Having trunk and branches folders seems to be the most common layout across
other projects.
Pete
this is the right thing to do.
Pete
On 06/01/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having trunk and branches folders seems to be the most common layout
across other projects.
Pete
How do I create new Components in Jira for Tuscany. I'd like:
cpp Build
cpp SCA
cpp SDO
Pete
The current cpp SDO and SCA were developed using MS Visual Studio on Windows
and eclipse + CDT on Linux. For a command line build on linux we simply
created a shell script that used the makefiles generated by the CDT managed
make.
I would like to create a more robust and portable build
I'm not sure where the SDO spec is being discussed. It is separate from the
C++ CI group.
On 09/03/06, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant,
At the moment, neither the SDO nor the SCA specification lists are
publicly viewable.
For SCA, we are investigating setting up a public website
/cpp/sdo/lib
directory.
Also, wouldn't it be better to use the latest version of libxml2 being
used
(which is 2.6.23)?
On 06/03/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A stable version of C++ Tuscany can be found at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-stable
fixed as TUSCANY-108 on Jira
On 10/03/06, Colin Thorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried building SCA using Axis 1.5. I received an error:
Linking...
Creating library Debug/tuscany_sca.lib and object Debug/tuscany_sca.exp
Logger.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol public:
Yes. I will update the instructions for running the tests on Windows.
On 10/03/06, Colin Thorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've taken a new extract of the code from SVN, and I have built SDO and
SCA
(for C++). When I run the SCA test program (tuscany_sca_test.exe) I get an
exception:
On 07/04/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody objects, I can move the wsdl.import up in the XSD. I'm in the
middle of changes to this project anyway.
Where in the source tree is the schema you are using? Is it in spec/... ?
--
Pete
Ignore that.. I found it :-(
On 07/04/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where in the source tree is the schema you are using? Is it in spec/... ?
--
Pete
--
Pete
The current SDO implementation handles the mapping of QName to the SDO Uri
type as per the specification. So if I use XSDHelper to load a schema which
defines a property as type xs:QName, e.g.xs:attribute name=joe
type=xs:QName /then use XMLHelper to load my xml containing
to DataFactory.
Is anyone else having similar requirements?
regards,
Ed.
On 21/04/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current SDO implementation handles the mapping of QName to the SDO
Uri
type as per the specification. So if I use XSDHelper to load a schema
which
defines
Geoff, I've seen this behaviour too using both TortoiseSVN and subclipse
from eclipse. It's not just on the cpp tree of Tuscany. It seems to happen
fairly randomly.
On 26/04/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried to retrieve the source for SDO for C++ from the repository
using
A separate thread to discuss SCA/SDO interop testing sounds like a good
idea.
I'd like to focus here on what we need to complete to have a viable binary
release: code(functional content), documentation, testing, samples... etc.
and then come up with a timetable/ordering of the tasks.
Cheers,
--
Great. I'll take a look at it and see if I can use it to achieve what I
need.
Cheers,
On 02/05/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago, Pete raised a requirement to create Types in a DataFactory
which are of type URI, but know that they came from a QName originally.
We store
Ed, this allows me to what I want. There is a problem though... you
need copy constructor and operator= methods on TypeDefinitions,
TypeDefinition and PropertyDefinition to copy the impl. I'll raise a Jira
for this (and probably fix it).
Cheers,
On 02/05/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED
Do you mean today .. May 5th?
--
Pete
We certainly need to get some C++ information up there so... +1 from me.
On 12/05/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone object if I move the wiki around so we have a common Tuscany main
page and sub-pages for java, c++ and php?
--
Pete
Hi Geoff. With your broking experience please try and break the code...
then fix it of course.
Cheers,
On 12/05/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, my name is Geoff Winn.
I've recently started looking at the SDO for C++ code having previously
worked on a variety of message
ooh that's an interesting one an I will defer to the legal folk if any turn
up ... but... I believe the format is
Copyright %START_DATE%, %LAST_MODIFIED_DATE% The Apache Software Foundation
or its licensors, as applicable.
So should probably read Copyright 2005, 2006 The Apache Software
That's a good point. A call to initialize the runtime passing the system
root and default module is a possibility. I'll look into it.
