Chuck, please forgive me if it looks like I'm jumping into a
Moderator issue; that is not my intent! As a private citizen and
consultant and ex-list-host, I'd like to address this current
discussion.
I think that list members like Tony G and Susan J are being unfairly
castigated (no R in
All
I'm with Tony on this.
In a community in which people frequently complain about the perceived lack of
tools and visibility of solutions, the truth is that there are precious few
places to promote or recommend good technologies when they come along.
I have no problem with people like Tony
D daverch wrote:
Tony G and Susan J are the biggest offenders. I will make sure that
I'm not put into that league.
Excuse me? From someone who hasn't posted anything _except_ ads to this
forum or any other for at least a year? Please...
---
u2-users mailing list
Dear List,
I'm on offender? In a league of offenders!? While I certainly try not to
miss an opportunity to offer information (including product information) to
anyone asking for advice or a solution such as mine / in my area of
expertise, I do try to keep it to a dull roar, only spoke when spoken
Susan:
You, nor Tony, nor anyone else, IMHO of course, is abusing anything or anyone.
Anytime information is posted it's a good thing. :-)
On the other hand, what's being done by those who volunteer to manage U2UG is
also a
good thing. Totalitarians will always try to rule everyone and
As a presenter and 'interested party', I'd love to hear feedback from
anyone on the list who attended U2U in Denver (in addition to the comments
from recent posters).
(I didn't get a chance to review the written evaluations before Janet
spirited them away with her to Sydney. :-( )
Thanks
I agree.
The other side is that if you don't like what is posted you can always go
else where for you free advice and free technical support. These are like
the popup ads you get with Google because it's free.
Tom Dodds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Man, I didn't realize that posting my opinion about the U2U would have
ended up in a cyber war.
Being a user, sometimes contributor, U2UG Presidential candidate, and
someone that does influence buying products for the company I work for,
I don't care what the subject line contains because most of
Wally,
In my first post, I said I thought it was great. I am looking forward
to all the new tools that IBM is working on getting to us. I love the
graphic editor that compiles on its own with its templates you can use
and add to. To those who have used the UniDebugger, the new tools is
similar
Hi Jerry et al
Just to state the official position with regard to the U2UGgrin
The list pre-dates the U2 User Group: it has been through several stewards,
most notably the distinguished Clif Oliver, with the U2UG being the current
stewards (with huge thanks to Larry Hiscock).
The U2UG uses
Thanks for the history and mini-rant, Clif. While little differences
of opinion like this recent one are common in e-mail communities, this
type might be classified as the type found in communities that have
more lock-down rules and are moderated in a way similar to ours.
This might seem like a
All,
If you'd like to continue this, I'd like to suggest that it move to
U2-Community, as it the conversation has moved away from technical
issues. END OF THREAD. If you would like to join U2-Community, for this
and other content, please visit: http://listserver.u2ug.org/ to subscribe.
Hi,
A colleague and I are having some difficulty getting XDOMRemove() to
work (UD 7.1, Windows). Using the syntax
ERR = XDOMRemove(HANDLE, XPATH, NSSTRING, ATTR, VAL)
Where
XPATH = /DEPStaff/body/staff[1]
NSSTRING = xmlns=HI
ATTR = '.'
and HANDLE is a pointer to an open XML file that looks
REPOSTED FOR NON-MEMBER ADDRESS: Support Mailbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bounce Notice: If you read this list through Indexfocus, Nabble, or any other
replicator - and you would like to be able to participate - sign up directly
with us. Here's all you need to know: To subscribe or
resubscribe please
There have been several occasions where on our Solaris machine (which
hosts both Oracle Unidata 7.1.0 simultanously! -- yeah, don't get me
started there, lol) that some NFS mounts may go offline and become
responsive. This interrupts momentarily our new active 'udt'
sessions while this mounted
(In an effort to introduce a little humor to cool things down:)
Oh, oh, Jerry. You forgot to trim. And you top posted. Thank heavens
you didn't use html, or there would be an armed militia headed your way.
:-)
-- Clif
On Sep 6, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Jerry Banker wrote:
Man, I didn't
Where can I get Unidata PE for Linux? When I search on the IBM site and
select the link:
U2 Personal Editions and Trials (UniData 7.1.0 Personal Edition) Downloads
I keep getting taking to System Builder 5.4.1 download - which I don't want.
Anyone with a correct link?
--
Jeff Butera, Ph.D.
We have a customer who has been getting the following error message show
up in single-line files in the _PH_ directory:
Name too long, do you want to change it(Y/N)?
They are on version 6.1 of unidata.
