If you use managed switches on both ends that properly support
EtherChannel and/or LACP, then your down time should be about 30 seconds
or less as the trunks setup. The main thing is that you will want the
links as balanced as you can get them.
John Thomas
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>
Based on the reviews, it looks like these may have some firmware problems...
Marlon, what kind of space are you talking about?
Here's a Buffalo box that does 4 TB ( 3TB in RAID 5) for $1000
http://shop4.frys.com/product/5782802?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> http://www
Have you guys in Louisiana heard about this?
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Lafayette-Unveils-FTTH-Pricing-99838
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Are you guys using the outbound feature on your inbound Barracudas? It
doesn't do as full a job as a outbound box, but it may help your problem.
John
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Does anyone use the Barracuda's for outbound spam filtering and is it as
> good as the inbound version? I need to keep m
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of John Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:29 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Barracuda outbounds SPAM filter any good?
>
> Are you guys using the outbound feature on your inbound Barracudas? It
> does
In the Barracuda, under Basic>Administration at the bottom of the page,
you choose the direction, inbound or outbound.
If you click on Advanced, you should have an Outbound/Relay tab. If you
set this to allow your email server to relay through the Barracuda, it
will log your messages and do som
A great article talking about why NOT to block ICMP
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/6524/1/
From the article,
In short, blocking ICMP is detrimental to the successful operation of
networks. It will break more than just ping; in fact, many protocols
will be neutered if ICMP is
Has anyone ever seen this?
http://www.boingboing.net/2007/05/30/wifi-slurper-grabs-u.html
John
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
Unless the Federal Government gives AT&T a blank check and ORDERS them
to this, it is NOT ever going to happen. I have seen copies of Project
Pronto documents that said the San Francisco Bay Area was supposed to
have fiber to the home 10 years ago. Yes, there were a few strands
installed, but n
What are the issues with your Barracuda?
John
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> On 2009-07-13 20:08, Don Grossman wrote:
>
>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>> box that after several attempts to
Try to find out what mac address is on which port-you can't do that with
the HP 1800's, you need something higher up the food chain.
John
Scott Vander Dussen wrote:
> Nick-
> Thanks for the info - I'm looking at specifications between the HP ProCurve
> 1810G Switch Series http://bit.ly/5g2F0B a
> (321) 205-1100 x106
>
>
> --------
>
> From: "John Thomas"
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:20 AM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Gigabit Switch Recommendations
>
> Try to find out what mac address is on which port-you
Read the fine print in the contracts. With AT&T, if you call people
outside AT&T's network too much, they will raise your rates.
John
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I expect if it comes to a point where services are degraded and enough
> customers complain they will do just what Vonage does - find the to
Start lining up the lawsuit then.
We pay about $350 for 100 megabits/sec at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.
John
Andy Trimmell wrote:
> 50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to AT&T. We're paying 10x that
> from AT&T right now.
>
> $0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible th
We buy ours through a reseller, and they have quoted us $1000/month for
Gig at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if GigE connections were under $1 now.
> I know a couple companies were at $1.
>
> Bandwidth pricing is the inverse
s ridiculous the cost we pay.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of John Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
>
> We
Kinda sounds like a WISP, eh? As long as they aren't overselling it to
the point quality suffers, who cares? We had to work at just doing a
speed test on our 100 meg connection as most of the servers couldn't do
100 meg up and 100 meg down. We finally were able to do a ftp and get 95
meg/95 meg
We have mounted omnis upside down because an omni pattern tends to
radiate from the base of the antenna upward. By turning the antenna
upside down, it becomes slight better at receiving and sending. That,
and Cisco 1500's make it easy to do...
John
RickG wrote:
> Thanks!
> Is there any advanta
Stock Cisco omnis, we were hanging them from light poles.
John
RickG wrote:
> Which antenna did you use? -RickG
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM, John Thomas wrote:
>
>
>> We have mounted omnis upside down because an omni pattern tends to
>> radiate from the
Midnight overhead fiber run... :-)
John
Jeremie Chism wrote:
> I have a pop across the street from one of my towers. The phone
> company there is giving me a great deal on bandwidth but I have to get
> it across to the tower. Any recommendations for something reliable at
> that range.
