On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:30 PM, Michael I wrote:Uh not to flog a dead horse but I remember some time back when Josh Leo loudly said the same thing...same song, same arugement. Is this something that should be addressed? I do not know the complete tift here but reading Manchessemo's complaint here
I remember reading about holographic storage / crystalline data storage
in the mid 90s but back then they could write the data but couldn't
read it back off. seems like they've fixed the problems according to
the tests run last november. looking forward to the personal
device using these to be
Phenomenal response! Lets bring this together, expose the trials and triumphs. Your only as good as the tools provided and your only as good as the people around you. What can be done to neutralize the negative emotions around this subject? Is this a medium that can change perception? How
Free program iSquint converts your AVI and MPEG video files to iPod-
compatible MP4 files.
http://homepage.mac.com/tylerl82/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!
There's been a idea that has been promoted to not define
Videoblogging. That it is too soon, that defining it will lock it
down and constrain it, and so on. The error is that a model,
definition, thesis is required to test if something is viable. You
don't discover something by not applying a
For the record, I don't ever want a *job and yes, vlogging *is
in most respects my life. I've been working toward creating things that are
served by what vlogging offers since I was but a wee lass in saddle
shoes.
If you feel on the outside ask yourself this: why do you
begrudge folks
hi folks
I am still using my cheap kiddie cam but I have a real camcorder on
the way.
I have decided to do vlogs about my new hometown Providence RI. I am in
love with Providence after living in Nyc for twenty years. Here are my
feeble attempts at vlogging about Providence. More to come.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it
became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.
'The Birth of a Nation' goes for 187 minutes.
Just for the record.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is the form of a duration around 90
minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.
This is so wrong it's not funny.
The length criterion (not to mention the absurd narrative-biased three
act structure
Doug,
I enjoyed those. I've been driving through Providence for years,
stopping only occasionally for breakfast near Brown. Good to see some
other parts of the city.
You should definately link your videos into the map!
http://wayfaring.com/maps/show/2721
(It looks like it's centered on NYC,
Warning - do not step into the ring with Matt Clayfield
on matters of the cinema. You will get served.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is the form of a duration around
SA-WEET!
... the treckie in me just wept a little ...
- Dave
http://www.davidmeade.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
oxymoron alert!
there is no such thing as a correct model
otherwise it would not be a model
all models are approximations
someday even physicist's will realize this and stop looking for the
right one
once a model is stamped correct, all you have is dogma
Enric wrote:
That model may be
It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model
at all.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oxymoron alert!
there is no such thing as a correct model
otherwise it would not be a model
all models are approximations
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it
became a vibrant media once Griffith found and clearly displayed the
60-120 minute, three act model in Birth of a Nation.
'The
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is the form of a duration around 90
minutes with three acts that does define the cinematic form.
This is so wrong it's not funny.
Joshua, it is so rare to have someone else take
your idea and turn it into reality. I've always been one with many ideas
and not enough time or energy or money for follow-through.
This is a great idea! In fact, I've always
toyed with the idea of having a "travel" TV show in which people
Glad you like it! Hope we can get some momentum going.
It would be cool to be out on a trip in some anonymous city, (NY,
Providence, Hoboken, Davis) staying in a hotel, and to be able to go to
the map and see what different neighborhoods are like, based on the
videos people have posted to the
On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll certainly set out and do a short piece on
Hoboken, NJ--which is a bedroom community for Manhattan and has become the Ft.
Lauderdale of New Jersey where all the young people gather to
party.
You make it sound much more exciting than
Enric wrote:
It is more useful to have a model that applies somewhat than no model
at all.
-- Enric
i can't say i agree with that enric
i think vlogs are more like canvas...
i looked up the definition of canvas a few times
all the ones i found were pretty lame
and they have no bearing
Thanks for this lead to a free program for
converting MPEG AVI files.
I've never understood what/why the reasons are for
people putting "free programs" on the Internet. I understand some Linux
users who passionately like the idea of open-source sharing. However, what
is the reason for
I don't understand the need to "strictly define"
videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced
"independent"video from advertising trailers promoting a commercial
product (movie trailers, etc.) The independence of unfettered personal
_expression_ is key to
I want to second all that Jan has said. When
I first stumbled onto the world of vlogging, she was one of the first people to
take the trouble to respond to my questions about cameras, computers,
etc.
She is someone who has slaved selfishly to help
build this community. And she, so far as
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the need to strictly define
videoblogging except to separate individually (or collectively) produced
independentvideo from advertising trailers promoting a commercial
product (movie trailers, etc.) The
It will be interesting to see different
perspectives on living somewhere. I'm hardly a fan of the Wall Street
greasers you describe. However, when some of them died on 9/11, the town
built a monument to them.
I see we do patronize the same green grocer at 3rd
Washington Street. Ever
I always appreciate hearing Jan's voice of sanity. I'm the laughing woman, who would be laughing more had anything of substance I told the reporter showed up in the piece. Don't get me wrong -- any publicity is good publicity. The traffic spike has been just enough to tick off my host and
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Adam Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/17/05, Randolfe Wicker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the need to strictly define videoblogging
except to
separate individually (or collectively) produced independent
video from
advertising
...independent journalism?
...connecting people?
...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
...criticized for being too banal?
...an endless debate on what it really was?
Now it's just myspace.com with video. And it's worse than blogging, with all
the self
promotion. People seem to act
Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead.
Here's something to think about for those that demand definition. Perhaps
defintions are for
those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get it? Definitions
are a crutch.
Go do something.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ha, I had mistakenly thought this conversation was dead.
Here's something to think about for those that demand definition.
Perhaps defintions are for
those who can't simply enjoy something, or just plain don't get
My Groups |
videoblogging Main Page
Reminder from
the Calendar of videoblogging
Do you really think videoblogging ISN'T those things, anymore? Has it really
changed that
much in such a brief period of time? The first three points on your list are
exactly why I
watch videoblogs, and the last one is why I avoid this yahoo group.
Every day in my little aggregator I find
It has changed quite a bit. it hasn't gone way of
mySpace otherwise we'd all be rich.
I think it is harder now to find what you want...you
have to filter. This is what happens when things be
come pop then culture.
--- missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you really think videoblogging
In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging)
may be a spirit
the feeling of the media's mastering
Loiez
Le 17 déc. 05 à 20:03, Enric a écrit :
Or perhaps they are not. There's no contradiction between having a
model and putting it in action (doing).
-- Enric
In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
allow anyone to be heard.
Vlogging and blogging are our bullhorns, our pamphlets, our
I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
right to the opportunity...
Remember, there is nothing obligating anyone to view your content just
because you publish it. Viewers will always have the right to tune you
out.
-josh
On 12/17/05, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 17 déc. 05 à 21:03, Ron Watson a écrit :
In our corporate dominated culture, everyone has the right to free
speech but not too many of us have the right to be heard. Well, that
is going to change, my friends. Vlogging and blogging are going to
allow anyone to be heard.
Vlogging and
This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of
the impure.
I urge you to begin them immediately.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Dec 17, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Loiez D. wrote:
Le 17 déc. 05 à 21:03, Ron Watson a écrit :
In our corporate dominated culture, everyone
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion vlogging is not a modele ( there is x modele of vlogging)
may be a spirit the feeling of the media's mastering
i like the sounds of that!
i'm not one for dogma or definitions. but i've always been a sucker
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/6305130949/104-5203272-5767925?v=glancen=130:
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of
Howdy Rick, My compliments on the new features Feedflare. http://www.burningdoor.com/feedburner/archives/001543.htmlThis is an open letter to ask if you and the guys at feedburner would be willing to fix itunes.What specifically I mean is itunes supports plain-text ONLY, no formating, no links
God, you're right.
Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.
I sob for those days when it was just Jay and I in a tent together
working on our novels.
