Re: [Vo]:New paper from B-J. Huang et al.

Because many thousands of negative pressure are produced within the cavity. On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 22:14, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Huang, B.-J., et al., *Water can trigger nuclear reaction to produce > energy and isotope gases.* Scientific Reports, 2024. *14*(1): p. 214. > >

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_engine On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 00:19, Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 8 Jun 2023 19:15:55 -0400: > Hi, > > A fuel cell + electric motor would probably also be more efficient. > >Hi Grimer! > > > >Hyd

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

Jun 2023 at 00:16, Terry Blanton wrote: > Hi Grimer! > > Hydrogen combustion in a gasoline engine has a fraction of the horsepower, > not to mention the embrittlement discovered by Bob Lazar when he fueled his > Vette with H2. Poor valves. > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 7:08 P

Re: [Vo]:Mr. Bean vs Mr. Musk

What about the ICE running on hydrogen generated from electricity. On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 23:08, Terry Blanton wrote: > When we get our energy via fusion, be it natural (Sol) or man made, the > ICE should be melted to make new weapons and plowshares. > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023, 5:44 PM MSF wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

Thanks Jed. On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 01:40, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I do not recall an experiment that produced a lot of steam. Maybe the glow > discharge ones? They went for 15 minutes before the electrode dissolved. > They did produce a lot of steam. > >>

Re: [Vo]:ICCF24 paper, How to fix global warming with cold fusion

Very inspiring. Well done. On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 22:41, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Here is the first draft of my presentation at ICCF24: > > > Rothwell, J. *How to fix global warming with cold fusion.* in *ICCF24 > Solid-state Energy Summit.* 2022. Mountain View, CA. > > >

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

reaction. Maybe I dreamt it. :-) On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 21:23, Terry Blanton wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:11 AM Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I can't remember where I read that Mizuno had demonstrated a specimen in >> a water bath which generat

Re: [Vo]:Very low power levels are worth TONS of money

I can't remember where I read that Mizuno had demonstrated a specimen in a water bath which generated impossible amounts of steam. Can anyone provide a link to that experiment please? On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 14:16, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jonathan Berry wrote: > > Wrist watches of course don't

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

This sounds like an example of the whirling of shafts "Whirling of shafts occurs due to *rotational imbalance of a shaft*, even in the absence of external loads, which causes resonance to occur at certain speeds, known as critical speeds." Large electricity generating turbines have to be taken

Re: [Vo]:Test

alled the Brachistochrome Problem > > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Brac > > Jones > > > Frank Grimer wrote: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg > > Two cars. > > Green low road car arrives first. > > Real or Fake. > > Please explain your choice. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

> > I would be more inclined to say that electrons are eddies, rather than > whole atoms. I think of the other particles in > the zoo as composite eddies. (Wheels within wheels as it were.) With a quasi solid core where the speed of rotation exceeds the information transmission speed of the

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

Thanks for your reply. Robin (my favorite garden bird :-)). A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the center of a vast collection of stars called

Re: [Vo]:Test

ectation > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvlmdPLMQM4 > > The more general phenomenon seems to be called the Brachistochrome Problem > > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Brac > > Jones > > > Frank Grimer wrote: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg > > Two cars. > > Green low road car arrives first. > > Real or Fake. > > Please explain your choice. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

> > why do like charges repel, and unlike charges attract? Because one is a source, the other is a sink at the bottom of a deep ocean. Unlike charges have a Bernoulli flow between them. One is a source - the other is a sink This leads to their apparent attraction. In reality they are being

Re: [Vo]:Test

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg Two cars. Green low road car arrives first. Real or Fake. Please explain your choice. On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 07:55, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

[Vo]:Test

[Vo]:Test of heading

Test of text

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

1747 words - in the middle of the night. One can't help but applaud your enthusiasm, Vibrator. On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 01:04, Vibrator ! wrote: > I didn't put any on tick tok. > > I didn't 'put' any anywhere. > > Again, every day for the last few weeks i've come home from work and > checked

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

I did look at some, not all, of the ones you put on tick tock. As for this one - blue skies - flashing like a semaphore - ergo - a firelantern with reflecting panels tumbling around in the wind. Not rocket science is it. On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 11:13, Vibrator ! wrote: > > If you want to

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

, flying freely in all skies, everywhere.. >> there's other consistent types of UFO and locales etc., but this is a >> consistent thing unto itself, and seemingly more common that all >> 'traditional' UFO types (saucers, cigars etc.) combined. They're all but >> ubiquito

Re: [Vo]:It's Time We Talked About the Box-Orbs..

