Hi Seddon,
Thanks for this summary of the issues.
Streamlining and standardizing trademark agreements with affiliates for
branded merch production would be great.
Even supposing that the US affiliates went to the trouble of opening a
collective merch store, the production and shipping costs for
Hey John et. al
Apologies for the delaying in responding to the last few emails. I want to
try and cover a couple of the points that been raised.
I'll first start with the history. I am very much aware of the background
surrounding merchandise, in particular the chapters and the changes in the
Thanks SJ. I largely agree with you there.
There is a complicated backstory about the hats, but I think it's safe to
say that we in Cascadia aren't especially interested in running our own
merch store. However, given the years of delays of getting the hats into
the WMF store, it would be nice if
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:07 PM, John Mark Vandenberg
wrote:
>
> Again as I recall, many chapters tried to negotiate amendments to that
> prohibition, and I vaguely recall the French chapter being successful,
> and I vaguely recall the Italian chapter being unsuccessful.
>
> I
Fascinating. My discussions with WMF Trademarks and WMF Fundraising lead me
to think that they didn't know of the existence of these historical
arrangements, because if they had I would think that they would have
swiftly approved the license request for logo use on hats, modeled after
the
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Sam Klein wrote:
>..
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:07 PM, John Mark Vandenberg
> wrote:
>
>>
>> IIRC, there were several affiliates that were previously running a
>> store, and naturally supporting the most relevant
Hi Fae,
Apologies for the length. I'll take your question into two parts:
Firstly about how we use the funds. We are extremely explicit about how the
proceeds are used:
On the front of the store:
*"We use the proceeds from the store to send thank you gifts to the
volunteers who make Wikipedia
The current practice, in my experience, is maximum red tape.
Pine
On Mar 22, 2016 10:52, "Sam Klein" wrote:
> Having a shop that is run with low overhead by someone who specializes in
> handling inventory and shipping, is a very good idea. I've had to do this
> both
Having a shop that is run with low overhead by someone who specializes in
handling inventory and shipping, is a very good idea. I've had to do this
both in-house and externally at a few organizations and when your shipping
volume is as low as the WM Shop's currently is, it doesn't make sense to
I am having a very stretched out discussion, over the course literally of
multiple years, to try to get approval from WMF to produce or aquire
Wikipedia-branded hats. So far no trademark license has been granted. I
have heard multiple times that the WMF store may get these hats, but after
multiple
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Nathan wrote:
> FWIW, it's clear that the trademark policy is intended to apply to users
> other than the WMF. This is all a bit overblown, considering the tiny scale
> of use and money involved.
IIRC, there were several affiliates that were
FWIW, it's clear that the trademark policy is intended to apply to users
other than the WMF. This is all a bit overblown, considering the tiny scale
of use and money involved.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Tim, thanks for raising the Trademark Policy.
>
>
Tim, thanks for raising the Trademark Policy.
Joseph, can you point me to where https://store.wikimedia.org explains
exactly how much of the "donation" is profit going to WMF funds and
how much is administration and costs (both supplier and WMF costs of
administration)?
My assumption is that
Hoi,
With the same pragmatism a different scenario. If say a $20,- donation
arrives and a T-shirt is send,
* $12 basic transaction and product costs
* $12 pro rata costs of having our "own" product to sell produce
* 1,80 WMF administration costs
* $5,80 loss on every T-shirt
Thanks,
GerardM
Fæ wrote:
>>> (I must admit that i tested the job a year ago, the product was fine, the
>>> shipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
>> Expensive? The profit adds funds the WMF, surely.
> This is a logical fallacy that many charities fall into, and end up
> damaging
On 22 March 2016 at 11:51, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 21/03/16 19:39, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote:
>> (I must admit that i tested the job a year ago, the product was fine, the
>> shipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
>
>
> Expensive? The profit adds funds the WMF,
On 21/03/16 19:39, Steinsplitter Wiki wrote:
> (I must admit that i tested the job a year ago, the product was fine, the
> shipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
Expensive? The profit adds funds the WMF, surely.
Gordo
___
Wikimedia-l mailing
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:57 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> On 21 March 2016 at 22:47, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> >
> > The extra control is hypothetically nice, but in practice one-off
> services
> > that are different from the rest of the infrastructure (as a
On 21 March 2016 at 22:47, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
>
> The extra control is hypothetically nice, but in practice one-off services
> that are different from the rest of the infrastructure (as a shop would be,
> like the blog, OTRS, etc) tend to be *extremely* expensive and
tested the job a year ago, the product was fine,
> the
> > > shipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
> > >
> > > I agree with other users that the shop schould be hosted on wikimedia
> > > servers.
