Thought I would report back that we went with Windows 2008 R2 Standard
Edition. It was less expensive than RHEL with our host site, and our VAR
did not want to go with CentOS onlly because Rocket does not support it.
--dawn
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> We have a
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org <
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org> on behalf of Dawn Wolthuis <
> dw...@tincat-group.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 8:26 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] CentOS with Universe?
>
> Thanks to all who respon
h
> Managing Director, U2 Servers Lab
> Rocket Software
> 4600 South Ulster Street · Suite 1100 · Denver, CO 80237 · USA
> T: +1 720 475 8098 · E: dmcgr...@rocketsoftware.com · W:
> u2.rocketsoftware.com
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun..
Hi Bill -- Ah, this time I'm in the client seat, desiring a hosted solution
for Universe. We will choose the same box for starters for the web server
as well. The VAR runs IIS on Windows, but Apache on linux. Given that info,
which OS would you select for Universe 11.1? --dawn
On Wed, Jul 17, 2
We have a VAR who would prefer to load Universe and their application on a
supported platform, but we would prefer not to pay for RHEL 6. I searched
the list and found a few tidbits, but does anyone have a good list of what
changes might be required to successfully run Universe 11.1 on CentOS? How
Maybe you were accepted after 10 days? --dawn
Typed on a mobile keyboard
On Sep 17, 2012, at 9:52 AM, George Gallen wrote:
> I remember when I applied to a college back in the early 80's. Under the
> question , which language do you
> Most fluently speak, I put in "binary" (how geekish could
I do not know the circumstances and did not read anything but I am minutes away
from SD. I do know that all state colleges are under the board of regents
running Ellucian software -- MultiValue for student systems (formerly known as
Datatel) --dawn
Typed on a mobile keyboard
On Sep 12, 2012, a
First, sorry about the breakup (that is, if you are) and second, that
is great! I love it. Did you explain that walls were once physical but
we could use them metaphorically? Now apparently they are virtual and
we cannot. cheers! --dawn
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, George Gallen
wrote:
> O
In SQL Server, I think it is called UDF = user-defined function
--dawn
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 25/06/12 17:47, Oaks, Harold wrote:
>> Hi Satya:
>>
>> An I-descriptor is the same as an I-type (or a V-type).
>>
>> It's like a little program in the DICT (dictionary)
I'll add a tidbit that some of the similar (not identical) names are:
virtual field
derived data
calculated field
computed column
user-defined function
stored procedure
--dawn
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Oaks, Harold wrote:
> Hi Satya:
>
> An I-descriptor is the same as an I-type (or a V-t
I loved runoff on the Pr1me. I wrote a COBOL book for a course in
runoff during the summer of 1981, but rats I don't have the 9-track
with the source anymore.
While the cost of entry to current word processors is certainly lower,
I really loved runoff. Word is much more frustrating to work with at
.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Horacio
> Pellegrino
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:16 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] File Sizing using concurrent option AND FAREWELL
>
> I remember a company that went bankrupt because they s
I have only seen SAP implementations from a bit of a distance and
through reading stories, but in every case, my understanding was that
those in charge of the project were gone before SAP went live. I have
seen systems analysts and programmers survive the project, with plenty
of stories once they d
Please let us know what you decide, if you could. Thanks! --dawn
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:32 PM, John Hester wrote:
> Thank you to everyone who responded. I have a decent sized list of
> options to investigate.
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug
imeout(serverUpdateTimer);
> }
>
> David A. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012
uter thinks it's doing
> something
> Rather than wondering "Is it DOING something"
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> To: U2 Users List
> Sent: Tue, May 1, 2012 5:30 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] READU vs READ and CRT
>
>
&
Wow memories. I'll speak up and agree with Allen -- solid products in the Pr1me
world. 15 years is definitely an underestimate. This is a forum where we know
that seasoned tools bring proven value. Thanks for piping up Randy.