I think it is related to improper savedlists or SAVEDLISTS or
savelist.map VOC entries, but
I enjoyed most of the sessions I attended. I would attend any session
that Mike Ryan presented. He was as entertaining as he was informative,
right Betty? I did attend the UniAdmin tool presentation. The new tool
will be available with Unidata 7.2. The question was asked about
availability
We have also seen this situation where the machine almost goes into a panic
when the NFS mounts don't respond. I think we made the problem less severe with
a Solaris mount option. These are the options I currently see when I look at
our NFS mount on our production box. The 'soft' option may be
You hit the nail on the head Dawn.
If I am unable to determine that a thread is a waste of my time, and thus
delete the whole thing, maybe I'm the one with the problem. I do it all
the time, though I do tend to look at the 6th or 7th posting to see if the
thread has morphed into something
Jeff:
Try:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/download/data/web/en_US/trialprograms/Z955364D40826J60
.html?S_TACT=104CBW71
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Butera
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:43 AM
To:
I've never subscribed to U2-community, and probably won't. I prefer the
discussions to be on this list and have learned how to filter/delete as
necessary. I feel like I'm going to miss something when a discussion is
asked to move . . . I didn't realize that list wasn't active, much...
I agree
I did both, on purpose. I didn't trim so, if they missed your post, they
would have the opportunity to read it. And, as far as posting at the
top, I was trying to make an overall point and not responding to any
individual point you were making. Personally I would much rather read a
person's
I agree, Jeff. That is my point with the suggestion that we eliminate
u2-community and permit discussions like this one, even if not of
interest to all. Let's move back/forward to a list where we permit
discussions on all related topics and let people filter it themselves.
Does anyone else
Jeff,
Try this link for Unidata PE download:
http://www14.software.ibm.com/download/data/web/en_US/trialprograms/Z955364D40826J60.html?S_TACT=104CBW71
Dave Taylor
CEO
Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
49 Aspen Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
(O) 310-544-1974
(C)
Andy,
Not only can it hang, it can coredump smm and you'll have to
restart Unidata. This happenned to us yesterday on a production server
with 450+ users and 3 other systems connected via nfa, very painfull.
Starts by nfa and new sessions hanging up and then no new connections are
Dawn, I fully agree with you. I do belong to the u2-community list and
from experience I can say that if a discussion is sent to community you
may as well just say end of discussion. And, I have seen some
discussions that should have been continued but died in this way.
Jerry
-Original
Wally,
Over all I think most of the discussions were great and very
informative. The geeky classes were definitely geared toward geeks. The
information about future developments was also great. The only class I
attended that was a disappointment, to me, was DS2009 Basic Extensions:
Your Key to
I think it's kind of silly to have 2 lists, and silly rules about what can be
discussed where.
I agree that topics can be ignored based on subject line alone.
Other list servers I'm on - this is not an issue.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hey People!!
The horse has officially been pronounced dead, so enough already.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
If I hear only silence, I will figure that
I am in the minority with this opinion. Cheers! --dawn
I'm of the 'delete it if you don't like it' camp.
Steve Ferries
TCR
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
I agree, there should be 1 list.
Regards,
Noah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 9:23 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] RE: Get a grip - was ads - was U2 University Last
I agree as well. Am a little more on the fence when it comes to rules:
yes, some basic ones are needed; no, not that many. But where you draw
the line is likely to become an almost personal matter. The present
flurry of e-mails on the subject is in response to what, considering my
experience of
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?q=pf=S_TACT=104CB
W71S_CMP=status=Activesr=1cat=k=ALLb=pn=pid=rs=u2trialsfpf=Windows
+XPfdt=Trialflang=Englishsb=rdx=15y=10
Eric
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit
I was teasing, thinking of the flame wars I've seen on other lists
about those issues.
- C
On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Jerry Banker wrote:
I did both, on purpose. I didn't trim so, if they missed your post,
they
would have the opportunity to read it. And, as far as posting at the
top, I
Its not on that link other than saying it's a Trial Version. But I did
finally find it so I'll share.
Download an 18-month trial of Personal Edition of IBM UniVerse 10.2.
This extended relational database protects personal data, supports U2
Web Services and strengthens and streamlines high
I already explained the reason the U2 Community list was started. It
was an attempt to keep the Monty Python jokes and other non-technical
discussions from running off a core group of technical people who
were providing the vast majority of answers to problems with the
products. Those
Check the UD release notes on the availability matrix on IBM's
website for information regarding this.
There have been a few fixes and changes to the product regarding
mounted filesystems and the affect it has on the database.
Bottom line though, it is best to have all filesystems which will
A, I would caution you not to be naive on this point. Until
Chuck, Clif, Brian, and maybe the U2UG board declare u2-community dead
and the moderating rules that send people there to be dead, this puppy
is still alive (or was that a horse?) Cheers! --dawn
On 9/6/07, Karen Bessel [EMAIL
I think the only important thing about the subject line is that it
reflects the content. So if you change the 'subject' change the subject
line. I am sure we all forget sometimes me included.
