[Vo]:Safe computing

A much safer computing paradigm is coming if I looked correctly at todays horoscope about what is written in the stars; I think these kind of ideas will be huge and completely change the landscape about how to enable integrity and catching criminals at the same time as well as keep databases over

[Vo]:Re: The message chain with an happy ending

It's part of the blog, computers tab, I see guile scheme as an art and have a few suggestions of great improvements for it. But you have to demand those features if you like it. And if you do not see we have some serious issues in the world, just ignore it as much as you like. Enjoy your sleep...

[Vo]:The message chain with an happy ending

as a team ... Please copy to anyone that you think should read this. Copyright July, 2023 Stefan Israelsson Tampe Oh, the happy ending, here is the explanation of how nature works ;-) \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage

Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

qm > > > > Stefan > > There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a > sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v) > > > J.W. > > On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > I think the following paper ill

Re: [Vo]:Fundamentals of charge

. > > On 19.05.2023 21:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html > > > > I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to > > pan out very nicely when I start to investigate math more serious

[Vo]:Fundamentals of charge

http://itampe.com/on-the-fundamentals-of-charge.html I must say that my intuition and back of the envelope analysis seem to pan out very nicely when I start to investigate math more seriously. It all fit very well, actually a very satisfying result and this will make the foundations of Mills

Re: [Vo]:LENR-CANR.org ChatBot improved

On the other hand we have not started yet to optimize the speed of them. Also consider what is happening on the hardware side. On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 3:18 PM H L V wrote: > A cognitive scientist has suggested that the performance of these chatbots > may have operational limits or trade-offs

Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

a new flavor of old garbage... > > J.W. > On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build > it up as an addition of such paths. > > On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > >> Stefan

Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

of all) is missing. Also the 3 rotation solution is unphysical > for mass... > > So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage... > > J.W. > On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a

Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

otation solution is unphysical > for mass... > > So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage... > > J.W. > On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build > it up as an a

Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm

gular motion (w instead of v) > > > J.W. > > On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the > > connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects > > experiment... How come we can d

[Vo]:Link between em and qm

I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model and end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities.

Re: [Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view

The point is that as you shrink it energy density will increase and I simply assume there is a limit for how much density space can take. I alsa suggest that this limit is consistent with lorentz transformations as it would not make sense if this depends on which frame the observer has. This also

[Vo]:A though experiment and discussion that should be important in my view

Hi First of all, the pre-history of the linked article exists at different dark corners of the internet and most likely I'm not the original person behind these ideas. But I find the thought experiment logical and feel that I'm obligated to popularize the ideas as they seem coherent in many ways.

Re: [Vo]:Chat Gpt as a tool to discuss hard topics

u for your time and effort! You're welcome! It was a pleasure to have this conversation with you. If you have any more questions or topics you'd like to discuss, feel free to ask. On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:01 AM Jed Rothwell wrote: > Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > >>

[Vo]:Chat Gpt as a tool to discuss hard topics

up significantly. -- Forwarded message - From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023, 22:15 Subject: Analyze Preprint Paper To: ulrika.ta...@gmail.com , Stefan Israelsson Tampe "Open sidebar Analyze Preprint Paper Model: GPT-4 Can you analyze a paper at a pre

[Vo]:Discussion about quantization of angular momenta as a derived property and not postulated

https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wo5bnf/on_the_quantisation_of_angular_moment/

[Vo]:Stern Gerlach

Maybe QM is modelling a deterministic system after all! https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wk3cud/on_the_stern_gerlach_experiment/

[Vo]:Logical missteps in QM

Not a post redit full of facts, but surely logically interesting and some of you may enjoy it or get motivated to try bust the myth. https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/wj6l2w/on_slit_experiments_and_bells_inequality/

Re: [Vo]:On the stability of Mills Orbitsphere

You are a genius. I think by going to v eq c, r, go to the fine structure constant just as Mills stated and I suspect that Vietas formula can be deduced as that formula includes a recursion the looks very similar to what you get if you consider surface tension in the tube you have in the torus On

Re: [Vo]:On the stability of Mills Orbitsphere

Isn't that defined by fundamental constants. Or do you mean that one can spot interesting things about it? Else mills ideas applies On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 22:15 Robin wrote: > In reply to Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:27:28 > +0200: > Hi, > > This looks interesting.