>
>
Droid can do RDP and VPN
John
Brad Belton wrote:
> I used to remote desktop from my Sprint Touch phone (and earlier models
> too). However, a year or more ago I saw one of the guys here running remote
> desktop on his iPhone and was blown away how much better it worked than my
> HTC Touch.
Wouldn't it be great if there was something resembling consistent
policies regarding facilities? Years ago, there was the suggestion that
phone companies should be broken into 2 pieces, facilities and services.
The facilities unit could sell access to the copper/fiber/cable to *any*
buyer. You
I've wondered what would happen with something like a licensed lite that
you had to pay $200 a year for access to a band. If the FCC did that,
and people actually used the bands, then they could make some money, and
people could get access. If, for instance, you had say 700-740 MHz and
each WIS
Cisco 1100 series a/b/g can be repeaters using both bands, Cisco 1200
series can be AP (root), CPE (non-root) or bridge.
John
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I'm thinking that every 802.11 device can be an AP or CPE.
>
> Pretty sure Tranzeo can. I know Engenius can. MT semi-can (requires
> lvl 4 to do
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1400&tag=nl.e102
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless
It may be worthwhile to consider a Dodge/Mercedes/Freightliner Sprinter
Van. The drawback is that they have a high roof line, but they do get 20
+ mpg in motorhome trim, and 25-30 mpg bare. They are Diesel and the
engines are supposed to be good for 400,000 - 500,000 miles.
John
George Rogato
Brian, I entered 2400 Camino Ramon San Ramon CA and got part of circles
in the coverage area. I will assume that is NextWeb/Covadwireless's
footprint.
They have a coverage map at
http://www.covadwireless.com/network-coverage-maps.html#sanfrancisco if
that helps.
John
Brian Webster wrote:
> I
Sooner or later, someone will do a 1/2 ton diesel electric hybrid truck
, and it should be able to do at least 40 mpg if they do it right.
It looks like these guys might be the ones to do it.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/11/mahindra-appalachian-diesel-pickup-arrives-in-us-next-year-dies/
John
I understand that Cisco is expensive, but it does work. I have clients
with Cisco Aironet 340's installed that are 7+ years old.
Is it the national pastime to beat on Cisco?
As for antennas, Superpass makes some that might work well for this project
http://www.superpass.com/SP-MIMO-D1J1.html
ht
Does anyone on list service Redding CA?
John Thomas
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List
Is anyone around here on LinkedIn? I just got signed up a few days
ago, and it may have benefits for your businesses. It works a little bit
like Facebook, but is much more business oriented.
John
WISPA Wants You
These will do what you want
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps272/ps6990/product_data_sheet0900aecd804c207b.html
John
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> OK, last one.
>
> What would you guys use for 3650 gear. I need to deliver very high speeds
> to lots of users with near 100%
Are any of the towers setup such that you could cross the circle?
In other words, if you had towers 1 to 20 in a ring, have a secondary
link between towers 4 and 16 for instance.
This would require routing, and preferably dynamic routing, but then you
would have some redundancy.
John
Marlon
That's E&M, it's used to connect to analog voice stuff, in place of FXS
or FXO cards.
John
Matt Jenkins wrote:
> I tried to look it up but I cannot figure it out. Whats an E to M card?
>
> Blake Bowers wrote:
>
>> I have a local non-profit that has a PILE of 1710 and 1750 routers
>> that they
PostPath is a drop in replacement for Exchange that runs on Linux. Cisco
bought PostPath, so it will be interesting to see what happens in the
future.
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2008/corp_091808.html
John
Josh Luthman wrote:
> Google is free.
>
> Exchange I know costs a copy of Windows 20
If you are big enough, or if you are multihomed you can get PI space
John
David E. Smith wrote:
> rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
>
>
>> This after renumbering and re-routing about 100 clients.So, then, I had
>> to find a way to revert everyone bak to the OLD provider All that
If you are multihomed you need to justify a /22 ( 4 Class C's) and if
you are not, then you will need to justify a /20 ( 16 class C's)
John
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> We probably need to get our own ip addys now. We're using 4 class c's and
> will need more pretty soon in one location.