--dawn
Typed on a mobile keyboard
On May 1, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Randy
ld only slow the process down, but they didn't care. They were quite
> willing to sacrifice speed for a stupid little character twirling around.
> Go figure...
>
> Regards,
> Charlie Noah
>
>
> On 05-01-2012 6:41 PM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
>
>> Good story, Laur
Good story, Laura!
We are figuring out where we need animated gifs in a web app to indicate
something is happening. They seem mostly unnecessary (with test data,
which, granted, might be the reason they seem unnecessary at this point),
so we are erring on the side of keeping them out, rather than
LOL. Thanks for the vote of confidence, Jeff. Back atcha. smiles. --dawn
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Butera wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 05:30 PM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
>
>> P.S. Jeff, sadly I do not qualify for the position as I do not have a
>> degree in Computer Sci
Well, it is pretty impressive that Jeff (aka Dr. Butera) actually knows
that his ERP system is running on U2/MultiValue/PICK while many Datatel
administrators think of themselves as "Datatel developers" or "Colleague
developers" or "Envision programmers" or, at a stretch, possibly even
UniData deve
Hi Allen -- I think I saw Joe as a facebook friend of Nancy Smith's.
If you would like Nancy's email address, let me know and I will look
for it. It is now likely firstname.lastn...@ellucian.com (given
Datatel's new company name). Tell Joe I still remember that he was the
first person to get me out
volume loads within a web service delivery
> environment.
>
> It's a good solid product for well established actively-promoted vertical
> market applications which need to extend to the surrounding I.T. ecosystem.
>
>
>
> Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
>>
>> I do disagr
products are then it
> will be difficult to convince people at a NoSQL meeting about something they
> have never heard of. Very, very frustrating I know.
>
> Glenn
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.2011 02:13, schrieb Dawn Wolthuis:
>> Good idea to attend.
>>
&
Good idea to attend.
Although I have some probably-not-great reasons (so I'll keep them to
myself) for not having a lot of respect for Neo4J even without touching it,
I think it is a really good idea to visit some of the many various NoSQL
events when they are in your neck of the woods (they are u
I'm late to the Party, but wrote this draft yesterday. Some of it has been
covered, but I'll click send without further revisions.
I did not see the original post on this (just the Re:) but you can only get
somewhat close on extracting first or last names from a free-form name, not
good enough to
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
> > From: Dawn Wolthuis
> > Looks great at first blush, Tony! I hope there are
> > some companies that can make good use of it (and have
> > the resources to make it happen). --dawn
&
Looks great at first blush, Tony! I hope there are some companies that can
make good use of it (and have the resources to make it happen). --dawn
P.S. Sorry about your investor problems. I'm being a chicken on that front
because of all of the horrible stories I have heard.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at
sing. The great mergers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> To: U2 Users List
> Sent: Fri, Sep 9, 2011 2:07 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] Ardent programmers
>
>
> Right, it does not have Sequoia under it when it has that name, it flows
>
; That it wasn't renamed until after Sequoia was defuncta.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> To: U2 Users List
> Sent: Fri, Sep 9, 2011 1:47 pm
> Subject: Re: [U2] Ardent programmers
>
>
> I think from OA to SequoiaPro to mvEnterprise
I think from OA to SequoiaPro to mvEnterprise. You can see that I bled
mvEnterprise into the border. It is just a long word. --dawn
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
>
> Here it is. Sequoia ran Open Architecture from Pick Systems.
>
> They heavily modified it. I think they did,
#x27;s a slow Friday!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:
>> u2-users-bounces@listserver.**u2ug.org[mailto:
>> u2-users-bounces@**listserver.u2ug.org]
>> On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 12:15 PM
>> To: U2 Users List
&
Oh, I can find a whole slug of 'em among the Datatel customer base. I did
not know what a proc was until I peeked out into the larger MV world. Even
now I have not purposely ever looked at a proc. --dawn
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
>
> By the way, I today, for the first time
eneral ever installed software from Pick and
> ompany, but they did load Universe on several boxes.