[Vo]:On the stability of Mills Orbitsphere

As a background you will need to understand the not surprising helical model and that space can't allow high enough magnetic and electrical fields. Here is my take on it (it's not a new idea i suppose), http://itampe.com/on-modeling-the-electron-loop-and-the-origin-of-mass.html Now on top of

Re: [Vo]:Concerning sub states of hydrogen

I think that electron screening means that the nuclei also can aim better at each other. In hot plasma you do not have this screening effect. Also an effect to consider. On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 7:46 AM H LV wrote: > In response to hot fusion detractors of the cold fusion explanation of > excess

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

> essence. If they were going to have trouble with a controller, that would > still happen. > > AA > > > On 3/27/2017 6:44 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > >> That does not sound logical to me. They are close enough to having > photovoltaics that it seems po

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

functioning which is logical." > > That does not sound logical to me. They are close enough to having > photovoltaics that it seems pointless to mess around with water calorimetry. > > AA > > > On 3/27/2017 1:54 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > As I un

Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be lumped together?

As I understand the crucial thing to achieve good evidences is to close the reactor and run it for long enough time with plain old water bath calormetry. Previously he had to shut down the experiment after just a short time. Closing the system can reveal new caveats and difficulties so this step

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Holmlid, Mills & muons

Axil's post is one interpretation of QM, other could be that the QM fields represents real fields e.g. no particles in space. This means that you can view QM as billiard with fields in stead of balls and things get to be much less mystic. Also Mills is starting to get real evidences of over unity

Re: [Vo]:Recommended eBook about Mills

They will say, "Eurika he has got it! No it's when they realize that in the electrion shell in Hydrogene the centripetal forces due to motion and electrostatic force balance at the electron shell - something you don't have in QM, they should say Heureka. On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Frank

Re: [Vo]:Recommended eBook about Mills

Also, Mills have released a new edition of his theory, you can check it out from the what's new page on BrLP's home page, this time in pdf format as well On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 6:44 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > Jones. > As someone who still thinks there is a future for

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

To me the dispute between Rossi and IH is very simple to resolve. If there is any weaknesses in the test one need to agree on a fair rerun of the test for a day or two. There is abolutely no sane argument for not doing such a test. Rossi has no arguments against doing that. It's peanuts compared

Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

Why can't the peak be at 100eV or 10eV and many order of magnitude more intense. There is not much in the shown signal that indicates a peak in teh extreme spectra near the seen peak in the background. I think it looks like a 1/X^n curve that continues way below the cutof of the instrument. The

Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

But the main frequency is invisible we only see the tail here what the peak is in the invisible range of this instrument. We simply don't know the magnitude of the radiation energy. But I agree that it is way to early to call this a success. It is an interesting lead and it should be repeated. On

Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video

This is just a story about technical development and I do find it to be a credible process of such and I enjoyed the story leading to the final design for which I agree that if the COP is high will lead to a success. Now Mills clearly show no need to prove to the public that it works. It do sound

Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video

>From the demo, - There is a heat sink in the bottom. So the silver vapor condense there. - The silver is melted only once after the system runs everything is in a closed system apart from losses in the cooling - The area at the top is much higher than at the bottom. But the temperature at the

Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video

>>Also, does anyone recall mention of how hot the main chamber's outside surface runs? I can not imagine any hope of operating without having an excellent high temperature insulator between the inner chamber and the outside >world. If no excellent insulation is used this device would be an

[Vo]:Double slit

Hi all, This is a wild idea. I was following an interesting discussion at, http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/index.php search for double slit. The idea here is that the particle wave duality comes from an interaction with the slit via momentum transfer. Whatever you think, it is a good

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

fication of orbital momentum may be rare. The > total mass of the system would be somewhat greater than one without the > neutral “epo” and account for the ambiguous spin-mass parameter Mills is > potentially suggesting. > > Bob Cook > > > *From:* Stefan Israelss

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Good question, as I understand there is standing wave fields between the >> shel

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

. I'm stuck with understanding what the heck the light reference frame is and why the correction moving between them are what they are. I think that if Mills could explain that concept in much more detail much of his work could be followed. > > Bob Cook > > /Stefan > *From

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The end result is that you get a 6 digit match between calculated and >> meassured i

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >In the model of infinitesimally thin orbitspheres with a charge >> distribution >d

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

allowed at any location. > > Dave > > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 4:40 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies > > Eric Walker s

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

onisation energies. My conclusion though is that GUTCP may be over tinkered with - especially for the second p shell atoms and beond. On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > st

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

g is obfuscated. Regards Stefan On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now really what you have in Mills is Re(Ylm(e)exp(iwt) but that

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

nd a model of the non linearities of the world and see what you get. Until then you may be right or you may be wrong. On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > j_l(|w|/c r)Ylm(e)exp(iwt), with e the spherical part of x, and r the >> r

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

rds Stefan On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe > > Ø > > Ø I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to > explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned w

[Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when discussing the recent notes from Louis DeChiaro. The short story is that one of the factors that demand such high energies in standard theory is that any small

Re: [Vo]:The theory of everything is at hand.

