Hello MFPA,
Friday, January 9, 2009, 7:29:38 AM, you wrote:
> Hi
> On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:04 PM, in
> , Ian A. White wrote:
>> I just checked my account folders and they QTB files I
>> deleted have not been re-created. The QT editor also
>> shows all accounts as having no QTs.
Hello Richard,
Friday, January 9, 2009, 8:17:44 AM, you wrote
> I've now had a response via the RitLabs Ticket system and they asked for
> more information (from .txt & .log files in root of mail directory tree) and
> supplied a Beta version since 4.1.7. I'd also looked at paying for the
> upgra
> Hello MFPA,
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT),
> MFPA wrote:
>>> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
M>> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
M>> the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:48:00 + GMT (09/01/2009, 07:48 +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
M> It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
M> the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
M
Hi tracer,
Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 4:56:30 AM, tracer (0tra...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 7:49:56 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I'll raise this with the RitLabs Ticket system, but thought I'd ask here in
>> case anyone can provide a quick solution. I have reverted to a previous
>
Hi
On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:39 PM, in
, Rick wrote:
> I don't ever remember it changing the entire thread.
It only changed the messages directly above the new one all the way up
the thread. If the thread branched, those not above the new message
didn't change.
My default view is t
Hi
On Thursday 8 January 2009 at 10:52:04 PM, in
, Ian A. White wrote:
> I just checked my account folders and they QTB files I
> deleted have not been re-created. The QT editor also
> shows all accounts as having no QTs.
Hmm. I just tried again and if I delete (or rename) the account.qtb
fi
Hello Roelof,
Friday, January 9, 2009, 4:36:27 AM, you wrote:
> Hallo koenraad,
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:14 +0700GMT (8-1-2009, 18:30 +0100, where I
> live), you wrote:
KR>> Filename is "thebat.exe" (now) and its gone if I try to install 4.1.xx.
KR>> The shortcut sits on the desktop but I end
> Hi
> A new message at the bottom of a thread previously caused all messages
> above it in the thread to show as "unread".
> I'm not sure when this was changed but it no longer does and I don't
> like the new way.
> How do I revert to the previous behaviour? I have not managed to find
> where t
Hi
A new message at the bottom of a thread previously caused all messages
above it in the thread to show as "unread".
I'm not sure when this was changed but it no longer does and I don't
like the new way.
How do I revert to the previous behaviour? I have not managed to find
where to change this
Hi
On Thursday 25 December 2008 at 12:16:57 AM, in
, Ian A. White wrote:
> Thanks. That did it.
I tried doing the same now that I am aware of the common templates
location - copied my main account.qtb file to the mail directory and
found most of my QTs duplicated there. Then I re-created one
Hallo koenraad,
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:30:14 +0700GMT (8-1-2009, 18:30 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
KR> Filename is "thebat.exe" (now) and its gone if I try to install 4.1.xx.
KR> The shortcut sits on the desktop but I end-up with the icon one used for
file
KR> missing.
I've heard one case
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, January 8, 2009, 11:09:50 AM, you wrote:
RO> Hallo Jack,
RO> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:00:44 -0600GMT (8-1-2009, 0:00 +0100, where I
RO> live), you wrote:
JSL>> A long time ago there was a thread on the dangers of leaving messages
JSL>> in the inbox. Unfortunately I no longe
Hello Thomas,
Thursday, January 8, 2009, 11:02:26 PM, you wrote:
Roelof, If you want this moved to Yahoo, no problem but maybe worth
first finding out who else has a problem with latest bat. What worries
me is not the destruction of the bat but the chance that the databases
get destroyed with an
Hallo Jack,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:00:44 -0600GMT (8-1-2009, 0:00 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
JSL> A long time ago there was a thread on the dangers of leaving messages
JSL> in the inbox. Unfortunately I no longer remember exactly what the
JSL> danger was. I searched the archives for the subj
Hello Jack,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:00:44 -0600 GMT (08/01/2009, 06:00 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL> A long time ago there was a thread on the dangers of leaving messages
JSL> in the inbox. Unfortunately I no longer remember exactly what the
JSL> danger was. I searched the archives for the
Hello tracer,
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:13:12 +0700 GMT (08/01/2009, 21:13 +0700 GMT),
tracer wrote:
t>>> Assuming I create them all by hand for mail coming in, what's the
t>>> easiest way to copy the lot to outgoing mail and then fix them by
t>>> hand...
>> The easiest (but not fastest) way i
Hi
A number of my programs have a menu option to send a new mail message using
the default email program (in my case TheBat! 4.1) with the current document
as an attachment.
This seems to work in most cases other than the default new message template
isn't used and I am presented with a blank win
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 10:29:01 PM, you wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:32:15 +0700 GMT (07/01/2009, 11:32 +0700 GMT),
> tracer wrote:
t>> Assuming I create them all by hand for mail coming in, what's the
t>> easiest way to copy the lot to outgoing mail and
19 matches
Mail list logo