Chinese fire lanterns. Which explains why they are seen all around the world. It wouldn't surprise me if you even have a small Chinese community in W3. On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 at 01:59, Vibrator ! wrote: > If you check the 'box-orbs' list, i now have at least two that clearly > show tethered pairs:

Re: [Vo]:Bearden dead and cheniere.org gone

I'm not sure how to start a new thread in Vortex-l but since this most concerns you Jed I'm posting to you in this thread. In your book on Mizuno (which I seem to have mislaid - probably lent it to someone who didn't return it) you describe at experiment with specimen of finely divided metal

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

a catastrophe such as failure of a prestressed concrete AGR pressure vessel is needed to provide the necessary *Gestalt* switch. However, as AGRs are now being decommissioned this possibility is slowly disappearing. On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 00:37, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: [Vo]:What would it take?

This is the kind of toy that is needed. People have made attempts to emulate but as yet no one has succeeded. They need to try harder. I believe it worked. > "Bruce Welsh is an electronics engineer with* the o*pen spirit which has > been devoted to alternative energies for twenty years. It is

Re: [Vo]:What would it take?

A Bessler Wheel in the form of a toy. Interestingly, Laithwaite came close to solving this with his gyro demonstration at the RI. May the strain be with you. On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 23:00, Jonathan Berry wrote: > Interesting idea. > > And while I don't think there are many things that could be

Re: [Vo]:Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang et al.

A good example of harnessing the power of the Beta-atmosphere. They will cotton on eventually. :-) On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 22:30, Jed Rothwell wrote: > This discussion group began long ago with discussions of vortex-induced > cavitation, also known as sonofusion. Examples include the work of

Re: [Vo]:the uninhibited mind

IT'S TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN          On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 at 14:15, Don wrote: > > > "When we understand the structure of matter then we may devise > confirmatory experiments using whatever instrumentation we please, but > until that understanding is attained, the proper tool is the

Re: Aha, there's a video Re: [Vo]:FE device quietly published

No surprise to me. As I've shown. It makes more sense to view concrete, etc., and held together from without by Beta-atmosphere pressure - and not from within by inconceivable tensions. It's very annoying to be born before one's time. Let's hope he pulls his finger out and builds a large scale

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

By removing the oscillation he removed the very thing that was causing the Steorn effect I seem to remember. On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 19:52, Terry Blanton wrote: > We called it the "Little Effect". Devices never worked around Scott > Little (or his daughter?) > > Kinda the opposite of the

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

I wouldn't worry too much about Puthoff Puthoff took an interest in the Church of Scientology in the late 1960s and reached what was then the top OT VII level by 1971.[3]

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

I believe it does. See the following article in Infinite Energy magazine. Grimer, Frank J. Aether Vacua and Cold Fusion, 2002, 8, 46, 28 I also think that Cold Fusion and the Griggs effect are connected as will be clear from the article. Mind you. I can well understand poor Griggs not wanting

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

https://remontideas.ru/en/warm-floor/vechnyi-dvigatel-potapova-generator-svobodnoi-energii-s-samozapitkoi.html A bit of history. On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 14:16, Jones Beene wrote: > David Jonsson wrote: > > > Hi > > The concept vortex seems to be used in different ways. > > How is it used on this

Re: [Vo]:What is meant by vortex here?

A good example of getting energy from the Beta-atmosphere. Beene knows what I'm talking about. https://assets.markallengroup.com//article-images/1085/f-hydro.htm "Hydro Sonic’s unit has been the subject of three tests by a leading US technical university. The university apparently demonstrated a

Re: Dave Beaty Re: [Vo]:ufo report to be coming out in a month

They are taking the piss. :-) On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 23:59, Robin wrote: > In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 20 May 2021 18:53:24 -0400: > Hi Terry, > [snip] > >I hope you are right; however, my research tells me that they are taking > >something from us. And I really don't think

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

I'm not surprised he is being successful. If I'd been him I would have let the experiment (he describes in his book) that was running away continue and blow up the lab. It would have been confirmation of the P experiment where they blew a hole in the lab bench.  On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 23:13,

Re: [Vo]:Verification of Mizuno experiment

I'm not surprised he is being successful. If I'd been him I would have let the experiment (he describes in his book) that was running away continue and blow up the lab. It would have been confirmation of the P experiment where they blew a hole in the lab bench.  On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 23:13,