>
> A
---Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Scott Piehn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 7:29 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] speaking of ARIN
>
> One add to the /22. You need to be or plan to be r
days
>> or they could revoke my IP's. Would they allot a /20 in the case you are
>> only using 4 class Cs?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Scott Piehn
>> Sent: Tues
ps full duplex link for $3,000
> per month. Then go buy a Trango licensed link for $11k and make $3k a
> month profit after 4 months. :)
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> John Thomas wrote:
>> Are you saying that it is not practical for you to get a T-1 so that you
>>
Even
> at $500/mo that's a lot of money to spend on something you will never really
> use.You might as well be down if your DS3 takes a hit and your traffic
> rolls over to the T1.
>
> Richey
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto
gt; From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Cliff Olle
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:02 AM
>>> To: 'WISPA General List'
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] speaking of ARIN
>>>
>>> I was told that I w
My question would be, is there anyone doing glass from the Carrier hotel
to the edge of town?
If you were able to get fiber on the edge of Spokane, wouldn't it save
you a few towers?
I wish it weren't top secret as to where the fiber is. Wouldn't it be
nice to be able to go somewhere ( website)
1 minute 49 seconds from a 100 Meg feed at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.
John
Scott Carullo wrote:
> Yes lots of them, from different internet connections as well. Focusing on
> customers from BHN connecting to our TW Telecom fiber circuit. Have not
> been able to do enough testing outsi
As they say, your mileage may vary We have a 2xT1 that we pay $560
per month for, and the routing/peering at TW Telecom is good, but then
again, we are in the San Francisco Bay Area. If the building owners
would have let TW Telecom into this buildings MPOE's we would have a 10
meg fiber c
ey couldn't
deliver. Maybe someone has bogus information?
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> If you want their service, they can't restrict you, AFAIK.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> -----
Cisco 2960G-24's are an option too.
John
Jon Auer wrote:
> I second that. We use 7200s trunked to, variously, 3500XLs, 3550s, and
> Zyxel switches.
> For gig ports go with a NPE-G1/G2 for routing and a 3560 as a port expander.
> Dot1q subinterfaces are your friend.
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:1
If you guys want to bash Cisco, that's your perogative, but my
experience has been somewhat different. We recently took on a new client
that has some Cisco switches that their old VAR sols them 5 YEARs of
Smartnets on. Since we are looking at them upgrading to some new
equipment, we asked Cisco
You might also consider a Cisco 800 or 1800 series router. They do
firewalls well and have a nice GUI.
John
Patrick D.. Nix, Jr wrote:
> Any suggestions on a good linux firewall distro. I'm looking at either
> implementing this or going with an older Cisco PIX 525. Which would be
> the best wa
Other opinions about Magic Jack
http://uninstallmagicjack.com/?p=5
John
Chuck Profito wrote:
> That's is what I remember from the list. Once it was in, a 'normal'
> subscriber couldn't get it out, and they, MJ, had a subscriber installed,
> and "agreed to", OPEN Back Door to any computer it wa
Here is some info
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps5318/index.html
John
Josh Luthman wrote:
> Wait pictures of this GUI???
>
> On 6/23/09, John Thomas wrote:
>
>> You might also consider a Cisco 800 or 1800 series router. They do
>> firewalls
If you are ONLY going to route, no NAT, firewall or other stuff, then a
Cisco 871 will do what you want. We have tested it at wirespeed.
John
Alan Long wrote:
> Anyone have a suggestion for a dual ethernet port router, that can handle
> 30-50mb/s of traffic. I do not need it to do nat or anythi
I don't know about those, but Frontbridge got blacklisted once and they
are an anti-spam provider
John
George Rogato wrote:
> How come Google, Yahoo, and Live.com don't get black listed.
> I'm pretty sure 1 million times more spam comes out of those domains
> than any small independent isp
http://www.mxlogic.com/services/email-filtering/index.cfm
they have done good by us.
John
George Rogato wrote:
> Wonder how much it is.
> Says it's based on qty of email addresses.
>
>
>
> RickG wrote:
>
>> Cost?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Pat O'Connor wrote:
>>
>>> We're sw
Please see my responses inline
Jeremy Parr wrote:
> 2009/7/14 David E. Smith :
>
>> Don Grossman wrote:
>>
>>> It seems time to take a look at our anti-spam solution. Currently we
>>> are looking to replace out Barracuda due to ongoing issues with the
>>> box that after several attemp
I know of Barracudas that the only time they get rebooted is for
firmware updates.