> wonder if there's a way to indicate that sort of distinction in your map?
> I want to say that DG didn't get into Pick until around 1990, but I'm not
> ertain of exac
o guessing, it's a slow Friday!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 12:15 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Ardent progra
with
folk ;-) too much.
cheers! --dawn
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:05 AM, George Gallen wrote:
> See added text at the end (...)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
Wow, what a Revelation! Are you saying he worked on the entire Cosmos? He
must have been Ardent to Pick the Ultimate project, related to all of
Reality, and stick with the whole Enterprise. The designer of the Universe
must really have some Cache' so I would like him to Mentor me as I could use
the
We use "optimistic locking" with a version number in each record (in our
case Cache' handles the versioning based on our specification of the files,
but either versioning or checksums works). This is a solid approach for web
apps instead of using pessimistic locking. --dawn
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 a
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
> > From: Bill Haskett
> > I wonder if this implies that those who U2 are all
> > database "gurus"? :-)
>
> I get the humor but...
> I need to create a distributed cloud-based MV environment,
> obviously smaller than
. That was supposed to be removed before delivery. That poor programmer
in the trenches. He/She/They apparently did not grasp the big picture or
magnitude of deploying such code. --dawn
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 23/05/11 18:35, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> > As an
> your apple dev key.
>
>
> Rgds
> Symeon.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: 23 May 2011 00:50
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Ponde
I agree. We will be migrating to html 5 soon but even where we are today,
the pages work on the iPhone family (including iPod touch, iPad) as well as
on android. So, while I can imagine preparing a Java wrapper for android and
perhaps even an objective-c wrapper for apple to wrap the web site (not
On the family tree chart (http://tincat-group.com/mv/MVFamilyTreeColor.pdf) I
show pcVerse from Profile. When researching it, I recalling hearing mention
of "multiVerse" but could find no one who was aware of any users of such a
product. It does show up on pages like this
http://www.thefreelibrary
l helps to let you read comments in context if you know the basics
> about the person making them.
>
> George Land
> APT Solutions Ltd
> U2 UK Distributor
> U2UG Board Member
>
>
> On 13/04/2011 19:02, "Dawn Wolthuis" wrote:
>
> > I'm late
I'm late to the party on this thread, but I'll put in my two cents that Ed
is one of those go-to technical guys who knows a ton about MV. He has helped
me out many times. He doesn't seem like a marketing type to me at all (less
than I am, for example ;-) [and I clearly am not as marketing folks kn
ulnerabilities or execute 0-day exploits.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: Sunday, 10 April 2011 12:46 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Has anyon
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 10/04/11 02:47, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> >> > I am currently looking at how U2 fits in the cloud environment with
> >> > products like Microsoft Azure and I think the model of U2 where each
> table
> >>
Comments within. Again, I am a U2 fan, so I am trying to do a comparison,
not a sales job, although I'm guessing it might sound a bit like Cache
evangelism. I am pragmatic about my choices, so even if I want to like a
more pure MultiValue platform (I started my career on a Pr1me computer,
prior to
OK, now I'm not finding the ones I thought were on this channel, so search
youtube for MultiValue and you will see both a little 6 minute-ish video and
a 4-part video related to Cache for MV developers.
--dawn
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> Hi Don -- Yes
Hi Don -- Yes, I have experience with UniData, SQL and SQL DBMS's, and I now
work in Cache' However, I have only a very tiny bit of experience with SB
and none with a conversion from SB+UniData to Cache'. Certainly I have a
deep fondness for U2, but I had to make a good business decision a couple
Thanks Dave for providing a first name. Is your name Dave Parkland? Are you
willing to provide the name of your company? I think Laura mistook you as
the OP for this post.
I'm with Laura in thinking that in a forum like this, anonymity is not as
professional nor as effective (or even comforting or
Hi Symeon -- For what it is worth, in case it is helpful...
