Took the typing right off of my keyboard Tim. Bravo.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Tim Sylvester wrote:
> Yes, I am amazed. Amazed by the bitching and whining about government on
> this list by people who ...
>
> - sell wireless service using spectrum "owned" by everyone and allocated to
> them by
I realize that the request went out to stop this thread. However,
health care represents more cost to my business than my Internet
backbone, so it has quite a bit of bearing on my ability to do business
and I consider this to be a good discussion to have.
---
Our current health care system i
gt; in their area to interconnect their networks.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> ----------
> From: "Matt Larsen - Lists"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 1:5
; our NOC and on different fiber pairs leaving town.
>>
>> Qwest had an outage here about 9 months ago that took two of my
>> competitors completely down for 5 hours... yet we were completely
>> unaffected. :)
>>
>> Travis
>> Microserv
>>
>> Matt Lar
Some kind of combination of failure between Charter and Qwest has left
tens of thousands of people in Nebraska without Internet and has
disrupted the Internet and phone services for thousands more.Right
now, the outage is going on 12 hours and there is no ETA for repair in
sight.
The wor
Since you are already familiar with StarOS, I'd recommend putting up a
couple of X2000 boards with 2' dishes.$225 each for the X2000s and
$170 each for the 2' dishes.
I have X4000s with 2' dishes shooting 32 miles with no problems, and one
45 mile shot with a 3' on one end and a 2' at th
ghz Backhaul Radio
>
> Has it run through heavy rain yet, wonder how much rain affectst the
> attenuation.
>
> On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 12:01 -0700, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
>
>
>> Just installed a Ligowave 24ghz unlicensed backhaul radio to take the
>> place of
Just installed a Ligowave 24ghz unlicensed backhaul radio to take the
place of a 100meg fiber loop.
We are going 2.97 miles with the 2' dishes. -65 signal on both sides
and it has tested out at 85meg of capacity in both directions.
Very happy with it so far. The software and management inte
FWIW, I have had oustanding results with 10mhz channels for voice
traffic. We are currently moving all of our old 802.11b APs to 10mhz
channel ofdm, and the results are great. 2x bandwidth capacity, lower
latency and the ability to put up more sectors if needed. Also, VOIP
works much bett
I've spent the last two days going through my "left for dead" pile of
Tranzeo CPQ/5a/SL5/SL2 radios in the shop.Out of 41 radios, I have
been able to get 35 of them resurrected, which was very surprising.
To be fair, about 6 of them didn't appear to have any problems at all, a
firmware upda
Hi all,
I have a situation where I need to come up with a couple of links that
can do T1 connectivity for a cell phone company.
We have tried Moto PTP400 radios with Flanger T1 converters, but they do
not work with the cell switches.Does anyone here have a
recommendation for links that h
Using StarOS we have about 480 subnet routes propagating throughout our
network. This represents approximately 220 routed devices.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Dennis Burgess wrote:
> I think a good OSPF single area would be around 75 routers. Over that
> you get quite a bit of traffic. Not say
addresses. I don't know
if it can be done on a Mikrotik but I know other firewall/router/NAT devices
can create a NAT pool with 100s of IP addresses for clients.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen -
lic address, I have a few questions:
>>
>> So, who is going to buy Matt a block of IPs to fix this non-NAT issue?
>> I ask, because I do as Matt does and if that is the fix, I need someone
>> to buy me a block as well.
>> But the issue isn't really NAT, is it?
>>
We are having a problem with certain sites that are rejecting our
customers because they say the IP address has sent too much traffic over
the last 24 hours. This is a problem, as 98% of our customers are
behind a single NATted IP address. I am just changing the IP address
of the NAT server
http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2714
Lets hope the FCC can make a ruling as balanced and appropriate as this one.
Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Speaking of multi-tool - these are awesome
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000XU43IC/ref=ox_ya_oh_product
If I forget something from the toolbag, this is great. It is also a
lot lighter than the traditional old Leathermen, that were so heavy you
started to lean to one side. This is ju
Hi all,
I am upgrading my network to OFDM 10mhz channels and phasing out my
802.11b systems.
