 +0200GMT I wrote: PM on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:23:24 -0400GMT (28.08.2008, 18:23 +0200GMT here), PM you wrote: R Is there any easy way from within The Bat to cycle through cookies? R Let's say I didn't want the one that was randomly attached to this R email ...

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Jens Franik
am Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 um 17:36 schrieb Thomas Fernandez: Can you help my imagination and describe a scenario? Insert a whois lookup, insert Statistic of something, ... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 27 August 2008 at 9:53:38 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: You can also do what I do, to install TB in a non-standard location, that is always backed up daily, including program, mail, cookies, etc, etc. Presumably, you could do the same if TB! is installed in

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Rick
Hi, on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:42:28 +0200GMT I wrote: PM on Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:23:24 -0400GMT (28.08.2008, 18:23 +0200GMT here), PM you wrote: R Is there any easy way from within The Bat to cycle through cookies? R Let's say I didn't want the one that was randomly attached to this R email ...

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:27:09 +0200 GMT (29/08/2008, 02:27 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: Can you help my imagination and describe a scenario? JF Insert a whois lookup, insert Statistic of something, ... And you want to insert all this through an external command without the

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Rick
Hello Jens, On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:27:09 +0200 GMT (29/08/2008, 02:27 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: Can you help my imagination and describe a scenario? JF Insert a whois lookup, insert Statistic of something, ... And you want to insert all this through an external command without the

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Rick, On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:07:56 -0400 GMT (29/08/2008, 09:07 +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: R Interesting ... I have thought it would be interesting to have a R counter - count down to an event for instance or count up (how many R days since) in a cookie. I have not thought it a serious enough

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Geoff Lane
On 27 August 2008, 02:33, Thomas Fernandez wrote: JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... JF (i never did this) An internal command (%Cookie=) will insert the cookie. Why would you want to use an external

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Christopher, On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:56:41 AM you wrote: CW I assume it is an extension joke based on the name of a venerable Unix CW program, fortune. remembering The world is coming to an end - flush all buffers! This appeared on a Unix system at 5:01 PM, just before the

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maggie, On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:17:06 -0400 GMT (27/08/2008, 21:17 +0700 GMT), Maggie Meister wrote: MM remembering The world is coming to an end - flush all buffers! MM This appeared on a Unix system at 5:01 PM, just before the shaking MM started at the 1989 San Francisco quake at 5:02.

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Christopher, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:53:41 -0500 GMT (27/08/2008, 11:53 +0700 GMT), Christopher W. wrote: CW A word of caution: The Bat's random number generator has an ironic sense CW of humor. If your cookies are like mine (sarcastic), you'll need to check CW the cookie against the

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Thomas, On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:04:01 PM you wrote: TF Hello Maggie, TF On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:17:06 -0400 GMT (27/08/2008, 21:17 +0700 GMT), TF Maggie Meister wrote: TF Rather than laughing, this just caused goosebumps over here. I hope TF this is an urban legend! No, no

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maggie, On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:03:01 -0400 GMT (28/08/2008, 00:03 +0700 GMT), Maggie Meister wrote: MM remembering The world is coming to an end - flush all buffers! MM This appeared on a Unix system at 5:01 PM, just before the shaking MM started at the 1989 San Francisco quake at 5:02.

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Thomas, On Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 1:11:13 PM you wrote: TF Another question: Are you subscribed to TBOT? No, not anymore. TF I smell a fish... You're right. Apologies to the group. -- Regards, Maggie The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Dan Lester
Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 1:03:59 PM, you wrote: I find it best to store the cookie file as you do, in My Documents because it is backed up AND if you have to go to a new computer, the cookies are brought over with the other documents; not in a Program Files folder that is re-created without

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-27 Thread Dan Lester
Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 10:43:21 PM, you wrote: Just curious... why are they called cookies nowadays? In the old days we spoke of taglines. My big file of those nice, bizar, wise, humorious, etc. sentences is still called tagfline.txt, I started with it as I still was in the pre-internet

Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Chrille Andersson
Hey Roelof, I have noticed that you have a quote in your signature that changes every time. How can I make one like that? -- Regards, Chrillemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 4.0.28.3 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3

Mod: Reply for new thread (was: Speaking of signatures)

2008-08-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chrille, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:57:48 +0200GMT (26-8-2008, 8:57, where I live), you wrote: C Hey Roelof, C I have noticed that you have a quote in your signature that C changes every time. How can I make one like that? moderator Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Chrille, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 08:57:48 +0200GMT (26-8-2008, 8:57 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C I have noticed that you have a quote in your signature that C changes every time. How can I make one like that? That being done with the %Cookie macro, in my case I'm using this:

