for the technology with a helium trap may produce enough. It's a bit
hard to do on a vehicle.
Still need hints and ideas.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: Wesley Bruce
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 5:55 AM
Subject: [Vo]:chromium and helium
I
Jed, Another point you should consider including is that because America
has failed to follow thorough on its own discovery and fund the
research; other country's are also effected. Some countries have been
actively discouraged from working in the field by American government
employees;
I need some advice and help.
I've identified a possibility that Chromium may be important in some of
the water fuel and hydrogen boosting work. Its not provn yet but we need
tests to check a few variables.
* I need a test for chromium (III) in solution.
* I need a test for chromium (VI)
Some will know that Google is running a competition where people submit
ideas for world changing projects and the top ten projects get funding
from them.
I have 5 submissions in. http://www.project10tothe100.com/index.html
* A perennial polyculture harvester for grains that are not
dried
Jones Beene wrote:
This blogster apparently is taking a comical view of
it:
http://icantseeyou.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/06/genepax-unveils-a-car-that-generates-electricity-with-only-water-air.html
However, other sources say the output is only 300
watts, and that the power unit was shown
Jones Beene wrote:
Not to be outdone by the GMs Volt
Could be a major breakthrough
...or not
http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/genepax-shows-off-water-powered-fuel-cell-vehicle/
This only makes sense if the electrolysis unit is burning the metal in
them. The metals oxidize and liberate
Jones Beene wrote:
Not to be outdone by the GMs Volt
Could be a major breakthrough
...or not
http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/13/genepax-shows-off-water-powered-fuel-cell-vehicle/
Why is the driver of the jap thing wearing a hockey mask??? Which horror
film rerun is he going to?
Michael Foster wrote:
Ethanol from corn is a crime and people are dying from it.
Sorry Michael but no-one is dieing because of ethanol production. They
are dieing because the things they sell are not valuable enough to pay
for the oil, fertilizer, etc that goes into modern farming and
Michel Jullian wrote:
Nanosolar's 1 GW/yr solar cell printer presented by CEO Martin Roscheisen here,
with a video:
http://www.nanosolar.com/blog3/
If they sell the panels at $1/W as announced, they are aiming at a $1B annual
income, not too shabby :)
Michel
Note also its not just the
Good post Robin, I disagree on some points but a good post. We will see.
I hope fusion will save the day as you do but its wise to consider the
options.
A few points:
1. If earth quakes could not dislodge oil and natural gas from the
ground significantly why does anyone think CO2 will be as
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
With all the energy info rhetoric eminating out of D.C. and news
sources do you sense the public is expecting too much from the energy
industry?
What is your predicted time line for the first really serious bump
in the road ?
Richard
I'm an Aussy
Michel Jullian wrote:
You seem to be running a very nice scam, Joseph :-) You're a great showman in
any case, so spectators aren't entirely robbed.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: JNPCo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:46 AM
Subject:
thomas malloy wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
the next big thing? imagine these all over the parched-prairies of
the southwest...
http://tinyurl.com/2rskd2
Interesting URL Jones. Thanks for posting it. I think that learning
how to set up and manage those plants is a big growth area.
---
thomas malloy wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
snip
But the structure is vitrified ceramic not the dielectric. Its a very
hard brick with no voids, the dielectrics break down does not matter.
Its also in a solid box that negates any easy penetration. I've
corresponded with Dick Weir
Paul Lowrance wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Sean McCarthy dropped this term again today:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=57711page=1#Item_17
http://snipurl.com/1jgm1
about how his technology works. Isn't this the same as hysteresis?
Terry
I was taught it's
thomas malloy wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 2 May 2007 20:29:15 -0400:
http://www.zenncars.com/home/EEStor%20equity%20investment%20April%2030%202007%20FINAL%202.pdf
[snip]
Inc. The negotiated investment terms also grant ZENN an
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote:
There is some debate about how much of these precious metals are
available elsewhere in the solar system, but I do not think this
matters much. Once you leave the Earth's atmosphere and go to the
moon or an asteroid, you can then use raw solar energy to vaporize
Terry Blanton wrote:
A Milky Way bar contains more energy than a stick of dynamite.
