Check out the video linked on the following page. It's awesome!
What do all of you think?
Hitler Panics Over Rossi's Energy Catalyzer
A parody compiled by Hank Mills has Hitler bemoaning: "If cold fusion
technology
hits the market place the oil industry will lose BILLIONS of dollars in
profi
Hello Everyone,
On the following page a person details how Rossi stated he would publish their
paper, but then did not do so. The person theorizes that the paper might have
not been published due to the fact he mentions CARBON as a possible catalyst.
http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?to
The following was posted on the Defkalion forum.
The forum was closed the next day.
---
Dear Defkalion,
In your recent video posted to Youtube (in which you present the Hyperion
technology to the world) the screen in the background has a partial chemical
formula. The part that I could make
I find nothing strange about this report.
So what if he sold the building. He kept the reactor, and has produced hundreds
more since then. Defkalion has proceeded to build hundreds more. Defkalion has
actually built their own units, tested them, and they work great.
What I find strange is that
That is obvious in my opinion. He pushes his Widom Larsen theory on everyone,
and anyone who dares oppose it he attacks. It is obvious he has a vested
interest in proving Widom Larsen theory. I think since Rossi denied his
technology has anything to do with with Widom Larsen theory, Krivit decid
It is an outright lie.
Krivit is doing everything he can to attack Rossi.
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Uppsala University Denies Rossi Research Agreement
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
>> [KRIVIT] P
Do you have something to back this up, or are you just trolling again?
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2011 3:27 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi and Defkalion Split-up?
Hold the presses.
Full Story at 5.
There are rumors that Rossi and Defkalion have split up. However, no evidence
has been presented.
If you have evidence, present it.
Otherwise, this is just rumor mongering.
- Forwarded Message -
From: noone noone
To: Daniel Rocha
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi and Defkalion Split Up RUMORMONGERING - You got
evidence, post it!
It is obvious Defkalion knows about the catalyst.
They would not have invested hundreds of
e put a big disclaimer on it when you post it, so people will know that it
has not been confirmed as being legit.
From: noone noone
To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com"
Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 1:38 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi and Defkalion Split Up RUMORMONG
What if the opposite is true?
What if Defkalion had advanced the technology beyond what Rossi had been able
to achieve, and they really did not "need" Rossi any longer.
Remember, Defkalion claimed that the Greek govt were going to do performance
and safety certification testing of their product
I think it is obvious they have the catalyst.
From: Daniel Rocha
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 10:41 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Defkalion doesn't need Rossi's catalyzer
Dear all,
I haven't seen any announcement from Defkalion regarding terminatin
What do you think the catalyst is at this time?
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Another Defkalion statement on PESN
Ever since one of our number “noone noone” posted this
http://www.mail
The thing is Widom Larsen theory (which I do not think is valid) does produce
nuclear fusion.
When a proton and electron pretending to be a neutron enter an atom's nucleus
releasing energy and causing transmutations, it is FUSION!!!
The Widom Larsen folks are absolutely out of their minds tryin
Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
supposed to be protons and electrons that become virtual neutrons.
Basically, Widom Larsen worshippers want people to believe if a proton and
Inspired by Krivit's nonsense.
Krivit has been out to try and discredit Rossi for a long time. He truly is a
"snake."
From: Mark Iverson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:26 PM
Subject: [Vo]:PhysOrg reports on Krivit's latest article...
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
pca wrote:
Deploying one, let alone millions, of Hyperion units in unsecured places gives
plenty of opportunity for competitor
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:more speculations on break-up
I wrote:
It's much better for Rossi to have licencee(s) build a few large
electricity-generating units in well-garded places, a
He is very jealous. From what I hear, he has only been able to produce small
amounts of output (perhaps 10-50 watts). Rossi has produced a technology that
generates huge amounts of output. Rossi once stated that a 50cc reactor core
has a maximum safe output of 10 kilowatts. The problem with the
I think that there are a group of competitors that are working together to try
and bash Rossi, so they can slow down the commercialization of the E-Cat until
they can make their systems produce 1/10th as much output. For the time being
they are putting aside their differences.
___
I agree that hot fusion was the biggest boondoggle of the 21st century.
Cold fusion is going to make everyone realize how the mainstream scientific
community kept us in the dark ages.