On 17/05/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the tuscany c++ SCA, and am finding it quite inconvenient that
the root and default module are
Java has a TuscanyRuntime to specify the default module so I will do the
same. Something like:
TuscanyRuntime::start(default_moduleComponent_name);
You will still need to set the TUSCANY_SCACPP_SYSTEM_ROOT to the root
deployment folder for the system.
Cheers,
On 17/05/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL
As mentioned previously we would be a like to have a binary release of the
C++ code by ApacheCon Europe.
I'd like to propose an IRC chat on Tuesday 6th June 17:00 BST (18:00 GMT)
12:00 (Eastern) 09:00 (Pacific) to finalize content and schedule to achieve
this.
As a starting point, and for
Andrew, great stuff. When you have something for us to look at you can post
a patch on the jira.
Please join us for an IRC chat tomorrow (I'll be sending a reminder note
soon)
Cheers,
On 05/06/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I've been taking a look at Axis2C recently and
A reminder:
We will have an IRC chat on Tuesday 6th June 17:00 BST (18:00 GMT) 12:00
(Eastern) 09:00 (Pacific) to finalize content and schedule to achieve this.
Any input from Java Tuscans on their recent release experience would be
welcome.
The chat takes place on the freenode IRC network,
robbinspg The purpose of this chat is to decide what we need to do to get
a C++ binary release available
robbinspg I'm not 100% on the Apache mechanism and logistics to do this
so that is one item discuss.
jsdelfino hi
robbinspg I'd also like to run through what function/code needs to go in
and
As we work towards a binary C++ release we need to elect a release manager.
I'm happy to volunteer for this.
--
Pete
In the Tuscany C++ source tree we have a subproject for SDO and one for SCA
(which prereqs the SDO build). For a binary release should we combine the
build output into a single zip ro have a separate SDO zip?
If we do combine them we have a further option of the unzipped layout having
a separate
OK... as I need to start on this several days ago I'm going to produce
seeparate zips for SDO and SCA.
On 08/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Tuscany C++ source tree we have a subproject for SDO and one for
SCA (which prereqs the SDO build). For a binary release should we
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-429
Project: Tuscany
Type: New Feature
Components: C++ SCA
Versions: Cpp-current
Reporter: Pete Robbins
Assignee: Pete Robbins
Fix For: Cpp-current
Attachments: axis2c_wsentrypoint.patch, axis2c_wsentrypoint_tests.patch
Provide
/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, great stuff. I'll review and apply the patch asap.
On 11/06/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
The patch for WS EntryPoint is attached to the Jira - also see the patch
containing the tests and updated samples for how
In the C++ implementation you would only get a single property
implementation. It's type would be sca:JavaImplementation which is a sub
type of Implemetation. I think this is correct as the schema tells us that
when loading the instance document to treat implementation.java as
implementation so
The C++ serializer works as Jeremy states. We would serialize this as
implementation.java. Our implementation does keep extra information about
the substitution groups and also what the original local name was when the
instance doc was deserialized. So if it was deserialized as
Andrew, thanks for that. I'll check these out and apply them soon.
Cheers,
On 16/06/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the absence of any sounds of disapproval, I have put 2 patches up for
these issues. The 461 patch probably contains the entirety of the 462
patch,
as I fixed 462
I have posted a preliminary distro for Tuscany C++ for Linux on
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/. Windows builds should be posted within
the next day or 2.
Please note this is NOT a release candidate .. yet. I would appreciate it if
someone could download and sanity check the distro and
The linux -bin- disto is built on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
On 24/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted a preliminary distro for Tuscany C++ for Linux on
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/. Windows builds should be posted
within the next day or 2.
Please note
Patches checked, tested and applied.
Thank you!!
On 23/06/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheers Pete!
On 6/23/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
I have noticed these and they are on my TODO list (together with your
fixes
to the scagen tool). I hope to check
I also applied your patches for TUSCANY-461 and 462
Cheers,
On 24/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patches checked, tested and applied.
Thank you!!
On 23/06/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheers Pete!
On 6/23/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
thanks for trying it out. The name of the source zip was the default from
automake. I agree putting -src- in it would be clearer.
I'll fix the Makefile.am.