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gary Lucas
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, Chrille Andersson scripted: I have noticed that you have a quote in your signature that changes every time. How can I make one like that? Greetings Chrille Andersson, 12:43, Tuesday, August 26, 2008 There's a handy program for generating random

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Rick
I have noticed that you have a quote in your signature that changes every time. How can I make one like that? I keep several different cookie files in a folder under My Documents. I just have to path to them. I use a different one for different mail groups that I am in via address book

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi Gary Lucas, There's a handy program for generating random cookies. It's called cookie jar and it's free. http://sourceforge.net/projects/kookiejar/ But in TB you don't need that, TB has a built-in option for cookies. Just gather your favourite cookies in a plain ASCII file (a .txt file,

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Geoff Lane
On 26 August 2008, 18:20, Gunivortus Goos wrote: There's a handy program for generating random cookies. It's called cookie jar and it's free. http://sourceforge.net/projects/kookiejar/ But in TB you don't need that, TB has a built-in option for cookies. Just gather your favourite cookies

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gary Lucas
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, Gunivortus Goos scripted: But in TB you don't need that, TB has a built-in option for cookies. Just gather your favourite cookies in a plain ASCII file (a .txt file, f.i. made with notepad) and save that somewhere, f.i. in your The Bat directory. Then rightclick

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gary, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:58:46 -0400GMT (26-8-2008, 19:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: GL Yes, but Kookiejar manages the cookies and selects them randomly. I have GL Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min. Whenever I compose GL a new message the following template

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Rick
Yes, but Kookiejar manages the cookies and selects them randomly. I have Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min. Whenever I compose a new message the following template adds it to my message. %wrapped=%Cookie=C:\Program Files\KookieJar6\cookie.txt If you want to pick them

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gary Lucas
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, Rick scripted: I only have about 35 but that is by choice. What is the advantage of Kookiejar? I am asking not baiting. Thanks Greetings Rick, 14:10, Tuesday, August 26, 2008 I stand corrected, thanks to Gunivortus and Roelof. Apparently The Bat

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gunivortus Goos
Hi Gary, Yes, but Kookiejar manages the cookies and selects them randomly. I have Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min. TBs macro grabs for every message randomly another cookie from the list. If you want to pick them manually you can, but I have over 700 to pick from

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Rick, On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 2:08:15 PM you wrote: R I use only the Bat. Whenever I compose a new message the template uses R the line: R %COOKIE=C:\Documents and Settings\Rick\My Documents\mail account exports\politics.txt I find it best to store the cookie file as you do, in My

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Rick
Hi Rick, On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 2:08:15 PM you wrote: R I use only the Bat. Whenever I compose a new message the template uses R the line: R %COOKIE=C:\Documents and Settings\Rick\My Documents\mail account exports\politics.txt I find it best to store the cookie file as you do, in

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Jens Franik
am Dienstag, 26. August 2008 um 18:45 schrieb Gary Lucas: There's a handy program for generating random cookies. It's called cookie jar and it's free. Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it inserted into the Template? Would be interesting... (i never did

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:58:46 PM, Gary Lucas wrote: Yes, but Kookiejar manages the cookies and selects them randomly. I have Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min. and you are stuck with their cookies. With TB! you can have cookies which are not just bland cookies,

Re[2]: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Maggie Meister
Hi Dwight, On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 at 5:44:45 PM you wrote: DC On Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 12:58:46 PM, Gary Lucas wrote: I have Kookiejar put a random cookie in cookie.txt every 5 min. DC and you are stuck with their cookies. With TB! you can have cookies DC which are not just bland

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jens, On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:18:06 +0200 GMT (27/08/2008, 03:18 +0700 GMT), Jens Franik wrote: There's a handy program for generating random cookies. It's called cookie jar and it's free. JF Is it possible to have a external Command executed and the Output of it JF inserted into the

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Gunivortus Goos
. cookies. Just curious... why are they called cookies nowadays? In the old days we spoke of taglines. My big file of those nice, bizar, wise, humorious, etc. sentences is still called tagfline.txt, I started with it as I still was in the pre-internet network FIDO. She is

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Christopher W.
Gary Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2008-08-26 12:58 PM Re: Speaking of signatures [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm lazy, no right click is needed, and the randomness is actually fun. A word of caution: The Bat's random number generator has an ironic sense of humor. If your cookies are like mine (sarcastic

Re: Speaking of signatures

2008-08-26 Thread Christopher W.
Gunivortus Goos [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2008-08-26 11:43 PM Re: Speaking of signatures [EMAIL PROTECTED] . cookies. Just curious... why are they called cookies nowadays? I assume it is an extension joke based on the name of a venerable Unix program, fortune. http://en.wikipedia.org

Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-13 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello, Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer Thanks everyone for putting me straight - apparently I was going mad! -- Nick Using Evolution 2.12.1 under Linux... nice, but not that nice.

Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Julian, On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:15:35 + GMT (11/01/2008, 01:15 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer. JBL Not in the plain text viewer. If you

Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello, Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer. TIA. -- Nick TheBat!: v3.99.3 on Windows XP Current version is 3.99.27.2 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Christopher W .
Nick Dutton @ 2008-1-10 12:31:44 PM Signatures in plain-text viewer. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer. You need to use the rich text viewer/HTML viewer, not the plain

Re: Signatures in plain-text viewer.

2008-01-10 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, January 10, 2008, 5:31:44 PM, Nick Dutton wrote: Am I going mad, or did TB! used to give me the option to specify the text style for signature text? It does for sure in the html viewer. Not in the plain text viewer. If you de-select Use Plain Text View in the right click menu of

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-24 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Chris, On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:20:50 -0600 GMT (24/11/2006, 04:20 +0700 GMT), Chris W. wrote: I realise that I am only using a small part of the features of TB yet. CW Join the club. I volunteer for collecting the club's membership fees. This is my account number: 83%%#%;.^%... NO

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Tom
Thursday, November 23, 2006, 12:55:16 AM, you wrote: Hallo Tom, On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:03:12 +1100GMT (22-11-2006, 12:03 , where I live), you wrote: T I do think though that there is probably a more elegant way available T with TB? Is it possible to link a signature to a recipient in the T

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Tom
Thursday, November 23, 2006, 7:27:29 AM, you wrote: On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 at 22:03:12 +1100, Tom wrote: I would like to use different types of signatures depending on who I communicate with. I am not using the function via the account (with the exception of this one) as for me this would

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Chris W .
Tom @ 2006-11-23 2:49:03 AM Different signatures depending on recipient mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried this by typing the %QT(%ABToFax=sig1) but this did not do anything. Apart from the fact that typing this string seems more time consuming than the handle for a QT (and more difficult

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 at 19:53:04 +1100, Tom wrote: The approach I use is to store this information in the memo field in the address book. Sorry but exactly is this memo field? The tab labelled Other in the address book entry Similar to my follow up to Roelof, this is way beyond me. I don't

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Tom
Friday, November 24, 2006, 3:40:17 AM, you wrote: The %QT(%ABToFax=sig1) goes in your templates, you create a number of QuickTemplates called sig1 ... sign, then, in the Fax field, you type the name of the signature quick template you would like used. Excellent, now I got it (finally). I

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Robin, On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RA If you want more information, I can provide you with the QTs I have RA that use this. Reg ex is way above my head but your way seems a pretty neat solution and it would be good to try. I don't suppose you could post them

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Chris W .
Tom @ 2006-11-23 2:34:01 PM Different signatures depending on recipient mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I realise that I am only using a small part of the features of TB yet. Join the club. -- Chris Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2. Accessing a POP3 mailbox. When

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Robin Anson
or would that annoy the majority of people who have no interest in them. If you think that's not a good idea I'd certainly appreciate a PM with them if you feel like sharing all your hard work amongst us lesser mortals! ;-) Okay, here goes. First of all, all your signatures will be stored

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Robin, Gosh, daunting stuff, but I'll certainly have a go at it and thank you very much for taking the time to post it. -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.86.07 ALPHA (beta) with POP3 account AntispamSniper 1.7.0.3 | Windows XP (build 2600) version 5.1 Service Pack 2 | F-Prot AV, Outpost

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-23 Thread MAU
Hello Richard, Gosh, daunting stuff, but I'll certainly have a go at it and thank you very much for taking the time to post it. AOL mode on Me too :) /AOL mode off -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.86.07 ALPHA (beta)

Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-22 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I would like to use different types of signatures depending on who I communicate with. I am not using the function via the account (with the exception of this one) as for me this would not be suitable. Recipients are different and will require individual greetings. Currently I

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:03:12 +1100GMT (22-11-2006, 12:03 , where I live), you wrote: T I do think though that there is probably a more elegant way available T with TB? Is it possible to link a signature to a recipient in the T addressbook? So each time I send an email to Joe Bloke my

Re: Different signatures depending on recipient

2006-11-22 Thread Robin Anson
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 at 22:03:12 +1100, Tom wrote: I would like to use different types of signatures depending on who I communicate with. I am not using the function via the account (with the exception of this one) as for me this would not be suitable. Recipients are different and will require

  1   2   3   >