Hi
On Saturday 9 November 2013 at 5:39:32 PM, in
mid:95227506.20131109113...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
The only times I can recall having a message land in
the wrong folder is when the sender changed something,
which had been static, upon which I had been filtering.
An
Hello Chris,
I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was
routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the
filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there.
Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do.
'Account/View log', or
Hello Chris,
I see the same, which is not really telling me how a message was
routed to that folder. I was expecting something that showed the
filter, or filters, used to move or copy it there.
Have you ever taken a look at the Account's log? If not, please do.
'Account/View log', or
Hi
On Friday 8 November 2013 at 5:30:39 PM, in
mid:1098350051.20131108113...@charter.net, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and
right-click on your message (running a later version of
TB! than yours), then click Test Filters this is what
I get:
Hi
On Friday 8 November 2013 at 10:33:31 PM, in
mid:1936778188.20131108223...@chriswilson.tv, Chris Wilson wrote:
I was expecting
something that showed the filter, or filters, used to
move or copy it there. I maintain this would be a very
useful feature, hope I haven't misunderstood the
MFPA, subject Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering
used., size 6,368 bytes filtered (processed by Processed by: Faux inbox.
Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S. LaRosa\Faux inbox, Processed
by: TBUDL List Server. Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S.
LaRosa\TBUDL
:
Message from MFPA, subject Re: Feature request?
Messages display filtering used., size 6,368 bytes
filtered (processed by Processed by: Faux inbox.
Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S.
LaRosa\Faux inbox, Processed by: TBUDL List Server.
Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack
describes what actions were taken with
this message as follows:
Message from MFPA, subject Re: Feature request?
Messages display filtering used., size 6,368 bytes
filtered (processed by Processed by: Faux inbox.
Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S.
LaRosa\Faux inbox, Processed
:
Message from MFPA, subject Re: Feature request? Messages display filtering
used., size 6,368 bytes filtered (processed by Processed by: Faux inbox.
Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack S. LaRosa\Faux inbox,
Processed
by: TBUDL List Server. Actions performed: Move to the folder \\Jack
Hello MFPA,
On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote:
M Right-click any message in The Bat! and select Test Filters. You can
M find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and
M what action would be taken by the filter.
Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and right-click
Hello MFPA,
On Friday, November 08, 2013 you wrote:
M Right-click any message in The Bat! and select Test Filters. You can
M find out the name of each filter that would process the message, and
M what action would be taken by the filter.
Hmmm. If I follow the above instructions and
Hi
On Wednesday 6 November 2013 at 9:11:20 PM, in
mid:699935416.20131106211...@chriswilson.tv, Chris Wilson wrote:
Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this,
but here goes.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt used to be the place but I don't know
now that isn't working.
Forte Agent
06 November 2013
Not sure if this is an appropriate place to post this, but here goes.
Forte Agent has a very useful feature whereby you can view why it has
filtered (Routed in Agent speak) a message to a certain folder. With
lots of folders and the occasional complex filter I feel this
Hi,
A small request i've already made a couple of time... just a hope that it
could reach the right people at Ritlabs :)
Could it be possible to manualy select a S/Mime certificate to sign an eMail ?
In Belgium, we use an eID : the electronic identity card, with this card we can
use an
Hi
On Tuesday 5 January 2010 at 9:52:56 PM, in
mid:56429591.20100105225...@freenet.be, Stephane Bouvard wrote:
Hi,
A small request i've already made a couple of time...
just a hope that it could reach the right people at
Ritlabs :)
I see you have asked on this list in previous years. Is
this task, as Thunderbird has done.
If I'm missing something, please help...
If not, please consider this a feature request...
--
Steven Vallière | tb 3.99.29 | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
If you didn't write it down, then it didn't happen.
-Larry Zana
Hello Steven,
Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 3:53:00 PM, you wrote:
SPV One can work around this shortcoming by creating a new
SPV message and cut'n'pasting from the old one, but it seems
SPV like it should be easy enough for the application to
SPV further simplify this task, as Thunderbird has
Hello Steven,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:53:00 -0500 GMT (30/01/2008, 21:53 +0700 GMT),
Steven P Vallière wrote:
SPV There are times when I would like to open a previously sent
SPV message, make a few changes and send it again, sometimes to the
SPV same person(s), sometimes to others.
Move or copy
Hello Steven,
The closest I can see is 'Re-send', which prompted me
about resending (I didn't) without ever offering any
opportunity to edit/adjust.
