Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Gino Villarini
WE are happy with SAF, DW and Trango all have diff pricepoints, overall winner on dollar/ value is SAF Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Paolo Di Francesco
Hi Gino, what is missing from SAF compared to DW and Trango? I will take a look to the documents, but you know manuals don't tell the whole story ;) Thank you WE are happy with SAF, DW and Trango all have diff pricepoints, overall winner on dollar/ value is SAF Gino A. Villarini

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Bob Moldashel
Ceragon today is NOT the same Ceragon it was 3 years ago. Unlike many here when it comes to choosing equipment I don't chase the price point. I look at who supplies the outstanding support. I look for the company that has my back when I am up against the wall with a dead link. And until

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm not sure of it's complete specifications, but Proxim just came out with a licensed product. GX800, I believe. I forget which booth I was at (MoonBlink, maybe) where they told me that the Proxim is about the same price point as the other licensed products out there, only there are no

[WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bill Gaylord
I have a Dragonwave link that was performing about 35-40db lower than the link budget says it should. I sent tower climbers up to repeak the link and found they did have it on aligned on a horizontal side lobe. After re-peaking it got better, but is now about 15-20db lower than the link

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Chuck Hogg
Sounds like a side lobe...we had the same issue...link was coming in at -70...link budget said -50...finally got it out of the side lobe and within 1-2 dB of the link path. Regards, Chuck On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Bill Gaylord bi...@torchlake.com wrote: I have a Dragonwave link that was

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Brad Belton
15-20db off typically means cross polarization. Have you double and triple checked they are both on the same polarity? Brad -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bill Gaylord Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 8:13 AM To:

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Brad Belton
That was my next reply to Josh.what series or model of Ceragon has he used. All our Ceragon links have been the older Fibeair 1500 series. There were a few re-branded versions of this radio for Nortel and maybe another name too. I think even Lockheed or General Dynamics had these relabeled under

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Josh Luthman
Are you at full tx power or full modulation? 256qam will take out something like 7dbm. On Nov 5, 2010 9:12 AM, Bill Gaylord bi...@torchlake.com wrote: I have a Dragonwave link that was performing about 35-40db lower than the link budget says it should. I sent tower climbers up to repeak the

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Josh Luthman
I can't memorize the weird model numbers. It was installed probably 5 or 6 years ago. It had an arp bug they took at year and two on site trips to fix. I could recognize them if you had pictures. On Nov 5, 2010 9:39 AM, Brad Belton b...@belwave.com wrote: That was my next reply to Josh.what

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bill Gaylord
Yes, I have. Thanks. That is the same thing I had though of the first time around. Bill Gaylord, President COLI Inc. On 11/5/2010 9:38 AM, Brad Belton wrote: 15-20db off typically means cross polarization. Have you double and triple checked they are both on the same polarity? Brad

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bill Gaylord
OK, I will try the Vertical Alignment again to see if it is on a vertical side lobe. I will give that a try next week and see what happens. Thanks. Bill Gaylord, President COLI Inc. On 11/5/2010 9:37 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: Sounds like a side lobe...we had the same issue...link was coming in

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Chuck Bartosch
I'll hazard a guess here that Radwin was OEMing boxes from Ceragon at the time then. That's like me complaining about Redline if I had problems with Alvarion's old Link Blaster, which was an OEM'd Redline point-to-point product. If I bought it from Alvarion and didn't get support, then it's

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bob Moldashel
Bill You can bang the physical dish up pretty good and not need to worry. The feedhorn is the most critical unit. Which Dragonwave radio are you using? Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless -Original message- From: Brad Belton b...@belwave.com To: 'WISPA General List'

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
About the same pricing, can mean a lot of things. About the same pricing could mean a $1000 difference. With Trango, the upgrade key doesn;t cost much more than that. Allthough always good to see new products entered into the market. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
Actually, I feel one of the flaws to the Dragonwave is that their clips to the antenna easilly can break if not careful when connecting them. Trango's are much more durable. (actually I'm not talking about the clips, but the metal-like part that the clips grab). On Andrews these parts are on

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bill Gaylord
It is the horizon 150Mbps. Bill Gaylord, President COLI Inc. On 11/5/2010 12:28 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: Bill You can bang the physical dish up pretty good and not need to worry. The feedhorn is the most critical unit. Which Dragonwave radio are you using? /Sent via DROID on Verizon

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
My opinion is that the dish damage probably would not cause much RSSI loss. (unless severe, but if it was severe I'm sure you never would ahve installed it). If part of the dish was bent, you'd need to determine what percentage of teh surface area was effected not reflecting to the correct

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Link Issues, Need Advice

2010-11-05 Thread Bill Gaylord
No Coax, the radio mounts directly to the antenna. I will climb myself and re-peak the vertical alignment Monday. Thanks Tom. Bill On 11/5/2010 1:25 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote: My opinion is that the dish damage probably would not cause much RSSI loss. (unless severe, but if it was severe I'm

