I have a problem where BPSK modulation has packet loss due to interference
greater than QAM16 at good RSSI levels.
I am using tons of DSSS all around the troubled OFDM link. (16 PtMP links
totalled from two cells, 2 miles apart). And my DSSS links most likely are
the culprits causing some self
There is going to have to be a compromise here guys. We will not be
putting together the composite subscriber data for the FCC. There are no
provisions for it. We can ask but then quite frankly I am not too keen
on telling them that most of our members here seem to be reluctant to
tell them who
I'm just flat out scared of the FCC. The way they are in bed with AT&T
and the likes. To be honest, I can get by on what I have. (900, 2.4,
5.8) 3.6, 700, and TV bands would be nice, but what is the cost? I'd
rather hide in the corner with a tin foil hat and not exist.
John Scrivner wrot
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or Not to Break theLaw...That is
theQuestion
> There is going to have to be a compromise here guys. We will not be
> put
Anyone offering any kind of high speed service in Zapata TX please
contact Mano Guterez at 361.676.6620. They are an petroleum processing
plant of some sort, and are in serious need for service, from what I
have been told.
Thanks
Pete Davis
NoDial.net
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
John,
I support your view.
We can not assume that the FCC's intent for Wireless is evil, just because
there is huge lobby efforts by our competitors (Cable and Telephone) and
Lots of debate at the FCC to address equality issues regarding VOIP, that
has generated much hippocracy and trouble in
Many of us exist, almost unnoticed (I'm not in the yellow pages, for
instance - not yet) by anyone except our customers. Many of us fill
"niche" markets, small towns without other ISP's, rural areas not served by
dsl or cable due to customer density and distance issues, etc. A few of us
are "m
Mark Nash wrote:
Winds in my area knocked power out early this morning (GEORGE R - heard
you guys had 100mph gusts on the Oregon coast...how'd it go?).
Hi Mark
I was waiting for the wind to start. Was supposed to be about 8pm. At 8
pm I was outside looking up and seeing stars and the moon, wo
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or Not to BreaktheLaw...That is
theQuestion
> John,
>
> I support your view.
> We can not assume that the FCC's intent for
Mark Koskenmaki said:
Further, this is directed at WISPA leadership... What is the FCC looking
for us to do? Do they have a defined role they're expecting us to be
filling? If they do, should we be attempting to change it, or should we
embrace it?
The FCC does not want or expect anything
Sorry John...
I should have been more precise in my question...
What does the FCC see as a role for WISP's, not WISPA...
Sorry about that.
North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence to: mark at neofast dot net
sales inquiries to: purchasing at neofast dot net
Fast I
Mark,
You made some very good points, in your response to me, and I do not
contradict them.
There is risk in all the things you bring up, when reporting.
Its part of the reason, I didn't file last year.
The difference, is that we are on the opposite side of the coin, when
looking at the odds
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
It is the NATURE OF
GOVERNMENT REGULATION TO HARM BUSINESS.They regulate for political
purposes
This is not based in fact. The role of government is to serve the
interests of the people. It is not necessarily to serve the interests of
one business sector over anot
I plan to file again, just I did last fall. I want them to know I am here and I need additional spectrum. If the rest of you don't file, I will suffer because there is no need for the spectrum to be given to a group that does not exist.
I do not necessarily agree with all of the FCCs rulings
Scott Reed wrote:
I plan to file again, just I did last fall. I want them to know I am
here and I need additional spectrum. If the rest of you don't file, I
will suffer because there is no need for the spectrum to be given to a
group that does not exist.
I do not necessarily agree with all
Pre-answering for John here
I have sat in on a few meetings with FCC officials and spoken at FCC
events regarding rural broadband, and it is pretty clear that the people
from the FCC I talked to wanted to see WISPs provide competition to
cable and DSL, especially in the underserved areas o
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or NottoBreaktheLaw...That is
theQuestion
> Mark,
>
> You made some very good points, in your response to me, and I do not
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
It'll go to the big guys. Telecommunications, defense contracting, space
development... You name it. Not a one has small business involved when it
comes to Uncle Sam paying to get something done.I'm not trying to be
cynical, but the odds are with me on this.