I did not do a conversion but did do interviews, reading, and tests of a D3
app a while back, recommending the site moved, they would be well-served to
choose UniVerse over UniData, although it was still definitely feasible with
UniData.
>
> A few years ago, with Epicor's new president, George X... Epicor's newer
> flagship product was released and runs on Microsoft SQL Server.
>
> --Bill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver
This is fascinating, although I primarily know these products from a
distance. Am I correct that Epicor was UniData. Is it now Progress instead?
Have customers moved from UniData to Progress? Was this previously Intuit
Eclipse that runs on UniVerse? What DBMS will this new company favor? Does
anyon
herefore the clients have 'requested' that
> access to that domain (among others) be restricted from within our network.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
>
Bummer. I did a blog a couple of years ago on wordpress.com and was
thinking of setting up one for someone else there, also a business
blog. Is there a reason that wordpress.com is considered bad? Are they
opposed to wikipedia and other professional resources that sound like
they are too informal t
-
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-
>>> boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 1:17 PM
>>> To: U2 Users List
>>> Subje
--
>> > Glen Batchelor
>> > IT Director/CIO/CTO
>> > All-Spec Industries
>> > phone: (910) 332-0424
>> > fax: (910) 763-5664
>> > E-mail: webmas...@all-spec.com
>> > Web: http://www.all-spec.com
>> > Blog: http://blo
---
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jon Wells
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:57 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Does anyone have an MV BASIC cheatsheet?
>
> I wonder if Sierra Bravo has something like that.
I have cheatsheets for JavaScript, HTML, and CSS for training student
interns but do not have one for MV BASIC. It's a long shot, but just
in case anyone has one, I'd love to see and use it. Thanks. --dawn
--
Dawn M. Wolthuis
Take and give some delight today
Got it. I understand now. cheers! --dawn
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:12 PM, David Jordan wrote:
> Hi Dawn
>
> I was raising an issue of etiquette to put names to emails so that everyone
> knows who they are dealing with and it is transparent that there are no
> hidden agendas. Not everyone kno
David -- This is Will who was on the original U2UG board with us --
seems like a long time ago, eh? --dawn
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:43 PM, David Jordan wrote:
> First Fft2001 Can we have your name. How do we know that you are not someone
> from a competitor like Oracle trying to make Rocket l
A little correction--I see that my first sentence made little sense
after I edited it incorrectly. I intended to say something like
"Because I am no longer a significant user of UniData as I once was, I
hesitate to pipe up ..."
--dawn
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Dawn Wolth
Sheesh, you guys. You were both on the board IIRC when we discussed
whether to pursue setting up as a legal entity in the US and/or
elsewhere. We decided not to do it then. Obviously that could be
discussed again, but I would not fund such an organization if I were
Rocket, and I do not see a compel
Because I am no longer a significant user of UniData as I once was, I
will pipe up on this question about what I see as the most important
role of the U2UG. When the idea came to me to work with folks to get
this off the ground, my thinking was that it would be useful to have
such an organization t
It looks like it might be a good idea, but will have trouble uniting
the MV world (as it indicates is the intent) with the name of U2
Market Place. Hmmm. I'm thinking that perhaps the Cache', D3,
Revelation, jBASE, QM and Univision folks might not jump at the
opportunity?? If the name were adjusted
I started on a P300 that I think might have been running Primos 3,
then we got a 400 running Primos 4. I think it was either the upgrade
to Primos 5 or 7 (details are too blurry at this point) when we had
significant issues with a upgrade, not the least of which was that the
cobol compiler was brok
1/01/11 21:25, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
>> PrimeOS was originally written in Fortran (then later I thought it was
>> C -- was it PL/I?) --dawn
>
> As someone (as a customer) who dabbled in this stuff, the original
> versions of Primos were written in FORTRAN - which is why a
Groovy! Thanks for passing that along. --dawn
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Clive Hills wrote:
> It was mostly PL/I later.
