On 3/16/06, Nando Stöcklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Michael!
>
>
> >
> > 4. About page protection
> > We have a wiki. A wiki means everybody can edit, at Wikimedia CH only
> > people logged in.
> > But, there are 2 reasons which are imho pro blocking some pages:
> > a)www.wikimedia.ch, w
On 3/16/06, Frederic Schutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Bimmler wrote:
>
>
>
> > 3. About the formal language.
> > I have discussed this matter some days ago in IRC with Jean-Baptiste
> > Soufron, the legal coordinator/advisor of the foundation and he told
> > me, that some formal require
On 3/15/06, Jürg Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry for my recent postings because they were a bit sarcastic a maybe not
> clearly defaced as zynical.
Well, your postings were ok with me...
>
> My opinion in this whole thing is:
> 1) If our preliminary board thinks, we need a special posta
This is a good idea. It's could be also correct to use
http://www.wikimedia.ch to indicate some important resolutions taken
here in the mailing list.
If a new member enter in the foundation, it could be informed of the
previous decisions.
Regards
Ilario
On 3/16/06, Nando Stöcklin <[EMAIL PROTEC
Thanks Michael!
4. About page protectionWe have a wiki. A wiki means everybody can edit, at Wikimedia CH only
people logged in.But, there are 2 reasons which are imho pro blocking some pages:a)www.wikimedia.ch, which is redirecting to our wiki, is mentioned atthe bottom of the Weltwoche article abo
2006/3/15, Jürg Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My opinion in this whole thing is:1) If our preliminary board thinks, we need a special postal address - I'm OKwith it because I don't have the whole view. And on the meeting last year wegave you the mandate and the power to operate towards the swiss chapte
Michael Bimmler wrote:
> 3. About the formal language.
> I have discussed this matter some days ago in IRC with Jean-Baptiste
> Soufron, the legal coordinator/advisor of the foundation and he told
> me, that some formal requirements need to be there (e.g. when mandates
> are terminated etc.) bec
I'm sorry for my recent postings because they were a bit sarcastic a maybe not
clearly defaced as zynical.
My opinion in this whole thing is:
1) If our preliminary board thinks, we need a special postal address - I'm OK
with it because I don't have the whole view. And on the meeting last year we
g
On 3/15/06, Ilario Valdelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Of course, your argument makes perfect sense. But being an association
> >that promotes Wikipedia and other Wiki-based projects, I would like to
> >think that we can do without the permanent protections, only with a
> >banner saying "This
Now there seems to be a big discussion going on here and I would like
to clarify a few points as the resolutions come from me and Nando:
1. Why we need resolutions:
a) We want to create as soon as a "wikimedia.ch", which is intended
for the public. We want to stop using ch.wikimedia.org, because (a
>Of course, your argument makes perfect sense. But being an association
>that promotes Wikipedia and other Wiki-based projects, I would like to
>think that we can do without the permanent protections, only with a
>banner saying "This is a resolution voted by the board, and should not
>be modif
>Which bank: Postfinance looks like a good option to me, if only because
>it is easy to give a postal account number to anyone for donations, such
>as "12-345678-9", instead of having to say "Bank such and such, account
>A-BCDEFGH-I". All the associations I know of use a Yellow account as
>the
Ilario Valdelli wrote:
> I don't undestand. Do you mean that pages are blocked to no-sysop
> members? It seems to have a sense because when a board (or preliminary
> board) take a decision it's important to communicate this decision
> (also with grammatical errors). If a no-board person makes a ch
Jürg Wolf wrote:
> Is it also foreseen to open a bank account? And if - in which place? And when?
> In whose name? At which bank?
When: not before the association is created. One needs a copy of the
bylaws, and the minutes of the first general meeting to open an
account (specifying who has
Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote:
> The thing is, that there are legal actions that have to be done now in
> preparation of the founding of Wikimedia CH and the Wikipedia Day, such as
> registering / transfering domain names (wikipedia.ch, wikimedia.ch etc.),
> contracts which have to b
On 3/15/06, Jürg Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there are even other cities possible:
> * Zurich - the economic capital of CH
> * Berne - the political capital of CH of home affairs
> * Geneva - the political capital of CH of foreign affairs
> * Lucerne - the touristic capital of CH
> * Jungf
Lugano - the "sunny" capital :)
On 3/15/06, Jürg Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there are even other cities possible:
> * Zurich - the economic capital of CH
> * Berne - the political capital of CH of home affairs
> * Geneva - the political capital of CH of foreign affairs
> * Lucerne - the
So there are even other cities possible:
* Zurich - the economic capital of CH
* Berne - the political capital of CH of home affairs
* Geneva - the political capital of CH of foreign affairs
* Lucerne - the touristic capital of CH
* Jungfraujoch - another touristic capital (indian view)
* Olten - t
> Looking at the latest changes on the CH wiki... is it on purpose that
> the current resolutions look as formal as a UN Security Council
> resolution ? "RESOLVED... AND... FURTHER RESOLVED... so proposed on the
> fifteenth of March 2006". I know it is borderline to hairsplitting, but
> this makes
Hi together,
just some words why such "resolutions" (or name them how you'd like) are
necessary:
> I know that several actions must be done BEFORE the real foundation, but I
> still do not see why we need a special post address BEFORE the foundation -
> and even after the foundation, since we do
I agree with Frederic
I know that several actions must be done BEFORE the real foundation, but I still
do not see why we need a special post address BEFORE the foundation - and even
after the foundation, since we do not expect a bunch of mail. And as long there
is no founded association, we all (=
Looking at the latest changes on the CH wiki... is it on purpose that
the current resolutions look as formal as a UN Security Council
resolution ? "RESOLVED... AND... FURTHER RESOLVED... so proposed on the
fifteenth of March 2006". I know it is borderline to hairsplitting, but
this makes the w
22 matches
Mail list logo