The
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or Notto BreaktheLaw...That is
theQuestion
> Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
>
> > It is the NATURE OF
> >GOVERNMENT REGULATION
compared to me, you're "the big guy", but then, we had someone come in and
file for loans and grants. The filed for every area for a hundred miles in
every direction, to prevent anyone else from doing so. They claim to have
never used a single dime, they just prevented anyone else from doing it.
Interesting. I kinda view my business in the same light.
You know, the 'lack of leadership in broadband' is such a myth. But that
doesn't prevent it from being beat to death politically.
ALL of these are taking from subscription (not availability) figures.
American consumers do NOT choose to p
Mark,
Heck, none of them did. We have the two
classes of industry... the unregulated and the subsidized.
Some truth to that. However, I'd argue, that thats not the way I'd prefer
companies to be seperated by.
As proud as I am to say I'm self funded, self built, and taken no hand outs
from n
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or NottoBreaktheLaw...That is
theQuestion
> Mark,
>
> >Heck, none of them did. We have the two
> >classes of industry...
, such as Skype Technologies and Google.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060205/wr_nm/telecoms_fon_dc
FON is a global community of people who share WiFi connections...
http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/a-dream-come-true.html
http://isen.com/blog/2006/02/everybody-have-fon-tonight.html
These are the
Why not set up a website on wispa.org that would collect the data -
anonymously?
Collect all the data they want through the organization and send them
the database or the raw data.
This would give those that did not want to follow the guidelines an
alternative that the FCC may accept.
Regard
I agree that the FCC sides with the Big Guys often and to the detriment
of the small guy.
That said, if you don't comply, I can easily see THAT as becoming the
end of the industry.
The FCC would add more regulation to get compliance.
It's a rock and a hard place kind of thing.
They CAN find you.
I know it would sure help alot if we didn't have to submit the form to
the "Wireline Competition Bureau" at the FCC.
Kinda like mailing the information to your competition.
BTW: What happens when the Commission provides my information to someone
who asks for it??? Then what???
I would love
I must be missing something in this discussion. I tell the FCC I have x customers in y zip codes and what percentage is wireless, what percentage is wired.
Many have posted more company confidential information that on this and other forums.
I have filled out the form so I know what it asks
Bob Moldashel wrote:
> BTW: What happens when the Commission provides my information to someone
> who asks for it??? Then what???
>
> I would love to hear the official response to how this is handled.
Um, did you see that part of the form where you can request the FCC treat
your submission a
- Original Message -
From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] To Break the Law or Not to Break the Law...That is
theQuestion
> Bob Moldashel wrote:
>
> > BTW: What happens when the Commission provide
Scott Reed wrote:
> I must be missing something in this discussion. I tell the
> FCC I have x customers in y zip codes and what percentage is wireless,
> what percentage is wired.
>
> Many have posted more company confidential information that on this
> and other forums.
Anyone who's working th
David E. Smith wrote:
Bob Moldashel wrote:
BTW: What happens when the Commission provides my information to someone
who asks for it??? Then what???
I would love to hear the official response to how this is handled.
Um, did you see that part of the form where you can request the
PersonallyI think the biggest fear is filing a report, showing up on
the radar screen, and having "big brother" come out to your place "for a
look". And considering the amount of non-compliant type accepted
systems out there.I can see their point. And don't think there
aren't people ou
I have been doing this with good WI-FI gear for years.
Contact me off list if you wish.
Ross Cornett wrote:
Hey guys,
I have a farmer that wants farm coverage with little or no trouble.
He wants to browse from his tractor while the satelite guides his
tractor for him. I am putting ou
Brian,
Call me monday, but too many volts is what kills electronics.
Blair
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
I'm a little confused here. I'm working on a 300 ft run of cat5 and
have a question. The radio is acting sparatic. The power supply has
already been upped from a 18v to a 24v. Both 1 amp.
And that setup is 6db over max power..
JohnnyO wrote:
Ross - about a year ago I put a 12dBi Omni on the top of my bronco
with a 1watt Teletronics AMP behind it.. I was able to achieve
FULL coverage for about 1.5miles around the tower through trees,
houses, buildings, anything.
Gents and fellow concerned WISP operators. I had the same questions most of
you have regarding FCC form 477. I went directly to the source as you will
see below. I got an answer and it is stated below.
At this time my opinions are not yet formed as we are now moving out of the
hobby type of ope
37 matches
Mail list logo
