On Friday 27 August 2010 20:22:03 Rob Davis wrote:
> I am using a Eurospec TV although am trying to use it at 60hz (I moved
> to the US from Italy) via a DVI to HDMI cable. I have two modelines,
> which I switch by my remote using the xrandr command, 720p60 looks
> better, but I think I should usi
Sorry to jump in on this, but I wonder if people could suggest what the
settings should be in xineliboutput plugins options?
I have just upped my card from an 8400 to an N210 with 512MB ram in
order to get 1080i/60hz interlacing working. It's an improvement, but I
think I still have somewhere
En/na Goga777 ha escrit:
if you disabled full gpu scaling , how upscaling will work really ? what and
how will upscale SD video to 1080p ?
This setting is only useful if your display device can't scale on its own or
the scaling is worse quality. If you enable it the card will always output
nati
Jukka Tastula napsal(a):
On Friday 27 August 2010 11:32:11 Goga777 wrote:
if you disabled full gpu scaling , how upscaling will work really ? what and
how will upscale SD video to 1080p ?
This setting is only useful if your display device can't scale on its own or
the scaling is worse qualit
En/na JJussi ha escrit:
I had (up till today) problem with my NVidia, what ever I described in
xorg.conf, output was 60Hz..
Command what fixed everything:
Option "FlatPanelProperties" "Scaling=Native"
in Section "Screen"
That's the same as disabling "Force full gpu scaling" in n
I had (up till today) problem with my NVidia, what ever I described in
xorg.conf, output was 60Hz..
Command what fixed everything:
Option "FlatPanelProperties" "Scaling=Native"
in Section "Screen"
Now,
#> DISPLAY=:0 nvidia-settings -nt -q RefreshRate
50,00 Hz
#>
JJussi
On 27.08.20
En/na Goga777 ha escrit:
Provided that I disable "Force Full GPU Scaling", the tv reports a 50Hz
signal.
if you disabled full gpu scaling , how upscaling will work really ? what and
how will upscale SD video to 1080p ?
According to the help text, that option is only useful if the display
r
On Friday 27 August 2010 11:32:11 Goga777 wrote:
> if you disabled full gpu scaling , how upscaling will work really ? what and
> how will upscale SD video to 1080p ?
This setting is only useful if your display device can't scale on its own or
the scaling is worse quality. If you enable it the c
Al 26/08/10 10:33, En/na Thomas Hilber ha escrit:
to verify. Even the Xorg.0.log lies about the fact that 50Hz are active
but in reality it uses 60Hz. Maybe nVidia has fixed that in the meantime.
To watch HD broadcasts I use the hdmi output on my laptop.
It isn't configured in xorg but I just
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:06:51PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Are you aware of the interaction between DynamicTwinView and XRandR? The
no. But if Xorg.0.log tells me (in the bad case):
(II) NVIDIA(0): Validating Mode "1920x1080":
(II) NVIDIA(0): 1920 x 1080 @ 50 Hz
(II) NVIDIA(0): Fo
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:33:48 +0200
Thomas Hilber wrote:
> When I started to setup my VDPAU machines (end of last year) I
> first made sure that the Xserver really is running a 50Hz modeline.
> I mostly play 25/50Hz streams. This way I found an Xserver bug/misbehavior.
> Only if I explicitly set
Hi,
Am 26.08.10 12:16, schrieb Laz:
Then my old TV blew up and I now have a full-HD LCD TV. I've been using
the same setup with the new TV and it still works pretty well for the SD
signals I can currently receive.
if you new LCD with HDMI use it to connect your HDMI output of the ION
board wi
On Thursday 26 Aug 2010, Thomas Hilber wrote:
> When I started to setup my VDPAU machines (end of last year) I
> first made sure that the Xserver really is running a 50Hz modeline.
> I mostly play 25/50Hz streams. This way I found an Xserver
> bug/misbehavior. Only if I explicitly set the modeline
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:16:37PM +0300, Prelude wrote:
> I have suffered this annoying judder in both live and recording viewing.
> My config_xineliboutput: http://pastebin.com/kxe7RvX0
> xorg.xonf: http://pastebin.com/6fCvWvxU
sorry, from that configuration alone I can't tell you what's going
On 25.8.2010 20:45, Thomas Hilber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:13:56AM +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
as MPEG/AVC input-stream is
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:13:56AM +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
> Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
> as MPEG/AVC input-stream is not synchronized to output framerate.
