Are you on TT to teach mormon doctrine?
DAVEH: No, Perryas I've explained before, that was not what
motivated me to join TT, nor is it the reason I remain. My main focus
was and is to learn about your
(Protestants in general) beliefsand, I must say...I've learned
a lot, though
DAVEH: Thanx for your reply, Christine. I hope somebody else will
give me some insight as to how non-LDS folks perceive this.
Christine Miller wrote:
Hm. Actually, Dave, I do not know how to answer you. I remember
God constantly referred to Ezekiel as "Son of Man," so there is a
DAVEH: Word game, Perry?!?!?! You must realize that you are
trying to force me into a dilemma. IF I were to answer as you
want me to, I would be lying. Though my memory may be weak, I surely
know my reasons for joining TT and continue to remain steadfast in my
explanation of why I came to
DAVEH: I've noticed that sometimes the guy who made those suggestions
isn't too warm to the idea either.
:-D
TruthTalk has too many posts for active
people to keep up. I have suggested in the past that we limit the
number of posts per day, but such an idea has not been warmly
All three of those say it is a false religion.
DAVEH: And you would give any consideration that what I say might be
true, Perry? Do you want me to dig out any of the exchanges you had
with DavidM about what you think of any truth that may be found in
Mormonism.?
As I've previously
DAVEH: Passing is for young football players, and race car drivers,
Terry. I don't think you qualify in either instance. Listen Terry,
don't you realize that the older you get, the worse your eyesight will
become. Just let those giggling scantily clad young ladies read the
mic for you! You
Christine:Did I 'miss' your response to the query
concerning those who'know' Christ as a living presence in their lives but, fail
to 'know' the meaning of Scripture in some or, many areas. (such as you just
exhibited)?
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To:
I have never observed otherwise.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 03:06
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of Teac
Are you on TT to teach mormon
There are a variety of understandings
forSatan in Job, the serpent in Genesis, the Nephilim in Genesis and on
and on...Why it is that some balk at my little formula continues to
puzzle me when, IMO, all TT participants demonstrate it's accuracy regularly.
(Text + believer + Spirit +
C'mon Perry! Why not just take a poll of all on TT?
I, for one, vote with Dave Hansen on this.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 03:36
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon
angels. was: Dave uses
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: Lance Muir
Sent: May 26, 2005 14:42
Subject: farewell to TT -- long but most real answer
Lance, this may be too long to post on TT. I'll let
you be the judge. I'm writing as if to you--you asked the question, and besides,
that keeps
Perhaps in that which Debbie has written. There
exists a forum (to be named off list) through which we (Jonathan, Debbie,
Caroline , Bill) might fruitfully engage one another.
Interested?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
IFF he is not nuts.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 26, 2005 19:20
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fond Farewells- Salvation
Written with a light heart, a smile and a tongue firmly in
Bishop JD:May I suggest a course entitled
'Empowering the Church for First World Re-evangelization: Theological and
Missional Themes' whose theological center is the recovery of trinitarian
theology and Jesus' Gospel of the Kingdom (in it's broadest sense - the sense in
which Jesus meant it
What did Christine say below that exhibits such a
failure to understand? All three were cursed including
the creation for their sakes... So how does your
"other" gospel say the scenario goes? jt
On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:17:37 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christine:Did I
It's only IYO Lance because your own lack of
understanding stands out like a sore thumb most of the time
and because all you will accept is your own theology
there will never be other than theological Bable in your eyes.
On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:23:40 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm just re-referencing the presence of diverse
understandings of Scripture by genuine believers. You don't disagree with that
do you, Judy? Is there, in all cases, ONE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING? I'd be
interested in hearing back on this? I am prepared, unless anyone out there
chooses to
Any inclination, Judy, to tell us that, in all
cases, when you cite Scripture in support of some position or other, that that
citation is, in reality, the sole meaning of that/those Scripture(s)? Do you at
least acknowledge that diverse understandings exist, by genuine believers
(exclude me
You can forget about forming your liberal church, John. Someone has beat
you to it.
The Church of Anything Goes. I had an epiphany last night. I am tired of
having to pray every day for the finances of this ministry. I am tired of
people sending me nasty and hateful emails. I am tired
Lance Muir wrote:
There are a variety of
understandings forSatan in Job, the serpent in Genesis, the Nephilim
in Genesis and on and on...Why it is that some balk at my
little formula continues to puzzle me when, IMO, all TT participants
demonstrate it's accuracy
Lance Muir wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Debbie
Sawczak
To: Lance Muir
Sent: May 26, 2005 14:42
Subject: farewell to TT -- long but most real answer
Lance, this may be too long to post
on TT. I'll let you be the judge. I'm writing as if to
If my husband werent the computer geek I
wouldnt even have one!