Try re-direct. That let's you edit the message.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.0.16 (ALPHA)
Hello Steven,
Wednesday, January 30, 2008, 8:53:00 AM, you wrote:
SPV If I'm missing something, please help...
SPV If not, please consider this a feature request...
You could use the redirect button. This lets you change the adressee
and make changes to the body. UnfortunatlyUnfortunately
Hi,
Does someone know if it is possible, using a command-line switch or
any other method, to enter the password on the command-line when using
OTFE ?
Greetings,
--
Claude Renaud
Skype :
Name : renaud_claude
Number : 0870445179
Using The Bat! v3.5.27 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello,
I already did post this mail to the BETA-List but I didn't get any
answer. So I try to start a discussion in the tbudl-list. Maybe you
like my idea, maybe not.
As I have seen The Bat offers a synchronisation function which is
very important. But as I see the funtion so far only offers the
But the rest of the data (or the data you want - you
need) could be put on a FTP server that you even can access the
calendar or addressbook from different computers - without thinking
of doing the synchronisation.
What do you think about that?
Excellent idea. Let's do it
--
Marten
Hello TBUDL
I would like to see a great big yellow button on the tool bar which,
when pressed, will link to www.google.com.
This *may* reduce messages of the type: 'where can I find
thispieceofsoftware?'.
Removing tongue from cheek...
--
Regards
William
http://www.residues.info
Flying
Hello William,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:38:03 +GMT (29-1-2004, 18:38, where I
live), you wrote:
WM I would like to see a great big yellow button on the tool bar which,
WM when pressed, will link to www.google.com.
WM This *may* reduce messages of the type: 'where can I find
WM
Hello znark,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:51:43 +1100GMT (29-1-2004, 21:51 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
z G'day Henk,
I am using this for quite some time and it is working like a charm!
http://toolbar.google.com/deskbar/index.html
z I've been using 'Daves' Quick Search Deskbar' for quite
Hello Leif,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:47:07 -0700GMT (29-1-2004, 22:47 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
LG Thursday, January 29, 2004, 2:16:55 PM, you wrote:
z I've been using 'Daves' Quick Search Deskbar' for quite some time.
z Works a treat. http://www.dqsd.net/
HdB Thanks! Will look into it and
In this case the '@'-sign is changed into blue also.
TF The colour should be changed back to normal when a successful attempt
TF has been made.
Sure, as in 'back to normal' being either 'no new/unread mail' (black)
or 'unread mail' (blue), hence the actual state at that moment.
Hi Scott,
It might be easier to look at the log file to se what the error was. I
am assuming that do do not have to many errors that often.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Original message text=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I do not find it easy but then again I have multiple accounts (yea, more than
any normal person
Apart from this. The log panel at the bottom of the screen has always seemed
to be lacking one essential detail to me - the account *name*. I am aware of
what it picks out from the log files to display, but it wouldn't be too
difficult to tack on an account name to that. As it stands, I find
Hi Thomas
Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 8:24:56 PM, you wrote:
S 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there
is
S an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same
S sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which
Hello Gerard,
It might be easier to look at the log file to se what the error was. I
am assuming that do do not have to many errors that often.
There is log file per account, so no big help.
I find Scott's feature request quite reasonable.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Scott,
on Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:55:57 -0600 (2003-11-26 18:55:57 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
wrote (at least in part):
S 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is
S an error getting email. When I have multiple
Hi Thomas
Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 8:24:56 PM, you wrote:
S 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there
is
S an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same
S sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which
Hello Peter,
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:10:08 +0100 GMT (28/11/2003, 03:10 +0700 GMT),
Peter Ouwehand wrote:
[FETCH or SEND failed]
S on error, change folder name color would be cool.
Or change the '@'-sign to the left of the account name into red.
Yes, that would be a good idea IMHO. But I fear
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
on Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:05:45 +0700 (2003-11-28 02:05:45 in .nl) in the
message with reference mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote
(at least in part):
TF [FETCH or SEND failed]
S on error, change folder name color would be cool.
Or change the '@'-sign to the left of the
1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is
an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same
sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which one(s) are the
problem on error, change folder name color would be
ON Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 6:55:57 PM, you wrote:
S 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there is
S an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same
S sound for a get email error, its a pain to track down which one(s) are
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:14:43 +0100 GMT (27/11/2003, 02:14 +0700 GMT),
Gerard wrote:
S 1) I would like to see the folder name in the list change colors when ever there
is
S an error getting email. When I have multiple email accounts, and hear the same
S sound for a get email
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:50:41 -0600 GMT(05/03/2003, 4:50 PM + GMT), Spyder wrote:
S Why not go 1 step further and change the font color of the errored account in
S the account list to red (or some other configurable color)? The account is
S bolding when unread messages are in it... I don't
Hey Peter,
My MUA believes 'Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws72 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)'
was used
to write mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Friday, March 7, 2003 at 3:54:53 PM.