> Re your earlier post I see Northgate are now actively marketed Reality as a
> NOSQL database with added SQL!
>
> Clive
> ___
PrimeOS was originally written in Fortran (then later I thought it was
C -- was it PL/I?) --dawn
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Clive Hills wrote:
> I note that PrimOS written by Prime was done in later iterations in PL/1.
> Projects like UV/UD and others originated on Prime.
> I think it's li
; some of their version of PICK OA was probably written in PL/I as well. >From
> inside of Stratus Pick you could call out to PL/I transaction processing code.
>
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
>
>> And you think that PICK wasn't? OK, OK, it was origin
And you think that PICK wasn't? OK, OK, it was originally TRW, but
running on IBM hardware (IBM 7090) and IBM was certainly in the mix
for getting from Nelson's flow charts to an actual implementation.
But, yes, you are right that the languages were developed by different
companies. cheers! --dawn
I don't know of any connection between the languages of PICK and PL/1
other than the timing. The similar terms would make sense because they
were the words of the industry (some coming from Fortran, for
example). MV BASIC stemmed from Data/BASIC which also took some terms
from Fortran.
I do not kn
Oh wow, it sure is hard not to jump in on this one, but it's Christmas
Eve so I will render quick opinion and hope that the conversation is
still going on when I really have a chance to respond.
A couple of opinions --
1. Were it not for the standardization of SQL, a majority of BI would
be more
I missed the "not" in "is not at all fleshed out"
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> Hi Shawn --
> You can see Curt Monash's response to my comment on this page
>
> http://www.dbms2.com/2010/08/18/nosql-hvsp-adoption/
>
> <http:
as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life,
> when
> all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about.'
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Dawn Wolthuis
> To: U2 Users List
> Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010
I made a passionate pitch to a few folks in a meeting at Spectrum this year
that we start marketing our niche that way. It wasn't met with disdain, but
also not with a lot of interest, it seemed.
The nosql.com and .org domains are held by an MV person since a few of us
coined the term in 2006 or s
Hi Jeff -- Yes, I suspect that is exactly what you want to do. In our code
where we sign something to use with an Amazon API, we have the following two
lines. [I know you know this is OO-enhanced mvbasic, using delivered
libraries in Cache', but I'll indicate that here for anyone else who might
oth
You said "MV system" rather than something more specific, so I would
encourage you to look at Cache'. I think it has the best features in the MV
space in this regard (as well as scalability and other ilities). --dawn
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Baker Hughes wrote:
> Hey y'all,
>
> I'm inter
What is your target run-time environment? Is it Windows or browsers or a
particular browser or Androids or iPhones or ...? --dawn
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Susan Joslyn wrote:
> An immense amount of good information has come from this thread. Thank you
> to everyone for sharing your ins
Sorry for not proof-reading before sending. The possessive ' in "its" alone
is torturous. smiles. --dawn
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Dawn Wolthuis wrote:
> I have done a lot of reading in this area too, finding some of the best
> information by googling for HCI (hum
I have done a lot of reading in this area too, finding some of the best
information by googling for HCI (human computer interface) and UX (user
experience) sites and blogs.
In addition to reading about UI theory, it makes sense to zero in on the
particular run-time environment, such as a browser a
Yeah, I was thinking Will knew something we didn't re the "fit" option.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Dan Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> He might be keeping fit.
>
>> From: fft2...@aol.com
>> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:13:31 -0400
>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> Subject: Re: [U2] Very much OT - AUT
LOL and Hi Dawn. --dawn
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Davis, Dawn wrote:
> I am making a FB group as we speak
>
> Dawn Janel Davis
> Database Manager
> dda...@carrollcc.edu
> 410-386-8058
>
> Carroll Community College
> 1601 Washington Road
> Westminster, MD 21157
>
>
> -Original Messa
Congratulations Karen. I will dare suggest that that grandma thing is s
much cooler than .NET, but congrats on both fronts.