A tank of gas in that SUV contains about a megawatt.
My grandson has more energy than a full SUV and often explodes.
Terry
Stop feeding you grandson the milky bars :-D I'll have them. ;-)
Bravo. Thanks my
Akira Kawasaki wrote:
-Forwarded Message-from Akira Kawasaki
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 27, 2007 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday April 27, 2007
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Apr 07 Washington, DC
Unintended or honourable attempt. --[very OT]--
There are times in history when Generals and politicians must attempt
the impossible just to prove its impossible. The Dieppe raid in WW2
comes to mind. People were demanding action and something had to be done
even if it cost thousands of lives.
thomas malloy wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
. . . moved to July:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=50211page=1
and they don't know if it will be start/stop or cyclical?!?
Terry
Actually the launch or bust is today April 13 according to Sean
stacking up?
On 13/04/07, *Wesley Bruce * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. . . moved to July:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=50211page=1
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=50211page=1
and they don't know
John Berry wrote:
On 4/13/07, *Wesley Bruce* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS Why are the Re:[Vo] subject line prefixes stacking up?
Because it's a stupid [EMAIL PROTECTED] script and it should be nixed. (or
fixed)
Yep. Thats what I thought.
What's the old saying
That makes more sense. Thanks Jed.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
W thinks we already have PHEVs obviously:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/09/bush-almost-blows-himself-up/
Terry
Right, pull the other #$%^# leg. Another attempt by Ford to sabotage
hybrids
to
that is 'No' a Jury with positive findings might even fail to utterly
convince me.
On 4/13/07, *Wesley Bruce* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok that's good its still useful information. I and others need that
data. Nice to see that its not bad news. Several sites on the web
Esa Ruoho wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3aaRrEIp-0
videoupdate is here
theres supposed to be text incoming at around 6pm gmt.
Yes got that useful data but not much I need the get an NDA from them
and find out some harder numbers.
The video shows me something Sean is a real believer.
Harry Veeder wrote:
When hydrogen is burned in air, the oxygen in the air combines with hydrogen
to form H2O. Will breathable oxygen decline if we burn too much hydrogen?
I guess this would never be a problem if all the hydrogen burned comes from
the decomposition of H2O into H2 and O2.
But
Terry Blanton wrote:
W thinks we already have PHEVs obviously:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/09/bush-almost-blows-himself-up/
Terry
Right, pull the other #$%^# leg. Another attempt by Ford to sabotage
hybrids. Why is the CEO Alan Malally/ /so stupid? Surely the hydrogen
fill cap is
Terry Blanton wrote:
. . . moved to July:
http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=50211page=1
and they don't know if it will be start/stop or cyclical?!?
Terry
Actually the launch or bust is today April 13 according to Sean in a
later post.
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Wesley,
There are good arguments that some of the dating is wrong for most
deposits and fossils.
I don't dispute the dating process may be flawed, but what does that have to
do with the quantity and variety of fauna and flora? Either the fossils
exist or
Thanks robin Your correct. Good black coal can be 80% carbon 20%
hydrogen. In clean burning coal the CO2 reaction is a big part of the
energy but if CO2 is chilled and sequested you loose most of that energy
and all that counts is the energy output of the hydrogen. That's why the
coal
Back in the 1980 Jacques-Yves Cousteau championed a ocean based biofuel
technology that has since been lost.
The technology involved buoy based nutrient up welling pumps powered by
methane. The Methane was produced from kelp plants grown on a mesh net
attached below the water line. The deep
Actually I have material on ocean fertilization, including iron, going
back to 1978 or so. Co-evolution quarterly had a design for a green ship
that delivered both fertilizer and a seed stock of algy and fish
fingerling. This combination gives you much more ecological control.
