OK probably not new to the long term Vorts but still very interesting as
are Fleischmann's comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=gGJiLrG3fLY
With respect as I in no way mean to make this statement personal: What a
load of self service CRAP. Are you blind as well as mentally impaired?
Do you ONLY see and read what you wish to see and read to support such a
BS statement?
On 12/18/2011 3:06 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
...it's been 22
to their assumptions, an external electric field
has no physical effects within the volume of a conductive electrolyte,
except for possible tiny leakage currents...
within mutual service, Rich Murray, 254-A Donax Avenue, Imperial
Beach, CA 91932 505-819-7388
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
505-819-7388
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm only small fish and late to the party. I do wish I was around when your
friend Eugene Mallove was alive. I may have ended up very bloody and lying
in the gutter but I would have put up a fight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VymhJCcNBBc
]:Twenty-Year History of Lattice-Enabled Nuclear
Reactions (LENR) - Hiding in Plain Sight
Am 16.12.2011 21:59, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VymhJCcNBBc
It is interesting and looks very convincing.
However, it is unclear to me how performant this is.
For example
Horace, I feel a LOT of LENR claims (both ways) are more about
Testosterone levels in Alpha Males than physics. I guess we are not that
far from the cave as we would like to believe.
On 12/17/2011 4:44 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
http
Mark, as an old engineer who has seen a LOT of Jaw Dropping things and
S**T, in the pit of my stomach, which I have learned to trust, LENR is
very real as are the results of Leonardo. As for DGT, I await to read
their publicly released test results.
What is now being revealed is the high
When you feed the output back into the input and there is additional
power to supply energy to an external load, then the COP is infinite as
also occurs in a Fossil or Nuclear plant which also have infinite COPs
if you exclude the energy obtained from the fuel. So claiming a LENR
generator has
, it is all about LCOE, reliability, market
acceptance and identifying the low hanging fruit before the other guy.
On 12/16/2011 9:37 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make
...@gmail.com wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
For the E-Cat or any other LENR generator to make inroads into
the global energy generation market, the LCOE per kWh of
delivered energy must be lower than from any
Interesting read:
http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/why-big-energy-wants-kill-lret
Now imagine what would happen with a LENR generator with a LCOE below coal.
Oops. Forgot about the big bang did we? It is amazing that based on a
few 100 years of observations by one species, on one planet, on the
outer rim of one galaxy of billions in the known universe that a semi
salient entity would make that statement. Had you said that 1,000,000
years in the
I would expect the pump noise to alter. Before boiling occurred the pump
only had to contend with flow loss induced pressure requirements. When
steam was generated it had to handle the flow losses plus the steam
pressure on the unboiled water that would be trying to force the feed
water back
Why? Because Rossi has apparently cracked the reliability issue. I can
tell you he is being super conservative about the COP number. The 1 MW
test had virtually NO input power. close to infinite COP, 5.5 hours of
heat after death until finally the customer's acceptance engineer said
I have
I think more his +10 kW outputs with a few 100 watts in is hard to
question and that is which causes the stares and envy. As for
questionable methods, the 15 Jan test was done under the supervision of
the university professors and scientists. As Rossi said in the video, we
did the tests as
What circus? Rossi brought a Door Knob and stove pipe style reactor to
the university for testing. Set it up with their test equipment and
advise. Did the test the way they desired, as the university people were
in the room (like Celani who tried to get / steal a spectrum) and
measured around
Are you saying Levi, Celani, Kullander, Essen,Bianchi, McKubre,Focardi,
etc and Rossi are ALL fools, idiots, liars or incompetents? If you throw
mud at Rossi you throw mud at them as well.
As for our venture, we need to wait for Rossi to post the technical
specification for the high
I stripped a few frames out of the video and used Image J to create a
animated gif.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/VdSgKfMWT81nW_FRSnO7PNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
(it is 15 MB .gif file, you need to download it)
What I observe is:. The blackness to the right and left of
1.
Fyodor
December 9th, 2011 at 11:08 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=15#comment-142909
Mr. Rossi
Has production begun yet in your US facilities? Or are they still
starting up?
Thank you for taking time to answer my question
2.