Re: [Vo]:Re: CONCEPTS OF TIME--

I like it. Makes sense to me.  On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 23:27, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them > cited I did know personally. > > The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did > spend 2 net years working

Re: [Vo]:Corona Virus

I watched it to the end and found it most interesting. Thanks Ron. On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 17:02, Ron Wormus wrote: > I don't have anything but the link. I think it is worth taking the time to > listen to it. Michael Osterholm is a expert who has thought a lot about > this situation. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:Magic Roundabout

Ride carefully.  On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 06:58, Vibrator ! wrote: > " a 50% accumulator? So 2-cycs to unity, 3 to 133%." > > eek i meant "3 to 150%", duh, need slepp.. > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:55 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > >> ..on 2nd thoughts, isn't it a 50% accumulator? So 2-cycs to unity,

Re: [Vo]:Math Scholar paper on LENR

Yes, fusion requires enormous temperatures at ambient pressure. not if the pressure is reduced by orders of pF magnitude. However, until it is recognised that there is no such thing as an attractive force and all materials are held together from without and not from within, held together by a

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

On my 80th birth my children has some packs of cards made with the pictures of my 54 grandchildren. I don't bother to keep track of the number of great grandchildren because it keeps changing.  The 88 relates to Rommel's anti-aircraft gun. which was so effective in the western desert.

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

: > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 7:06 AM Vibrator ! wrote: > >> >> >> Sorry to bump my own thread, bad form.. >> > > Some suggestions: > > Look up Frank Grimer. He hangs out at the Besseler Wheel forum: > https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/ and will be delight

Re: [Vo]:Old news: Conversion of hydrogen into helium in palladium

How interesting. One wonders what prompted them to look for helium in the first place. Was it ordinary hydrogen or heavy hydrogen? On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 15:28, Nigel Dyer wrote: > While looking for an article in a a copy of Nature from 1926 (as you do) I > came across the following article

Re: [Vo]:The potential weaponization of LENR

I seem to remember something about a quarter inch cube of palladium blowing a hole in a lab bench. What would a one inch cube have done! On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 05:15, Terry Blanton wrote: > There have been at least two deaths which could be attributed to CF > experiments, one at SRI in 1992

Re: [Vo]:The potential weaponization of LENR

Very interesting. People have got it the wrong way around though. Its not because the positive pressure has gone up. It is because the negative pressure has gone up, the pF has gone up. This relates to the first paper I published on the strength of clay-cements and how it is affected by the

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

No, no, no. On 1 June 2018 at 21:15, Terry Blanton wrote: > Grimes, Damn autocorrect. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:12 PM Terry Blanton wrote: > >> Crimes? >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:11 PM Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 1:42 PM Vibrator ! wrote: >>> @Chris -

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

I think they are cavitation pits where the high pF inside cavitation bubbles has "sucked" the plastic out. On 26 September 2017 at 18:56, Alan Fletcher wrote: > > Not an expert in either .. but a lot of those look more like dendritic > crystal growth than particle tracks. >

Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form of LENR?

This doesn't surprise me. With cavitation you are getting negative pressures up to pF6. Think Hutchison effect and Dr Judy Woods dustification. On 25 September 2017 at 22:25, Axil Axil wrote: > https://steemit.com/science/@mfmp/ecco-macro-photography- >

Re: [Vo]:Li batteries

Thanks for that. Most interesting. Especially the video contrasting the effect of brutality on the liquid lithium and the solid lithium batteries. :-) On 14 February 2017 at 07:41, Axil Axil wrote: > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/tech/new-damage-proof- >

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

"Jones Beene must be a lawyer..." He was - and possibly still is. ;-) On 4 June 2016 at 05:06, Axil Axil wrote: > Jones Beene: "Their opinions are* de minimis..." * > > Jones Beene must be a lawyer of at least work with them alot. > > My lawyer oftentimes describes

Re: [Vo]: OT: Give Mel a Break?

with full knowledge. If he died in that state he would have merited the fires of hell for all eternity). If he had killed someone he would have merited a long prison sentence. I speak as a catholic just as traditional as Mel Gibson. Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: New Energy Times

At 07:30 am 10/11/2006 -0800, you wrote: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Id: Content-Disposition: inline I have supplied a Subject Header. We'll see if it takes. Looks like Steve has become infected with blank-Vo syndrome. Glad I'm not the

Re: [Vo]: Challenges are popular.