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, November 18, 201
I think the answer is simple. He is jealous. In one breath he claims that Rossi
is producing excess heat and wants him to share information. Next, he is making
skeptical remarks. It makes it clear to me that he wishes he could produce the
same output Rossi can. So instead of admitting that, he a
Hello,
Congrats on being able to test an E-Cat.
I would like to request that you utilize two, single modules in the test. One
with hydrogen, and another without hydrogen. The one with no hydrogen would be
the control. You would input electrical power into the control just like you
would the no
Please ask for two E-Cats to be tested. One with hydrogen and one without
hydrogen.
In all the tests that have been done so far, there has not been a "control"
used. A test with a control would blow away the thermal inertia hypothesis.
It would also confirm beyond a doubt that the E-Cat with hy
This guy is obviously very desperate.
I think Larsen is jealous that Rossi has been able to build practical cold
fusion systems, and he has not.
He is so desperate he has Krivit helping him attack those who do not support
his theory.
When the E-Cat technology is powering the world, Larsen an
Obviously, Leonardo Corporation and LTI would not want to reveal the location
of their labs that contain confidential equipment.
From: Giovanni Santostasi
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Leonardo Corporati
I think this is very good news.
If he can create electricity even moderately efficiently, this technology is
going to change the world -- BIG TIME!
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional technologies
will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one megawatt
I would like to start this thread as a place where details about the deal
between the US military and Andrea Rossi can be discussed. In my opinion, it is
a very big deal that a very experienced engineer not only validated the
technology on Oct. 28th, but now the military is purchasing an additio
The fact Rossi is telling the truth is clear and obvious at this point.
Your irrational skepticism is what is mysterious. When the E-Cat technology is
powering the world I hope you will reveal your true identity, and admit to the
fact you trolled forums across the net trying to attack it. Of c
In my opinion, Piantelli's work is meaningless. He was not able to do anything
with Ni-H fusion.
Piantelli is like a person who discovers heavy crude oil. Andrea Rossi is the
person who was able to refine it into high grade jet fuel, and use it to power
an aircraft.
Anyone who thinks that Pian
A tax on cold fusion devices?
The last thing we need is another tax!
Our government wastes billions of dollars as it is.
They could save billions by ending hot fusion research, and bringing our troops
home from around the world.
The ITER needs to be abolished.
_
I think what we need to do is convince the world that the E-Cat works, and then
promote a peaceful uprising of the people to force the patent office to grand
Rossi's patents.
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:50 PM
I don't agree with the government using tax dollars to pay cold fusion
inventors.
In my opinion, the government needs to be forced (peacefully) to grant Rossi's
patent.
When the government tries to fix a problem they helped create, 9 out of 10
times they make it worse.
__
The following was posted on the Defkalion forum. I thought it was a good
question.
-
The following are facts according to what Defkfalion told the Swedish magazine
NyTeknik.
Fact #1 - In July of Defkalion started thinking of developing it's own
technology. Here is the text from NyTeknik.
Of course they are not like Rossi. They have not designed a paradigm shifting
technology. Instead, they are just searching for some particle, with no idea of
how to make it into a technology.
By the way, Rossi has tested his device over and over again. He is satisfied
the technology works and t
I am all for vertical agriculture, but I am totally opposed to a global basic
income. I do not support socialism or communism.
With cold fusion technology, the price of everything will go down. Even a job
at McDonalds will be capable of paying for a nice house, nice cars, etc. We can
have a wo
I can't wait until the cost of everything has went down dramatically. I think
combining cold fusion with robotics and nanotechnology could allow us to end up
in a world where there is no such thing as scarcity. Everything could be dirt
cheap, and a simple part-time job would allow someone to liv
I think the election cycle this year is going to be very interesting. Actually,
I think it will be more exciting than ever before!
With the US military satisfied the Rossi technology works, purchasing thirteen
systems, and helping with R and D, I think the politicians are bound to be told
abo
What the heck is stopping someone from taking private money and doing research
in their basement?
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley and other professors can only take money from official
Can you describe the first test that is left out of the PDF file?
How many slides were you not allowed to post?
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Private information" about Rossi was the Ampe
Where does that reference come from?
The closest thing I have been able to find is the following page.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/in-attesa-di-brindare-alla-fusione.html&ei=uEJ1Ta-kCIWT0QGsn5nFAQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved
Can you tell us anything more about this replication of the Rossi system?