Andrea Rossi
This is silly. There was a clamp on amp meter on the mains cord and on
the heater wires going into the E-Cat. Power consumption was recorded
during the self power run. Refer to the Higgins data. Are you suggesting
that during the self powering period NONE of the MANY people in the room
would
:24 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 11.12.2011 01:46, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
This is silly. There was a clamp on amp meter on the mains cord and
on the heater wires going into the E-Cat. Power consumption was
recorded during the self power run. Refer to the Higgins data. Are
you suggesting
and the reading NEVER changes. Your
theory would only work if they ALL were fools and incompetents, which
they were not.
On 12/11/2011 4:09 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
You can clearly see
at 9:57 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
They used a WATTS UP Pro Es power meter and recorded input power
every 8 second via a USB port to the PC:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Levi,%20Bianchini%20and%20Villa
So you did not read the last 2 pages? Where an expert in steam quality,
measured and made adjustments in the order of -2% to the energy output.
There was no invalidation, no matter how much you wish there was.
On 12/11/2011 5:38 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Terry
1.
Neil Taylor http://www.cce-mt.org
December 8th, 2011 at 5:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=4#comment-142341
Dear Mr. Rossi,
As one who has signed up to receive a home plant when they become
available I am curious to know if you have attained the
?
On 12/9/2011 9:58 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
1.
Neil Taylor http://www.cce-mt.org
December 8th, 2011 at 5:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=4#comment-142341
Dear Mr. Rossi,
As one who has signed up to receive a home plant when they become
available I
The model and manufacturer of the 6 Oct heat exchanger has been revealed:
SWEP E8T-SC-S
http://www.swep.net/index.php?tpl=productsheetslang=enid=361Type=ESize=8TMaterial=SCPressure=S
in Mats Lewan's report:
When you look at the images from 2 satellites, 90 deg apart, in orbits
around the sun, it makes it difficult to understand how this is a
imaging failure.
On 12/10/2011 11:07 AM, Man on Bridges wrote:
Hi,
I really like the following comment:
http://gizmodo.com/people/lilstevie/lilstevie
Another step closer to producing Ac kWhs:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563cpage=4#comment-142311
generator) and primary circuit fluid circulation pump?
Best regards to you and your family for the holiday season,
AG
On 12/9/2011 11:28 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has selected the primary circuit fluid
Oh good
At Rossi's suggestion we have taken a step back and will wait for the
technical specs of the high temperature 1 MW E-Cat plant to be published
before we continue our discussions to present Rossi with a purchase
order. He is very conservative and has NEVER pushed us to purchase a
plant or to
but the leg action is the same.
On 12/9/2011 12:28 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
I will be glad to apologize to Rossi if he is right.
What are we going to do if he is wrong?
Giovanni
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote
For sure. Each CHP unit will have a BIG switch with 3 positions: CHP
OFF GRID
On 12/9/2011 12:51 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:23:48 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
I grew up supporting the grid and will fight to see it retained. However
Technically Rossi and the US has a working LENR reactor. They have a BIG
head start. But you may be right and in 12 months there may be 50,000
scientists and engineers working to bring LENR devices to market. That
is my hope.
On 12/7/2011 6:41 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
-
http://citi5.org/launch/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Energy-Localization-No8-11.ppt
for asynchronous generators, to restore a
good phase (ie: absorb reactive power, restore good cos phi...)
There are many VAR corrector system on the market.
2011/12/6 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Based on the lowest LENR
not look as cool, but it
is far more likely to give you long term reliable running.
On 6 December 2011 03:34, Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
This piston based steam engine looks very doable and market ready
for a home CHP plant: http
On 12/6/2011 10:22 PM, Colin Hercus wrote:
Could you have a problem with the 30kWH of excess heat. It seems a bit
much to get rid of for space heating and hot water especially in a
suburban situation.
The Hyperion unit has 9 cores and can dynamically stage them as required
by the load. 30 kWs
Larsen starts talking at 3:20: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVRLcC21F14
Rossi stated earlier the Ni 62/64 isotope enrichment is done in-house. I
seem to remember someone said Rossi has a patent on the process.