Don't you just hate this. You pay the
big bucks and then, well, you have so little control over the thing.
John
Frequently. Guess I'll have to quit that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:15 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave
Interesting. Be sure to give us an
update. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:38
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
Terry if you follow Daves advice
you will need rubbers; not leathers. Better keep your Bride at your side
instead. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 1:55 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
Perry, I think we should all agree that
Dave does push his mormon views on TT (just as we all push ours), but that he does
not concede that as his primary motivation for being here. Perhaps it is subconscious
in his case. I know I personally feel manipulated by the mormons whenever
I try
Izzy says of Mormonism:'Not worth 'fighting'
about.' I'm thinking she might wish to qualify that as the nature of God and the
Gospel are indeed worth very serious engagement ('fighting' aside).
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Show me, please.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 07:53
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Method of
Teaching LDS doctrine on TT
Lance, there is definitely only one accurate
understanding of scriptureand that is Gods intended meaning.
Granted, there are deeper levels of accurate understanding, but
none of them invalidate the others. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance
Diverse understandings of
scripture by genuine believers is obvious. But not diverse accurate
understanding. Just because genuine believers have differing understandings
does not make them all accurate. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
BIG SMILEY FACE!!! Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 5:35 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: daily devotional (Fri. 5-27-2005)Liveprayer.com]
You can forget about
FYI, I also found Debbie to be a different
person offline. It goes both waysjust the nature of a public forum.
Blessings, Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:00 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject:
(Ill leave you to decide whether I
meant computer or husband.)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:03 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave
Good point, Lance. However it is my
nature (calling?) to give my best attempts at explaining the gospel
until/unless I am convinced that the person is not really open to such and is,
in fact, only toying with me. Then I leave them to their own
devices. But I hang out, always hoping they
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Terry if you
follow Daves advice
you will need rubbers; not leathers. Better keep your Bride at your
side
instead. Iz
I intend to.
Couldn't do without her.
Izzy says re:understanding of scripture: 'none of
them invalidate the others.' IFF I have 'UNDERSTOOD YOU' correctly then,
shouldn't you just be amening everyone's interpretation/understanding of every
scripture?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To:
Charles:Are you angrier at the Mormons than God is?
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 08:57
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
Socratic Method of Teac
Dave, do you
a visionary comment or a present time reality? Either way you have nailed the assignment.
JD-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 05:37:33 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels.
Lance, thanks for posting this very candid and informative post. It is
almost always a good exercise to see oneself as others see you.
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: farewell to TT -- long but
This IS a course that I currently have for sale on
24 CDs.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 09:04
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
No need to quit that because a few of our mail readers can't display it.
Express yourself. We will just think the message is from Jesus.
From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk]
Lance,
I am not angry at them. I am pained by their inability to reason outside
of Joseph Smith. They do not think for themselves at all. When it comes to
spiritual things, they cling to Smithism like they are clinging to a sinking
life raft in a storm. By the way, I DO beleive that the
Perry:There are some, you and I among them, on TT who similarly 'cling' to
that which is simply not so concerning the nature of God and His Gospel.
Would you not agree? Does one find penetrating 'that' any easier?
Lance
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
DAVE: ??? I don't understand your answer, Lance. Are you saying you
think I am here to teach Mormon doctrine?
Lance Muir wrote:
I have never observed otherwise.
-
Original Message -
From:
Dave
Hansen
To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
Lance,
I agree with you. We all want to be in truth, and cling dearly to and
defend that which we believe to be true. I typically have not spent my time
trying to penetrate 'that'. My reason is that, first of all, I consider most
of those issues to be in house debates. Christians reasoning
-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 07:38:09 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: daily devotional (Fri. 5-27-2005)Liveprayer.com]
BIG SMILEY FACE!!! Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perry:Then carry on with that to which you 'feel drawn'. I engaged in
similar activity for about 18 months some 20+ years ago. I've come to rather
different conclusions concerning the intrinsic value of such activity.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Dave,
I respect your position, and I beleive that we may have settled our first
point of contention.
While you may not consider some of your responses to be teaching
mormonism, I most whole-heartedly believe that some of it is.
When you answer questions that are asked, and even when
Now, just who was it that was speaking of 'Babel'
and, interpretation? Ahh, it was I. No Dave, I was agreeing with you
saying that THAT WAS NOT WHY YOU WERE ON TT! That is what I meant by saying 'I
never thought otherwise'- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
How did I misinterpret God's actions in Genesis? Why do you think God never addressed the serpent?
Lance wrote:
Did I 'miss' your response to the query concerning those who'know' Christ as a living presence in their lives but, fail to 'know' the meaning of Scripture in some or, many areas?
I
Lance, are you offering an explanation to the passage or just a lamentation? Tell us what you think.