--dawn
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Bessel, Karen
wrote:
> After jumping from lily pad to lily pad several times over the last several
> years, as my employers have
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Baker Hughes wrote:
> Would those of you mind responding that use 3-Tier or N-Tier architecture -
> I'm trying to gather some quick numbers for some decision makers (somewhat
> urgent).
>
> Please respond if your site, or sites who you service have UniData,
> UniVe
Re the wiki comment -- I changed the Multidimensional page way back when to
include multivalued IIRC, the someone removed the multidimensional page
pointing it to OLAP. The stub of a MultiValue page I started (please anyone
jump in, we are all busy and I just stubbed it in a while back) pointed to
Some good summary information here, Dave. One note about not needing
specialized software is that you use a white board with post-it notes.
Using a Kanban board (or similar) with Scrum makes a lot of sense if
you are colocated. If you are a distributed team, a tool like
scrumy.com might be a good w
; From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] U2 is now Rocket U2
>
> Love the U2-rocket story, Dominic. I don't know if there is
Good job and thank you for writing that up.
I've been trying on the scrum front, after having some past project
successes with various agile techniques, but I do not feel like I'm
particularly successful on the Scrum front.
We have our "tickets" for requirements (user stories) and tasks in
Trac,
Love the U2-rocket story, Dominic. I don't know if there is any U2 in
Russia or related countries, but I understand that some PICK or
PICK-a-like system was used to track Russian spies in the US, perhaps
all the way to the end of the cold war. If anyone has details on that,
such as which MV flavor
I'm impressed that they actually used the MultiValue[TM] word on this
page. That it is still a trademark of Spectrum, right? I don't recall
them using that when they were IBM, although they might have. --dawn
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:41 AM, Ross Morrissey wrote:
> http://www.rocketsoftware.com/u
We have talked about this before, Laura, and I find it fascinating. You are
the only person I know to have met both Pick and Codd in person, although
there might well be others on this list. I had not recalled the information
about the presentation by Goodman. Good info.
I wish this thread were not
HI Harold -- I'm confused. I don't even see a post from me in this
thread. What are you reading from me that has the word "proof" in it.
Did you mean "Wol" instead of "Dawn" below? Otherwise, could you
provide the quote from me? Thanks. --dawn
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Oaks, Harold wrote:
The one statement below that isn't the way I would say it at all is
"As cache was already multivalue, they added the PICK flavor to their
flavors just like flavors on UniVerse."
Their native data model is broader than MV, so they (Jim Idle of jBASE
and many others) wrote MV to sit on top of the M
I was guessing that was the case. In that case, I am impressed with
the information they did put out there regarding how they have worked
with other products to give the U2 community hints that they should
not be freaking out. The fact that you, Susie and others seem pleased
with this move should g
So are they not yet free to make an actual announcement or what? Just
curious. --dawn
--
Dawn M. Wolthuis
Take and give some delight today
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Hennessey, Mark F.
wrote:
> I believe this is more in the way of a "Happy New Year" type message.
>
>
>
> -Original M
What do you mean "just"? For building a new app, they got to the top
of my list a couple of years ago. Now that they (Cache') have a number
of conversions from various mv platforms under their belts, this
change in U2 ownership might prompt a few more folks to think about
migrating, but for the mos
I'm going to have to do some brain science to figure this all out. --dawn
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ross Ferris wrote:
> No, but the process may be as complicated and straight forward as Rocket
> Surgery!!!
>
> Ross Ferris
> Stamina Software
> Visage > Better by Design!
>
>>-Original
Laughing. I'll probably quote you on that one sometime, Wol. Cheers! --dawn
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Anthony W. Youngman
wrote:
> In message
>
> , "Hennessey, Mark F." writes
>>
>>
>> Huh, does this make me a Rocket Scientist?
>>
>>
>> I'll go out on a limb and guess "No" ;)
>>
>
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