>> If you can find a modeline what your output is currently using you can
>> use online services to check framerates it provides.
> "xvidtune -show" prints the current modeline, but the refresh rate
> calculated from it will not be the same as the actual rate.
My used modeline is (1080p60)
$ x
On 21 August 2010 14:54, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:37:10AM +0300, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
>> Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:54 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
>> > > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
>> > > outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some j
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 01:37:10AM +0300, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
> Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:54 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
> > > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> > > outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
> > > as MPEG/AVC input-stream
btw, have a look on new ASRock Core 100HT NetTop
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=asrock_core100ht&num=1
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Fri, 2010-08-20 at 10:08 +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
> > There is no graphics card, BD/DVD player or other standalone device that
> outputs
> > those rates exactly. I don't know how much they deviate, but I'd guess
> it's usually
> > something like 0.01 % (50.005 Hz instead of 5
On 20 August 2010 00:37, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
> Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:54 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
>> > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
>> > outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
>> > as MPEG/AVC input-stream is not synchronize
>> > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or
>> > 23.976Hz outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on
>> > display output as MPEG/AVC input-stream is not synchronized to output
framerate.
>
>> do you mean that all nvidia vdpau cards with existing drivers fr
Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:54 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
> > Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> > outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause some judder on display output
> > as MPEG/AVC input-stream is not synchronized to output framerate.
>
> do you mean that all nv
> >> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia
> >> graphics components? It would really be great to not depend on
> >> proprietary drivers.
>
> > Hardware decoding through VA-API is working on some Intel chipsets
> > and CPUs, but I haven't seen any usable GPU deinterlacin
Hi,
ke, 2010-08-18 kello 10:13 +0200, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com
kirjoitti:
> I also would like to remind the framerate issues. Naturally you decide what
> is enough precision and quality for you.
>
> Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
> outputs to your T
On 18.08.2010 11:13, jori.hamalai...@teliasonera.com wrote:
I also would like to remind the framerate issues. Naturally you decide
what
is enough precision and quality for you.
Computer hardware usually cannot provide 50.000Hz, 59.940Hz or 23.976Hz
outputs to your TV/Monitor. This will cause so
On 18.08.2010 00:36, Paul Menzel wrote:
What driver did you use?
I used the ppa:gma500/ppa repository as described in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupportComponentsVideoCardsPoulsbo for
Ubuntu Lucid.
There is lot of green in the table the real situation for this driver is
not as excelle
>> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia
>> graphics components? It would really be great to not depend on
>> proprietary drivers.
> Hardware decoding through VA-API is working on some Intel chipsets
> and CPUs, but I haven't seen any usable GPU deinterlacing implemen
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
>> Just wondering why you even care about this... The Nvidia drivers
>> work well for me and honestly that's all I care about.
>
> Good for you. As I wrote I do not want to start a flame war. But you
> asked. ;-)
>
> Everyone should decide for h
Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 09:48 -0700 schrieb VDR User:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Paul Menzel
> wrote:
> > is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> > components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> > drivers.
>
> Just wondering why
Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 19:06 +0300 schrieb Seppo Ingalsuo:
> > is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> > components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> > drivers.
> >
> > The VIA chipset VX855 was supposed to have support 1080p suppo
On Tue, 2010-08-17 kello 19:36 +0300, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:39 +0300, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
> > IMO the only reason to go for a separate card over ION would be higher
> > quality 1080i deinterlacing. You'll need GT 220 for that since GeForce
> > 210 is only slightly faster
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> drivers.
Just wondering why you even care about this... The Nvidia drivers
work well for me and hone
Hi Paul,
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 17:13 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> drivers.
Hardware decoding through VA-API is working on some Intel chipsets and
CPUs, but
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:39 +0300, Niko Mikkilä wrote:
> Yes, as VDR User said, the latest generation VP4/VDPAU feature set C
> cards (GeForce 210, GT 220, ...) have an integrated audio controller.
> The ALSA driver should support 7.1 channel PCM too.
>
I found that someone has had success with s
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:56 +0300, Rene wrote:
> I'm also starting to check for a new setup, and i'm on the same line as
> you: Silent, low-power device that will runn 24/7. I have not yet looked
> too much around, but there is one thing i'm wondering. What kind of
> dvb-devices will you use?