I'll see if I
David Thomson wrote:
I don't see what need there is to take the carbon out of the air. We spent
150 years of hard work getting all that sequestered carbon back into the
biosphere.
Don't these people realize the climate of the Earth was most stable during
the time of the dinosaurs? Our planet
I'm looking at a better way to win the Branson-Gore prize and make a
profit into the bargain. If it works we'll be richer than both.
Turn the coal and lots of alga into *carbon fibre*: billions of tons of
it. The process should be profitable if we can crack the chemistry.
1. _Anaerobic
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
Ok so far as I can see there is only one magnet clearly visible and
all the motion is the product of fingers and the tweezers poking it.
Are we sure they are legit images of the Steorn thing since there is
no self motion visible in those
Ok so far as I can see there is only one magnet clearly visible and all
the motion is the product of fingers and the tweezers poking it. Are we
sure they are legit images of the Steorn thing since there is no self
motion visible in those pictures? The little arm on the right is a
classic
Jed Rothwell wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Suppose you want to recharge a dozen cars at one time, ten times per
hour (six minutes each) during the peak rush hour. That's 120
I have a simple answer, you plug the car in when you shut it off. I'm
talking about a garden variety, 20 Amp plug in.
Harry Veeder wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I think electric cars would be easier to implement than people
realize, and most of the concerns about limited operating range
are either unimportant, or they could easily be fixed. If the
world had run short of oil back in 1960, you can
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Because it doesn't. It's a magnetic motor -- permanent-magnet-based
engine -- and there's no mechanism for it to steal heat from the
environment, nor any evidence
Wesley Bruce wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Tue, 26 Dec 2006
19:33:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Some half-baked ideas from memory on previous lists (somewhat
jocularly):
Buying cheap land under high tension power lines.
Selling energy stocks
Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19920005899_1992005899.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_thermal_rocket
It is interesting to think about how one might apply high temperature
CF for a rocket engine. I am rewriting my book, based on the
Jed Rothwell wrote:
A 60 m wind turbine in Aomori Japan fell over mysteriously. There was
no strong wind at the time. See (in Japanese with photo):
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/news/20070110i501.htm?from=main5
wind turbine accidents are more common than you might think. I doubt
that
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Hoyt A. Stearns Jr.'s message of Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:33:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Some half-baked ideas from memory on previous lists (somewhat jocularly):
Buying cheap land under high tension power lines.
Selling energy stocks ( and the many subsidiary
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
Ed sez:
Jed sez:
If it is a hoax, they have fooled the Chinese government, and enraged
it. Since they depend on that government for survival, it seems like a
stupid thing to do.
Of course, this assumes the Chinese are really upset.
Steven Krivit wrote:
Well, some of you attempted to intervene, and I applaud you, whoever
it was, but it seems the like things are a bit out of control there at
the moment.
I'm appalled that such destruction could occur and that it has been
left to stand. Let them have their way. One day
John Berry wrote:
On 9/17/06, *Wesley Bruce* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZPE saves the conservation of energy yet again.
John Berry wrote:
snip I'm to thick to handle this bit. ;-)
Plus you do not state by which mechanism the thrust would
John Berry wrote:
Well if Kyle and Robin are right it can't be calculated because we
can't really know what our velocity relative to the machian reference
frame is.
If I am right then, well I'm no good at the math but I think that a
superconducting chamber bouncing EM around assuming the Q
Good work fellows however I am more inclined to look at useable
interplanetary speeds, earth to Mars in a few weeks or so, say
~518041367424 km in 6 weeks [1008 hours ] This requires hideous
velocities and you will need a hell of a bumperbar on you ship. How do
the numbers come out?
Kyle R.
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to John Berry's message of Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:10:37
+1200:
Hi,
[snip]
No Kyle, your mistaken.
You doubt KE = 1/2mv^2?
Not in anything other than reactionless propulsion.
Who
ZPE saves the conservation of energy yet again.