What catalysts are they using?
Would you please clarify what you mean by 800 watts per liter of powder? Do
they
have to have one liter of nickel powder in the reactor to produce 800 watts.
___
Jones,
Can you please give us the reference for two pounds of zirconia in the Rossi
system?
If that is true it is huge news.
- Forwarded Message
From: noone noone
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, March 7, 2011 4:05:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Rossi mechanism explained ?
Where
That would be a huge win.
If they confiscate it then they have to admit it produces radioactivity.
Then he could go on every talk show in the entire USA.
Cold Fusion would finally be vindicated.
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, March 8
I have looked and looked for it but I cannot find it.
I have found speculation about zirconium and zirconia on the Polywell forum,
but
cannot find anything about the Rossi unit containing 2 pounds and containing 2
grams of nickel.
Did someone actually claim to have heard from someone else that
Jed Rothwell has stated there is new information in the video above the Q and A.
What is this info?
I wonder when a super liberal, illegal alien loving, pro-communist, left wing,
and George Soros funded website will take notice of Rossi?
I also wonder when a super liberty minded, Ron Paul supporting, anti-North
American Union, small government, Federal Reserve abolishing, truly anti-war
(unl
Hello Everyone,
Over the past few months I have read many guesses as to what the catalyst(s)
might be.
A couple speculations are sodium hydride and zirconium.
Please use this thread to post your speculations as to the catalysts used in
the
E-Cat.
If we can figure this out replication work c
It also indicates to me that the cost of the catalyst must be low compared to
the nickel powder and/or they are not using much of it.
Thanks for that additional clue!
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 11:41:55 AM
Subject:
Rossi has stated they use ordinary nickel and not any one specific isotope of
nickel.
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 1:24:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
Peter Gluck wrote:
And as I
Dear Rossi,
As I understand from your answers you confirm or suspect that only Ni 62 and
Ni
64 react to produce Cu 63 and Cu 65 respectively.
The Swedish professor Kullander says in the magazine “Ny teknik” that in the
‘spent’ fuel there is 10% copper 63 and 65 (70:30) and 11% iron.
Since nick
Does this tell us anything new?
Dear “HRG”:
My process has nothing to do with Widom Larsen Theory. Nothing at all, as you
will see when we will publish our theory together with the presentation of our
1 MW plant in Greece in October.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fro
I don't think he has been dishonest with us at all.
He has told us for a long time that the copper comes from Ni 62 and Ni 64. He
just did not state that they enriched the nickel.
To me, the situation is obvious.
He buys one quantity of nickel powder. He stated that the nickel powder he buys
c
.
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 6:20:50 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, noone noone wrote:
> He has found some process of removing some of the other isotopes so that
> there is a
Since I started this thread I would like to request that accusations against
Andrea Rossi not be made in this thread.
If you think he is lying please take such discussion to another thread.
Lets focus on finding additional information and figuring out what catalysts he
is using.
__
Who do you think alerted him?
I hope no one went up to him and told him to stop sharing information.
It would make sense if his patent lawyers did so, but if a member of the cold
fusion community did so I would be furious.
From: SHIRAKAWA Akira
To: vortex-l
addresses Ni enrichment issue
noone noone wrote:
Who do you think alerted him?
>
He does not need to be alerted. He is an experienced businessman. No one makes
a
dime in business if he gives away his technical knowledge and trade secrets for
free.
>I hope no one went up to him and
, April 12, 2011 8:24:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses Ni enrichment issue
Say “noone noone” … are you the Malloy character who was here a few years ago,
and could add little more than far-right rhetoric to any science discussion?
Why should we care how furious a noone with noinsigh
Just to specify, I was not the one who started the political discussion.
Someone
else took a jab at the right wing. I'm glad to not discuss politics here. I
would rather focus on cold fusion. But if someone jabs first I'll comment back.
Thanks for the info!!!
ogy. But from
another point of view the world needs it badly (billions of people vs. Rossi)
and I think people should think about that before warning him.
From:Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 8:09:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi a
There is no question about it in my mind. Nickel is transmuting to copper via a
nuclear process.
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, April 13, 2011 11:26:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is it nuclear, or is it Memorex?
On 04/13/2011 02:17
When the E-Cat starts being used around the world I hope he will resign from
his
position in shame, apologize to the world, and crawl into a hole never to be
heard from again.
