Re: [tw] Re: More elegant way of doing this lexicon?

2017-08-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Something like: <$list filter="[tag[lexeme]each[english]get[english]sort[]"/> Should make your basic english list. With a variety of techniques, you can make the list look more like something you want. If you can make a tiddler that automatically culls and presents the items, do you really

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Ok. There's a couple things going on. One a mistake. One a semi-bug. And one probably a slight UTF8 cut and paste error. In your application template, you forgot to close off <$wikify> with the closing tag. In addition, and I know this shouldn't really matter, but sometimes you need to stack

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread TonyM
Mark, Sorry, but it is hard to explain what I want without reference to how to accomplish it when there are a lot of terms I am still becomming familular with. Of course I did ask at the top of the post "Edit fields in Current Tiddler" I have published a version of my work at

Re: [tw] Re: More elegant way of doing this lexicon?

2017-08-10 Thread Silvercat
So any pointers toward telling tw5 to take the 'english' fields from all the tiddlers tagged 'lexeme', match them with the tiddler title fields, alphabetize them by the 'english' fields, and then throw them all in one tiddler? Cuz I'm clueless, sorry. I'm focusing on the 10 or 11 completely

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
It's better if you explain what it is that you want to accomplish than insist on how it gets accomplished. The variable <> is available to all "children" of a tiddler, assuming that by children you mean transcluded or templated tiddlers. If you have some other interpretation of what children

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread TonyM
A Quick description, I hope it helps Psudo-Constants TiddlerA has a title or field name To set a constant you need to define a "variable" using the value of the tiddler title or field, however when you use any reference to the title or field it will be a string that refers to the field not

[tw] Re: Using a filter in a list field for sorting purposes

2017-08-10 Thread stevesuny
Thanks, Mark. I think the first mechanism is better for me :) but I appreciate the hack. It is pretty cooli haven't used droppable yet, looks interesting//steve. On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 12:24:49 PM UTC-4, Mark S. wrote: > > Well, the list mechanism specifies the ordering. So you

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
I'm still not understand why the set widget does not work for you. It sets a variable with certain name and that variable is accessible to all it's children . How is your requirement different ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.

[tw] Re: Investigation: Going Shadow

2017-08-10 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
Yes, that's the only way -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to

[tw] Re: Tobias' Delete All Tiddlers By Filter

2017-08-10 Thread codacodercodacoder
Cool. Thanks Mario! On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:50:39 AM UTC-5, PMario wrote: > > Hi, > Try this one: https://wikilabs.github.io/editions/remove-states/ ... it > shouldn't be that destructive, because you can see, what you delete. > -m > -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Tobias' Delete All Tiddlers By Filter

2017-08-10 Thread PMario
Hi, Try this one: https://wikilabs.github.io/editions/remove-states/ ... it shouldn't be that destructive, because you can see, what you delete. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[tw] Re: TW5 So lost i need a map.

2017-08-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
When you use the $(variable)$ construction inside a macro, it substitutes the text literally, without rendering. So when the #*#@&* DO things render? And how do you control it? This is the kind of thing that can make you bang your head against the wall for hours. Fortunately, we now have the

[tw] Re: Presenting: GRAPHS - pies, bars, scatter and whatever turns you on

2017-08-10 Thread codacodercodacoder
I forgot about this little gem! Especially HashStr -- excellent solution to the problem of having to supply/think of IDs per use. I'm using HashStr already :) On Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 8:05:03 AM UTC-5, Thomas Elmiger wrote: > > Hi Mat > > Great to hear that my rpn plugin is of use to

[tw] Tobias' Delete All Tiddlers By Filter

2017-08-10 Thread codacodercodacoder
I stumbled across this and thought it would make a good starting point for a JS macro. Having tried it on a couple of TWs (where I had a ton of archaic temp/state tiddlers I wanted to remove) it seems there is a very

[tw] Re: Presenting: GRAPHS - pies, bars, scatter and whatever turns you on

2017-08-10 Thread Mat
Thomas Elmiger wrote: > > > Your remaining problem with chart slices >50% reminds me of a similar > problem you had with CircleBar … please feel free to steal back from my > variant on https://tid.li/tw5/styles.html in case you want to integrate > something similar in Graphs! > I had totally

[tw] Re: Investigation: Going Shadow

2017-08-10 Thread Mat
As far as I know, a shadow tiddler *is* a tiddler that is in a plugin. So, as far as I know, yeah. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[tw] Investigation: Going Shadow

2017-08-10 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Simple question: is the easiest way to create shadow Tiddlers to put them in a plugin? The Use Case is this: I have created several templates related to Tweeting from TiddlyWiki. These are "ground-zero" and may I want to edit them sometimes ... but also be able to restore the original via

Re: [tw] Re: Comments on an online service

2017-08-10 Thread stefct4
Hi, On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 4:57:36 AM UTC+2, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > > Personally, I'm never going to use a service where "you would get charged > storage plus all of the traffic" unless I'm contracting directly with an > actual service provider. At the very least, I would say,

Re: [tw] TW5 So lost i need a map.