I have a bunch of older model Tranzeo radios that I am looking to
liquidate and wanted to let people on the WISPA lists know about them
before I put them on ebay or our upcoming Used Tranzeo site.
T
We are in the process of replacing all of our old 802.11b gear with
802.11g AP/CPE running on 10mhz channels.802.11g on 10mhz channels
is a great solution, as it takes up less spectrum, has more interference
resistance and delivers about 2x the speeds of standard 802.11b.In
my experienc
I have a couple of StarOS backhauls that will only work in AP mode in
one direction. This is very frustrating, but I have not been able to
find a solution to it, so I just deal with it. I'm using firmware
1.3.23b with atheros cards (Mikrotik R52H).
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Butch Evans wro
Hello all,
We've been doing some troubleshooting of some occasional issues with
NATed customers and started to wonder if we have reached the limits of
what we can do with a single NAT server.
Right now, I have one NAT server that has two Internet backbone
connections coming into it. This ser
I have a couple of sites that I need to sectorize and am looking for a
couple of 180degree H-pol 2.4ghz sectors.I have a bunch of the old
YDI 180degree sector antennas that have been far better than any others
that I have used (great f/b ratio and 14db gain), but I'm pretty sure
that they a
Here is the graph straight from the charge monitor for our solar panels,
to give you an idea what the charging pattern looks like. This is for
a pair of 60w panels.
http://www.thelar.com/gallery2/v/Wireless/Hogback/graph_image1.png.html
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Christopher Erickson wrote:
>
Here is the setup that we recently did for a combination solar/wind
powered site. This is a StarOS site, X4000 board with four Mikrotik
R52H cards in it. One is 5ghz backhaul, two are for APs and the third
card is a spare.
2 60 watt solar panels
solar charge controller
air-x wind generator
kup?
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists
> wrote:
>
>> Martha Huizenga wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I thought there was a way to get Census Tract info in batch, but the web
>>> site I thought I used last
Martha Huizenga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thought there was a way to get Census Tract info in batch, but the web
> site I thought I used last time gives me Lat and Long. Can anyone
> suggest a free site?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Martha
>
I don't know of any free sites that will do a batch of addresses, some
My suggestion for Phase II of the Broadband Stimulus Program:
http://tinyurl.com/kmd4hn
Other potential program titles:
Money for Modems?
Bucks for Broadband?
Wampum for Wireless?
Any other ideas?
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
--
For your vicarious enjoyment of nature vs. Ubiquiti products
http://www.thelar.com/gallery2/v/Wireless/Miscellaneous/
Won't be doing an RMA on this unit.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Storm #2 rolling in today
We've already had three tornado warnings and at least one on the ground
within three miles of my house. Amazingly enough - nothing is down
other than one site that had a brief power outage. New 9 mile 19ghz
link on 2' dishes faded from -48 to -70 for a while and
I bought my E71 unlocked and it is an awesome phone. It even went
through a complete washer/dryer cycle with my laundry and came out just
fine (after it dried out for a few hours).
I have mine setup with my office Asterisk server so that it will try my
SIP extension first, then the cell phone
I got tired of seeing this weneedbroadband.com website coming up over
and over on Twitter and in press releases, especially since so many of
the places on their map already have access to WISPs. So I registered
http://www.wehavebroadband.com/ and pointed it to the WISP Directory.
Tell your fr
Routing will help considerably, and also coming with reasonable
bandwidth control plans for all of the customers, enforced at the AP.
I can get 40-50 people on an 802.11b AP with mostly 384k and 640k
bandwidth packages.These are also bursted, and half speed on the
upload, so on a download
not handle the
>> addresses we feed makes the progress harder and slow.