Cheers,
On 24/06/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
The linux -bin- disto is built on Red Hat Enterprise
On 24/06/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used this binary distro but my machine is Fedora Core3. I got the
following problem building the Calculator sample:
g++ -g -O2 -o calculator_client Calc.o
-L/home/jeremy/Desktop/tuscany_sca-bin-0.1.incubating-M1/lib
-ltuscany_sca
Sounds good. I'll give it a go.
On 27/06/06, Andrew Borley (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-471?page=all ]
Andrew Borley updated TUSCANY-471:
--
Attachment: TUSCANY-471.patch
This patch uses a
Works a treat. Patch is checked in.
Thanks
On 27/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good. I'll give it a go.
On 27/06/06, Andrew Borley (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-471?page=all ]
Andrew Borley updated
On 27/06/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent a little time playing with the C++ SCA implementation. I want
to
replay my understanding to see if it is correct.
When constructing a service that will have a web service binding you have
to
provide a number of things including
Looking at the include path it appears you have not set the required
environment variables: TUSCANY_SDOCPP, TUSCANY_SCACPP.
Cheers,
On 27/06/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I down loaded the binary distro unpacked it downloaded Axis2C too and
unpacked but didn't do anything else with it.
Thanks. Hopefully we will be able post something today,
On 27/06/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Pete
When the C++ win release is available I can give it a try and provide
feedback.
- Luciano
*Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
06/24/2006 07:22 AM Please respond
- Im sure the linux one
will be the one most people want anyway.
cheers,
Ed.
On 24/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/06/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used this binary distro but my machine is Fedora Core3. I got the
following problem building the Calculator
Forgot to say that the instructions for building the samples are in the
samples/INSTALL file.
On 28/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the include path it appears you have not set the required
environment variables: TUSCANY_SDOCPP, TUSCANY_SCACPP.
Cheers,
--
Pete
There is a refreshed version available at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg
Linux bin build is RHEL3. Windows src and bin now available.
Please give these a try and raise problems!!
Cheers,
--
Pete
as a prereq. Is this really necessary for just SDO?
Pete Robbins wrote:
There is a refreshed version available at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg
Linux bin build is RHEL3. Windows src and bin now available.
Please give these a try and raise problems!!
Cheers
VC 6. Ed is working on a build for VC 7.
On 29/06/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows binary distros which CPP compiler? Should it be listed under
the prereqs as needed for windows source and to build samples ?
Pete Robbins wrote:
There is a refreshed version available at:
http
yes!
On 29/06/06, cr22rc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there files missing in the windows binary distro in the samples
directory (i.e. INSTALL, reademe etc)?
Pete Robbins wrote:
There is a refreshed version available at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg
Linux bin build is RHEL3
I've checked in a fix but have not re-generated the zips yet. Thanks for
finding that.
On 29/06/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes!
On 29/06/06, cr22rc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there files missing in the windows binary distro in the samples
directory (i.e. INSTALL
There a number of problems with the windows zips... missing folders etc. I
will be fixing these ASAP.
--
Pete
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here.
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
Would all interested parties take some time to review this so that we can
either re-spin the release or vote on it asap.
The website documentation is out of date and will be re-written to sync
There is a problem with the Windows src zip for sca to do with filename
lengths. I will fix it and re-post a new zip.
On 06/07/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here.
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
Would all interested
to
update the zip.
Any ideas on why WinXP zip expand has a problem?? I'm fairly sure that it is
to do with a long path name.
Cheers,
On 06/07/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a problem with the Windows src zip for sca to do with filename
lengths. I will fix it and re-post a new
on Windows using the command line,
devstudio6 and devstudio7. The builds all work fine, but the calculator
sample on studio7 only half works as the project descriptions are missing
some of the proxies/wrappers. Add works but Div doesnt.
Im just going to fix that
Ed.
On 06/07/06, Pete Robbins
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
The code is tagged in svn:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-0.1.incubating-M1/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/cpp-0.1.incubating-M1/%C2%A0
Please
+1
that just about covers it from my point of view. I'd also be interested in
experimenting with a 1hr email session. Email is pretty fast nowadays and
refreshing and responding via the mailing list could also work. It would
also remove the really annoying thing about IRC which is the loss of
Hi Martin.
Using stdcxx is certainly on our list of things to investigate. There are 2
ways in which we can use a C++ standard library:
1) Internally withing our own implementation code
2) Exposed on user APIs
We currently use stl within our implementation and the use of stl classes on
our
.
-- Luciano
*Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
07/05/2006 08:02 PM Please respond to
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org cc
Subject
C++ M1 Release Candidate
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here.
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
That looks like output from the visual studio build. Did you try the command
line?
Cheers,
On 07/07/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pete,
I found one issue.
I used VC6 to attempt to build SDO and I get some problems during the
copyout. I'll raise a JIRA for this.
Linking...
be great if some of you C++ guys could be around on the mailing
list and IRC to answer any questions about C++ setup I may have.
Thanks,
...ant
On 7/6/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted a candidate for the first C++ release here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC1
On 07/07/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just one quick question... are we going to make the final C++ M1 Release
as
a non-debug build ?
I think we probably should ultimately make the bin release a non-debug
build. For this release I'm not sure. If enough folk think it's
From the source distro on linux you should be able to just run ./sdotest.sh
from the top level folder. We should write a sdotest.cmd to do the same on
win.
On 07/07/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point, you should raise a JIRA that the build.cmd doesnt run it
automatically.
It looks like the ws call is getting into the component and that is working
fine. The error is when we are trying to convert the dataobject returned
from the calculator sample to an axiom object before returning it over the
wire. I haven't seen this behaviour before.
Before starting the axis
Axis2\lib should definitely be on the path. Do you have libxml2 on your
path? On wiindows you also need iconv and zlib on the path. Here'w what the
Axis2C doc says:
You also need the following dlls
- libxml2.dll [http://www.xmlsoft.org - download the version =
libxml2-2.6.20.win32]
-
There are obviously some problems in the install and run doc + some bugs so
I thinke we need to fix these problems and re-spin the candidate. Please
continue to find problems... it is much appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Pete
The reference to xmlTextReaderConstEncoding is from Axis2C. Have you tried
an axis2C sample to see if you have that installed correctly?
What version of libxml2 do you have? Can you post what is on your PATH
environment here.
We'll re-work the doc and rebuild the release in the next couple of
to use isn't very clear in the INSTALL doc), but
still
get the xmlTextReaderConstEncoding could not be located error. Could you
list out exactly what environment variables I should have set and what
should be in my PATH?
...ant
On 7/8/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Axis2\lib
On 10/07/06, Edward Slattery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure I agree with that. The dlls appear in the bin directory - thats
what is required on the PATH.
You are of course correct.
(Note to self: drink coffee before reading mail and replying)
--
Pete
I am going to change the windows binary distribution to a Release build
rather than Debug The MS debug dlls may not be available for all users.
A debug build will still be possible using the source release.
--
Pete
Thanks for trying this out. We will add the prereq info to the
documentation.
Andy, as you are working on the doc ... ;-)
Cheers,
--
Pete
Many thanks Andy. It looks good. I'll apply the patches later today.
On 11/07/06, Andrew Borley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just added a further patch on that jira that adds a document which
explains how to create, build and run a Tuscany SCA C++ component.
Cheers
Andy
On 7/10/06, Andrew
with
ASF incompatible licenses then that's a compelling reason not to so they
should be listed out in the install notes.
Do you have a list of these dependencies with incompatible licenses? Not
sure if I've downloaded them so maybe that's why I can't get it to work.
,...ant
On 7/12/06, Pete Robbins
I have posted a 2nd candidate for the first C++ release here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-2
Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release distributions. Please
take some time to download the distributions, review them and test them
in your environment before voting.
The vote is
was asked to vote on this. And yes as committer I can vote if
this is really is ready as a separate distro ? Hmm, a package without a
single sample, a single smoke test ? How do I or even you know if it
even works?
Pete Robbins wrote:
I have posted a 2nd candidate for the first C++ release
On 13/07/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep - go for it. You have committer access? Make us some.
