In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:32:11 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> This figure is too high. The amount intercepted by the Earth is 5 million
>> quads
>> per annum above the atmosphere, and then some of this is directly
>> reflected back
>> into space by cloud cover.
In reply to Man on Bridges's message of Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:04:38 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi,
>
>On 19-11-2011 13:31, David ledin wrote:
>> "Nickel may not be necessary at all'
>
>I wonder if anyone has tried the following "binding-agents"?
>
>39K (93.260%) ==> 40Ca
You might also consider
23Na (10
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:13:09 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
>You did read Focardi's comments on the radiation and the transmutations:
>
>"/*So, if gamma [radiation] is emitted in one direction, the nickel goes
>in the opposite direction,
The momentum of the gamma ray i
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:58:16 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
...well ships probably don't make any sense, because they would use fission
reactors. Ditto subs. The army could use about that much hot water for a
military base. How many bases are there in the US?
>Rossi sai
In reply to vorl bek's message of Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:50:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Aussie Guy quotes Rossi:
>
>>
>> Actually, we have found a breakthrough with a primary fluid
>> with which the reactors remain stable when we make steam at 450
>> Celsius.
>
>Since lead melts at 327 Celsius, is t
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sun, 27 Nov 2011 18:21:47 +0200:
Hi Peter,
>Please do not be surprised, Randy considers that his process
>has nothing to do with Rossi's or Paintelli's.
>And the BLP technology (I still hope to see it working more or less
>publicly this year) is hyperchemistry
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:52:13 +0200:
Hi Peter,
[snip]
>Dear Robin.
>
>I told mainly what Randy thinks- he has nothing to do with what Rossi (or
>Piantelli) has
I'm well aware that Randy doesn't want to have anything to do with CF.
>As regarding Transition Metals-
In reply to Akira Shirakawa's message of Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:58:43 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>On 2011-11-27 21:52, Peter Gluck wrote:
>[...]
>> As regarding Transition Metals-H LENR (not only Ni works)...
>
>It's interesting to know that not only Ni (in addition to Pd) works.
>I assume that Fe-H LENRs cou
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:23:40 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
> Need 500C steam for electrical.
At 120C steam the inside
>temperature is too high .. not a very stable situation.
This just means that the thermal conductivity needs to be improved. A design and
m
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:20:47 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
>In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:23:40 -0800:
>Hi,
>[snip]
>> Need 500C steam for electrical.
>
>At 120C steam the inside
This got stuffed up during composition. It sho
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:50:06 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>See (in Japanese):
>
>http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/2029-OYT1T00943.htm
>
>Summary:
>
>Sales will begin January 30, 2012. Minimum sales price will be ¥3,200,000
>($41,000). after government rebates it co
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:38:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>* Confirms the presence of 6-7 Mev Protons
The suggestion that 6-7 MeV protons are responsible doesn't add up. If you
bombard Nickel with 6-7 MeV protons you don't get enough energy from the fusion
reactions to acc
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:53:08 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, wrote:
>> In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:38:04 -0500:
>
>> Note also that 6-7 MeV is the energy that you get from fusing a proton with
>> a Ni
>> nucl
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:29:25 -0500:
Hi,
>where one of the two protons fuses, and the other is ejected carrying
>
>the energy of the fusion reaction of the first proton.
>
>
>
>Could these two protons derive from a cooper pair of protons coming from a
>Bose-Einstei
In reply to Peter Heckert's message of Sat, 03 Dec 2011 01:36:18 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The other problem is, where to get deuterium in pressurized bottles ;-)
[snip]
That one isn't really a problem. Electrolysis can easily produce high gas
pressures. You could do the entire experiment in the D collec
In reply to Peter Heckert's message of Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:23:08 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The problem is, the athmosphere must be absolutely dry.
>I have seen D2O costs about 1-3 Euro per milliliter. Possibly it works
>with dry D2O steam?
Pass the gas through a cold trap first? (cooled by liquid Nitro
In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:16:53 +0100
(CET):
Hi,
[snip]
>My thought is to improve the efficiency of this process. Generate 100 keV
>electrons or protons in a vacuum and shoot them directly in a lossless way
>into a /pressurized/ deuterium /stream/.
>I don
Hi,
The (private?) Swiss company Glencore has acquired all the shares of the largest
Australian Nickel producer Minara.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:46:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>When one of these coherent atoms becomes QM decoherent and leaves the QM
>assemblage through the action of a trigger, it releases this potential
>energy over the entire QM assemblage.