At 02:50 am 02/09/2006 +1200, you wrote: Don't know if this has been posted before: http://www.relativitychallenge.com Interesting - Looks good to me. Frank

Re: [Vo]: How Steorn Works

At 01:48 pm 29/08/2006 -0400, you wrote: From Steve's interview and close examination of the test rig image, I believe I know how the Steorn machine works. Note the large aluminum disk has what appears to be four threaded holes around it's perimeter. Also note that to the left of the disk are

Re: [Vo]: Half baked idea

At 03:47 pm 27/08/2006 -0500, you wrote: Here is a more accurate account: http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/14766 Harry Well done. There's no arguing with that one, eh! 8-) Frank

[Vo]: Re: For Joe Cell Lovers

occidatur haec est mater eius === Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: Re: For Joe Cell Lovers

At 09:55 am 22/07/2006 -0700, you wrote: Frank, What I found particularly contemptible was the way that Deryagin did a volte-face when the going got tough. ...volte-face... hmm... sci-pun or no: http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2002/02/01.html Err...? Too deep for me,

[Vo]: Re: For Joe Cell Lovers

larger than the OH2 - OH + H scale. Anyway, Jones should be happy cos it looks as though his ICE engine will be running on ICE after all. 8-) Cheers, Frank Grimer Foederis Arca, Ora pro nobis

[Vo]: Re: Pseudocapacitance And Waterfuel/Joe Cell

At 05:40 am 21/07/2006 -0600, you wrote: http://electrochem.cwru.edu/ed/encycl/art-c03-elchem-cap.htm pseudocapacitance provides one of the best examples of electrochemical (pseudo)capacitance as, in addition to the almost constant capacitance over a wide voltage range, its reversibility

[Vo]: For Joe Cell Lovers 8-)

I've managed to get hold of F. Frank's Polywater for the bargain price of $2. 8-) On page 7 of the first chapter there is the following passage which is of considerable relevance to Joe Cell Lovers and fellow travellers who have the laudable ambition of discovering the secret of how water

Re: [Vo]: Nanobubbles and Free-energy

At 08:40 am 13/07/2006 -0700, Jones wrote: - Original Message - From: Frederick Sparber A fundamental law? Energy is inversely proportional to radius? Certainly true regarding photon wavelength - plus - Prof. Casimir sez: as you go smaller and smaller in dimensions, then the

Re: [Vo]: OffTopic: Male Pride and Female Prejudice

[snip} See also: The New Gender Divide At Colleges, Women Are Leaving Men in the Dust http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/education/09college.html - Jed Whilst on this interesting subject. I've often wondered how many ladies there are in our Vortex group. If I had to guess I would

Re: [Vo]: DOE's Top 100

At 07:58 pm 10/07/2006 -0400, Terry wrote: Actually 101: http://www.er.doe.gov/sub/accomplishments/decades_discovery/decades.htm http://tinyurl.com/h42bn U.S. Department of Energy's Decades of Discovery For the past two-and-a-half decades, the Office of Science at the U.S.

Re: [Vo]: Imaginary Weapons

At 03:01 pm 09/07/2006 -0400, Terry wrote: A book recently mentioned on the hydrino list has been the subject of discussion by certain fringe scientists in other lists: http://www.fourmilab.ch/fourmilog/archives/2006-06/000715.html http://www.imaginaryweapons.net/imaginary_weapons_climax.htm

Re: [Vo]: Re: Bell, Bang and Entangle

At 05:28 pm 07/07/2006 -0700, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton -- Robin van Spaandonk It's also possible that there is no such thing as a photon. This is Don Hotson's contention. It was also Caroline T's opinion [Requiescat in pace] and no doubt many others. I

[Vo]: Fears over Britain's nuclear plants

Revelations of safety concerns at Britain's AGR power stations come at a crucial time for the nuclear industry, with results of the government's energy review due in the next fortnight. = http://www.guardian.co.uk/nuclear/article/0,, 1812795,00.html

Re: [VO]:Re: Is Spacetime a Superfluid

At 06:06 pm 30/06/2006 -0500, Richard wrote: .. everything is held together by the power of His Word. Richard Or in technical terms, by Itereative Hierarchical Strain. 8-) Frank

