much to be desired. and at
$200/month ? EEK.
I wouldn't go near it.
James
use sa-learn and train it with say 6k emails.
i delete the original emails.
Does the database need to read anything from those emails or is it ok to
get rid of them?
I assumed that spamassassin just grabbed what it needed from training
and put it into database but i wasn't sure
TIA
-James
you want to get from the U.N. to be put toward solving this
problem. It's simply not an issue I believe we should be spending any
portion of that particular budget for.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
John Rudd
I've been getting more spam recently so I did sa-update for the first time in a
year (I thought it was automatic :-()).
I restarted the spamassassin service (Ubuntu).
$ /var/lib/spamassassin$ ll
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Oct 15 2011 ./
drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 Jun 12 06:40 ../
On 09/22/12 15:38, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Itll use the lastest rule you downloaded as these are your core rules now
Martin
On Saturday, 22 September 2012, James wrote:
I've been getting more spam recently so I did sa-update for the first
time in a year (I thought it was automatic
On 09/22/12 17:11, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 9/22/12 3:31 PM, James bjloc...@lockie.ca wrote:
Great thanks.
I am lowering the required score to 3.
That is generally not a desirable practice.
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with a low score.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0
On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with a low score.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_DBL_SPAM
On 09/22/12 22:38, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, James wrote:
On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with a low score.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00
On 09/23/12 18:28, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
I wrote this little script to update the bayes rules. I can do this on my
imap account but my pop3 account gets way more spam and the messages are no
longer on the machine with sa once I pop them off.
Any comments
.
Is there any way I can have spamd use the user that spamc passes it? Etc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] As of yet it's using root to connect to
the mysql db.
Any thoughts? Need more info?
Thanks,
James
the errors above. In
the end it shows the stats but shows that no spam has ever been processed, all
percentages are 0. Am I logging spamd improperly?
- James
Like I said before it finds and reads the spam log file fine. It
occurs when parsing the actual log file, it does not have trouble
locating it. Any other ideas?
- James
Steve Dimoff wrote:
By default, the sa-stats.pl uses the log file /var/log/maillog
You need to tell sa-stats to use
: (closed before
headers) means
Snip below to put into context. I have spent all day reading and searching
but found very little.
Thanks James
May 16 01:35:56 66-226-75-102 spamd[30044]: spamd starting
May 16 01:35:59 66-226-75-102 spamd[30153]: server started on UNIX domain
socket /tmp
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
This is some spam that wasn't marked as spam, shouldn't one of the tests be
BAYES_00?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,
FSL_MY_NAME_IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH autolearn=no
On 02/25/2015 10:03 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
It looks like you either have a permissions problem or a confusion
problem.
Your run of 'sa-learn --dump magic' is looking at some Bayes which has
enough ham/spam but what ever your spamassasin is looking at doesn't.
Your 'sudo' isn't running that
I get a lot of spam from Chinese senders and Chinese subjects but only
an image for the body.
I want to mark as spam any non-English sender names and subjects.
I tried TextCat but either I did it wrong or it only looks at the Body.
On 07/11/15 09:32, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
*From:* RW mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com
*Date:* 2015-07-11 08:28
*To:* users mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: non-English sender and body
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:00:10 -0400
James wrote:
I get
22:00:10 -0400
James wrote:
I get a lot of spam from Chinese senders and Chinese subjects but
only an image for the body.
I want to mark as spam any non-English sender names and subjects.
I tried TextCat but either I did it wrong or it only looks at the
Body
*From:* RW mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com
*Date:* 2015-07-11 08:28
*To:* users mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: non-English sender and body
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:00:10 -0400
James wrote:
I get a lot of spam from Chinese
On 07/11/15 19:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.07.2015 um 17:36 schrieb James:
Does Bayes catch them?
===
I don't know since I don't get any non-english emails. But, you
could collect and feed them to sa-learn spam and see
On 07/12/15 17:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.07.2015 um 21:40 schrieb Bill Cole:
On 12 Jul 2015, at 11:28, James wrote:
The problem is finding out which directory the running spamassassin
uses, I can't seen to train the one it expects.
I put this in my /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
On 07/12/15 00:22, ch...@antennex.com wrote:
Why not run:
sa-learn --dump magic
And you'll see the number of spams vs tyhe number of hams learned?
The problem is finding out which directory the running spamassassin
uses, I can't seen to train the one it expects.
I put this
On 2019-03-20 12:07 p.m., Dave Warren wrote:
What is the result when you train inbound spam as ham first, then as
spam? As I understand it, forgetting is not required, SpamAssassin will
handle this automatically. So as long as users move spam into the spam
training folder (not deleting spam
On 2019-03-18 7:40 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 18 Mar 2019, at 13:59, James wrote:
The documentation says to use your inbox. :-)
It does not.