John Berry wrote:
snip I'm to thick to handle this bit. ;-)
Plus you do not state by which mechanism the thrust would be effected,
where my Doppler effect pushing it out of resonance lowering the Q is
pretty much what was stated in the
A stationary emdrive can still push a ship in a given direction. It
becomes an inertial anchor. An inertial anchor resists being moved but
does not move itself. You can push down or back on it and it wont move
but pulling upon it and it moves freely. A craft with an inertial
anchor on it can
William Beaty wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Remi Cornwall wrote:
These guys are *sincere* but mistaken amateurs.
*This is not how science is conducted.*
If they're keeping it secret, then it's not science, instead it's business
(i.e. inventors, corporate RD, etc.)As
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
JR As far as I know he does. He has not described the O2 in detail.
It is not stochiometric; there is extra H2 because the O2 from
electrolysis at the anode is separated out by the inverted funnel.
If it is not stochiometric then we can conclude
thomas malloy wrote:
Vortexians;
Merlin is a computer program which predicts future events with an 80%
accuracy. One of the developers is George Hart, PhD physics. To get
the full story, truncate the URL at Merlin. Now if I can just figure
out how to listen to his sound file on Iran.
I'm
Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be allowed
if the theory is disputed and it gets worse if there is no theory at
all.Steorm wants the patents on this. Peer reviews wont help the
reviewers must have hands on contact. They simply wont believe a paper.
There are
Thanks Robin, I thought I had typed kW but missed the mistake. Well
spotted. Damn Dyslexia.
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:10:22
+1000:
Hi,
[snip]
If it is 500 mW / cc [0.5 watts/ litre] then I have about a hundred
Actually 0.5
it to another venue...
Excellent analysis!
Mark
From: Wesley Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Steorm
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:10:22 +1000
Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be
allowed if the theory
Your overlooking the problem of patents. The patent will not be allowed
if the theory is disputed and it gets worse if there is no theory at
all.Steorm wants the patents on this. Peer reviews wont help the
reviewers must have hands on contact. They simply wont believe a paper.
There are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying again. It bounced on gmail:
Well here's the setup:
http://www.geocities.com/terry1094/JC_Setup_small.JPG
It's being fired by a wall wart rated at 6VDC which is actually
putting out 9VDC with considerable ripple. Probably just a xfmr and a
rect. Only the
A key experiment that has to be done is to take nickel sheet formed
into Joe cell cylinders chrome them and build a cell. What happens if
there is no iron at all? Is chromium the key. No-one has checked
chromium for Fleischmann/ Pons effect. Cold fusion could be driving
thermal dissolution of
thomas malloy wrote:
Grimer wrote:
At 09:03 pm 19/05/2006 -0700, you wrote:
Forward from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Akira Kawasaki)
[Original Message]
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. DA VINCI CODE: CARDINALS COMPLAIN THAT THE NOVEL IS FICTION.
Aren't they always? Cardinal Poupard,
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Prime Minister,
As well as having Uranium resources among the largest in the
World, Australia has about a million square kilometers of desert
admirably suited to the collection of solar energy, and pretty
much useless for anything else. In fact we could more than
Good call Mark but every thing known about the bonds and bond energies
and chemistry tells us that this kind of thing is impossible with only
one exception a cold plasma. Hydrogen stripped of its electron and
oxygen + stripped of one of its 6 outer electrons can mix without
burning and holds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Ryan's water fuel. What is it about being downunder?
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individualvideoid=7009
13288n=2
Terry
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Ryan's water fuel. What is it about being downunder?
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individualvideoid=7009
13288n=2
Terry
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage
Harry Veeder wrote:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
The cold fusion article at Wikipedia has grown too large, so it must
be split up.
Someone asked me to assist with the sub-article cold fusion
controversy. I should not waste my time on this sort of thing, but I did.
The skeptics will soon trash this
Steven Krivit wrote:
Anybody ever think about British Petroleum's name change to BP?
Hmm ...
s
It's been BP for decades here in Australia. Some have re defined it as
meaning British Power; as in energy not empire.