Re: [Vo]: Re: Is Spacetime a Superfluid

have never heard him say it, I think Grimer believes that his atmosphere hierarchy is the physical manifestation. Now wouldn't that be amazing. 8-) But it is our destiny to seek the Truth. Terry Indeed it is. Unfortunately, all too often, we end up being satisfied with Wales. g

[Vo]: Re: Stan Meyer - Autopsy Report

When I was at grammar school and first learnt about water I visualised it as a lot of little molecules of H20, much like individual marbles in a big transparent bag. Later I discovered it was a tad more complicated than that. Some of the marbles had split into H+ and OH-. Mind you, in

Re: [Vo]: Rarification of Aether

At 04:13 pm 28/06/2006 -0400, Terry wrote: If your Beta-atmosphere is really the luciferous ether, then the propagation of x-ray photon should be superluminal through the lens-shaped cavity. This should not be difficult to test. It *would* get you that trip to Stockholm. :-)  No,

RE: [Vo]: Tiny Bubbles in the Sky . . .

tensile strains that arise from the pressure of deuterium nuclei as they saturate the metal. Perhaps a more accurate name for Cold Fusion would be Cavitation Fusion, cos, clearly, that's what it is. 8-) Cheers, Frank Grimer The high temperature inside metal cavities also explains what

RE: [Vo]: Tiny Bubbles in the Sky . . .

Whilst on the subject of Beta-atmosphere vacua taking off the pressure that holds things together, why do you think things like salt fall apart when dropped into water. Water molecules are electrets, and consequently form a jangle of struts and ties with plenty of nooks and crannies where

Re: [Vo]: Re:[VO]: Tiny Bubbles in the Sky

At 06:58 am 26/06/2006 -0500, Richard wrote: We are mere mortals being accelerated just as a free falling object in a vacuum. The question becomes not if but when and will this free fall in advances in scientific discovery end in a splat or a smile. The when answers are given in

Re: [Vo]: Re: Black hydrogen, palladium and Bush

At 07:28 am 25/06/2006 -0700, Jones wrote: ...although Erik seems to have dropped off the map in the last year. Too bad... fine writer with an open-mind, unlike most science writers (and the morons hired by IOP etc) who think that they must tow the company line ... I wish they really

RE: [Vo]: Tiny Bubbles in the Sky . . .

cavities in palladium is the bits are speeding up, not slowing down. No wonder people are reporting fusion. Probably means that those reports of sono-fusion are genuine too. Cheers, Frank Grimer

RE: [Vo]: Tiny Bubbles in the Sky . . .

At 02:49 pm 25/06/2006 -0400, Frank wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . . . they are there; but, we don't know why. http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=1946 Space is fizzing. Above our heads, where the Earth's magnetic field meets the constant stream of gas from

Re: [Vo]: Can You Get Energy From Gravity?

At 01:32 pm 24/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: http://www.alternate-energy.net/R/news.php?detail=n1151100689.news http://tinyurl.com/grvcr Tension (negative strain energy) in the swing suspension is fine. But one must not forget the compression (positive strain energy) in the columns wot stops the

Re: [Vo]: Henry Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor

, or does it generate more energy than it consumes? Evidence from the Finsrud machine suggests that the latter is entirely possible. Let's hope it proves to be so. Cheers, Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: Henry Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor

and extracting energy from Beta-atmosphere heat. Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: Henry Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor

At 01:33 pm 21/06/2006 -0400, Terry wrote: -Original Message- From: Grimer Let's hope he's wrong - but if he isn't then I think the Finsrud machine is the best bet for proving a point of principle. The solution is more elegant than the Sprain in the cunning way it achieves the different

Re: [Vo]: Henry Paul Sprain Magnetic Motor

At 04:44 pm 21/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: Terry wrote: Now, things may have changed since then. However, at that time, he was confident in it (effectively) self running. If that still stands, it would make verifing his claims somewhat simpler... Indeed it would! The problem has been finding a

Re: [Vo]: PLEASE.... RE and not RE .

At 08:46 pm 19/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: I will say this in closing, John is a very smart guy and he knows his stuff...anyone who has actually spoken with him for any length of time will appreciate this. I don't doubt it, Kyle - and I shouldn't have been pedantic and picked on his

Re: [Vo]: PLEASE.... RE and not RE .