I
>
> is there really no recommendation for a board not using Nvidia graphics
> components? It would really be great to not depend on proprietary
> drivers.
>
> The VIA chipset VX855 was supposed to have support 1080p support build
> in. But those devices do not seem to be available in non Asian r
Dear VDR folks,
Am Sonntag, den 15.08.2010, 21:59 +0300 schrieb Seppo Ingalsuo:
> My old HTPC motherboard died and I'm now looking for a new one to become
> a vdr-sxfe "thin" client. The old Silverstone case is for normal ATX
> board but I no more need PCI slots so a smaller one, even a Mini-I
On 15.8.2010 21:59, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My old HTPC motherboard died and I'm now looking for a new one to become
> a vdr-sxfe "thin" client. The old Silverstone case is for normal ATX
> board but I no more need PCI slots so a smaller one, even a Mini-ITX
> would do. Since the PC runs 2
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 19:05 +0300, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
> Asus Bravo 220 silent seems to be a passive model. Do you know if these
> non-motherboard integrated cards support 7.1ch PCM audio over HDMI?
Yes, as VDR User said, the latest generation VP4/VDPAU feature set C
cards (GeForce 210, GT
On 16.8.2010 19:05, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
Asus Bravo 220 silent seems to be a passive model. Do you know if these
non-motherboard integrated cards support 7.1ch PCM audio over HDMI?
http://wiki.xbmc.org/?title=HOW-TO_set_up_HDMI_audio_on_nVidia_GeForce_G210%2C_GT220%2C_or_GT240
Don't know is t
> would you like please show qvdpautest results for zotzc ionitx
This is already been posted on a few different forums on the net.
Google will get that info quicker I think.
Also, I would think any GT220 has an own audio controller and
therefore HDMI audio but this is an assumption. My GT220 doe
> > I recommend you to use PCI-E GT220 Geforce card with motheboard which you
> > will choice
>
> Asus Bravo 220 silent seems to be a passive model. Do you know if these
> non-motherboard integrated cards support 7.1ch PCM audio over HDMI?
seems, doesn't support
> I got as PM one tip that poi
> Why not get one of the Zotac IONITX boards and stick it in the M350
> case like I did?
would you like please show qvdpautest results for zotzc ionitx
Fanless, low power, and OS can be installed on SSD,
> usb flash stick, Microdrive, SD(HC), CF, you name it. They all have
> usb adapters so th
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Seppo Ingalsuo wrote:
>> Fanless, low power, and OS can be installed on SSD,
>> usb flash stick, Microdrive, SD(HC), CF, you name it. They all have
>> usb adapters so that way your system will remain totally silent.
>
> True, my old IDE HDD is not compatible wit
Thanks VDR User,
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 14:01 -0700, VDR User wrote:
> Why not get one of the Zotac IONITX boards and stick it in the M350
> case like I did?
I'm not familiar with Zotac but I could try it instead my usual of Asus
mobos (the one that died was an Asus too). Zotac seems to be sold he
Hi, Thanks Goga777,
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 00:35 +0400, Goga777 wrote:
> I recommend you to use PCI-E GT220 Geforce card with motheboard which you
> will choice
Asus Bravo 220 silent seems to be a passive model. Do you know if these
non-motherboard integrated cards support 7.1ch PCM audio over H
Why not get one of the Zotac IONITX boards and stick it in the M350
case like I did? Fanless, low power, and OS can be installed on SSD,
usb flash stick, Microdrive, SD(HC), CF, you name it. They all have
usb adapters so that way your system will remain totally silent.
__
Приветствую, Seppo
I recommend you to use PCI-E GT220 Geforce card with motheboard which you will
choice
this series has very good performance for 1080i temporal_spatial deinterlacing
and h264 decoding
have a look on qvdpautest
http://linuxdvb.org.ru/wbb/index.php?page=Thread&postID=16142#post
Hi,
My old HTPC motherboard died and I'm now looking for a new one to become
a vdr-sxfe "thin" client. The old Silverstone case is for normal ATX
board but I no more need PCI slots so a smaller one, even a Mini-ITX
would do. Since the PC runs 24/7 I'm interested in low-power
motherboards with
51 matches
Mail list logo