BP Australia has a big chunk of our solar market. Solar hot water and
solar
Steven Krivit wrote:
Who has ever seen a major science journal expose the flaws of hot
fusion in such a straightforward and raw manner?
Is this as new as it appears to me?
If you are interested, I'll send you the article.
Steve
Send it to me. I've got an interest in that question.
Steven Krivit wrote:
http://iesiusa.com/images/Image_photogallery.gif
Maybe I'm just a suspicious rat-ba_tard, but I checked this with a New
Energy Times reader / graphics artist and we notice the following things:
-The sign appears to be tilting out from the top - never seen such
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came across this while searching for six dimensional theories:
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18925331.200.html
excerpt:
Claims of the possibility of gravity reduction or anti-gravity
induced by magnetic fields have been investigated by NASA
Jed you said no-one was buying your book. I've just done so. I just put
in a order for two good ones with some padding to cover postage. I hope
its enough. Actually my order would have gone in before or at the same
time as your vortex post.
Hang on to some of the miss prints, I've mentioned
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
Does anyone know of any other publicly-traded company or subsidiary
besides D2Fusion that exists which is exclusively geared toward RD
or commercialization of cold fusion?
No, but I have another question for anyone who can answer it.
On
revtec wrote:
I think it highly unlikely that we have in this world aliens coexisting with
angels. We either have aliens masquerading as angels, or fallen angels
masquerading as aliens. I personally suspect the latter.
Then, there is also option three for those who prefer it, that both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the axiom of any publicity is good pubicity applies in this
Hustler interview of Dr. Steven Greer:
http://www.disclosureproject.org/bassiorinterview.htm
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free |
I think Ed Storms and Jed Rothwell make good point the one flesh thing
but the one flesh reference misses the point.
Leviticus is were the action is and it includes things like quarantine,
antiseptics (Hyssop and cedar oil) both known antibacterial agents that
have never produced immune
thomas malloy wrote:
Vortexians;
I assume that the halos are caused by the decay of the radioneuclide
in the zirconium crystal. I assume that there are multiple decays. Is
the intensity of the halo determined by the number of decays? Is there
some way to determine the number of decay events
Good site you've found Harry but way way off topic I'll take hours to
check it out. The excerpt page below while technically correct it still
needs work. The ‘who are we’ page of the site worries me a little.
They've never been on a good theological collage campus it seems.
I can answer the
Jed Rothwell wrote:
OrionWorks wrote:
This post is primarily directed to both Jed, Steven Krivit,
Jed, in the past you have lamented the fact that you feared CF
research may be dieing a slow death, particularly due to what you
have perceived is a lack of necessary infusion of young
RC Macaulay wrote:
Hi Anon,
No at all, Vorts are by nature , looking for trouble.. err, make
that answers that may trouble.. or ,, may provoke troubling
doubts.. or.. may trouble provokitoors.. or may provoke thought and
discovery.. ah! the quest., the quest..
Imagine the posts regarding
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
In other words
* If I believe in God and I am right what do I gain? All the
pleasures of eternity.
* If I am wrong what do I loose? A few passing pleasures and then
oblivion.
* If I disbelieve in God and there is life after death and some
judgement
Good point Steven, I'm willing to plead arrogance as a defence. :-D
I was thinking about communism which slaughtered millions for their
faith in the soviet union and still does in some places. But your
correct to identify Nazism.
OrionWorks wrote:
Recent exchanges between Mr. Rothwell and
leaking pen wrote:
Christians like me don't mind the harmless atheists.
missed that one...
really now. pay any attention to people like Bush, who stated that
athiests cant be considered patriots, and are a danger to the
country? hows about pat robertson, who prays for the death of
OrionWorks wrote:
From: leaking pen
Christians like me don't mind the harmless atheists.
missed that one...
really now. pay any attention to people like Bush, who
stated that athiests cant be considered patriots, and
are a danger to the country? hows about pat robertson,
who prays for the
OrionWorks wrote:
From: leaking pen
Pardon, but i was responding to Mr. Wesley, as I had
missed the thread in which he had made the statement,
and was quite sure he would read THIS thread as well.