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
They've released several new firmware upgrades in the last 1-2 years, and support AAM (that actually works) and hitless-AAM now. HAAM has been great for us with the occasional ducting we get in the valley. I can deal with it dropping from 280MBps to 110Mbps at 6am rather than dropping the link

Re: [WISPA] NS2 with 24v

2010-11-05 Thread Scott Carullo
The key to this thread is NS2 - Not NSM2 They are different and the power supplies they can operate of are also different... some NS2's will not work with 24v. Just fyi... Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: Tom DeReggi

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Scott Carullo
Trango does what now too? Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 1:40 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops Trango

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Matt Jenkins
If you want to leverage dual pol with XPIC you could look at Dragonwave quantum. On 11/04/2010 02:20 PM, Matt wrote: We are looking at upgrading our network and adding a handful(7) 11ghz licensed hops. What gear out there can use both horizontal and vertical at once to increase throughput?

[WISPA] Friday Funny

2010-11-05 Thread Marco Coelho
This must be strange propagation month. We've got a new installer who put a 900 MHz canopy with a yagi pointing to the south side of one of our towers 6 miles away. He gets a 56 signal, but it's really unreliable for some reason. He goes out there again to re-sight, same issues after a

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Matt
How long has Exalt been doing licensed gear? Is it pretty good gear? Does SAF allow you to use a dual polarity dish in 11ghz and bond both polarities for additional bandwidth? Can both polarities be done on the same channel?

Re: [WISPA] Friday Funny

2010-11-05 Thread Justin Wilson
900 is Voodoo -- Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net/blog ­ xISP News http://www.twitter.com/j2sw ­ Follow me on Twitter Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support From: Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Josh Luthman
Not sure where dual polarities come in to play with licensed gear. I know that your PCN strictly states V or H. The SAF CFIP Lumina uses 50Mhz one way and 50Mhz the other way to get full duplex. Each channel with 256qam does 325mbps. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
I was refering to the Trango having a Combiner option now, that allowed two Apexes to share one antenna via 1 horiz and 1 V pol. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Scott Carullo To: WISPA General List Sent:

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Brad Belton
You coordinate two paths. We have a Trango GigaLINK 6GHz link using two radio pairs and a combiner plate attaching to one antenna on each end. One radio set is V the other is H. Gives us twice the capacity (165MB x 2) plus failover in the event one ODU or IDU fails plus Frequency diversity for

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Kristian Hoffmann
There was interest in the upgrade outline, so here it is. This was for a 11GHz Horizon Compact, but I think the process is the same for 18GHz as well. Please also read the release notes for yourself. It worked for me, but buyer beware. If you're running pre 1.01.00, the process to get up to

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Gino Villarini
Saf has the option of dual pol combiner as well Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 2:59 PM To: WISPA

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Scott Carullo
Can you use 40Mhz channels with the trangos on 11Ghz for 300Mb throughput? I thought we were limited to 40mhz on our apexes for a ~268max throughput... Scott Carullo Technical Operations 855-FLSPEED x102 From: Brad Belton b...@belwave.com Sent:

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Brad Belton
No, I do not think so. FCC limits 11GHz channel size to 40MHz. However, 165 + 165 = 330, so that gets you beyond 300MB in 6GHz with a combiner and 265 + 265 = 530 in 11GHz with a combiner plate. Brad From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
Any discussion on best way to combine the two links from the DATA FLOW perspective or TCIP/IP perspective? The average Mikrotik Loadbalancer may not handle that 800mbps link all that well. Are people using Switch level trunk aggregation, or layer3 aggregation methods? OR just running two

Re: [WISPA] [Spam] Re: Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
Brad is correct. 40Mhz max, due to FCC regs in 11Ghz. Note, some LIcensed 11Ghz gear is capable to be configured to 56Mhz channels sizes because some other countries's regulatory bodies allow 56Mhz channels. For example, I'm pretty sure England does. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc

[WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Nash
This is lengthy, but worth discussion, I think... I just had a long meeting with our general manager about Systems Management (monitoring, documenting, updating, etc) Let me explain... We ALL have systems to 1. monitor our network 2. document our systems (IP addresses, equipment type, etc) 3.