At 07:28 am 20/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: Dear Vortex People, I admit I am not the best speller. I admit I get somewhat excited and or exercised when I type fast. I do not generally use of have a spell check program. I thank Kyle and I thank those of you who are ''lurking'' and may or

Re: [Vo]: Re:[VO]: PLEASE.....RE and not RE

At 03:17 pm 20/06/2006 -0500, Richard wrote: Grimer wrote.. You want an exciting theory? What could be more exciting than a theory which stands conventional physics on its head and claims that materials are held together by external compressions, not by internal tensions - which claims

Re: [Vo]: New look for Newton's bucket

dimensional analogue of magnetisation in ordering the micro hexagonal domains into macro domains. Since the Griggs device involves similar strong shearing forces it suggests that it probably is OU and is getting its energy from inverse Carnot-type cycling of the Beta-atmosphere. Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: cheap medicine - spam

At 03:03 pm 18/06/2006 -0700, you wrote: Hmmm. If spammers send email to vortex-L, while forging the from address to be a vortex subscriber, then their spam gets through. I hope it's not my address cos someone is using the @ and bit after with random stuff in front of the @ to spam. I know

Re: [Vo]: PLEASE.... RE and not RE .

, Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

At 11:49 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, Lawrence wrote: ... I have never claimed to have a PhD. You seemed so knowledgeable I just assumed you must have. 8-) ... My religion is Lutheran ... Ah well, that explains a lot. ;-) F.

Re: [Vo]: Re: Mendeleev, Aether Oil

At 12:55 am 16/06/2006 -0500, Thomas wrote: Jones Beene wrote: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In 1902, in an attempt at a chemical conception of the Aether, he put forward an incorrect hypothesis that there existed two inert chemical elements of lesser atomic

[Vo]: Mizunos Book Cover

are not unlike that famous photo of a drop impacting on the surface of milk. Frank Grimer

Re: [Vo]: Mizunos Book Cover

At 12:30 pm 16/06/2006 -0400, Terry wrote: -Original Message- From: Grimer It would take those kind of pressures to open up such a huge Beta-atmosphere cavity in a metal. Is it really happening *in* the metal or just at the metal surface? Like a Beta-atm black hole impacting

Re: [Vo]: Mizunos Book Cover

At 01:40 pm 16/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Grimer Also you will notice that the central splashes are small. This corresponds to the apex of the dome which is the thinnest part. You are probably right; however, it's your fault that I look at things

Re: [Vo]: How to demonstrate magnetic energy extraction.

At 02:46 pm 16/06/2006 -0400, Stephen wrote: http://www.rexresearch.com/coler/colerb~1.htm In any case, I find it very hard to understand why this wasn't pursued at the time. Of course, the Germans were busy losing the war at the time of the original experiments, and afterwards the

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

At 02:48 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, Jed wrote: ... There is no energy input as far as I can tell from the descriptions. You cannot continuously extract energy from permanent magnets any more than you can from a spring. A classic spring is assumed to be perfectly elastic so cycling it encloses

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

At 05:10 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: Of course permanent magnets are conservative! In the macroscopic world in which we live and in which perpetual motion machines are built, they follow Maxwell's equations; the A field, which describes the combined E and B fields, is conservative.

Re: [Vo]: Hathaway versus 19th century me

At 05:19 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: [Another message to Hathaway] To summarize, your readers will probably all assume that every machine on earth must have a primary source of energy: nuclear, chemical or mechanical. If your claim is that this machine does not tap any primary source, and

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

At 05:24 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: Grimer wrote: A classic spring is assumed to be perfectly elastic so cycling it encloses no energy area. However, perfect elasticity is a theoretical ideal not found in the real world. I mentioned this in my second message. Also, as far as I know all

Re: [Vo]: Re: Read it again

At 06:17 pm 15/06/2006 -0400, you wrote: Grimer wrote: The theological virtue of Faith (belief without doubting) may be appropriate for religion, but it has no place in science. Here is what has no place in science: Claims unsupported by experimental proof. These include the often repeated

RE: [Vo]: US Windpower

At 11:05 am 14/06/2006 -0400, Jed wrote: John Steck wrote: I wonder what the environmental impact would be to tap it. Interesting point. I doubt it would be significant. Total wind power equals the total solar energy that intercepts earth, and that is immense compared to human energy

[Vo]: RE: Raising Polly Water

Re-reading, http://oemagazine.com/fromTheMagazine/oct02/eyeontech.html I came across this useful factoid, === Scientists have characterized nanotubes as the Superman of the molecular world. Composite materials made with nanotubes can be 100

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >