尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:59e8863641491084871729!
On 09/21/2015 03:02 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
security hole.
Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/21/2015 08:55 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>> I think that permitting a null password, if policy does not admit it, is a
>> security hole.
>> Prefer you you add another explicit call to be called for no password
>> checking (at all).
>>
>> Regards,
On 09/21/2015 02:26 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 0
Il 21/09/2015 14:59, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 1
On 09/17/2015 12:28 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/18/2015 09:30 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Applies perfectly! Thanks!
>>
>> On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, M
On 09/18/2015 03:23 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Applies perfectly! Thanks!
On 09/18/2015 09:21 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
On 09/18/2015 02:47 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Drew, I know you've put a lot of effort into these patches, but they do not
succeed against the
5.5.0 trunk. Patches should be made against the most recent revision, which
can be checked out via
Subversion from Sourceforge.
On 09/18/2015 08:11 AM,
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
On 09/17/2015 04:55 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
5.5.0, some of it
had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the sn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 10:52 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I basically did a diff from 5.4.29 to 5.4.33 and implemented that diff to
>>> 5.5.0, some of it
>>> had already been done to 5.5.0 and alot of it centered around the snprintf
>>> tidy up's and the
>>> st
On 09/17/2015 04:04 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Was this patch generated with the SVN trunk (5.5.0)?
On 09/17/2015 09:57 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
>>> I have
On 09/17/2015 03:37 PM, Matt Brookings wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
from 5.4.29 to
5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2015 06:23 AM, Drew Wells wrote:
> I have created a patch for vpopmail-5.5.0 which incoporates all the changes
> from 5.4.29 to
> 5.4.33, does anyone want this patch or has work in vpopmail-5.5.0 stalled ?
Drew, I'd be happy to take a look a
Il 17/09/2015 13:18, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c wh
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
On 09/15/2015 03:27 PM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if
Il 15/09/2015 15:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to a
On 09/15/2015 02:26 PM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is mo
Il 15/09/2015 15:10, Drew Wells ha scritto:
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Wh
On 09/15/2015 11:06 AM, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and
On 09/15/2015 11:00 AM, Tonix - Antonio Nati wrote:
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
ginal Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault in vadduser
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vadduser that causes a
segmentation fault when a password does not pas
Il 15/09/2015 11:22, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x)
Hi Drew,
I suggest to install (and debug) vpopmail-5.4.33 that is more stable,
reliable (and recent) than 5.5.0. Whan I try to use 5.5.0 I found many
bug and problems tha new features.
Why you need vpopm
Il 15/09/2015 11:03, Drew Wells ha scritto:
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as
when -e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
I do not understand the problem.
Of course pa
This is probably why the 5.4.0 is still not considered as stable (the latest
stable version is still 5.4.33)
-Original Message-
From: Drew Wells [mailto:drew-vpopm...@elysium.ltd.uk]
Sent: Tuesday 15 September 2015 11:19
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Segmentation fault
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e55641551049011877!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there is a bug in vdominfo that means option 'q' does
not work, there is a missing break after the 'q' case. Additionally
vdominfo's output differs from vuserinfo's output in that in vuserinfo
the quota and the quota usage are treated seperatly, I have changed
vdominfo to fix
In vpopmail-5.5.0 (and I think all 5.4.x) there seems to be no way of
removing an alias_line using valias, I've added this functionality.
Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7e35241555071313485!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/valias.c vpopmail-5.5.0/valias.c
--- vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/valias.c2010-
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e35941551360728760!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vadduser that causes a
segmentation fault when a password does not pass the password_strength
rules. Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7e27341551399513616!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vadduser.c vpopmail-5.5.0/vadduser.c
--- vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vadduser.
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e27941558004510909!
I use the onchange functionality in vpopmail-5.5.0 but find it awkward
that the script is only called once for "add_domain", instead of calling
the script with "add_domain", "add_user" then "mod_user" so have written
a patch to allow this. One side affect is that the order of calls in
vadduser
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e1cc41551654711741!
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:55f7e0eb41551555158803!
In vpopmail-5.5.0 there seems to be a bug in vpopmail.c where the
password strength is checked even if a password isn't used (such as when
-e is used to add the encrypted password). Patch attached.
!DSPAM:55f7df0641553245911066!
diff -uPr vpopmail-5.5.0.orig/vpopmail.c vpopmail-5.5.0/vpopmail
尊敬的同学：您好！
您的求职简历已经收到，我们会尽快进行阅评，之后再决定是否与您面谈！
中信泰富（中国）投资有限公司
人力资源部
!DSPAM:5595fb4341556565779328!
Hi all,
Recently I tested vpopmail-5.4.25 / 5.4.33 with maildrop 2.7 / 2.8.2, I
found that it will add a "From " header to the first line of email, like this:
>From r...@helloworld.com Fri Jun 26 06:27:19 2015
However while I use maildrop 2.6, there is no such problem. I found that
vdelivermail.
Hello,
Currently vpopmail doesn't include trashed messages in quota usage.
These are messages that were marked as deleted (IMAP flag \Deleted) but
are still not expunged. These are denoted by the T flag in Maildir:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html
It seems two of the popular mail servers o
//www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 24 avril 2014 19:46
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection
problem
That could very well be, Tom.
Stéphane, I believe the
Stéphane,
try in this way:
* delete the forward ss...@piemont.fr
* create one normal account ss...@piemont.fr
* insert within this account a forward to spa...@piemont.fr
In this way it should work.
Tonino
Il 24/04/2014 19:45, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
That could very well be, Tom.
Stépha
e
11100 Narbonne
Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SP
Coupe
> 11100 Narbonne
>
> Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
> FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
> GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
>
> http://www.abac-info.com
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
> Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
> À : vchkp
ine-
De : xaf [mailto:x...@abaxe.net]
Envoyé : samedi 19 avril 2014 03:42
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : Re: [vchkpw] Re: !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM]
Rrdirection problem
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When
On 04/18/2014 06:41 PM, xaf wrote:
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
3) what you desire to happen
When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the message
go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to spa...@piemont.fr
And when i send a mass
|--> Eric Shubert, le 18/04/2014 23:38, a dit :
>> 3) what you desire to happen
>> > When i send a message to ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr i want that the
>> > message go to the ssiad-secretar...@piemont.fr mail box and foward to
>> > spa...@piemont.fr
>> >
>> > And when i send a massage to ss.
4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2014 17:50
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet : !!! CHECK SENDER !!![vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Rrdirection problem
Stéphane,
This does not app
matique
1 Bis Ave Pech Loubat
ZI La Coupe
11100 Narbonne
Tél: 33 (0)4 68 41 73 00
FAX : 33 (0)4 6841 73 02
GSM: 33 (0)6 85 36 67 28
http://www.abac-info.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Shubert [mailto:e...@shubes.net]
Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2014 17:50
À : vchkpw@inter7.com
Objet
Il 17/04/2014 20:39, Jeremy Kister ha scritto:
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06
so I plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I
want to add chkuser and tls but also few others like the c
Nice does it have tls?
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I
>> plan to recomp it and I have vpopmail w
Do u know what does this patch include will it work on netqmail 1.06?
Thanks
Inviato da iPhone ()
> Il giorno Apr 17, 2014, alle ore 11:39, Jeremy Kister
> ha scritto:
>
>> On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Hello all
>> I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmai
On 4/17/2014 2:33 PM, Remo Mattei wrote:
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been reall
Hello all
I have a qmail which is running now I want to up it to netqmail 1.06 so I plan
to recomp it and I have vpopmail working so on the new one I want to add
chkuser and tls but also few others like the channel since gmail and others
have been really a pain does anyone suggest a set of patch
Stéphane,
This does not appear to me to be what was written on the QMT list.
In order to be clear, please describe:
1) your configuration (what are accounts, what are forwards)
2) what actually happens
3) what you desire to happen
For example:
1) There are 2 email accounts, ss...@piemont.fr and
Hello,
I have a couple of vpopmail/qmail-based e-mail servers that have worked well
for many years.
A few years ago, we began using the Calendar Server on MacOSX. The calendar
server sits on an internet pipe which doesn't pass port 25, so I can't use the
built-in mail server to handle calendar
t? Or will their email
clients just automate the change?
*From:* "c...@milos.co.za"
*To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
*Subject:* [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPA
e the way they connect? Or will their email clients just
automate the change?
>
> From: "c...@milos.co.za"
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 6:45 AM
>Subject: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM
It doesn't matter how good your password is if you're using plaintext
connections :)
Since every MUA I've used i nthe last few years supports SSL or TLS I
should really get around to deprecating pop3 and imap and only using
pop3s and imaps.
This is especially imporant since some govts are tr
The submission entries outside the US could very well be from hacked accounts.
I'm finding a surprising number of compromised accounts (once a week?),
including users with good passwords, so I have to assume they're snooped on
public wireless, or their computers are compromised by malware of som
Thanks for the reply.
NOTE: None of my users will have sent anything from outside the US.
I've got some log entries for vchkpw-submission (marked as successful in the
log) with non-US IP's (Russia, Egypt, Honk Kong, etc).In my analysis I'm
marking those entries as hacked accounts.
>From what I
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
Cher Client,
Nous avons bien reçu votre e-mail et nous vous en remercions. Nos
collaborateurs le traiteront aussi rapidement que possible.