Surely the energy of any one atom
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:20:00 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
>Aussie FITs require the grid to be fed via a grid connect inverter and
>the inverter fed by a "Renewable" energy source. I doubt LENR would
>qualify.
If you get a system working, then I think you should requ
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:01:10 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Why hasn't anyone notice excess heat?
At a guess I would say there are two reasons.
1) There isn't much.
2) No one measures it, they just get rid of it.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:21:38 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>In this low temperature lattice case, coulomb shielding from the ultra
>strong dipole moments of Rydberg matter produced by the internal heater
>will still occur and cold fusion will still result in a cold lattice. But
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:44:29 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Axil:
>
>
>
>Let me take a stab at your question:
It wasn't Axil's question, it was mine.
>
>"Why should coherent protons be any better at thermalizing gamma radiation
>than ordinary protons? (Especially
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:58:50 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I think the most obvious explanation is that the beam isn't perfect, and the
occasional fast particle hits the wall and knocks a fleck of material off it.
The impact of such a fast particle in solid matter constitut
In reply to Aussie Guy E-Cat's message of Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:23:48 +1030:
Hi,
[snip]
>I grew up supporting the grid and will fight to see it retained. However
>LENR brings new business opportunities. With 45 kW of heat from a
>Hyperion unit, it is possible to build a relative low cost and simpl
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:09:15 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.faraday.ru/ah.pdf
>
>This is not the first time xenon and hydrogen have been proposed to work
>together for gain.
Indeed. Papp used a mixture of all the noble gasses, including Xe.
(With the H coming f
In reply to Man on Bridges's message of Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:26:08 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>"Concerning matter, we have been all wrong. What we have called matter
>is energy, whose vibration has been so lowered as to be perceptible to
>the senses. There is no matter." - Albert Einstein
>
I don't think
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:30:30 -0500
(EST):
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>
>
>
>Subject: check out this 10,000 volt single cell battery near end of lecture
>
>
>I see it but I still don't believe it.
>
>
>
>
>http://academicearth.org/lectures/batteries-emf-energy-conservat
In reply to ecat builder's message of Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:21:23 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Quoting: "Experiment with RFG to determine sweet spot for initial
>heating and then sweet spot for maintaining reaction, modulating pulse
>rate, frequency and power. Wave shape is important. Half wave sweet
>spots a
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:34:04 -0800:
Hi,
alpha*c is the speed you get for the electron in a Bohr orbit, utilizing the De
Broglie wavelength. What is not apparent from the snippet quoted is why this
velocity follows from a "screw type of motion".
>Might I sugges
In reply to David Roberson's message of Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:41:59 -0500 (EST):
Hi,
The trigger isn't the problem. The problem is the necessary chain reaction
mechanism after the trigger is applied.
>On an earlier post I suggested that the LENR reactions such as those exhibited
>by Rossi could h
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:30:49 -0900:
Hi Horace,
You probably did. I also pointed it out to Frank himself a couple of years back.
The calculation of the electron speed is nothing new. It's also in the Hydrino
calculations on my web site. However I still haven't
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:10 -0800 (PST):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Yes, it is nothing new - Mills did this in 1990 rather emphatically - and even
>then it was not new, but Robin - you seem to be downplaying your own
>contribution.
>
>Does not a 'screw-like' motion mesh
gt;Frank Z
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: mixent
>To: vortex-l
>Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2011 5:38 pm
>Subject: Re: [Vo]: NOT = NOT off topic, 2.188 = 2*1.094
>
>
>In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:10 -0800 (PST):
>Hi Jones,
>
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:07:01 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Horace Heffner
>wrote:
>> The problem was due to a cached web page from Rossi's site. I deleted the
>> browser cache on both systems and the ads went away.
>
>With Chrome, I turn
In reply to Charles Hope's message of Sat, 24 Dec 2011 17:21:53 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>The very first act I'd do is run my own home and office from the technology.
>In winter the windows would be wide open to enjoy the fresh air as we roasted
>in the balmy heat pouring from my heaters that were atta
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:32:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is some kind of
>super-battery, probably worth billions just for that. Unfortunately
>for this battery idea, ... helium.
You appear to have ignored th
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:41:55 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Mirror electrons in the dielectric keep the protons close to each other.