On 12/7/2011 4:06 PM, Berke Durak wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Peter Gluckpeter.gl...@gmail.com
wrote:
And he repeats in a message today that
Rossi has said the 1st customer is a US military research contractor and
that the first plant is installed in the US. Why would Rossi need to pay
a local Italian university to do research when that is probably already
happening in the US and at no cost to Rossi. You did read, in the 3 LENR
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
ssie FITs require the grid to be fed via a grid connect inverter
and the inverter fed by a Renewable energy source. I doubt LENR
would qualify. No reason to generate DC and then feed the grid and
the home from
It is about which nation controls LENR as it has the capability to
reshape the world. As for living happily ever after, well that may be
the fairy story.
On 12/7/2011 6:13 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi’s fairy tale:
The US military is the customer. The DOD RD guys bought the Big-cat
to see
This piston based steam engine looks very doable and market ready for a
home CHP plant: http://www.greensteamengine.com 1,500 rpm. 10 HP (~6.5
kW.e) at 125 psi steam or 4 HP at 50 psi steam. $1,995 for the
commercial 2 cylinder unit without a generator. Ok needs a control
system to hold Ac
I've emailed Robert Green and asked for more data and if what I get
looks good, I will buy one of the 2 cylinder 10 Hp unit to have a play.
From what I can find this is my front runner steam engine to use as the
torque source for a domestic LENR CHP unit. With 24/7 LENR primary heat
source and
comparable to the generator I found when production
numbers and competition kicks in.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 5, 2011 11:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Domestic LENR steam/electricity front end
I've
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Bushnell-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Nelson-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/NASA/20110922NASA-Zawodny-GRC-LENR-Workshop.pdf
these plants can
quickly be paid off as otherwise the plant owners will just continue to
burn coal.
AG
On 12/1/2011 11:05 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Nov 30, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
All the LENR component suppliers need reliable electricity to produce
their components as do
Others have openly admitted in trying to get a spectrum. And joked about
it how Rossi got angry at them for trying it on. Like it had no value.
Almost suggesting Rossi had no right to withhold it from science. If
true I do hope he sues the University and all involved for everything
they have.
Are you saying you support IP theft? This is not Vulcan where the needs
of the many outweigh the needs of the few:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xa6c3OTr6yA
This is business and this is, if proven, theft. If I was Rossi, I would
be talking to the police and asking for charges to be filled
I have no problems with the test the 2 Swedish physicists, Levi. Focardi
and a hand full of other academics did.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
If it is true, then it is a case of scientific fraud and industrial spionage.
If its untrue and they all collaborate
More like just another snake who needed the spectrum to work out Rossi's
key IP. If proven, all involved are just common thieves.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So, if that is confirmed, we can put Piantelli also as a scammer, from
the point of view of the hardest skeptics.
is theft.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:28 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Only in this case. This invention, if true, is too precious to be kept
private.
2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
Are you saying you support IP theft? This is not Vulcan where
They acted like scientists do. We are not certain. We need to do more
tests, which you can pay us for. Oh and by the way we need to do those
tests in private so we can get the radiation spectrum and figure out
that you have inside. I'm like Rossi, an engineer and I don't give a
C**P what is
. Send
both to jail? :)
2011/11/29 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
If proven it is planned IP theft. Clear and simple. Those involved
should go to jail and the University, if involved, should be
forced to pay a very large amount of money
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
More like just another snake who needed the spectrum to work out
Rossi's key IP. If proven, all involved are just common thieves.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
So
Rossi has said his IP / trade secrets are in Escrow and if anything
should happen to him they will be released, I guess to him estate. So he
has dated and recorded his priority.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:50 PM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote:
maybe is it still legal to build a similar reactor, with a
I suspect there was bad blood there for some time and Rossi used Krivit.
Have you listened to the way Krivit asked questions? HE showed no
respect at all and basically / indirectly accused most who he
interviewed of lying. I know and have many good Italian friends. They
would not stand to be
On one test occasion Rossi had provided 2 holes through the 2 cm thick
lead shielding. The scientists present at that test tried to switch the
radiation detector from count mode to spectrum mode, despite Rossi
telling them they were not allowed to record a spectrum. Rossi saw what
they were
It is still theft. No way to spin it any other way.
AG
On 11/30/2011 12:29 AM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote:
it looks like what I say about patent race... hard to keep an IP from
creative competitors...