Lance wrote:
= theological Babel
Ooh like the tower? :-)
BlessingsLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a variety of understandings forSatan in Job, the serpent in Genesis, the
Dave,
Our second point of contention is that I feel you have repeatedly
maligned me by misrepresenting my position with respect to my belief that
you indeed are teaching mormon doctrine on TT.
I have repeatedly said that I believe TT to be an open forum, and that
you, as well as any
Whoa Terry, great post! To hear you talk about tolerance for beastiality or adultery as the homosexuals demand tolerance puts the issue well into perspective. Amen, sir.
BlessingsTerry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can forget about forming your liberal church, John. Someone has beatyou to
For the most part, Debbie speaks for me as well. The only exception might
be that in off list discussions, I have not observed people being too much
different, but this might be flavored by differences in how we filter what
people write. I try hard not to read between the lines more than I
Lance wrote:
There exists a forum (to be named off list) through which we
(Jonathan, Debbie, Caroline , Bill) might fruitfully engage
one another. Interested?
Feel free to name the forum on this list if you like, Lance. Is the forum
open to other TruthTalk members or only John and those you
NO. You obviously just dont get
it, Lance. You seem to think that everyones differing opinions are all
correct. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:53 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk]
Yes. You think everyone is right except
for the fundies. Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 6:53 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk]
[TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses
Izzy wrote:
Calling DM nuts is an ad hom attack,
and entirely uncalled for.
Lance wrote:
IFF he is not nuts.
It is an ad hominem argument even if it were true. The truthfulness of the
statement does not matter. What matters is whether he is speaking to the
man or addressing the point
Just keep doing whatever the Lord asks you
to do, Perry. Blessings, Iz
-Original Message-
I pray that if this compulsion to reach out to
momons is of Him that it persist, and that if it is not that he remove
it.
Perry
To clarify, Lance, none of the CORRECT
interpretations invalidate the othersthey must be in agreement with
them, just perhaps some have deeper understanding. Do you need examples?
Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, May
I did NOT do so, Christine. You appear
openand, this is excellent. When you reach your Dad's age (you should live
so long!) you will have come to an understanding more expansive than the one you
now have. May you continue to grow in grace.
- Original Message -
From:
Just a lamentation, Christine. Your dad is, IMO, in
the business of offering explanations for passages. I rarely engage in such, as
all on TT know, due to the fact the nobody every changes their mind.
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To:
So then, Christine, you 'would' have picked up the
first stone?
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 11:32
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd:
daily devotional (Fri. 5-27-2005)Liveprayer.com]
Take my opinion, please? I've been reading ME but,
have you? You jest, you young thing you.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 11:40
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk]
[TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom'
Yes, mommy, I do. Please?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 11:54
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk]
[TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom' response to 911??
To clarify, Lance,
none of the
Is there a moderator in the house? Izzy is a bona fide author. We know that
she'd run a tight ship. She'd pare the list down to 2 or 3 in no time at
all. How 'bout it Iz?.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 11:48
So wherewas the concernwhen Deegan called me a liar half a dozen times? -Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:24:35 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments
Is there a moderator in the house? Izzy is
These problems -- did they include Deegan and his use of the word "liar?" -Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:48:53 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments
Izzy wrote:
Calling DM nuts is an ad hom attack,
Author?-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:09:04 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was: Dave uses Socratic Met
This IS a course that I currently have for sale
It will be open to all. Keep watch!
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 11:37
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fond
Farewells- Salvation
Lance wrote:
There exists a forum (to be
I agree with Perry. The shoe is close to my size.
JD-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 06:08:12 -0700Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: farewell to TT -- long but most real answer
Lance, thanks for posting this
Lance wrote to Christine:
When you reach your Dad's age ... you will have come
to an understanding more expansive than the one you
now have.
Very true. Nevertheless, there are very few things that I believed when I
was Christine's age that I would say that I was wrong about. Mostly, I was
John wrote:
So where was the concern when Deegan called
me a liar half a dozen times?
Just for the record, John, I wrote Gary privately about that and his
response was asking me to dig up the old posts for him. Then he posted
something to TruthTalk that basically said he wanted people to be
John wrote:
These problems -- did they include Deegan
and his use of the word liar?
Yes.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
Darryl Johnson Charles Ringma (speakers -
it's an audio course dumbkoff! - (AD HOMINIMUM ADVISORY) Lance is at it again,
Gary.
PS:Seriously, please don't 'fire' Gary. He is
remarkable. I love the big lug.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
May the truth be sith you Davi-wan.
Popcorn anyone??? Yes thanks.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 13:17
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Knowledge of Truth and Star Wars Trivia
Lance wrote to Christine:
I am used to Kevin -- you need to understnd that using the "n" word was like me leaning over, slapping you on the back, and saying, "so this confirms it, youARE really nuts."
I meant it in a friendly sort of way. I will refrain from that word in the future.