As I pointed out on this list a few weeks back (though it may not have been
noticed in the deluge), this doesn't work because "close" is much
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011
14:05:01 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Regarding the profitability of illegal businesses, like Afghani heroin, I'm
>going to suggest something outrageous. We should seriously consider growing
>our own poppy fields and the manufactu
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:41:55 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Gain comes from non-quark nuclear boson depletion, is instigated by strong
>force attraction, followed by Coulomb repulsion - and depends on quark
>statistics. Gain is in the range of tens to hundreds of keV per prot
In reply to Zell, Chris's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:14:56 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>some pretend LENR can incinerate, with the produced neutrons), and also for
>cleaning and recycling plants... but basically nuclear industry will move to
>cleaning mode for 40-60 years.
Actually protons would be f
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011
10:56:38 -0600:
Hi,
Quote:
"I think they will care less about any theoretical arguments that"
This is one of my pet peeves with Americans. ;)
The expression is "couldn't care less" not "could care less".
"couldn'
In reply to Mary Yugo's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:31:21 -0800:
Hi,
The reasons you give have little to do with the reason for being there, as
indicated by the fact that the current incumbents are not much better. Basically
the problems you describe are part of the culture of the local people
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:03:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>At 11:39 PM 12/26/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
>>In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:32:07 -0500:
>>Hi,
>>[snip]
>> >Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is s
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:27:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Several neutron Compton scattering (NCS) experiments on liquid and solid
>samples containing protons or deuterons show a striking anomaly, namely, a
>shortfall in the intensity of energetic neutrons scattered by the pro
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:17:21 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>It is notable that the
>radioactive isotopes of these elements tend to have nonzero nuclear
>magnetic moments.
...notable perhaps, but hardly surprising. Pair forming results in stability,
hence nuclei with u
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:10:20 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>-Original Message-
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>>There are secondary nuclear reactions but most of the energy gain is from
>accelerated protons.
>
>> Robin: This implies close proximity between proton and t
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:10:20 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>-Original Message-
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>> As I pointed out on this list a few weeks back (though it may not have
>been noticed in the deluge), this doesn't work because "close" is much
>smaller than
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:16:32 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Yes, and that is why - by convention - one atom of thickness is treated as
>2D. Were you not aware of that? In the abstract, an atom thickness may not
>be "true" 2D, but it always works out that way with high p
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:48:59
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Primarily for the theorists in the Collective.
>
>This from the Ni-H yahoo group...
>
>-Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>I try to explain it:
>All you have to do is, to put the electron from the H-
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:08:00
-0800:
Hi Mark,
[snip]
Horace's calculation has nothing to do with alignment of magnetic fields in
clusters, which can't produce such huge fields anyway. (Consider that in an
ordinary magnet many (most?) of the atomic field
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:11:45
-0800:
Hi Mark,
[snip]
>Robin:
>Thanks for the comments, and I see your chicken-n-egg argument...
>
>As I prefaced my comment about Horace's calcs, "I'm not sure if this is
>relevant either..."
>Please note that in many case
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:32:09 -0900:
Hi Horace,
[snip]
>In the process of changing their spin
>axes the particles can (in a non QM interpretation) precess, due to
>torque on the spin axis. When this happens the particles can
>radiate, and flip their spin
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:47:18 +0200:
Hi,
>This morning I have received this from Giuseppe Levi re this test
>:
>Average flux in that test was 1 liter per second (measured by me many times
>during the test). No steam. MINIMUM power measured was 15 kW for 18h. 0.4g
In reply to Dennis's message of Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:09:20 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>So could his catalyst additives be Si and Co?
Co could easily be a contaminant in Ni, however it could also be a product.
e.g.
Ni-62 + H => Co-59 + He4 + 345 keV (unlikely due to low energy of reaction?)
The Si could
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:35:03 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>This 270kWh per 0.4 g if hydrogen is obviously well beyond chemical
>if the consumables actually are H and Ni. The energy E per H is:
>
>E = (270kwh) /(0.4 g * Na / (1.00797 gm/mol)) = 2.54x10^4 eV / H
>
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:56:08 -0900:
Hi,
The reaction
Ni-60 + 4 H (cluster) => Ca-40 + Mg-24 + 13.5 MeV
readily produces Calcium.
>Hafnium reactions, Hf + H reactions, like Cs reactions, do not
>produce initial negative energy, thus should produce an imme
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:39:36 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>> ..we also don't know how much of the H remained in the Ni after the
>> reaction was
>> finished.