The example shows using your inbox.
if possible. This will make it more accurate for your incoming mail.
Do this using the "sa-learn" t
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
Is there a way to whitelist all the email addresses in my inboxes?
On 2019-03-17 5:45 p.m., John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019, James wrote:
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
Are you also
On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote:
On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote:
I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the
"required" number.
About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high.
I run an IMAP server with my own spamassass
On 2019-03-17 5:43 p.m., @lbutlr wrote:
On 17 Mar 2019, at 15:03, James wrote:
I run sa-learn --ham on my inboxes.
You inboxes likely contain spam messages that haven't been caught, so training
on inbox will poison your bayes in favor of more spam. Unless your inbox is
perfect (entirely
, and probably doesn’t include email from other countries
where this takes place.
But by this definition, false positives do occur, and my company’s
SpamAssassin installation has to try to handle them.
James.
¹ Fortunately, they’re also unaware that signatures should be removed
when replying
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate the
backlash against everything being in English for so long ... there are
hordes (sorry) of folks who want to be able to use their native
charactersets.
James Butler
Oh yes ... there's no denying its complexity. But the desire to use
one's native tongue is quite simple.
James Butler
Pete McNeil wrote:
James Butler wrote:
We've fielded many, many inquiries about the availability of Arabic
domain names over the past several years. Don't underestimate
calculators, where it undoubtedly played
better than during our mainframe sessions. Talk about network latency!
Fire a photon torpedo and wait about 5 minutes to find out if you hit
anything. Good times. Sorry about the sidetrack ... carry on!
James Butler
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 1/29/2010 12:44 PM, te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
Really, I was just trying to figure out what the point would be for
someone to fill out the form with obviously invalid data.
My guess is that it's a spammer's bot looking for a broken web form to
abuse.
Many web
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, James Butler wrote:
. Gibberish in the form is just a probe.
My experience has been that the gibberish gets around simplistic tests
for 'empty' fields. That's why I advocate the use of a field that
*should* be empty. :)
- C
Great idea. Works
line, so people normally just delete it out.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ClamAVPlugin
James
clues on where to find out what the issue may be?
Thank you!
James
? Thanks for the help.
James
a way
to do this?
Sounds like you¹ll need to determine what MTA you¹re using (postifix,
sendmail, etc..), read some docs and post to that group. Hope that helps.
James
=)
-James
: 21.62
Average spam score : 23.80
Average clean message score : -6.44
Total spam volume : 345 Mbytes
Total clean volume :92 Mbytes
We are well pleased with SA without blacklist.cf :)
James
and trusted_networks?
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Right lads, we've got 45 minutes to score 37 goals.
aprilcottage.co.uk | No problem with that -- the other team just did.
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
James
-to-person ham.
In my (limited) experience, nonspam IP-based URLs almost always have
paths after the IP address, whereas a *lot* of spam just points to the
IP address.
Does this match anyone else's experience?
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | How about an Australian-language version?
aprilcottage.co.uk
Just an observation hereI did my 3.2.3 to 3.2.4 and suddenly sysloging
of spamd stopped. I had to manually add s mail to my startup to get it to
play fair again. Was this change documented anywhere...that syslog was now
turned off by default?
James
. Danke :)
James
and not on by default
in the general distribution?
Cheers,
James
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.03.08 07:57, James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's
practically useless
I don't find it useless. It works quite well
Unless you receive
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that
it's practically useless and if you are an unfortunate who ends up
incorrectly listed
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that
it's practically useless and if you are an unfortunate who ends up
incorrectly listed
server (202.77.91.40) you'll see it
lists the secondary MX for both gray.net.au and grayonline.id.au as
mail.mas...
James
--
It is often the case that the man who can't tell a lie thinks he is the best
judge of one.
-- Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
smime.p7s
Description
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:09:47 pm D Hill wrote:
Now your confusing the subject. The previous response you made was from:
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now you are using:
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOTH of those domains point to an MX that has a CNAME
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:59:19 pm mouss wrote:
James Gray wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that
it's practically useless
mouss wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
James Gray writes:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:09:47 pm D Hill wrote:
Now your confusing the subject. The previous response you made was
from:
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now you are using:
From: James Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BOTH of those
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:31:34 am mouss wrote:
while you are at it, fix your DNS. your domain has been succesfully
submitted to rfci (boguxms):
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=gray.net.au
On 26.03.08 11:30, James Gray wrote:
Yes - that's one
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25.03.08 07:57, James Gray wrote:
Why are rules that look up against this list still in the base of
SpamAssassin?? The SORBS dynamic list is so poorly maintained that it's
practically useless
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I don't find it useless. It works
Matt Kettler wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Sorbs sux, don't use it. Last time we had this problem they wanted
money (and not an insignificant amount either) to remove a listing
from their systems. They arbitrarily add addresses to a database the
IP's owner can't control, then demand money
a daemon going at reboot time.