PP Albeit I wouldn't use Notepad, but my beloved GViM :-)
I am with you there Peter! I had to decode a M$ Ol header
Hellow tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com
i wish:
- a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all
--
Best Regards,
Task Control
mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net
Using:
- Windows 98 4.10.1998
- AVG 6.0 Free Edition
- The Bat!
On Sunday, March 09, 2003 at 18:29:28GMT -0400 (which was 5:29 PM where I live)
Task Control wrote and made these points on the subject of simple feature request:
TC Hellow tbudl arroba thebat.dutaint.com
TC i wish:
TC - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
TC I never use Check
Hello Task,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:29:28 -0400 GMT (10/03/03, 05:29 +0700 GMT),
Task Control wrote:
i wish:
- a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
Alt-F2 does that over here.
I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all
Me neither. That's why I have marked Combined
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 09, 2003, Task Control wrote...
i wish:
- a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
I never use Check for all, i never use Send for all
There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time
of checking
Hallo Task,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:29:28 -0400GMT (9-3-03, 23:29 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TC i wish: - a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
Simple, just press F11
Whenever you miss a shortcut for a function that's already in TB, you
can assign it with the shortcut editor: View -
Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:44:57 -0600 GMT (10/03/03, 05:44 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
i wish:
- a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time
of checking mail (combined delivery check box found in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, March 09, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
i wish:
- a shortcut key to: Send And Check for all.
There is a way around this... set all your accounts to send at time
of checking mail (combined delivery check box found in account
Hi Miguel,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:28:04 +0100 Miguel A. Urech
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't
know any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat
makes them seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to
Hello Peter,
snipped quite a bit
Albeit I wouldn't use Notepad, but my beloved GViM :-)
OK, OK, understand. And I would use my beloved TextPad :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version
Hi,
I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got
no replies at all.
I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error
sound to each account.
I have a lot of different accounts here (I think that a lot of people
have too)... and every time I hear
Hello Fabio,
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 11:11:46 AM, you wrote:
FBO Hi,
FBO I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got
FBO no replies at all.
FBO I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error
FBO sound to each account.
FBO I have a lot of
Why not go 1 step further and change the font color of the errored account in
the account list to red (or some other configurable color)? The account is
bolding when unread messages are in it... I don't know that I could remember 30
different sounds for error and email is here.
Scott
v1.62 on
I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't know
any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat makes them
seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to endure the HTML hoopla.
When I get the attachment, I would like to view it as source code
Hello Fabio,
Wednesday, March 5, 2003, 17:11:46, you wrote:
FBO Hi,
FBO I already asked here for this feature here (in 2001 I think) but I got
FBO no replies at all.
FBO I think that could be a good feature a different (configurable) error
FBO sound to each account.
FBO I have a lot of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ricardo,
@5-Mar-2003, 18:54 +0100 (17:54 UK time) Ricardo van Eck [RVE] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... snip
FBO
FBO Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
FBO
Hello Ricardo,
I'd rather have a visual thingie :)
a. if winamp is running you might miss the error sound
b. I hate these plings and ploings everytime Windows scews up. I don't
want to see The Bat! going on the same route...
c. A visual someting is better because it will probably stay on
Hello Spyder,
I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't know
any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat makes them
seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to endure the HTML hoopla.
When I get the attachment, I would like to view
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, James Olsen wrote:
There's also free Win32 version that you can very easily use with
ANY email client called SAProxy (http://saproxy.bloomba.com/). It
will scan messages and flag them as SPAM (based on your
configuration) as they are downloaded from your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tim Fountain [TF] wrote:'
TF On a semi-related note, does anyone know if it's possible to setup a
TF global filter of some sort that applies to all accounts?
No. This isn't possible. It will likely be possible in later
Hello Allie,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:58:11 -0500 GMT (23/02/03, 19:58 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
If you used a global filter, how would TB! know where to apply the
filter. In fact, it may very well apply global filters first.
Hm. I would think in each account you give each global
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Fernandez [TF] wrote:'
TF Hm. I would think in each account you give each global filter a
TF position (or not, if you don't want the filter to be applied to that
TF account). In a central location, maybe under
~John,
On 22-02-2003 01:25, you [~] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
~ Peter Fjelsten wrote:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Miguel,
In a message with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Feb 2003 21:37:09 , you typed:
Have you guys used SpamPal ?