Jesus. This has caused me to really look into my life and really
question things.
As a result I'm going to go off
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined.
But a start. I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of
videoblogging. Just that it is more useful to have a workable
definition than none.
--
chris_koehn wrote:
...independent journalism?
...connecting people?
...the occasional interesting artistic tidbit?
...criticized for being too banal?
...an endless debate on what it really was?
Ah, the good ole' days. Strange the compressed time schedule these
days. It used to be
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chris_koehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...an endless debate on what it really was?
Sure, but right now I'm feeling like I have to argue on behalf of
cinema in general. Crazy stuff...
I even once left
this list because I was causing trouble by criticizing
You tell em Josh!
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Dec 17, 2005, at 3:07 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote:
I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
right to the opportunity...
Remember, there is nothing obligating anyone to view your content just
because you publish it.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would amend this to the opportunity to be heard or maybe the
right to the opportunity...
And that's what counts.
The read-write web has turned negative liberties into positive liberties.
At least for some. I
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of
the impure.
I urge you to begin them immediately.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
Videobloggers of the world, unite!
We were the media
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This can only be enforced with STRICT and REGULAR purges and TESTS of
the impure.
I urge you to
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We were the media
Actually, I've always had a problem with the term we are the media.
I mean, do we really want to be the media? The media are evil.
I personally think the 'the' should have been removed.
We are
My reply to Michael (sent privately earlier, hadn't realized he'd
posted in the group as well):
Michael -
I actually met for a few hours with the iTunes podcasting team this
week in San Francisco, and better rendering of show notes, links to
items, comments, etc. was high on my list of
we will be "the" media ?Le 17 déc. 05 à 22:47, Chuck Olsen a écrit : We were the media --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Clayfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This can only be enforced with
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we will be the media?
A media, among many. There will be no 'the.'
Now, *this* is absurd...
:D
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not online. Make a
Désolé, j'ai peut-être fait un contresens et il serait plus facile pour moi de m'exprimer en français ;-(LoiezWhy you don't speak french ? and spanish, turkish, german..Le 17 déc. 05 à 23:07, Matthew Clayfield a écrit : --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Loiez D." [EMAIL
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why you don't speak french ? and spanish, turkish, german..
Because I can't!
Puisque je ne peux pas!
Weil ich nicht kann!
¡Porque no puedo!
And so on and so forth.
Yahoo! Groups
Sorry for this thread i was angry ;-n
because it's difficult to be a citizen of the world
But I think vlogging could be a way for that
Peace, love, and vlogging for all !!!
Loiez
Le 17 déc. 05 à 23:29, Matthew Clayfield a écrit :
And so on and so forth.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there's a definition of cinema, I would say too loosely defined.
But a start. I'm not proposing a restrictive defintion of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We were the media
Actually, I've always had a problem with the term we are the media.
I mean, do we really want to be the media?
Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL half of the world and my friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter?
regards,vincent
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a crime to have models...
And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging.
You didn't say that a certain form was or could be a model for a
certain type of cinema, Enric, you said that a
Define mediaEnric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Matthew Clayfield" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chuck Olsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:We were the mediaActually, I've always had a problem with the term "we are
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
tools. Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
be media.
Sigh.
Enric, that remains true with or without the 'the'.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a comment on Amazon.com on the running time of Birth of a Nation:
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
Wow, what a great idea. I'd love to be able to order a film at the
length I prefer. Imagine King
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:09 +0100, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
tools. Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
be media.
Since I managed to bring up McLuhan in the video conference today: We
don't
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a crime to have models...
And I'm not saying it is. And I'm still not talking about videoblogging.
You didn't say that a
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:21:47 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
Wow,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagine King Kong at around 5 minutes.
There's a vlog entry in that.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Birth of a Nation has had different running times depending on what
the various distibutors over time thought worked best.