From: Jed Rothwell
To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com"
Sent: Wed, April 13, 2011 2:12:16 P
What forum was this on?
From: SHIRAKAWA Akira
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, April 14, 2011 9:00:32 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Hanno Essén: "follow up experiment next week"
Hello group,
In answer to a question from a concerned person regarding water flow
measureme
I found it!
Mind if I post the link?
From: SHIRAKAWA Akira
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, April 14, 2011 9:00:32 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Hanno Essén: "follow up experiment next week"
Hello group,
In answer to a question from a concerned person regarding water
>From andrea Rossi's blog
Dear “HRG”:
You are perfectly right, I agree totally with your comment, as for concerns
the
incompatibility and the unacceptability of entities which work and get
financing from Oil Companies, Nuclear Companies, Hot Fusion Research centers
as
“indipendent third pa
Has anyone read this before? It was posted on the Rossi blog a long time ago. I
think it is a big clue about the function of the catalyst.
Also, please don't run up to his blog and suggest he delete it to protect his
IP. The world needs all the info they can get so this technology can be
replic
Rossi has specifically stated that one or two other elements are used as
catalysts with the nickel powder.
So while it is possible there is not a "spill over catalyst" there is some type
of catalyst mixed in with the nickel.
The truth cannot be that he has lied repeatedly to the world on his
Could you please share more with us about the WIPO document that is due out
soon?
Do you have any links to discussion about it?
This is the FIRST TIME I have heard about this.
Would this WIPO document cover the catalyst his system use? Rossi has stated
they have submitted a patent applicati
Rossi has specifically said that a couple of elements are used as catalysts. If
what you are saying is true (and I do not believe it is) it would make him a
total lying scum-bag. Of course, I don't think he is lying and he is telling us
the truth.
Also, the fact the system can self sustain with
Mining the asteroid belt would be easy if the powers that be would release the
gravity and inertia based technologies they have been keeping beyond top
secret.
These technologies exist, but are simply highly classified. With these
technologies mining the asteroid belt would be extremely easy. O
ter.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:10 PM, noone noone wrote:
Rossi has specifically stated that one or two other elements are used as
catalysts with the nickel powder.
>
>So while it is possible there is not a "spill over catalyst" there is some
>type
>of catalyst mixed in w
This is a fusion reaction.
It is simply not producing as much or as intense gamma radiation.
Rossi has stated that the Gamma radiation produced inside of the device is what
is used to heat the device and the water.
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
The Rossi effect does produce radioactivity! It produces gamma rays! They are
just low energy and do not penetrate the 2cm of shielding.
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 1:11:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about th
They did not have a sensor inside of the reactor chamber. If they did they
would
have detected the gamma rays.
Are you saying that Rossi has flat out lied about the production of gamma rays?
If he has, I would be the first to call him a scum bag lying piece of human
filth.
However, I don't t
I want it to be nuclear to prove to the skeptical naysayers who have suppressed
cold fusion technology for the last twenty or so years that nuclear reactions
can take place at low temperatures, and be used to produce significant
quantities of power!
Andrea Rossi has been working on these devic
Let me get these trivial comments (that are bound to come up) out of the way so
real discussion can begin...
There is a problem with their measurement of water flow! Their scale is a model
xyz when it should have been a model yzx!
The location of their thermal probes is all wrong! It was two
It's why you can gain energy from playing around with the BH curve of magnetic
materials.
From: "Roarty, Francis X"
To: "mix...@bigpond.com"
Cc: "vortex-l@eskimo.com"
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 4:16:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CA
Be careful with the fraud word. You may have to live with those words forever,
after the E-Cat technology starts being used all around the world.
From: Jeff Driscoll
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 5:12:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New tests- by N
How about no need?
They can easily examine the steam quality where the tubing is attached. It's
strait forward to tell if it's wet steam or dry steam. If it's dry steam, there
is no need to do the 55 gallon water tank test.
From: Jones Beene
To: vorte
I like the term cold fusion better. The skeptics have been challenging cold
fusion for decades. We need to shove cold fusion in their face.
From: Wm. Scott Smith
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 6:18:00 PM
Subject: [Vo]:"Non-Chemical Heat Phenome
re the ratio of the mass of vapor to the
mass of liquid droplets when it is pegged at 100%? If Noone Noone comes back
with some capacitance thing I'm going to ask him to do some more research
because I can't explain science to him.