>>
>> /Eje
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt Larsen - Lists
>>
>> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:49:41
>> To: WISPA General List
I thought I would share this email that I just sent to the FCC regarding
the Form 477 report. I am late filing this report because we don't have
accurate data and thought that my reasons why were worth sharing with my
colleagues. I support what the FCC is trying to do with Form477, but was
not
Hello,
I just got access to a few towers that had working 18ghz and 23ghz P-Com
links on them at a point in the nearby past. I have the dishes that
were used for these links as well, but the Pcom radios were 4 and 8 T1
models. My understanding is that I can re-use the dishes with DS3 or
OC3
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:35 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> S
These guys have been outstanding for us:
http://kitsupport.com/
We forward our tech support calls to them between 5pm-8am and they have
done a great job. All calls that they receive come back into our
Freeside system as a work ticket with all the details on the calls they
have taken and our
Unfortunately, that will not work. I have been trying to get Tranzeos
to work with StarOS (and Mikrotik) for a while and have not been able to
make it happen. I have even taken the Tranzeos apart and put the cards
into the other radios and did not get it to work.
I did take the cards out of
Jeff, I think you have made a fine point. I realized about a year ago
that with the cost of licensed links coming down, there wasn't a lot of
reason to look at the high-end UL radios anymore.When a StarOS or MT
setup will deliver 30-50meg of FD throughput at a very low cost, the
next logi
This article in the LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-geocoding-errors5-2009apr05,0,5966285.story
This documents the reasoning for why I have not completed my Form 477
data yet. Nearly 40% of my customer base will have to be re-coded for
the Form 47 because the geocoding datab
I've got gear on several of these towers in my area.Most are built
like a brick sh**house. American Tower wanted to do an engineering
study before they would let us put equipment on one of these, and I just
laughed. You could drive a pickup up the side of the tower - I'm
pretty sure tha
A few responses here:
1) You don't have to use Tranzeo APs with Tranzeo CPEs.The new
Tranzeo APs (EN-500 series) does have a lot more management features
than the older Tranzeo units (TR-6000, TR-5a). You can also use StarOS
or Mikrotik APs and have all the centralized management and adv
StarOS will do 4.9ghz FD no problem.
The X4000 and X2000 units can both do this. They are FCC approved,
although someone would probably argue that they may not be approved with
all of the 4.9ghz antennas. I know it works, and we use it combined
with Tranzeo 4.9 CPE radios for our local city
Mark Nash wrote:
> Has anyone used the hotspot features in StarOS?
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 78 Centennial Loop
> Suite E
> Eugene, OR 97401
> 541-998-
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To: ; "WISPA General List"
> Se
I have decided that the FCC will get my Form 477 when I get around to
it. I'm not dropping everything in a mad scramble to fill out the
information.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> I had the same problem! How can they have some of the error checking
> they have, and not acce
Wasn't "Blett Grass" involved in this thread somehow?
(trying to bypass the universal mailling list spam filter with my
misspelling :^)
Larsen
Bob Moldashel wrote:
> Too many witnesses
>
> I wonder what ever happened to Mr. Farber..
>
> -B-
>
>
> Rick Harnish wrote:
>
>> I remember
One of my phone techs thought that he could go out and do local service
calls when the phones weren't busy. This guy is pretty big - probably
about 350 or so at the time and not the most nimble person in the world.
He stopped by the customer's house and went to look at his router, which
was
article?
> Knowing this could help others to gain access to this positive press.
> Congrats,
> Scriv
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists
> wrote:
>
>> Its only the Scottsbluff StarHerald, but this was a nice write-up anyway
>>
>
Its only the Scottsbluff StarHerald, but this was a nice write-up anyway
http://www.starherald.com/articles/2009/02/22/news/local_news/doc49a0d84daaead679125026.txt
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! J
Don't drink the Mikrotik kool-aid just yet. You should probably give
some consideration to StarOS. StarOS has an excellent industry
standard mesh routing protocol built in - OLSR - and the popular X4000
platform is very low cost (~$350 or so in a four radio configuration).
I tried Mikroti
Winbox is okay, but it doesn't do much that the StarOS ssh interface
doesn't do, and that includes the Torch functionality. The StarOS
"Beacon" functionality has the ability to track all TCP connections,
simliar to Torch, so that functionality is there as well. I would
probably lean toward
From a vendor perspective, Eje is right. StarOS has gone through a
lot of weird stages that lead to alienation of their vendors, and ended
up settling on a situation where it has a limited number of vendors.
From an operators perspective, the software is fantastic. The
wireless drivers
!
Matt Larsen
mlar...@inventivemedia.net
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> Thank you for your efforts to help us with the mapping and taking the
> time to make sure that all of the WISPs in Michigan have their coverage
> areas listed on the WirelessMapping map. I woul
Hello Brian,
Thank you for your efforts to help us with the mapping and taking the
time to make sure that all of the WISPs in Michigan have their coverage
areas listed on the WirelessMapping map. I would encourage you (if you
have another couple of hours to spend) to send me the list of zip co
Preparing to launch the Holy War Hand Grenade.:^)
On the AF09 wireless, I am just following the terms you gave me as a
"typical example of 802.11 not scaling". If there is only one access
point for 50 users, then yes - cap it at 1Mbps. How much do temporary
users need? If they needed
Canopy vs. 802.11... things are not always as they
> seem. I know of a large Canopy operator that is buying radios for $160
> each. ;)
>
> And, we have Trango AP's that only deliver 5Mbps total with 128
> clients and we deliver 4ms latency to every single client.
>
> Travi
Sorry Travis, but you are dead wrong about 802.11 not being able to
scale beyond 20 users, especially with 802.11a. I explained how it can
be done to you before and I have consulting clients with 10,000 plus
users on their 802.11 based networks scaling right up to the same size
as any Canopy
The TerraWave antenna looks exactly like the PacWireless model.
Perhaps it is manufactured in the same place in China, but is sold under
a different brand name?
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> Good question...We searched for a long time to find good 5.X wide band
> omnis. Some
Hi there,
If you have some of the old Tranzeo 900 series radios that you are no
longer using or would like to get rid of, let me know. I have a
project I'm working on and I'd like to come up with 5-10 of them. Thanks!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
-
Our good friend and fellow WISP operator Mac Dearman is in the hospital
after suffering chest pains on Saturday. It was determined that he did
have a heart attack and he will be undergoing further tests tomorrow at
the hospital in Shreveport. Please send your thoughts and prayers to
Mac and
I just lent a pair of Bullet5 units to a friend who is planning to
replace some old upconverted Alvarion BH units on a 26 mile link with 2'
dishes. That should be an interesting test.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Matt wrote:
>> Andrews Antenna P3F-52-NXA
>>
>> 5.8GHz backhaul radio died today b
We've been doing 3x120 in 2.4ghz and 5ghz. Using StarOS on the X4000
boards, it is right around $1000 for a three sector setup, and that
includes the AP and antennas.
Mounting hardware and labor varies according to the type of
installation. If it is a rooftop or other structure that doesn't
I don't know why Tranzeo has had so many problems with their 2.4ghz
CPEs, but there is a pretty well defined history of issues with them.
However, I have a couple of their 5ghz APs and about ten of their 900mhz
APs, and they have never had any problems. One of my 5ghz APs has 90+
subs on it.
Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 2:14 AM
> To: WISPA General List; Motorola Canopy User Group; w...@wispa.org
> Subject: [WISPA] WISP Directory - please register
>
Inventive Media would like to formally announce the unveiling of the
WISP Directory 2.0 at http://www.wispdirectory.com/ - now with zip code
search, ratings, reviews and WISP Technology used by each WISP.