Well I was asked to vote on this. And yes as committer I can vote if
this is really is ready as a separate distro ? Hmm, a package without a
single sample, a single smoke test ? How do I or
In case anyone hasn't picked this up from the usr list... I'm assuming JUG
is Java User Group
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephan Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07-Jul-2006 16:04
Subject: tuSCAny talk at BeJUG
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Hi,
Is there anybody out there who
On Jul 13, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Pete Robbins wrote:
In case anyone hasn't picked this up from the usr list... I'm
assuming JUG
is Java User Group
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stephan Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07-Jul-2006 16:04
Subject: tuSCAny talk at BeJUG
To: tuscany-user
comments inline:
On 14/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the RC2 binary distribution, and was able to run the Calculator
samples including the Calculator Web Service.
The binary distributions look pretty good to me, I just found a few
minor issues that should be
+1
The trunk is dead. Long live the trunk!
--
Pete
Sebastien, good to have you on board!
Please feel free to update the doc if you see anything that needs doing. I
hope to have an RC3 available today which has (hopefully) better doc and
also samples added in to the SDO distribution. I think the only thing
missing is the doc on running the SDO
thanks. I'll correct those
Cheers,
On 17/07/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cpp\sdo\projects\tuscany_sdo\build_instructions.txt
The versions required are these:
libxml2-2.6.20.win32
iconv-1.9.1.win32
zlib-1.2.2.win32
cpp/sdo/GettingStarted.html
has
libxml2
I think they were added as we had problems with the windows build so I'd
leave them there for now. We can re-check after we get the release done.
Cheers,
On 17/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm adjusting the svn:ignore properties in the C++ source tree and just
I've applied this patch. It works fine in VC6.
Cheers,
On 17/07/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried compiling the Tuscany SDO CPP with MS Visual C++ 2005 Express
Edition http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/visualC/default.aspx
which you can download for free, but need to
Just checked. Looks like it is misisng from SCA samples bin distro. Looks ok
in the src distro?
Cheers,
On 17/07/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The windows cpp build doesn't seem to be doing this... note
GettingStarted.html in the root is there... the samples one is not there.
... and the linux src and bin distros for sdo and sca I'm on the case!
On 17/07/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just checked. Looks like it is misisng from SCA samples bin distro. Looks
ok in the src distro?
Cheers,
On 17/07/06, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The windows
I have posted a 3rd candidate for the first C++ release here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-3
Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release distributions. Please
take some time to download the distributions, review them and test them
in your environment before voting.
The vote is
know I'll put a patch up, otherwise not worth
bothering with.
+1 for this release
Andy
On 7/18/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted a 3rd candidate for the first C++ release here:
http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-3
Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release
this. ... not a show stopper but thought I
mentioned it. BTW once I added those the sample did run.
Pete Robbins wrote:
I am going to refresh the distro zips in about 1 hrs time to include
the fix
that Sebastien found. Also some script errors.
Cheers
DOH! minor problem with the Windows src distro where a directory structure
is missing from the sample :-(
Re-creating distro and will update in 1hr.
--
Pete
I have refreshed the distros. Please vote on the release candidate available
here: http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/RC-3b
Apologies for any inconvenience.
Cheers,
--
Pete
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'll certainly look into seeing
how we can use this in Tuscany.
Cheers,
--
Pete
+1 from me
--
Pete
Looks interesting. One quick comment: what is Object in C++ terms? ;-)
On 20/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked in a first attempt at a class diagram representing the
recursive assembly model:
a passable wine, sometimes exceptional.
Anyho... as the sandbox code has moved to trunk I think it should no longer
be referred to as Chianti. It's Tuscany ... maybe qualified with Java.
So, discussions on Chianti spi should just be [Tuscany] [Java] spi
[delete as appropriate]
So if everyone
With more than 72hrs since the refreshed distro and 4 +1 votes I have asked
the incubator PMC to vote for this release.
Cheers,
Pete
I have been using eclipse for svn access and editting but building via the
command line (as I was trying to get a working command line build!). I
started off using CDT and will probably go back to that. Any tool to help
with the automake/conf would be great!! so I will take a look at KDevelop.
Great stuff. I will go back to using CDT now the automake is kind of stable
;-)
At one point I checked in cdt project files into svn. Do you think this is
worthwhile?
Cheers,
On 21/07/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just finished configuring a Tuscany C++ development
1 - 100 of 867 matches
Mail list logo