>
>Yes, very true. The 25.4 keV is a *minimum* energy per hydrogen
>atom. However, if 30% of the Ni was conv
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:48:52 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>I don't understand- excuse where is the pressure of hydrogen measured? It is
>adsorbed absorbed in the nanometric nickel, the temperature increases there
>up to say 400 C- I don't think the reactor has a mano
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:24:21 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Dennis wrote:
>
>> I am not too good at looking at Electron microscope pictures
>> perhaps someone here can
>> help me understand Rossi's pictures in his patents. us20110005506A1
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:39:14 -0800:
Hi,
>Peter,
>
>
>
>Thank you for checking.
>
>
>
>Apparently, there is no ultrasound.
>
>
>
>The need of differential heating, provided by electrical input, in a
>situation where the reaction itself is gainful - is most unusu
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:17:40 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>By a person, not Google translate:
>
>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article324.ece
>
>- Jed
Ni has roughly the following isotopes/percentages:-
Ni-58 68%
Ni-60 26%
Ni-611%
Ni-62
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Fri, 25 Feb 2011
22:57:12 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
He has no fear of bearding the lion in it's den. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:08:56 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>If pycno is formed preferentially by the same geometric tendencies, we would
>expect to see it with
>
>2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126 protons.
This is an interesting idea, but take into account that the magic numbers res
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:14:22 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>Robin - When the proton (or hydrino) appears as a bound species - along with
>inherent negative charge, as happens with either pycno (or possibly with an
>expanded Mills' version) and which is nearly charge neu
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 26 Feb 2011 23:47:53 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
A virtual neutron is a small neutral object comprising a proton and an electron
with a mass less than that of a real neutron, that hasn't (yet?) undergone a
weak force reaction.
It has the ability to closely appro
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:28:04 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>> Ni has roughly the following isotopes/percentages:-
>>
>> Ni-5868%
>> Ni-6026%
>> Ni-61 1%
>> Ni-62 4%
>> Ni-64 1%
>>
>> If 30% of the Ni is converted to copper over the l
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:44:22 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:33 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> Should we welcome the "mindset" of Russia's Siberian Khatru, or should
>> we be a little concerned.
>>
>> IOW, what else is in their "mi
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:52:35 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>> A virtual neutron is a small neutral object comprising a proton and
>> an electron
>> with a mass less than that of a real neutron, that hasn't (yet?)
>> undergone a
>> weak force reaction.
>> It has the abi
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:39:30 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>I believe there was a statement by Rossi that there was no residual
>radiation, so this should rule out 59Ni in the leftovers.
The radiation from 59Ni may be difficult to detect, as most of the time it
decays v
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 2 Mar 2011 10:52:26 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Look at it this way - nuclear reactions do not violate conservation of
>energy, which is based on valence electron reactions.
What do nuclear reactions have to do with valence electrons?
> When the reaction
>moves b
In reply to Shek Singhal's message of Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:01:01 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Ismael Aviso is considering open sourcing his technology that harvests
>energy from the environment on the fly to keep a 11-kW DC motor running.
>*
>**
>http://pesn.com/2011/02/27/9501773_Aviso_Ponders_Open_Sourcing_
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:45:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Along the same lines, the letters to the editor in a recent edition of
>the Sci. Am. included several critiques of the assertion that cell
>phones cause no harm because the radiation is not strong enough to break
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:33:42 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>This taken as a whole is an agreement with you, for very slightly
>different reasons, reasons that make sense within the deflation
>fusion model, that *all* the Ni isotopes can prospectively be
>converted to
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:32:46 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>There is NO such reduction. Mills is clearly wrong on that, as all his
>detractors have correctly stated. Potential energy exists when a force acts
>upon an object that tends to restore it to a lower energy configurat
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:18:10
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin sez:
>
>> ...sounds to me as though he is tapping into the Van Allen belt energy.
>> This is the resonant transfer concept.
>
>Oh dear! If this takes off I bet one can wager their suntan lotion
Hi Horace,
I have been thinking about trapped electrons, and I am not sure they are trapped
at all. My reasoning is as follows, please correct any errors.
I'll use the following reaction as an example:
Ni62 + H -> Cu63 + 6.123 MeV
In Cu63 there are no electrons in the nucleus (normally), so the
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson's message of Thu, 3 Mar 2011
07:28:51 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Any reasonable guesstamate as to how much energy, theoretically speaking
>here, could be tapped into?
A rough calculation of the power delivered by the average Solar wind based on an
Earth ra
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:12:11 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>On Mar 3, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> http://blastr.com/2011/03/giant-chamber-on-the-moon.php
>>
>> with must-see piccy.
>
>Apparently it is a lava tube.
>
>http://www.siliconindia.com/shownews/IS
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:23:50 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>On Mar 3, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> http://blastr.com/2011/03/giant-chamber-on-the-moon.php
>>
>> with must-see piccy.