There may be CPU time quota constraints, of course.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ |Just for once, I wish we would encounter an alien
aprilcottage.co.uk | menace that wasn't immune to bullets...
| -- The Brigadier, 'Doctor
is a heuristics based classifier, and as such
shouldn't really be used to classify one way or the other based on a
single criterion. Such approaches void the whole idea of heuristics.
So I guess I saying yep agree, but there are corner cases in some
circumstances.
Cheers,
James
developers are reading, I'd love to see how rules like
this play in the sandbox...
James.
¹ I'd like to do it on body length, but I can't find a suitable way of
doing this. body /.{100}/ will match on any e-mail which *has* got a
paragraph of 99 characters...
--
E-mail: james@ | The opinions
-60 | xargs sa-learn --showdots --spam
works for me on Fedora 8 with SA 3.2.4.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Users are not like normal particles; they wave when you
aprilcottage.co.uk | observe them.
| -- Andrew Dalgleish
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:00 PM
To: spamassassin-users
Subject: Re: Looking for hosts to white list
I don't know if you noticed but I'm a spam filtering company.
Must be true, its on his web site:
-Original Message-
From: Henrik K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:45 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Looking for hosts to white list
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:38:13PM -0400, James Pratt wrote:
-Original Message-
From
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:46 AM
To: John Hardin
Cc: SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: Re: yahoo.com acknowledges no control over third party email
from their mail servers
How the hell can they disown that?
is
no longer supported: this means you won't get security updates, so these
systems should not be exposed to known-malicious traffic (like spam...)
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | The Inquirer was set up by Mike Magee (ticker: DODGY),
aprilcottage.co.uk | who co-founded well-known
Anyone have any ideas? Just started cropping up a few ago.
James
May 22 16:05:32 myshield spamd[2914]: razor2: razor2 check failed: Invalid
argument razor2: razor2 had unknown error during get_server_info at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 188.
at /usr
with debug enabled for more
information
Very confusing...just those 2 rulesets...anything I can do to fix them?
Thanks.
James
On 6/17/08 6:49 PM, SM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:25 17-06-2008, James Lay wrote:
So here's what I have with rulesdujour:
Lint output: [5993] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_random.cf: HTMLHEADMETA
HTTP-EQUIV=Refresh CONTENT=0.1
You
on the number of users, this may not be
practical.
Hope this helps,
James.
--
E-mail: james@ | Never ask, Oh, why were things so much better in the old
aprilcottage.co.uk | days? It's not an intelligent question.
| -- Ecclesiastes 7 v. 10
On 6/22/08 9:30 PM, metamorph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spamassassin/Clamav/Ubuntu/PHP5/Apache2/citadel/
I just installed spamassasin and tested it with gtube and it worked, but
when I tried to install clamav it still lets the EICAR files through. I
read through old posts and everything
Hey all!
Soomail from myspace has been getting tagged as spam...been trying
to halt that on a domain basis. Here's what I've tried (and seen
online):
.*myspace.com
@myspace.com
*myspace.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone tell me which is the correct format? Thanks!
James
Thanks for the help and great suggestions all :)
James
Hello All,
I am currently having 2 issues with Spamassassin. I have included the script
as well that I am getting the errors with. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. I have to fix the error with this version of Spamassassin, I
cannot upgrade it at this time. Please let me know if you
Sarge. Here is a sample of some of my rules:
#custom rules
body CSTM_INFINEX_VEN /infinex/
score CSTM_INFINEX_VEN 2.0
body CSTM_FONT_SIZE_EQLS_2 /tdfont size\=2/
score CSTM_FONT_SIZE_EQLS_2 .1
I appreciate any help.
Sincerely,
Chase James
: SpamAssassin local rules not executing
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 04:54:13PM -0400, Chase James wrote:
The first site rules file loaded is init.pre, the last file loaded,
though,
is:
debug: using /etc/spamassassin for site rules dir
debug: config: read file /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
created above. Then link that user_prefs file back to the user's own
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs for editing. This seems ugly to me. But it
does preserve the jail's integrity.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Chase James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theo,
Well, I took the allow_user_rules line out
took the opportunity to=20
write:
And that trick could also very well cause you to loose legitimate
...and more message...
end
Thoughts? I have preserved the entire message, for anyone who may be
interested. Thanks.