So they see that a lot of the behavior in 3D is codified in a surface. That looks like they are onto the link between Mills theory and QM because Mills codify the information in a surface as well. Knowing the data at the electron surface and I speculate that you can deduce the 3D behavior at least

[Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

Hi, I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published their hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading, http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/ General remark. Quantum

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

using Mills theory. He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication, AFAIK. *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

to find any hint of energy gain using Mills theory. He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication, AFAIK. *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result of the double slit experiment. Turns out

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

of energy gain using Mills theory. He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication, AFAIK. *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Self interference has be shown for neutrons. The double slit deminstates self interference of particles. On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Have the double slit been verified for neutrons? Just curious, Mills

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published their hypothesis

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment there is an overlap. Regards Stefan

Re: [Vo]:BLP's version of the double slit.

/Path_integral_formulation On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment there is an overlap. Regards Stefan On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:50

Re: [Vo]:What was the implicit power meeter in the Lugano report showing

to issues atm. Regards Stefan On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the implicate power meter e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power

[Vo]:What was the implicit power meeter in the Lugano report showing

I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the implicate power meter e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power measured. So, people have tried to explain this with some strange temperature behavior of the resistance. But isn't it more natural to

Re: [Vo]:stiring

to get motion of the liquid LiH-Al metal. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Heya Vortexuses, Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup, When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer

[Vo]:stiring

Heya Vortexuses, Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup, When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer to even out the temperature in the mold, hence improving the quality of the final product. This works by the magnetic varying field induces

Re: [Vo]:stiring

spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the liquid LiH-Al metal. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Heya Vortexuses, Any thoughts about

Re: [Vo]:stiring

, and then the web of SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the liquid LiH-Al metal. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Heya Vortexuses, Any

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

that exists only in his imagination. On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Peter, I'll try to answer the critique in the slides for Mills theory shortly. But, I just wanted to support the rant that you do not need to explain new

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

. I don't understand the situation. Peter On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Imagination yes, if there was no real quantities calculated. But by calculated many 100 of experimentally measurements one could just say that his theory has 100

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

Thank you Peter, I'll try to answer the critique in the slides for Mills theory shortly. But, I just wanted to support the rant that you do not need to explain new phenomena to develop a new theory and it is advisable to drop that principle as a lone principle. The reason is, of cause if you

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

in the long run if space have a memory. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Yep, this is exactly the problem, you have two incomplete models that same the same thing

Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Calculating the Energy of an atom using the equation for an isolated conducting sphere.

I searched a little in the literature about these hydrinos, They seams to originate from the wave operator, people have found them in simple wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains the wave operator. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a

Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Calculating the Energy of an atom using the equation for an isolated conducting sphere.

I searched a little in the litterature about thise hydrinos, They seams to originate from the wave operatores, people have found them in simple wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains it. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a spatial

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

golden stars. Mark my words, if Einstein worked at the patent office today he would remain there, do we want such a society. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Yep

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

take away n x 27.2 eV from atom through collision. Peter van Noorden *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com *Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2015 7:20 PM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:QM rant I would like to see a grants and target institution targeted

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

these stable fractional quantum levels in his experiments, when he followed his theory that predicted that the groundstate of a hydrogen atom can be destablized by using catalyst which can take away n x 27.2 eV from atom through collision. Peter van Noorden *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

at 11:58 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: The hydrino is a variant of the hydrogen atom. It is never claimed by Mills to be a fundamental particle. Hence it needs so low energy so that you can maintain the bound You can't find it using collisions of high energy, which

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

myself how much knowledge of physics do we know as compared to that which we do not know nor have any concept about? If we understand a mere 1% of the total I am in awe of the field of study. Just my few cents worth. Dave -Original Message- From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

Just to spam for your fun, the above was quite ok and a freeze of wikipedia at 2006, no go to the this years edition and enjoy the intelligent society we are living in, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackLight_Power On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

, which should have spotted all this in a sec. And now all is referencing him lol. But sure we can agree to disagree, no hard feelings. On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

to say, Nothing. So you are dead wrong, it's the QM folks that are mute. On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: It is a shame that we don't have a serious heated debate

Re: [Vo]:Re: QM rant

, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Did you look at the address, goes to blacklight power!!! I have no reason to doubt that the rebuttal came from Blacklight Power. My