The skeptical naysayers are the ones that started this conflict. They have
attacked cold fusion for twenty years. Instead of being honestly skeptical and
stating more research needed to be done, they claimed it was impossible. We now
need to prove to them cold fusion is a reality. We do not need
The E-Cat has been proven to be most probably real to anyone but the most
extreme of skeptics. I will be the first to admit that I want to see additional
testing, but the chance of this system being fake is extremely low. I would say
one percent or less. Too many people have performed tests on t
This makes the test even more impressive. There is no way less than a gram of
hydrogen could have produced a constant 2.3 or 2.6 kW of heat for hours!
From: Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 1:27:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Lewan video
The E-Cat does not produce Tritium or any other radioactive waste.
The E-Cat has been approved for use in Greece, and this would obviously not be
allowed if it produced radioactive waste.
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 2:26:5
The fact is that none of the E-Cats tested have ran out of hydrogen fuel. They
have all kept working until they were turned off. To say that an E-Cat only
produces less than a hundred times the energy of burning hydrogen is
ridiculous.
If the E-Cat was left on for an extended period of time it
There is proof of it! Look at the tiny bulge in the copper pipe. That is where
the reactor is located.
The reactor vessels are NOT the same size at all! The original one was huge and
this one is tiny.
Rossi is not hiding anything.
From: Jones Beene
To: vo
It is hard for me to believe you are being sincere in your posts.
The only reason for the output being less is the size of the reactor vessel is
50cc rather than one liter!
There is no retraction here at all. If anything, this is a BOOST for the
technology because the actual power density has
The proof is the copper produced by nuclear transmutations.
Once again, those scientists did not have a probe inside of the reaction
vessel.
They could not detect if radiation was being produced there.
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Ma
e: [Vo]:FAKE or REAL -- April test -- NO Chemical Fakes eliminated
noone noone wrote:
I do not know why some people keep bringing up the notion that this technology
is a fake. It is not rational in my opinion.
>
It seems odd to me, as well. I am much more worried about other aspects of the
The natural isotope ratio issue is not an issue at all. Copper was found. There
is no source of copper inside the reactor other than transmutations. The
reactor
is composed of stainless steel that does not contain copper.
I read the V and B report. The simple fact is that cold fusion does not
I bet Rossi was trying to keep the reaction perfectly stable throughout the
experiment. He could have detected an increase in temperature and wanted to
throttle down the input slightly.
From: Angela Kemmler
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 8:
If he reduced the input without telling Mats it would only hurt the results and
not help it. It would not really be fraud if you are doing something that does
not help you.
From: Angela Kemmler
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, May 2, 2011 9:20:48 PM
Subj
I wonder how long the excess heat debate will take to settle. In my opinion,
the
evidence is clear there is a huge amount of excess heat. No one has been able
to
make a significant argument otherwise. Perhaps data from a month long run in
Sweden will settle the minds of some skeptics. If not,
No, you seem to worship Randall Mills of Black Light Power and seem to be on
this forum for one purpose, to push an anti-Rossi agenda.
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, May 3, 2011 6:22:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Let us exercise some common se
He was never a scammer. You are intentionally twisting the entire history.
Everything you post on this forum has an anti-Rossi slant. You will even make
the most illogical of technical comments just to spread FUD about the Rossi
technology. It seems like you are pandering to Randall Mills, who i
Hello Everyone,
There is probably a simple explanation for this.
In the new video that can be found on the following site.
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/canale-tv.php?id=23074
A schematic layout of the experiment is shown
In the schematic there is a canister of hydrogen labeled H2
There is a
So to be clear, do you think that Rossi's statement that a catalyst (two
elements other than nickel) is used in the E-Cat is a lie?
From: Peter Gluck
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 5:33:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to t
d and inspires speculation.
Peter
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, noone noone wrote:
So to be clear, do you think that Rossi's statement that a catalyst (two
elements other than nickel) is used in the E-Cat is a lie?
>
>
>
>
>
From: Peter Gluck
The device was working great.
The 50cc units are officially rated at 2.5 kilowatts. He was probably trying to
keep them at their official rating for the test.
I think it is much harder to keep the power output at the official rating than
it is to let the power output spike and go into self sust
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