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Josh Luthman
I can tell you how I solved these problems but it might start a big thread again... The key is to force the documentation, activity (monitoring, cpe function) and billing in sync. I've not seen multiple applications stay together by human hand. Maybe it would work if someone's entire job was

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Nash
We have a 2-pronged approach, actually... Tech brings checklist back, someone in office processes it and slaps tech around if not complete or accurate enough to process... :) With the right person in the office, this is just beginning to show signs of progress. - Original Message -

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Robert West
My old system of writing it all on the back my business cards and discarded Burger King napkins found on the floor of the van worked for awhile but quickly failed. Napkins sometimes got used for other purposes after they had the information on them so I have a no napkin rule as a result. Paper

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Nash
Yeah, when your goal is 2-3 COMPLETED installs per day, that system quickly gets out of hand ;). Other companies on this list go for far more than me, too. - Original Message - From: Robert West To: 'WISPA General List' Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 2:52 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Mark Nash
Also, we USED to have HUMONGOUS discrepancies in setting speed limits for customers before the traffic management was integrated with the billing system. We use Powercode for this right now. In the beginning, we speed limited people at each AP. The biggest problem then was that people were

[WISPA] Juniper M20

2010-11-05 Thread Mike Hammett
I am looking at comments or recommendations for a Juniper M20. I was looking at a PowerRouter 2200 (or equivalent), but someone I'm working with on this project said a Juniper M20 would be a better choice for the type of application I'm looking at. Recommendations\comments? I am looking to

Re: [WISPA] Juniper M20

2010-11-05 Thread Jon Auer
IMO you only go with the M line if you need OC cards. MX80 would be a better fit if you are all ethernet. On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote: I am looking at comments or recommendations for a Juniper M20.  I was looking at a PowerRouter 2200 (or

Re: [WISPA] Juniper M20

2010-11-05 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
How much aggregate throughput are you looking to handle? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote: I am looking at comments or recommendations for a Juniper M20. I was looking at a PowerRouter 2200 (or equivalent), but someone I'm working

Re: [WISPA] Juniper M20

2010-11-05 Thread Mike Hammett
Somewhere between 1 and 5 gigs. Probably 1 - 2. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 11/5/2010 5:39 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote: How much aggregate throughput are you looking to handle? Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:21 PM, Mike

Re: [WISPA] Juniper M20

2010-11-05 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
We can help you with that, if you are open to it. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:46 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote: Somewhere between 1 and 5 gigs. Probably 1 - 2. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 11/5/2010

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Scott Lambert
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:34:01PM -0700, Mark Nash wrote: This is lengthy, but worth discussion, I think... Unless there is a good process in place to ensure that these systems get updated when components on our networks are added/removed/replaced/changed. That place is the billing

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Cameron Crum
This is why we wrote wispmon. Handles virtually all this in a single platform. Cameron On Friday, November 5, 2010, Scott Lambert lamb...@lambertfam.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:34:01PM -0700, Mark Nash wrote: This is lengthy, but worth discussion, I think... Unless there is a good

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Tom DeReggi
This automagically happens when your script to automagically update Nagios removes accounts which are marked as inactive. Be careful with that idea. Automating that almost killed us. The reason is that sometimes you may want to disable monitoring on an account that is live, because it may be

Re: [WISPA] Licensed 11ghz Hops

2010-11-05 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote: Any discussion on best way to combine the two links from the DATA FLOW perspective or TCIP/IP perspective? The average Mikrotik Loadbalancer may not handle that 800mbps link all that well. Are people using Switch

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Blake Covarrubias
Scott hit the nail on the head with a number points so I will not rehash them, but I do agree you should integrate most of that info with your billing system (PowerCode, if I'm not mistaken). We've written scripts to integrate our billing system, Platypus, with all of the back-end systems used

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Wilson H
I have an application I created myself with php and mysql. When I do an install, I login to our server register the customer info along with the cpe mac, model, and ip. It assigns the customer 512kbps/ 128kbps by default. It keeps track of the billing info: balance, etc. It cancels if no

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Wilson H
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Mark Nash markl...@uwol.net wrote: Also, we USED to have HUMONGOUS discrepancies in setting speed limits for customers before the traffic management was integrated with the billing system. We use Powercode for this right now. In the

[WISPA] Telescoping Mast

2010-11-05 Thread Liam Cummings
Anyone know of a place where I can get some sort of telescoping mast that I can tow behind me in my truck or maybe just put on my tow hitch? Oh yeah and it needs to be cheap too. I want to start using something like this for our site surveys because it would be much easier than getting out the

Re: [WISPA] NS2 with 24v

2010-11-05 Thread RickG
Per Mike Ford: [image: Default] -- Hello, Nanostation is 12V to 24V, Bullet is 5V to 24V. Thanks, Mike On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.comwrote: The key to this thread is NS2 - Not NSM2 They are different and the power

Re: [WISPA] Telescoping Mast

2010-11-05 Thread Robert West
Dude! I showed ya once. The Nuclear Torpedo Wilbert Mast Pain in the A** (WISPA RULES PREVAIL) Site surveys always a BS thing. What I do is make the link calculations, print out the path THEN go to the site and see the big mass of trees right in the path. Walk

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Robert West
Sadly. I agree! J I think most of us were there in the beginning! From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mark Nash Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 5:54 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

Re: [WISPA] Systems Management - Process

2010-11-05 Thread Robert West
Scott, You are focused correctly. BILLING! It all has to orbit around billing or we may as well stay home. Unless, of course the billing server is at home, then it's okay to do other things... Like scrapbooking and laminating things with the wife. Hm... Billing needs