I was not responding to you. Perhaps YOU should read
posts more carefully before assuming
/features/fallacies/
Wesley Bruce wrote:
I have seen people cured of the incurable.
This assertion makes no sense. If they were cured it was not
incurable, q.e.d. I think you mean that you have seen people cured
when the odds were against them. No doubt this is true, but it proves
nothing
Harry Veeder wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
Is you world view big enough for God? His is big enough for you.
An atheist would interpret this as a personal request. Based on his beliefs
you are asking him if his world is big enough for you. If the atheist
has a big heart he would say
Very good question! What alternatives are consistant with Atheism? Send
to my home address if you choose not to clutter Vortex.
PS sorry the table did not come out right.
Harry Veeder wrote:
Must an Atheist believe in oblivion after death
if he doesn't believe in God?
Harry
Wesley Bruce
Ulcers were also cured by high dose vitamin C. A friend of mine was the
person that launched black current juice back during world war two. They
had scurvy in the British ranks at Tabrook. Acid vitamin C sources like
oranges and lemons rotted quickly and made you sick in the heat and it
burned
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:25:14
+1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks Ed the Students guide is my main resource and I've read it. I was
just being thorough and careful before diving in to a room full of
politicians, scientists and others.
I've said to a friend that most critics of cold fusion can't quote or
cite a single paper critical of cold fusion. It's certainly correct in
Australia. but is it correct in all cases. What are the papers critical
of cold fusion and have we debunked them all in turn? We need a list and
counter
There's only one way to turn a lone superpower into an exSuperpower and
Dr Bob Parks applying the weapon skillfully. He'll destroy America's
future in his blind effort to protect His idea of Science. The
Unibomber, Ted Kaczynski, killed a few people in his letter bombs in the
name of
Well said Jed.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Wesley Bruce wrote:
We can't rule out a collapse of communism in China or a shattering of
the peoples republic, both would be messy, very messy.
Not necessarily. The collapse of communism in Russia and Eastern
Europe was calm and orderly
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I researched plutonium powered radioisotope thermoelectric generators
(RTG) for the book chapter 2. As far as I know, there have only been
~24 US spacecraft equipped with RTG, and telecom satellites are not
among them. See, for example this document, written in 1984:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Standing Bear's message of Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:52:00
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Hasn't Iraq provided the military industrial complex with enough
profit yet? They need a war with China as well? I assure you,
after any such war, there would be no military industrial
OrionWorks wrote:
Vorts,
Not sure if this is a rehash of old news but here's an interesting article on a
recent Nanotech breakthrough pertaining to organic solar cells. Researchers at
Wake Forest and New Mexico State University have reached 6 percent efficiency.
The ultimate goal is to
A continuous acceleration flight at one g, a tenth of a g or 0.01g;
results in a maximum speed at the mid-point that is very fast so the
relative velocity is huge even if you hit a tiny piece of matter, a
micro-meteorite or a flake of paint from another ship. Micrometeorites
are fast enough
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Fri, 04 Nov 2005 19:14:02
+1100:
Hi,
[snip]
About the same. The time frame is not acceleration limited. Its limited
by orbital windows. Some have proposed making a cycler using ISS
modules. The minimum fuel option is a
RC Macaulay wrote:
Wes and Fred,
Force field reaction may be closer to describing the event.
Yep but what lies at the heart of and defines the field, if not zpe then
it must be something very new.
Generally when we get a directional beam we get a flow of something.
Photons, electrons, etc.
Hey folks, there is another site that may relate to this debate see: J.
Slough Louis Giersch http://www.ess.washington.edu/Space/PlasmaMag/
They are thinking a drive in the vacuum of space but it could be bagged
to operate in the atmosphere.
Mark If the fields so big it will have real or
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