2017-08-10 Thread Arlen Beiler
Check this out, it's a little different: \define myStateTid2() $:/state/$(currentTiddler)$ \define buttontest1() <$button set="$(myStateTid)$" setTo="edit1">Press1 \end \define buttontest2() <$button set=<> setTo="edit2">Press2 \end <> <$set name="myStateTid" value=<>> <> <> <>

Re: [tw] TW5 So lost i need a map.

2017-08-10 Thread Arlen Beiler
Try this: \define myStateTid2() """$:/state/$(currentTiddler)$""" \define buttontest1() <$button set=$(myStateTid)$ setTo="edit1">Press1 \end \define buttontest2() <$button set=<> setTo="edit2">Press2 \end <> <$set name="myStateTid" value=<>> <> <> <> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at

[tw] TW5 So lost i need a map.

2017-08-10 Thread mystikite
I thought i had finally wrapped my head around the difference between $var$ and $(var)$, so i went to test it. Below is my test, and I am at a complete loss for why buttontest1 renders the markup instead of the button, and why buttontest2, when pressed, creates a tiddler that is the exact

Re: [tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Tony, that sounds like advanced requirements for programming ("similar" inheritance, wow!) that requires a concept, something like a data/structure model and documentation – not exactly stuff that should be covered by standard functionality or a beginner documentation ;–) The more we know the

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread TonyM
Thanks Thomas, It looks like I will need to use such a method but I need the constant(s) to be set from a value in an existing tiddler and maintained for that tiddler so some part of a tiddlers name will need to be in the path name to your suggested variable tiddler, then all tiddlers who

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread TonyM
Thanks mark I will revisit. I think I addressed everything including a reload to be sure. I expected it to work as well. I will share when I can get to it. Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread TonyM
Thanks Josiah for your considered response. I will respond at greater length later (as it's bed time in Sydney) but thought I would say a free things. Tiddlywiki is powerful because of its structure and it's interrelated qualities and none should be lost. When I suggested these features be put

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
It's such a simple macro, I couldn't imagine what could go wrong unless we have different expectations for it's usage. Maybe you could post an example or export the tiddler and post here? Comments -- The field "objecttabs" needs to already exist in the same tiddler where you are using <>.

[tw] Re: Presenting: GRAPHS - pies, bars, scatter and whatever turns you on

2017-08-10 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Hi Mat Great to hear that my rpn plugin is of use to others! Your remaining problem with chart slices >50% reminds me of a similar problem you had with CircleBar … please feel free to steal back from my variant on https://tid.li/tw5/styles.html in case you want to integrate something similar

Re: [tw] Comments on an online service

2017-08-10 Thread Jan
I meant the applicant pays a fixed sum in advanced to make his TW-App downloadable in the Appstores for free. Am 10.08.2017 um 13:20 schrieb @TiddlyTweeter: Ciao Jan Can you clarify what you mean here ... :-) Best wishes Josiah Jan wrote: ... Talking monetarisation I could imagine

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Hi Tony, Just a thougt on your search for (pseudo?) CONSTANTs: The most simple way would be to put the constant value in a tiddler of it’s own. If you wand to hide your constants, use a prefix starting with $: e.g. $:/constants/constant-name. This way, the value can be transcluded from

Re: [tw] Comments on an online service

2017-08-10 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Jan Can you clarify what you mean here ... :-) Best wishes Josiah Jan wrote: > > > ... Talking monetarisation I could imagine *free apps which are paid in > advance* ... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe

[tw] Re: [TW5] Desirable core additions

2017-08-10 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao TonyM Good discussion you started. I read it with interest. I'm slightly laterally thinking on it ... (1) -- revision of syntax would likely ONLY be possible in a major revision step ... i.e. for a TW6. So its a Longer Term aim? (2) -- the recurrent documentation saga with TW is a

[tw] Re: How to set value within in the excise dropdown?

2017-08-10 Thread PMario
Hi Jan, You are posting a link that looks like linking to a TW core tiddler, but it wants to download a .html file?! Call me paranoid, but I personally don't download stuff that is presented in that way. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[tw] Re: How to calculate (sum, avg) with fields and store the result in an other field?

2017-08-10 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Hi Uwe Try this structure to sum 4 fields in 1 macrocall: <$macrocall $name="rpn" a=<> b=<> operation="+"/> Hint: in the shortcut <> the tiddler from where to get the field value must be specified in the transclusion. All the best, Thomas Am Dienstag, 8. August 2017 16:28:44 UTC+2 schrieb