Oh, so
Hi, I am considering buying a camera and am curious if it really
matters which format I use if my video is going to end up online. I will be
filming in Kenya, which is in the PAL half of the world and my
friends tell me I should get a PAL camera. Does it really matter?
regards,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though finding the definition providing the fundatmental
characteristic of videoblogging will also be useful.
The fundamental characteristic of videoblogging is time-based images
exisiting in a more or less permeable network
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a statement of fact, not value.
You were contradicting yourself.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
Amazon.com is NOT an authority. Check the IMDb if you have to check
anything.
i think Amazon owns IMDB.
-Josh
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
Make some more p-money bird vids while you're at it ;)
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Weagel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
God, you're right.
Call in the UN. A great tragedy has befallen this once great giant.
I sob for those days when it was
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a statement of fact, not value.
You were contradicting yourself.
You're correct on that point.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i think Amazon owns IMDB.
Really? Wow. I had no idea.
What u$e could they po$$ibly have with a $ite like that, I wonder?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain and/or example permeable network context.
The multidirectional communication flow of the internet.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Most low income homes are not
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain and/or example permeable network context.
The multidirectional communication flow of the internet.
OK, what about the blog
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain and/or example permeable network context.
The
At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you guys having fun with this?
I hope so,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 0:03 + 18/12/05, Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
--- In
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you guys having fun with this?
I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...
Starting? A little?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real
At 0:12 + 18/12/05, Matthew Clayfield wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you guys having fun with this?
I hope so, because its starting to drag on a little...
Starting? A little?
It's all about the tension over time. We'll
which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses ;-/
On Dec 17, 2005, at 6:42 PM, Matthew Clayfield wrote:
If cinema is a phylum, videoblogging is a genus.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop
This is just too much... I liked this group the first week but you
all seem so worried about nothing...
OH Richard nice Rocketboom !!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all about the tension over time. We'll come to that later in our
series. :-)
Actually, I can't think of a worse example of storytelling than
discussion list topics! They suck hard when it comes time
Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
some conversations are better carried on off-list.
-Josh
On 12/17/05, jeffrey_harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just too much... I liked this group the first week but you
all seem so worried about nothing...
OH
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which would make videobloggers all gen(i)uses ;-/
Ha ha.
Seriously, though, we might say that if videoblogging is a genus, then
the various types of videoblogging (personal, citizen journalism,
experimental,
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
some conversations are better carried on off-list.
Or maybe it's better not to talk about such things at all!
Surely it's important for
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make some more p-money bird vids while you're at it ;)
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
Susan, I think you have Bottom Union mixed up with Human Dog. We have nothing
to do
with Human Dog and the flith they're spewing over
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Matthew Clayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't judge us all over a zealous conversation b/n a few people
some conversations are better carried on off-list.
Or maybe
This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts
floating around
out there.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Bennett-Forrest [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of
Bill - You just nailed it. Well done.On 12/17/05, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a very controversial film. No doubt there are several different cuts floating around
out there.
Bill Streeter
LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
www.lofistl.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard
I just decided to learn how to vblog. It actually doesn't look to
bad except that I can't get past a very basic step.
I went to the Free Vlog tutorial at: http://freevlog.org/#compress
I am using a Dell 4550 PC and have Windows Movie Maker. So I opened
WMM and dragged and dropped an video clip
Useful email tip:
Set the junk mail filters in your mail program to exclude and
automatically delete mail from distasteful posters.
Chris Weagel
www.human-dog.com
On Dec 17, 2005, at 8:08 PM, bottomunion wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make
Hey Joseph,
Sorry about that. The tutorial uses Movie Maker from Service Pack 1
Here's how you do it with the current version (the one you have):
1. File Save Movie File...
2. Choose My Computer, click Next
3. Give your file a name and choose a place to save it. click next
4. Choose Other
On Behalf Of Joseph Puentes
Well for the life of me I can't seem to find the Save Movie button
and options to do the other and NTSC 768. [in fact that whole row is
missing I see the menu items -file-edit-view- like in the tutorial and
I see the row of items below that has undo, redo,
98 matches
Mail list logo