>
>Source article on the lava tube:
>
>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lps
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:39:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>>It's no secret:
>>
>>http://energenx.com/products.html
>>
>>The Bedini pulse charger removes sulfides from the plates.
Isn't that "sulfates"?
>
>Maybe that's it, maybe not. My impression was of a European
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:43:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>The worst that can happen is the NRC tells you cannot operate this
>nuclear reactor in the U.S. So, you inform the mass media that Uncle Sam
>agrees you have a nuclear reactor. You pack it up, ship it to Greece,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 4 Mar 2011 06:55:09 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>In trying to look at it from Rossi's POV, the "cascade" was the only
>rationale which made logical sense to me - as to why he would go 100+
>modular units.
[snip]
Multiple reports exist of varying power output from t
In reply to Dennis's message of Fri, 4 Mar 2011 08:57:50 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>I had the feeling that the heating was by directly passing the current
>through the metal bed - that would make for very fast transfer.
>
I doubt it because there are 5 controllers for the device. If the current were
pass
In reply to Nick Palmer's message of Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:27:09 -:
Hi Nick,
[snip]
>Robin wrote:
>
><<..Well maybe not quite. The problem with this is that the general public
>only
>understands one kind of nuclear. I'm afraid that educating them in the
>subtleties is going to take a while.>>
>
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:53:31 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The strangest photo I have seen is this one:-
http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2011/03/12/1226020/139133-satte-japan-earthquake.jpg
Notice that the yellow line down the middle of the road has been split in two
Hi,
I had a dream this morning. I was looking up into a blue sky at the image of a
huge inflatable globe of the Earth at about 5 ft (complete with lines of
latitude and longitude), that expanded to fill the whole sky. The part that I
could see was South America, and in what appeared to be acce
In reply to Dennis's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:25:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The thing I do not understand is that I would have expect people to notice a
>pulse of noise from a gas pressure switching system. I wonder if he can do it
>without a non-static H2 pressure. I can't do that. I
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:48:24 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Multiple reports exist of varying power output from the device. Such
>variability wouldn't be acceptable in a commercial device. By ganging a
>hundred units together, the variability tends to average out resulting in
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:New paper from Cardone
>
>
>http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1153
Neutron detectors may also be sensitive to Hydrinos through enhanced electron
capture (something which I suggested on this for
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:57:30 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>They are outgassing Reactor 1. G-d bless those operators who are
>remaining on station. They are likely DMW (dead men walking).
>
>T
...one wonders why the control room has to be even within km's of the reactor?
In reply to Dennis's message of Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:14:07 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Apparently the reactors were shut down automatically as soon as seismic activity
registered on the instruments, so there are probably no neutrons to speak of.
The heat is largely due to the decay of radioisotopes, and hav
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:42:07 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The annual cost for hydrogen
>and nickel, the "fuel", ie a device capacity of 20 kW is about 1,300
>euros, when the value of the energy produced at current prices of more
>than 14,000 euros.
...if we assume a co
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:39:20 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hello group,
>
>Have a look here:
>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3126617.ece
>
>Many interesting additional questions from Ny Teknik readers have been
>recently answered by Rossi, reg
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:39:20 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hello group,
>
>Have a look here:
>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3126617.ece
>
>Many interesting additional questions from Ny Teknik readers have been
>recently answered by Rossi, reg
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:39:20 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hello group,
>
>Have a look here:
>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3126617.ece
>
>Many interesting additional questions from Ny Teknik readers have been
>recently answered by Rossi, reg
In reply to SHIRAKAWA Akira's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:39:20 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hello group,
>
>Have a look here:
>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3126617.ece
>
>Many interesting additional questions from Ny Teknik readers have been
>recently answered by Rossi, reg
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 22:01:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Quick, without Google, take a guess what percentage of land on the
>earth is antipodal, ie a line from the land drawn diametrically
>through the earth touches land?
>
>I was surprised at the answer.
>
>T
Because th
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:43:36 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Water reacts with hot Zr to produce powdered ZrO2 and with uranium to
>produce powdered U3O8, which generates a lot of heat, resulting in the
>observed fires. The UO2 is only slightly reactive with water and is not
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:36:15 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Those who
>favor a nuclear-only pathway might look to the P-e-P reaction as the
>aftermath. Some deuterium is expected in the ash.
Just a side note here - I think the P-e-P reaction energy is all carried away by
the
101 - 200 of 3347 matches
Mail list logo
