I could be mis-remembering this, or confusing things (say, a tower where
we replaced a 5800 with a 5830 or vice-versa), and if I'm wrong I'll cop
to it. But I truly believe, with religious fervor and zeal, that Trango
has changed their MIBs with different point releases of the firmware.
I can't
Fair enough. I agree completely. Standard MIB-II objects should be
provided with MIB-II Object IDs. If they provide "equivalents" only in
their own enterprise object space, that requires extra work on the user to
lookup and reference the OIDs. The right way would be to provided both a
MIB-I
any one have wireless in yuma.
rob
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
rcomroe wrote:
> On another part of David's reply he comments on interface.InOctets.
>>And don't even get me started on
>>the fact that they don't use the same Enterprise MIBs that pretty much
>>everyone else on the planet uses for 'interface.InOctets' and so on.
> The interfaces MIB is a standard
I'm of course familiar with the Motorola enterprise MIBs which they
constantly add to. But here's the issue why I soapbox'ed that changing a
previously defined OIDs is shameful. Take the effort to develop an snmp
management function ... update some device's firmware and the management
functio
You misunderstood. He went out of his way not to send his message at all
to the list for fear of being labeled a spammer. I went ahead and sent
his information to the list whether he benefits financially or not
because his information was very on-topic and is not (in my opinion)
spam at all. Mr
I have dealt with Mr. Comroe and his software in the past and he is a
very helpful gentleman.
I no longer use it, but that is not due to any problems with him or
his software. It was for monitoring canopy radios and Moto made
changes to the radio firmware that broke compatibility.
I don't
rcomroe wrote:
> Under no circumstances should
> any
> manufacturer CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A PREVIOUSLY DEFINED OID.
and yet...
Trango's MIBs for the 5800 and 5830 are wildly different. Never mind that
they're substantially the same hardware (from the point of view of "how
you use them in your
http://www.trangobroadband.com/pdfs/TrangoMRTG.pdf
Todd Barber
Skylink Broadband Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
970-454-9499
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 3:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subje
I am forwarding this message to the group because this individual is not
trying to spam us and is actually benefiting us I think. I am sorry if
any of you think this is spam. He did not ask me to forward it onto the
list. I feel it is good information and should be shared with the group.
I will
Thank you Paul. This is exactly what I was looking for in regard o
customer links. If we take a service call it would be nice to see what a
customer's historical data has been in regard to signal levels,
bandwidth used, etc. It sounds like you hit this one right on the head.
Doing the same for
Yes, that's an important topic too. There's a variety of access protocols
that different devices support. Many devices have web interfaces. Some
have snmp support. StarOS has that SSH interface. Another popularly
supported interface is plain telnet. In a network composed of mixed
equipmen
Well, as one of the list members who received the spam, with this
apology in hand, I'd give him a second chance
But I don't run the list, so I guess it is up to you, Rick.
Rick Harnish wrote:
The following is a copy
of a reply that Martin tried to send
to the list
Dave,
I monitor all my Trango backhauls traffic via MRTG. I downloaded their
MRTG instructions and followed them. It was fairly painless.
Todd Barber
Skylink Broadband Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
970-454-9499
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Be
StarOS isn't great for SNMP but Starutil works really well for various
stuff. We have been using it to graph with MRTG the signal levels for
individual clients and backhaul links as well as throughput.
Cheers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beh
At the risk of derailing (sorry, boss), has anyone gotten MRTG or
something similar (PRTG, Denika, or whatever) to reliably track *anything*
on a Trango?
Sure. TrangoLINK-10 integrated with Nagios and MRTG.
However, I had to write a wrapper perl script around the Nagios
RSSI check_command beca
rcomroe wrote:
> There are 2 fundamentally different approaches for monitoring.
[ stuff ]
For reference, in the network Scriv is describing, there's a nasty mixture
of gear. Backhaul is primarily Trango (though that's likely to change at
some point), and the customer APs are all either StarOS ru
Sounds apologetic. Is he back on? If it's his first contact with
WISPs I'd hate for him to think we're a bunch of jerks.
Rick Harnish wrote:
The following is a copy
of a reply that Martin tried to send
to the list this morning after I removed him.
WISPA members
The following is a copy of a reply that Martin tried to send
to the list this morning after I removed him.
WISPA members,
I sent an e-mail off-list to seven WISPA members. My intention was to
find the person at each of these companies who is responsible for business
development partne
I have a potential customer there that wants a solution. Any WISP in the
area? Contact me off-list. We don't provide service
in that area.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/piperma
For StarOS we use MRTG and Starutil. You should be able to graph anything
that Starutil can provide.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: 03 November 2005 17:33
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Tracking Signal / Noise
There are 2 fundamentally different approaches for monitoring.
[1] Poll parameters and strip-chart them displaying some specific duration
of history. In this approach data rolls off the end of the strip-chart and
is not retained. Only numerical data can be displayed graphically is
appropriate
I am starting to feel the pains of trying to accurately trace problems
in a network that is getting increasingly larger all the time. We have
roughly 20 tower locations now. We have a pretty good picture of what we
are getting for bandwidth use through our MRTG graphs. We can see when
any link
Most importantly, I would find the "key" aides in each respective office
who handles such topics. Email and fax your personal comment to them and
follow up with a phone call if possible. If you plan on being active in
communicating to your state and federal representatives, get to know what
commit
Way to go, RICK!!
Original message
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:55:47 -0500
>From: "Rick Harnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WISPA] Spammer removed
>To: "'WISPA General List'"
>
> Link: File-List
> Link: Edit-Time-Data
>
> I have removed two addresses from our list for
> s
Thanks for the heads up Rick, I'll forward this to my senator
and rep.
Original message
>Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:03:06 -0500
>From: "Rick Harnish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WISPA] FW: [TVWHITESPACE] FW: Broadcast to
Broadband: Prominent Engineers Dismiss TV Industry
Interferen
I have removed two addresses from our list for spamming. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I assume they are one and the same
person. If anyone knows differently,
please let me know.
Thank you,
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
27 matches
Mail list logo