> > >
> > > --Steinsplitter
> >
the product was fine, the
> > shipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
> >
> > I agree with other users that the shop schould be hosted on wikimedia
> > servers.
> >
> > --Steinsplitter
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:41:46 +0100
> > >
ipment fast. A bit expensive for my taste.)
>
> I agree with other users that the shop schould be hosted on wikimedia
> servers.
>
> --Steinsplitter
>
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:41:46 +0100
> > From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
> > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:41:46 +0100
> > From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
> > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who runs the Wikimedia Shop ?
> >
> > How many orders are handled by this shop?
> >
> > Rupert
> > On Mar
; From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
> To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Who runs the Wikimedia Shop ?
>
> How many orders are handled by this shop?
>
> Rupert
> On Mar 21, 2016 17:32, "Joseph Seddon" <jsed...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
I don't have numbers of orders to hand but revenue projections for the
store can be seen on Slide 12 here:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/WMF_Advancement_and_Fundraising_Tech_quarterly_review_-_Q2_FY2015-16.pdf
FY 15/16 Projections:
Gross Revenue: $74,383.34
Net Revenue:
How many orders are handled by this shop?
Rupert
On Mar 21, 2016 17:32, "Joseph Seddon" wrote:
> In an ideal world then I would definitely be pushing for a fully wikimedia
> hosted online shop. I completely agree with the principles you've raised.
> But moving in-house
In an ideal world then I would definitely be pushing for a fully wikimedia
hosted online shop. I completely agree with the principles you've raised.
But moving in-house would require resources for building and maintaining an
ecommerce workflow that I don't think we collectively can justify. The
What your saying makes sense. I'll take a look into this Jon and get back
to you as soon as I can.
Seddon
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Joseph Seddon
wrote:
> Hey Florence,
>
> Regarding your first question the shop is Foundation owned and run but
> hosted by Shopify,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Ricordisamoa
wrote:
> Il 21/03/2016 13:14, Marc A. Pelletier ha scritto:
>>
>> On 2016-03-21 8:03 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote:
>>>
>>> As in [1] I'd like to know whether the use of Shopify is acceptable for a
>>> FOSS-friendly
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Joseph Seddon wrote:
> Hey Florence,
>
> Regarding your first question the shop is Foundation owned and run but
> hosted by Shopify, an e-commerce provider. [1] The orders are then sent to
> our fulfillment partner, SWAGBOT. [2]
That it is
On 2016-03-21 8:34 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote:
And yes, it'd be nice if the server side was under WMF's control too!
Yes, and no.
The extra control is hypothetically nice, but in practice one-off
services that are different from the rest of the infrastructure (as a
shop would be, like the blog,
Il 21/03/2016 13:14, Marc A. Pelletier ha scritto:
On 2016-03-21 8:03 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote:
As in [1] I'd like to know whether the use of Shopify is acceptable
for a FOSS-friendly organization. Thanks in advance.
While Shopify isn't FLOSS-only, they're a fairly okay place that does
On 2016-03-21 8:03 AM, Ricordisamoa wrote:
As in [1] I'd like to know whether the use of Shopify is acceptable
for a FOSS-friendly organization. Thanks in advance.
While Shopify isn't FLOSS-only, they're a fairly okay place that does
contribute to FLOSS themselves (mostly in the Ruby and Go
As in [1] I'd like to know whether the use of Shopify is acceptable for
a FOSS-friendly organization. Thanks in advance.
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_merchandise#Shopify.3F
Il 21/03/2016 11:28, Joseph Seddon ha scritto:
Hey Florence,
Regarding your first question the
Thank you
I sent you a private email.
Flo
Le 21/03/16 11:28, Joseph Seddon a écrit :
Hey Florence,
Regarding your first question the shop is Foundation owned and run but
hosted by Shopify, an e-commerce provider. [1] The orders are then sent to
our fulfillment partner, SWAGBOT. [2] We have a
Is that directly run by Wikimedia Foundation staff or is that run by an
independant company "paid" by WMF to manage the shop ?
Who is behind the email address merchand...@wikimedia.org ?
Thank you
Florence
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
36 matches
Mail list logo