Inventive Media has put a few hundred hours into revising the directory,
weeding out dead
One of the nice parts about StarOS is that the scripting format is the
same as the linux packages that they load to perform those functions -
so if you want to learn how to do fancy cbq scripts, just look for the
many available linux docs that describe how to use iptables and you are
set. Sam
I put myself in as being Tranzeo based, as that is the heavy majority of
my CPE radios, although I have a fair amount of Ubiquiti, Telex,
HighGain and a smattering of Mikrotik CPE as well. Chuck started the
survey, and as a Canopy user he is more used to the idea of everything
coming from the
I know of quite a few non Canopy networks. Among my consulting
clients, neighbors and other associates, I know of
Rapid Communications - 2000+ StarOS/Tranzeo
R-Com - 4000+ StarOS/Tranzeo/Trango/Deliberant
Action Communications - 4000+ Cisco (they have a little bit of Canopy)
OIBW - 2500+
I'm curious to hear why the client's VPN wouldn't work. I haven't had
any problem with client VPN units working through StarOS. Might be a
network design issue rather than anything to do with StarOS.
I would strongly suggest switching to a StarOS board with V3 and atheros
chipset cards. I
Hello all,
I'm trying to figure out how to track CPU load and PPS on our Mikrotik
core router. Is there a simple guide for tracking this with MRTG/RRD
somewhere out there? I"m not having much luck finding it.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
--
I'm with Travis on this, with the exception of using StarOS instead of
Mikrotik. It is nice to have a set of standard, mature tools such as
radius, cbq/iptable rules and standard, non-vendor specific hardware to
work with instead of having to use a limited, proprietary system limited
to a sin
I am having great luck with the Nanostation5 radios. The NS2 radios
have a terrible antenna, so I'm sticking to Tranzeos for 2.4ghz use.
I'd love to see an NS9 at some point.
The new products look interesting, but if they are like other Ubiquity
"new product releases" - they are vaporware
Hi all,
I am looking to order about 10 Tranzeo 902-11 radios. Our main
supplier is backordered on them and I have a backlog of installs, so
anyone who can ship radios on Monday, please contact me.
Thanks!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
--
The ability to push configs out from a central location is really a nice
feature of Nagios/Cacti/MRTG. I also use Big Brother to monitor
customer connections, and it is nice to have something that
automatically pushes the configurations out whenever we make a change in
the billing system - ke
http://gigaom.com/2008/07/28/the-brookings-plan-for-rural-broadband/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wi
Hi Chuck,
Need to put the new AirOS 3.0 firmware on the NS5s and they will work as
expected.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CHUCK PROFITO wrote:
> Has anyone on the list noticed on the 5.x nanos, that when selecting 10 Mhz
> channels, that they only line up in the center of the channel, not lik
I don't usually agree with Mark's viewpoints, but I agree with this one
100%.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marlon, my friend, that is the wrong viewpoint.
>
> This is the RIGHT one...
>
> "Imagine the sales I could make if the taxpayers weren't subsidizing
> CenturyTel."
Here are a few reasons to buy the Tranzeo
1) 3 year warranty
2) Available stock - tried to buy a lot of Nanostations lately?Good
luck getting them consistently.
3) Tranzeo design has been through a few winters and hot summers.
There are already some questions about the durability of
Never really had a major problem with this. Just keep P2P apps limited
at the core router, no intercell relay and connection limits per customer.
It would be nice if there was a polling implementation that could be
easily implemented with standards-based equipment instead of proprietary
gear.
for a system that will scale to larger number
>>> of clients. I have Trango AP's that will only do 5Mbps total
>>> bandwidth, yet we have loaded them up to their max clients (128) and
>>> have no issues. Latency is less than 5ms to any clie
y
> is at least 10x bigger than StarOS... it would make more sense for
> Ubiquiti to load Mikrotik on the Nano's... ;)
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
>
> Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
>> Travis Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> I agree
ht now today. :)
>
Or Nanostation-SOS - a Nano running StarOS.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
>> Hi Travis,
>>
>> I'm with you - the Nanostations are a pretty amazing product. I've
>> been deploying
Hi Travis,
I'm with you - the Nanostations are a pretty amazing product. I've
been deploying Nanostations on 10mhz channels in 2.4 and 5ghz with
StarOS access points and the performance/interference resistance is
pretty amazing at ANY price point. I could say the same thing for the
newer T
You can build a good squid box with lots of memory and fast hard drives
and get good results. The squid setup is also nearly infinitely
tunable, as opposed to the ones in Mikrotik and StarOS which have a
pretty vanilla configuration. Being able to tune the cache parameters
helps a lot, alon
Check the feedhorn for cracks. We have had a few PacWireless units
(dishes and grids) that were damaged by hail or dropping ice and
developed hairline cracks that caused them to stop working in wet weather.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Anyone ever have any water get
Just a reminder - the WISPA Board Elections will be starting on Monday,
June 23rd. Any WISPA member who wants to vote in the election has to
be paid in full before the date of the election. If you are behind on
your dues, please get them caught up. I have just sent out invoices
for everyo
Very valuable advice for any of you who are using OSPF on StarOS
Make sure that any of your point-to-point wireless links have the
statement "ip ospf network point-to-point" in each of your wireless
interface definitions, otherwise you are going to see the StarOS OSPF
act completely random
The real problem is the number of connections. One client opening up
300-400 connections is going to cause all kinds of problems. Being
able to limit connections is a pretty important item to be able to
handle on a wireless network.
Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com
Mike Hammett wrote:
> and I for
the same distance, you are only getting 30Mbps.
> Why is there a 50% loss when doing full-duplex?
>
> Also, are you testing with TCP or UDP?
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
>> OK, here are some real world examples:
>>
>> 5.3ghz
OK, here are some real world examples:
5.3ghz 40mhz channel, 8.5 miles. WAR4/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless
Antennas.50meg one way.
5.7ghz 20mhz channel, 10 miles.WAR2/CM9 attached to 29db PacWireless
Antennas. 45meg one way (CPU maxes out on WAR2s)
5.7ghz 10mhz channel, 42 miles
At least is wasn't your main tower!That sucks!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
David E. Smith wrote:
> Okay, less FEMA politics and more disaster pictures.
>
> http://images.bureau42.com/sa/blrv08/SANY0837.JPG
>
> (This was from Tuesday evening. We were nowhere near any tornadoes, as far as
> I k
Check on the Valemount site and look for the X-4000. It is under $400
and has four radios and pigtails in it. Performance is equal to or
better than the WAR4s or RB333s.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Interesting, I was hoping to switch a few towers over from War4 Metro
I thought I might pass on a piece of information I recently found out
about StarOS networks.
At the StarOS training session last month, they mentioned that the newer
Version3 firmware automatically prioritizes VOIP traffic as long as the
correct TOS bit is set. That made it a lot easier to
I have had excellent results with the Tranzeo units. I didn't have any
experience with their older ones, but I do know that we can install
customers in NLOS situations and get good performance even with the 5mhz
channel sizes. I would highly recommend them.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
chris
Hi all,
I am looking for a licensed link to replace a fiber connection. I am
currently paying for a 100meg fiber connection between two of my towers
and would like to replace it with my own infrastructure. I own the
towers on both sides, there is plenty of LOS and the link distance is
2.9 m
Hi all,
I did some performance testing yesterday with the new X-4000 radio units
from Lucaya and wanted to share the results. These are the new four
radio access point/client/backhaul units from Valemount Networks (the
authors of StarOS). The latest versions of the firmware now support
fu
Just use QuickBooks to do your regular bookkeeping, and Freeside to
handle the Accounts Receivable from your ISP customers. Everyday, we
input all of our payments into Freeside, then add up the deposit and put
the total deposit into QuickBooks under "Freeside Deposits". This
system has work
StarOS V3 does true FDX with dual cards.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Mike Hammett wrote:
Other than N-Streme 2, what out there is true FDX and not just HDX with 50/50
balancing?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
---
Freeside with built in RT Ticket system. RT is also available as a
standalone application, and works well. We use it to keep track of
installs, deinstalls, service calls, maintenance work and a few other
things as well.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Ty Carter wrote:
Platypus w/ wombat (
George,
Comcast's customers are the ones paying for access to the Comcast
network. If a Comcast customer wants to use Vuze, he should be able to
because he is ALREADY PAYING FOR THE RIGHT TO USE THE NETWORK.
This idea of content providers being "parasites" on networks is a total
load of
101 - 200 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