JD-Original Message-From:
Christine Miller wrote:
Whoa Terry, great post! To hear you talk about tolerance for
beastiality or adultery as the homosexuals demand tolerance puts the
issue well into perspective. Amen, sir.
Blessings
Thank you
Thank god I am not German, or I would be affended !!Gaa -- re-Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:36:00 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] mormon angels. was:
Okay, I have a minute before dashing out
the door. How about God is love? A child (or a
liberal with childish thinking) will think, Oh, God loves meHe
will only do things a loving father would do. This is absolutely
True! However, when this child gets a bit older he realizes that God
is
Excellent! Thanks.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 13:51
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE:
[Bulk] [TruthTalk] A possible 'kingdom' response to 911??
Okay, I have a minute
before
John wrote:
I will refrain from that word in the future.
It is not the word, per se. Calling people pretender or hypocrite is
worse, in my opinion. The real problem is turning the subject to being
about the person you are discussing an issue with rather than continuing the
dialogue.
Lance
David Miller wrote:
When Jesus comes to establish his kingdom physically by
subduing the nations of the earth, he will do so with a rod
of iron. Do you believe this?
Lance wrote:
No I do not
How do you interpret the following passage?
Psalms 2:7-12
(7) I will declare the decree: the LORD
Lance wrote:
There are a variety of understandings for Satan in Job, the
serpent in Genesis, the Nephilim in Genesis and on and on ...
Why it is that some balk at my little formula continues to puzzle
me when, IMO, all TT participants demonstrate it's accuracy
regularly. (Text + believer +
Lance wrote:
Is there, in all cases, ONE CORRECT UNDERSTANDING?
I'd be interested in hearing back on this?
It depends upon the subject, Lance. If one person says Jesus is not the
Christ, and somebody else says that Jesus is not the Christ, then there is
only one correct understanding here
Psalm 2 addresses the themes of 'God's Annointed' and, of His universal
dominion. The theme you 'wish' for me to acknowledge is more that of the
'singer/psalmist', not that of the Lord Himself.
As to Revelation David, I'm not a literalist when it comes to this book. I
believe it to have masked
Izzy wrote:
... there is definitely only one accurate understanding
of scripture-and that is God's intended meaning.
Granted, there are deeper levels of accurate
understanding, but none of them invalidate the others.
Lance wrote:
IFF I have 'UNDERSTOOD YOU' correctly then, shouldn't you
This what I like about Linda -- she doesn't stay mad long -- except with me, of course. But I don't mind. She gets enough humor in there that Ireally do not mind.
The ad hom --- it is as bad as it gets, which is somewhat encouraging to me. We are big boys and girls. Bill Keller's piece did
Ahhh 'the imaginings of the mind! That's when you (David Izzie) impose
your tradition on the Scriptures As I've read the two of you over this
extended period of time I've sensed a sort of syncretism from both of you
(as you probably think of me).
You both appear to be
What you have said is genuinely void of meaning. You've simply said what I
posted a year or two back 'My theology can beat up your theology')
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 14:31
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
That is true --hopefully you will come to see your complicity in the problem, as well.-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:07:22 -0400Subject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments
John wrote:
I will
Perry wrote:
No need to quit that because a few of our
mail readers can't display it.
Most email readers probably can display it. They simply need to be setup
with the right character set.
I use Outlook Express and it displays the smiley faces fine. My font
encoding uses Western European
-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:02:21 -0400Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Izzy's "J" smiley.
Perry wrote:
No need to quit that because a few of our
mail readers can't display it.
Most email readers probably can
Lance wrote:
Your dad is, IMO, in the business of offering explanations
for passages. I rarely engage in such, as all on TT know,
due to the fact the nobody every changes their mind.
The goal is not to change minds, but to add to the foundation of knowledge
which already exists. Those who
Well then, may those who have ears.I believe in the separation of
the church and religion.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 15:26
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] Separation of Church and State
Lance
Subject: 500 Employees
Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than
500 employees and has the following statistics:
*29 have been accused of spousal abuse
*7 have been arrested for fraud
*19 have been accused of writing bad checks
*117 have directly or
Lance against displays his slick ability to miss the entire point. Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 12:58 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
I thought you were going to identify a local church
(same thing)
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 27, 2005 16:00
Subject: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Fortune
500 company]
Subject: 500 EmployeesCan you
Cool! Will you send us a copy of the article? (Don't be surprised if the
reporter twists and misstates everything you said and tries to make you look
bad--this is common with reporters. I don't trust them as far as I can throw
them. But in this case you had to try to get the Truth out.) Izzy
Where do you go to church, Lance?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance
MuirSent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:09 PMTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [Bulk] [TruthTalk] [Fwd:
Fortune 500 company]
I thought you were going to identify a local church
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