MAU Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate?
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
MAU Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
I never could figure out how to setup Popfile.
--
Regards,
John Morse
Pride is what we have, vanity is what others have
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Hello Krister,
May i ask why? Is Spampal harder to set up? Less ackurate? I also want
to use the best, so am curious as to why folks prefer one thing over
the other, but it's also of course a matter of preference.
I'm only interested in Bayesian classification and that is only one of
the
Hello John,
I never could figure out how to setup Popfile.
Once installed the Manual is available:
,- [ ]
| To learn how to set up POPFile, please choose one of the following options.
|
| Installing POPFile
| Setting up Buckets for mail classification
| Getting your email program to
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M | Installing POPFile
M | Setting up Buckets for mail classification
M | Getting your email program to work with POPFile
M | Training POPFile
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, 22:11, John Morse wrote:
M | Installing POPFile
M | Setting up Buckets for mail classification
M | Getting your email program to work with POPFile
M | Training POPFile
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen
Hello John,
I looked over the manual, but it was way to vague for me.
Especially when all I ever seen from the program was a DOS program.
A DOS program
If you have installed POPFile you should have aPOPFile Program group
in Star/Programs. There you have access to two versions of the
Hello James
JO I'd like to take a message/messages and submit them to a Bayesian
JO filter to learn my good versus spam messages.
Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 |
ON Thursday, February 20, 2003, 10:24:23 PM, you wrote:
JO Everyone's suggestions and comments are very appreciated.
Hi James,
I will assume that you have seen that there is an option in the filter
dialogs to execute an external program under actions.
The way I would do it would be to move
Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
~John,
On 21-02-2003 15:44, you [~] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
~ Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
--
greeting Best regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 15:53 +0100 (14:53 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
Blacklists are
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Marck,
On 21-02-2003 16:01, you [M] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ~John,
@21-Feb-2003, 09:08 -0600 (15:08 UK time) ~John [j] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
j thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
I don't use it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 16:13 +0100 (15:13 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PF With the amount of spam today I feel this is the only way to go.
... if blacklists have a positive effect on incoming spam,
Hello Marck,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
--
Al Jacobus
Using TheBat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current
Hello Al,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Use POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ which takes care by
itself about adding words, and in any language.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Peter
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Peter,
In a message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Feb 2003 16:13:35 , you typed:
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
PF There are many different blacklists. Some
Hello Clive,
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
messages per day and the last time
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 11:00 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 9:07 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
M Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
M messages per day and
Hello Miguel,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:57:08 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Clive,
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
MAU Fully agree with you
ON Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote:
AJ Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
AJ constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Al,
Here is my tip:
After filtering out al know email try searching for To unsubscribe
in TEXT. I
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:52:02GMT +0700 (which was
2:52 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez posted:
TF Come again? How can that misconfigured spampal reply have triggered a
TF filter to send the message to 11,000+ people?
My CNET virus
Hello Mark,
I'm willing to give POPFile a try, however. What is the URL?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello ~John,
Have you guys used SpamPal ?
Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Thomas,
I haven't used spampal, but I see that it is not that easy to
configure, judging from the recent flushing of TBUDL by one Frank
Nijkamp. ;-)
But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
Hi Thomas and list,
On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36
where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of Plug-in/Feature Request to
allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or group
and list,
MG On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36
MG where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
MG these valuable points on the subject of Plug-in/Feature Request to
MG allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or group of
MG messages
Good night Tim,
It was foretold that on 21-2-2003 06:53:20 GMT+1100 (which was
20:53:20 where I live) Tim would mumble:
snipped a bit
T For Windows, there's a simple installer that will install the minimum
T Perl needed.
Yep, that did the trick. Tnx.
--
Best regards,
Luc
Miguel,
On 21-02-2003 21:42, you [M] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :)
?
Is that a
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
M But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
M a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
M concept. If bounce (or reply to) real spam it will get nowhere :)
I didn't know SpamPal was capable of this... could you tell me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Al,
21-Feb-2003, 08:46 -0800 (16:46 UK time) Al Jacobus [AJ] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AJ Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
AJ constantly adding words and I know there must be another,
AJ simpler way.
First -
Hi Spike,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:08:13 PM, you wrote:
S My CNET virus newsletter filter picked up his hccnet.nl address by
S mistake. It automagically sends these virus newsletters out to a
S group containing 11,589 members. Let's see that 19 messages X 11,589
S members, that's 220,191
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