Attention : ceci est une réponse automatique. Vous ne pouvez donc pas y
répondre.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées.
BNP Paribas Fortis SA
T :
Hi everybody.
I've been hit by a bug in vdelivermail (in maildirquota.c, precisely), and I
want to share the
resolution I've found.
I've recently upgraded to vpopmail 5.4.33, and we experienced that occasionally
(once o twice a day) vdelivermail starts looping, eating all the CPU.
An strace o
Hi everybody.
I've been hit by a bug in vdelivermail (in maildirquota.c, precisely), and I
want to share the
resolution I've found.
I've recently upgraded to vpopmail 5.4.33, and we experienced that occasionally
(once o twice a day) vdelivermail starts looping, eating all the CPU.
An strace o
Hi Eric,
i have it under:
libvpopmail_a-vpopmail.o:
U vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vauth.o:
0caa T vauth_getpw
libvpopmail_a-vutil.o:
U vauth_getpw
So i think it is ok.
Thank you
Bye
Marcello
Il giorno 14/dic/2013, alle ore 03:01, Eric Shubert ha
scritto:
>
Hi,
I have all correct I think.
/home/vpopmail/etc/lib_deps contains:
-L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail -Xlinker -R -Xlinker /usr/lib/mysql
-L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz -lm -lcrypt
So it is correct.
If you see in my log:
checking for ev.h... yes
checking for ev_loop_new in -lev... yes
ch
One more thing, I am looking at my compile location and I do have it, I do get
a shared lib but I am not using it on my server.
Anyhow, I will check and let you know.
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
!DSPAM:52ab6e0
Hi Marcello,
I am looking at my installation and I do not have vusaged are you sure you are
using 5.4.33?
Ciao
--
Remo Mattei
On December 13, 2013 at 12:21:39, Marcello Lupo (ml...@itspecialist.it) wrote:
vusaged
!DSPAM:52ab6d5c34264660412975!
Hi,
Thank you.
I tried in vpopmail-5.4.33 dir:
make distclean
autoreconf
automake
autoconf
./configure --enable-tcpserver-file=/home/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp \
--disable-roaming-users \
--enable-onchange-script \
--enable-auth-module=mysql \
--enable-logging=p \
--disable-mysql-limits \
--enable-v
Hi,
yes all is correct:
the only libvpopmail.a found are:
/usr/src/vpopmail-5.4.33/libvpopmail.a
/home/vpopmail/lib/libvpopmail.a
and are identical files.
I think the issue can reside in the way the configure script make the check of
vauth_getpw in the libvpopmail or depending on some configu
Hello,
Yes i have done it but it is not woking.
Anyway the make distclean is useless in the vusaged directory. It doesn’t
produce any effect since the Makefile have still to be created because
./configure is not working.
The libvpopmail.a is correctly found and loaded in the LDCONFIG.
Any hint?
T
Hello,
any news on this issue?
I have exactly this issue on ubuntu server 12.04 LTS x86_64 .
checking for vauth_getpw in -lvpopmail... no
checking for vauth_getall in -lvpopmail... no
checking for get_domain_entries in -lvpopmail... no
checking for client_query_quick in -lvpopmail... yes
configure
Replying to myself…
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.vpopmail/20650
Looks like I need 5.4.33. Built it with most of the strncpy and other nice
patches, compiled clean, and I'll do some testing tomorrow. If it holds up,
I'll submit my updated port to the FreeBSD folks and see if they'll ta
Where should I be digging around to see where large quotas fall apart in
vpopmail?
I'm on 5.4.32 (long story, but I like the extra security cleanup in the FreeBSD
ports version) and while 5GB+ quotas seem to work fine when dealing with
individual user accounts (delivery, displaying quota, maild
Il 02/10/2013 03:30, Charles Sprickman ha scritto:
Simple question I hope…
What's the recommendation on the vpopmail side on integrating Dovecot's LDA for
final delivery?
I've seen various suggestions, including just calling it from the user's .qmail
file. In that particular case, it's not a
On 10/01/2013 06:30 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Simple question I hope…
Some yes, some no. ;)
What's the recommendation on the vpopmail side on integrating Dovecot's LDA for
final delivery?
I'm not aware of any recommendation per se.
In the QMail-Toaster community (I am the project leade
Simple question I hope…
What's the recommendation on the vpopmail side on integrating Dovecot's LDA for
final delivery?
I've seen various suggestions, including just calling it from the user's .qmail
file. In that particular case, it's not at all clear to me how other tools
that would touch t
Hello,
I am installing vpopmail together with dovecot.