Re: [Vo]:Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry revised

We most be open that there are mistakes in pro cold fusion results, but also make sure that they are put into contexts, are the mistakes of a few outliers, or are they the main part. That is the question we need to answer. Typically to validate or disprove cold fusion you make sure to draw a

Re: [Vo]:QM rant

into that framework? These are the things I want to know. On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it is: All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of order

[Vo]:QM rant

It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it is: All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of order more elegantly and easily and less convoluted you have a better theory, this is what Mills theory does compared to quantum mechanics. That

Re: [Vo]:QM rant

Orionworks, Yes experiments is all good, i'm more concerned why we don't get any replication / debunks and from more independent sources. Is'n there enough to verify the evidences? Also what if it's too difficult to create hydrinos, and Mills theory would be better suited to explain for example

Re: [Vo]:QM rant

permutations and combinations of interactions that could be experimentally demonstrated involving the hydrino as a fundamental elementary particle. On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Orionworks, Yes experiments is all good, i'm more

Re: [Vo]:Determining the transmittance . . . of semitransparent materials at elevated temperatures

I wanted to add that in the dummy run there was a 10% deviation between measured and output, assume that the heat is proportional to the Temperature (which it's not, its T^4) you will get a 10% error in temperature measurement. (3.5% if you think in T^4). Now state that at the higher temperatures

Re: [Vo]:An expert reviewed and approves of this configuration

IThe is no way in nuclear science to convert the reactants seen in the way seen. T This is probably true, there might be a dog buried, we need to look in that direction. But also, it is our current view of nuclear science, all reaction chains depends heavily on some extra constraints that you

[Vo]:I don't get the 9x % controversy

Im staring at p 45, fig 4b / ash and is comparing with p 44, fig 3b, So is it that much difference? I don't understand that we can argue about data, we really shouled have pictures from at least 20 randomly selected particles to say anything, it is suggested that Rossi have bought the isotope 62

[Vo]:Didn''t TIP2 compensate for emisitivity temperature variation as on page 15

why on earth did they stopped using that method as Jones seam to indicate with his correspondence. I don't get it.

Re: [Vo]:I don't get the 9x % controversy

was faked. Which means that his secret sauce actually includes 6Li. He would have done this to confuse the situation so that his secret was seen to be the ash, and not the other way around. But it could have happened either way. *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe Im staring at p 45, fig

Re: [Vo]:If IH/Rossi was so paranoid about his baby..

I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross is, he is surly is one hell of a man to work with tools so I guess it was just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor it quite enough still to avoid cheating. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze

Re: [Vo]:If IH/Rossi was so paranoid about his baby..

...@gmail.com wrote: They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to handle a lab saw? On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross is, he is surly is one

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

During the discussion about the first TIP, at energikatalysatorn there was a huge stir about the applicability of using a heat camera to validate the output energy until a heat camera expert enter the discussion and although he was skeptical of the final result, said and explained thoroughly that

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that the wires get a bit cooler then the heated core. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote: Fig 12b. page 26.

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

benefit). On 13 October 2014 00:35, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that the wires get a bit cooler then the heated core. On Sun

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote: far above curie limit for Ni, magnetic fields won't move powder magnetically, only ions, but temps are too low for significant Li or H ions to exist, and no ionising radiation sources in evidence. On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

radiation sources in evidence. On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Yes but in that case the core can be hotter then the cables. We don't know about the powder, and the changes of magnetic fields inside the core could stir the powder around

Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature hot-cat Lugano demo

evaporation zone. On 13 October 2014 01:18, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: Robert I think you make good points, not sure what the inner cylinder is made of and I guess that if it is metal it has to be thin in order to not show up on the weight. There is also

Re: [Vo]:Nasa scientist endorses report

Jed was talking in watts, W ~ T^4, T is the fourth root of W so it is logarithmic not exponential in your jargon. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: *From:* Jed The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W for two days.

Re: [Vo]:Nasa scientist endorses report

If there is a real transparancy issue as GoatGuy suggest then the inner must be of much higher temperature then the surface. To get a feeling of this issue I tried to look at the published picture of the cat and see if there was a region of lower temperature at the upper part of the ecat in the

Re: [Vo]:About Goat Guy theory of Alumina transparency and emissivity change on E-ca test

Again how serious this is depends on the temperature difference between the inner and outer shell no. If that was serious you would expect the top edge of a picture of the hot cat to have unsharp color shade because the top edge should represent the heat of the outer shell. I have not find such an

Re: [Vo]:About Goat Guy theory of Alumina transparency and emissivity change on E-ca test

Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the time constants of heat transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: Not scientific -- but a search of google images for alumina transmission indicates

  1   2   >