As I read it, this is not fusion, as it was understood to happen. So not
much use looking for the products expected from conventional fusion. May
have seem transmutations but no gammas. So why stress out over missing
gammas? The old understand is not happening here. I'm just an engineer
but
That is a VERY strong statement the WMO has just published:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-11-30/climate-change-to-kill-australians2c-report-says/3703062
say he sitting in Australia with 42 Ac GWs of thermal plants on line.
Hey Rossi how long to deliver 120 thermal GWs of E-Cats? Am I serious?
Better link:
http://www.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_935_en.html
AG
On 11/30/2011 12:53 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
That is a VERY strong statement the WMO has just published:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-11-30/climate-change-to-kill-australians2c-report-says/3703062
say he
As a guide:
1) thermal to electrical conversion efficiency of 35%, generating 350 Ac
kWs from 1 MW thermal
2) COP 6, feeding 167 kWs of electricity generated back into the input
to generate 1 MW thermal
3) 183 Ac kWs available to be sold (350 Ac kWs generated - 167 Ac kWs
looped back)
lower LCOE than any other Ac kWh generation technology or
no one will take a change on it and it will be business as usual.
AG
On 11/30/2011 2:14 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
4
to children with cancer?
What happened to that?
G
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working from currently published figures. $2 million for a 1
MW thermal plant and $500 k for the hot fluid to steam generator
published technical specifications. I can tell
you that if the plant doesn't pass the test, I will not be silent.
AG
On 11/30/2011 3:35 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
As a potential
temperature we can generate and from that match the steam
temperature to a good steam turbine and be able to give my board a
budgetary estimate for what it will cost us to build a 350 Ac kW plant.
AG
On 11/30/2011 4:09 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
Just after I read that Larsen thinks LENR reactions can occur inside
Lithium Ion batteries I read this:
http://www.rex.com.au/MediaRelease/Files/295_MR2025%20-%20Mobile%20Phone%20Self%20Combustion.pdf
Battery was reported as glowing Red hot.
AG
More photos of the phone:
http://www.australianfrequentflyer.com.au/community/travel-news/iphone-self-combusts-regional-express-34736.html#post522180
Sure made a mess of the phone. Maybe send the phone to Larsen to look
for transmutation products?
AG
On 11/28/2011 8:15 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
Try this:
https://picasaweb.google.com/100758632386227249211/November282011?authuser=0feat=directlink
AG
On 11/28/2011 8:23 PM, Andrea Selva wrote:
AG
pictures are not visible to not registered members of this site
2011/11/28 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e
Try this:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cfakepathlattice-energy-llc-len-rs-in-liion-battery-firesjuly-16-2010
AG
On 11/28/2011 9:16 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
This is why I dont have my handy in my pocket ;-)
What has this to do with LENR?
That output was seen by everybody in the room when the reactor fired up.
Rossi tried to damp it by increasing the water flow to max but when the
outlet temp reached 40 deg C, he shut down the reactor and then
restarted it. That is what happened if you believe Levi and the others
that were
I suggest Rossi is more skilled in the art of understanding and
controlling his reactors than anyone on the planet. He was there so his
health was also at risk. It is a cheap shot to suggest to suggest he
intentionally risked the others health. You were not were, so how can
you judge? I do
Patents in themselves give the inventor no real commercial protection
unless they have the funds and time to defend it in court. Investors
like to see patents, so maybe they do have a use.
AG
On 11/29/2011 3:46 AM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote:
experience of small companies owning patents, or
And how do you know that is the case? I would suggest he has. Even
better to do it as a provisional. Rossi then gets another 12 months to
keep it secret yet establishes a worldwide priority date.
AG
On 11/29/2011 9:51 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
An interesting conversation:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/A-Conversation-With-Thomas-Blakeslee.shtml
Is Krivit backing down a bit?
AG
Provisionals do not have high visibility. I know. I use them.
On 11/29/2011 10:46 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
And how do you know that is the case? I would suggest he has. Even
Way to go Rossi. Congratulations. Bit sad they beat us but then we need
Ac kWs.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM
My guess is you are very wrong.
AG
On 11/29/2011 1:05 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com
wrote:
visitable by the
This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944
Wonder if he is Rossi’s newest customer?
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
and the E-Cat needs.
AG
On 11/29/2011 2:44 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
This guy was interested in buying a E-Cat:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=32#comment-118944
http://www.journal
Following best practice in the CSP (Concentrating Solar Power) industry,
where every watt is important and the heat is lower than what can be
generated in a conventional thermal plant's boiler, we will be building
a 1 MW E-Cat plant based on this system. We are working with Rossi to
make this
Kumazawa 2005 -- 2008 Japan: Rich Murray 2011.06.03
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011/06/self-organizing-networks-can-develop.html
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/86
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the interesting read
The closest technology out there at present is what has been developed
for CSP plants. I don't have the time nor like to re-invent the wheel if
it can be avoided. There are several companies developing CSP plants in
Australia and we can tag along on their coat tails. Many thermal power
plant
We have access to what is happening in the CSP world and believe their
solutions, minus the heat storage, are currently the best fit for a 400
deg C E-Cat thermal plant, especially for a demo plant.
AG
On 11/29/2011 3:36 PM, Robert Leguillon wrote:
You describe a scenario that we would all
I have redrawn the plant diagram. We do not know what the E-Cat's
primary fluid is nor what temperature it exits the E-Cat at. As Rossi
says this is still RD. What we do know is Rossi has generated steam at
450 deg C as indicated here:
5 months after the 23 March 1989 P and F announcement which may have
helped Piantelli to understand he was seeing a Cold Fusion, as it was
called back then, effect. I suspect Rossi's burnt finger tip happened
when it touched a piece of Nickel in his bio fuel converter system that
should not be
/astrodeep/message/85
within mutual service, Rich Murray
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
5 months after the 23 March 1989 P and F announcement which may have helped
Piantelli to understand he was seeing a Cold Fusion, as it was called back
Found this paper referenced on the web: Journal of Electroanalytic
Chemistry.JEC 319 (1991) 161-175 Elevated-temperature excess heat
production in a Pd D system, by Liaw, Tao, and Liebert. Couldn't find
it in the lenr-canr archives. It does seem to be a significant peer
reviewed result.
How in H**L was that result ignored? But then again if 300 Ktons / y of
Rossi's Nickel fuel (at 2.3 tons / TWh) will reduce the amount of fossil
fuel used for energy production to zero, well there could be a reason.
AG
On 11/28/2011 11:31 AM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
It was in the 1990 paper :
of Ni fuel to replace all usage of fossil fuels for energy.
AG
On 11/28/2011 11:54 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
How in H**L was that result ignored? But then again if 300 Ktons / y of
Rossi's Nickel fuel (at 2.3 tons / TWh) will reduce the amount of fossil
fuel used for energy production to zero
The next 12 months will not be boring.
AG
On 11/28/2011 12:56 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
The URL:
http://www.sumobrain.com/patents/wipo/Amplification-energetic-reactions/WO2011123338.html
links to Brian Ahern's USPTO Application published Sept 29, 2011, entitled -
AMPLIFICATION OF
I would agree. I believe 2012 will see the start of the LENR worldwide
patent wars that will rage on for years and years. Injunctions will be
sought against all who are claimed to be patent violators. The LENR
business worldwide just might grind to a halt under the weight of the
patent wars
with supplying the basic fuel (Ni and H).
Of course, the price of Ni is going to see a pretty drastic increase, so
Rossi's estimates of costs are probably not realistic except for the very short
term.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat [mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com]
Sent
I hope you get it working too. All the best mate.
AG
On 11/28/2011 3:17 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Of all of this patent goings on, no one has applied for a patent to
produce electrical power directly from a LENR reaction. The don't know
enough. They are just making thermal energy to
Seems I have both you and Jed to talk for creating the www.lenr-canr.org
web site. Yes it is a treasure trove of information and yes it did help
to convince me and several others that Ni-H LENR reaction are real. Well
done guys. I'm sure many other do appreciate the effort and the results.
AG
Map here: http://www.leonardocorp1996.com/dove_eng.htm
AG
On 11/27/2011 12:37 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
A little digging and this comes up:
1) Karl Norwood owns a real estate company named the Norwood Group and
the office property at 116 S River Rd, Bedford, NH, belongs to him.
Appreciate the history lesson. Good stuff. I do agree with you that F
P deserve a Noble for their work. Then they can fund Jed's work with a
small part of the prize money.
AG
On 11/27/2011 1:16 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e
201 - 300 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