Mail must be delivered to /home/vpopmail/domains///Maildir,
not by vdelivermail itself, but by dovecot-lda (to keep index files updated,
among other things).
So, I write a /home/vpopmail/domains///.qmail file,
containing simply
| preline
I have qmail 1.03 with several patches including qmail-smtpd-auth-0.4.3
and vpopmail 5.4.33.
After upgrading Debian 6 -> 7, I broke SMTP-AUTH *only* when using
stunnel for SSL.
When trying to auth over stunnel4, i see:
454 oops, problem with child and I can't auth (#4.3.0)
syslog shows:
Jun
t;Thibault Richard" wrote:
My way of doing (I’m the author of http://qmailrocks.thibs.com) is not so bad
From: Ron Herzing
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:49 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to
vpopmail/domains/domain directory
I
the author of http://qmailrocks.thibs.com) is not so bad
>
>
>
> From: Ron Herzing
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:49 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to
> vpopmail/domains/domain directory
>
> I word of caution. Qmai
sday, May 16, 2013 3:51 PM
> *To:* vchkpw@inter7.com
> *Subject:* Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir
> to vpopmail/domains/domain directory
>
>Hello Geeks,
>
> I resolved it by adding www-data to vchkpw group and changed owner and
> group of the a
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to
vpopmail/domains/domain directory
Hello Geeks,
I resolved it by adding www-data to vchkpw group and changed owner and group of
the apache files to vpopmail:vchkpw earlier it was www-data was owner and
group. Now i am facing
My way of doing (I’m the author of http://qmailrocks.thibs.com) is not so bad
From: Ron Herzing
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:49 PM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to vpopmail/domains/domain
directory
I word of caution. Qmailrocks is not a good way
On 05/16/2013 06:51 AM, swaroop kumar wrote:
I resolved it by adding www-data to vchkpw group and changed owner and
group of the apache files to vpopmail:vchkpw earlier it was www-data was
owner and group. Now i am facing new error "could not update file".
This bit is solved in qmail-toaster by
I agree with that! It used to be a good point, then the best one was from Bill
but that was taken down ;). I would suggest to look at qmail.org or at this url
http://notes.sagredo.eu
Bye,
Remo
On May 16, 2013, at 06:49 , Ron Herzing wrote:
> I word of caution. Qmailrocks is not a good way
If you're talking about QmailAdmin, you need to make sure it's got the suid bit
set and is owned by the vpopmail user.
You shouldn't have changed Apache to run as vpopmail, and should revert those
changes.
If vpopmail is working for you, you should focus your efforts on
troubleshooting QmailAd
*
>
> As it seems you are using my guide, could you please do :
>
> ** **
>
> *chmod +x /downloads/scripts/qmr_inst_check
> /downloads/scripts/qmr_inst_check*
>
> ** **
>
> and tell me the result
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards
>
ng my guide, could you please do :
>
> ** **
>
> *chmod +x /downloads/scripts/qmr_inst_check
> /downloads/scripts/qmr_inst_check*
>
> ** **
>
> and tell me the result
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
I word of caution. Qmailrocks is not a good way to learn how to install
Qmail.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:14 AM, swaroop kumar wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am switching my mail server from sendmail to qmail, currently installing
> qmail in debian and i am following this link http://qmailrocks.thibs.c
d tell me the result
Best Regards
Thibault a.k.a Thibs
From: swaroop kumar [mailto:swaroopk...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 16 mai 2013 14:23
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Re: [vchkpw] [SPAM] Error: Unable to chdir to
vpopmail/domains/domain directory
Hi,
Permis
On 16/05/2013 03:23 PM, swaroop kumar wrote:
Hi,
Permissions seems to be ok.
drwxrwx--- 8 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 May 16 13:56 vpopmail
Regards,
Swaroop.
Check ~vpopmail/domains and all the directories leading to the
domain.com one.
!DSPAM:5194ac5434121347158045!
Hi,
Permissions seems to be ok.
drwxrwx--- 8 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 May 16 13:56 vpopmail
Regards,
Swaroop.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Todor Petkov wrote:
> On 16/05/2013 03:14 PM, swaroop kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am switching my mail server from sendmail to qmail, currently
>>
On 16/05/2013 03:14 PM, swaroop kumar wrote:
Hi All,
I am switching my mail server from sendmail to qmail, currently
installing qmail in debian and i am following this link
http://qmailrocks.thibs.com/ [1]
I Have a problem in creating domains using vpopmail, below is the
error thrown when i am
Hi All,
I am switching my mail server from sendmail to qmail, currently installing
qmail in debian and i am following this link http://qmailrocks.thibs.com/
I Have a problem in creating domains using vpopmail, below is the error
thrown when i am trying to create a domain.
"Unable to chdir to vpo
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