But doing this will makes following threads and filtering much easier.
I quite like [U2] for both
I really appreciate everyone's responses thus far to this thread. I'm
going out to the product matrix for Unidata right now to verify
release notes. This has been one of those things that has gotten on my
nerves and frankly I wish our sister org (which is who's running
Oracle -- the pig) wouldn't
I may open an IBM support case on this, but as always, the fastest and best
answers are usually here (when we're not debating if the Parrot is dead or
not, and what tags we need/don't need g)
UniData Replication offers a flag called ReEvaluate Virtual Fields and the
documentation says:
By
1. Vendors. I have appreciated any post I see from Tony Gravagno,
Doug Averch, Jeff Fitzgerald, Dawn Wolthius, Susan Joslyn, IBM people
promoting U2 features or classes (yes, same standard applies to IBM),
and any other vendor/consultant in our market.
B. The moderator's job is not
I'm totally with Clif on this. I subscribe because there are a few
nuggets that I grab onto and save. Most of the stuff that passes by
really doesn't affect or interest me, but I just skim and delete it
using my adult reasoning capacity - the same adult reasoning capacity
that allows me to
What is the txt from the XMLGetError function?
This may point you towards your issue.
Michael Rajkowski
SWG Client Support - Information
I've been reading these posts a bit. Etiquette dictates that posts which
are blatant advertisements for the sole purpose of marketing should be, at a
minimum, prefixed with one of the appropriate subject markers. There aren't
many posts here that are solely marketing lures. I have seen many
I am glad to hear someone using replication and having a success story. Is
anybody using it on UNIX?
The only site I know of that tried it on UNIX did not have enough horsepower on
subscribing side and had stop using it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I've always considered you a sensible voice, Clif, and you came
through on this one. Because the U2UG is the trustee of the list, and
because I think this e-mail will get to many of the board members
without e-mail them individually, I will simply copy Brian Leach, the
President of the U2UG, and
Thanks for the feedback, Brenda.
It was not a question of deciding if to go or not - we have booked and paid,
and now are trying to decide which sessions to go to, they are concurrent so
some must be missed.
As a 25-year Pick person, I thought this list would be the best place to
find other
David wrote:
Why would I *want* the
subscriber to re-evaluate a virtual field?
Really the only case that Jonathan Smith or I have ever come up with is if
you have a virtual field that uses data that is unique to a server (such as
including the hostname or IP address).
Or possibly path to an
Thanks Jerry. Tells us that as programmers we shall feel at home. We shall
read the brochure on DS2009.
Terrific help - you are another gem!
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 5:38 AM
Subject:
problems surround smm forking a 'df' process to load the available
filesystems into a shared memory table.
We have made fixes in this area.
If you can configure your OS so that 'df' never hangs - regardless of the
status of the nfs file systems - you shouldn't ever have a problem.
I'm not saying
Thanks for that. Presumably we will get a timetable when we register, which
will tell us who the presenters are.
We are UniVerse, so shall probably go to what is concurrent with the
UniAdmin tool one.
You are a gem!
- Original Message -
From: Michael Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I didn't attend the file tuning, so I can't comment on it. I either was
in another class or it was one of the one's I skipped to do the
certification testing. The other on testing I also did not attend, I
attended the Extended basic session. However, that was a little
disappointing as it was
based on continuing work on UniData Data Replication over the past 18
months or so, I would recommend UniData release 7.1.8 as the minimum if you
are going to be implementing.
Wally Terhune
David wrote:
BTW -- are you doing either New York or California sessions?? Why read
slides myself when I can have you read them to me?? ;-)
I'm currently scheduled to present 4 sessions in both NY and SF (subject to
change, of course!)
DS2003, DS2010, DS2014, DS2015
I get to lull you to sleep
sigh
Jeee -- I cannot believe all this turmoil
Dawn has pretty much laid out the way I feel --
I have a headache so I won't be as nice
This IS supposed to be a community...so why the need for a separation in lists?
Community members interact in many different ways...
You CAN
Due to the change in the locking within ODBC UD 7x on AIX I am looking for
alternatives in access methods regarding SQL Tables that reside between the
above mentioned, and a Unisys box. Triggers were also being utilized. The new
locking (just migrated) has rendered this no longer a viable
BTW -- if ALL you want is strictly technical information -- then RTFM, Tech
Connect etc...I use this list to ask others for help regarding their personal
experience and opinions on subject matters where I could not get the answers
via those previously mentioned methods. If the answer includes
This definitely makes sense -- but the default is that RW_REEVALUATE_VF=1 ,
and the documentation makes it sound like you may be getting into trouble by
changing it --
But your logic is where I was -- why would you NOT want to send it over
pre-chewed? I think the issue is the default needs to
61 matches
Mail list logo