James
Hi all,
I just took over the administration of spamassassin, since my coworker moved on. I'm not really familiar with a lot of this. The problem I am having is this:
A user has a legitimatly high AWL score (because of rules determined by management). Now they want the user to be reset. I
:19 +0100, Duncan Hill wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 16:07, Golden, James wrote:
Hi all,
I just took over the administration of spamassassin, since my coworker
moved on. I'm not really familiar with a lot of this. The problem I am
having is this:
A user has a legitimatly high AWL score
I have a little more information. I figured out I could get ps to tell me what the process is running as. It looks to be running as a daemon, and is running as root. I didn't think it was supposed to be run this way. Even so, shouldn't the prior command have reset the AWL score then?
# ps -eo
was turned off.
That doesn't sound right. How is it that it was turned off but working?
James
, but that
would be too mean. :-D
This was a possible explanation for my Snort installation picking up the messed
up headers, a few days ago, too. Maybe there is a problem with the Apache.org
installation munging stuff?
James
If you do the math out, I would bump it down to 10 -15. AT 15 you would be using 675mb of RAM (likely). Since you have other things that still need to run, you need to leave some space open. We currently have ours set to 8, and we have umteen thousand messages handled a day with 2 gig of RAM
dependency 'L_DRUGS12'
Jul 27 08:16:27 myshield spamd[15259]: rules: meta test FP_MIXED_PORN3 has
undefined dependency 'FP_PENETRATION'
Just an FYI I guess...anyone else see this kind of action? Thanks!
James
documentation, so if you can point me at some I would greatly appreciate it!
Thanks,
James
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 20:12 -0700, jdow wrote:
Tao, make sure your Bayes tests are working correctly. Then raise the
score for BAYES_99 almost to 5, if it is not hitting more than one
item ultimately scored
LOL! Thanks for the reminder. Best of luck in your efforts to stop SPAM
around the world.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/1/06 at 11:29 PM jdow wrote:
Mr Butler
into the project with, re: Microsoft). We can presume that his masters
include the almighty dollar and low-hanging fruit.
Oops ... I may be a fsking idiot ... sorry.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
trying to help ...
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 8/2/06 at 4:15 PM Ken A wrote:
jdow wrote:
From: Ken A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's crazier than I thought you were
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I have
3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus the SARE
rules tank it? Or am I safe? Thanks all!
James
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
John D. Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, James Lay wrote:
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus
the SARE rules tank it? Or am I safe
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have 3.0.4 running on 128 Megs okwill upgrading to 3.1.4 plus
the SARE rules tank it? Or am I safe
with their products that impact safety and economic issues on a
broad scale.
James
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 10/23/06 at 7:17 PM Duane Hill wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm considering filing a lawsuit against Microsoft to try to get an
order to make them make public security updates
..'? After this, it sems
that 17429 no longer talks to the parent process.
I'd be surprised if too low a
max-children setting would be causing the problem, so can someone shed light on
what the problem was with this child process? I had to restart spamd to
get things going again.
Thanks,
James
Log
looking for 510 and installing it when it doesn't find it.
Reading the SA docs, it doesn't seem to require anything later than
5.8.8...can anyone clue me in as to how to tell the ports version of it to
use 5.8.9? Or should I just use the source directly?
James Smallacombe
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 23:41:38 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe u...@3.am wrote:
Installing from ports automatically installs perl
5.10.1 which causes spamc children to run wild and basically, spamd
can't cope with it.
I don't need or want perl 5
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
James Smallacombe u...@3.am wrote:
I actually meant spamc's that had no spamd children to talk to. It
seems the ports version of SA replaced my original sa-spamd startup
script, which raised the max children from (default
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, LuKreme wrote:
On 04-Mar-10 21:41, James Smallacombe wrote:
I tried to upgrade from SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0 by installing the newer one
from FreeBSD Ports.
Really? I just did a update of the port tree and yet
$ portversion p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin
We are using the CommuniGate Pro mail server, which allows Outlook user
to submit messages using the Microsoft's MAPI protocol to submit
messages across the IMAP port. The problem that we are having is that
although the messages are submitted directly from an authenticated
client connection,
On 2010-05-21 at 03:09+02 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
3.2.x is in maintenance, and gets emergency rule updates
*exclusively*. As it has been for quite a long time.
3.3.x uses a new rule update model, and gets frequent updates. IFF
the mass-check corpus is large
for stopping targeted phishing attacks, too,
which as a university we get a lot of.
Scamnailer is at http://www.scamnailer.info/
Thanks,
James
__
James Kelly
Network Administrator
IST Network Operations
Chapman University
Phone: 714-744-7833
Email: jake...@chapman.edu
---
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY WILL NEVER ASK
(the bulk of
which are in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/). Have rules been optimized or
something? Should I copy over all the SARE rules and setup RulesDuJour to
update, or leave as is? Thanks for the input.
James
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