They can run for months without a reboot, but usually the firmware
updates have useful stuff in 3-6 months that requires a firmware upgrade.
John
Charles Wyble wrote:
> David E. Smith wrote:
>
>
>> What kind
Yes, but Cisco switches only do Cisco Prestandard and 802.3af 48 volt.
John
Charles Wyble wrote:
> On a cisco poe enabled switch can't you just do
>
> conf t
> interface Gig0/0
> shutdown
> no shutdown
> done
>
> to power cycle?
>
> Lots of resellers out there.
>
>
> Jason Hensley wrote:
>
>>
Is Covadwireless out of their price range?
John
Jerry Richardson wrote:
> Name
> Ray
>
> Email
> r_a_...@yahoo.com
>
> Phone
> 408-421-2100
>
> Your message: Do you guys cover 95008 zip code for wireless internet? if not
> any suggestions who does?
>
>
> -
To be fair, I wonder how much larger Cogent is than Dragonwave?
Someone has to pay the engineer's salary, and it costs to have a 24/7
support staff.
I always find it interesting to see people's perspective's on support.
John
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> Well, when I really needed support for Dragonwave
Ryan, when you agree to offer service, that becomes your responsibility,
and when someone is paying for it, they have a reasonable expectation of
the service they are paying for.
With that said, is it crazy expensive to get a 2 x T-1 where you are?
Maybe a T-3 is stupid expensive, but if you eve
Is this some place you could put some batteries and a solar panel or
small windmill?
John
Jerry Richardson wrote:
> Thank you,
> That is very good advice. After some research, I'm leaning toward a UPS.
>
> A pair of good AGM batteries and charge controller will cost less and be far
> less mai
Unless your equipment is tolerant of voltage swings, you will still
probably want a DC-DC regulator, but that will likely be more efficient
than a 12/24volt to 120 volt inverter.
John
Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote:
> Hi Guys...I'd steer away from inverters since they soak up a lot of
> power. Y
Are you willing to setup a server for their backups?
For home users, Mozy charges $4.95 per month. If you setup your own
backup server, you would have the initial expense of a server with big
drive space, but you could charge $4.95 and at least save money on your
upstream bandwidth.
John
Mike
Is there any reason you can't mount the panels close to the ground? In
Nevada, this is common practice.
Can you setup a small windmill? Home Depot has these ( as do many other
suppliers)
http://www.homedepot.com/h_d1/N-5yc1vZ1xr5/R-100658295/h_d2/ProductDisplay?langId=-1&storeId=10051&catalogId=
Absolutely, 12, 24, or 48 volts depending on what you are trying to do.
John
Paul Rice wrote:
> I'd recommend you use either a unmanaged or managed industrial DC powered
> switch 12-20 vdc
> otherwise your going to need a LOT of solar panels (650 watts is what my
> calcs came up with)
> In fac
It looks like there is a sweet spot at 60 watts
http://www.solarhome.org/51-60wattsolarpanels.aspx
About $250 each.
John
Mike wrote:
> I was shocked to find the 15W panels at Northern for $79.00. I
> ordered some and they work great. You need a charge controller,
> $45.00 to keep the batter
Josh Luthman wrote:
>Bill Prince is out that way.
>
>http://skylinebroadbandservice.com/
>
>Josh Luthman
>Office: 937-552-2340
>Direct: 937-552-2343
>1100 Wayne St
>Suite 1337
>Troy, OH 45373
>
>“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
>continue that counts.”
>--- Winst
Josh Luthman wrote:
>>Issue I see is that not many other units, UBNT or MT have a 2nd Ethernet that
>>pass through POE?
>
>Not to my knowledge.
>
>I've always done two lines up the tower. Usually MT APs so I can do
>tons of troubleshooting but an NS2 works great, too.
>
>Josh Luthman
>Office:
Josh Luthman wrote:
>>Issue I see is that not many other units, UBNT or MT have a 2nd Ethernet that
>>pass through POE?
>
>Not to my knowledge.
>
>I've always done two lines up the tower. Usually MT APs so I can do
>tons of troubleshooting but an NS2 works great, too.
>
>Josh Luthman
>Office:
.e ww.sa xs,cssx. Z.
Josh Luthman wrote:
>>Issue I see is that not many other units, UBNT or MT have a 2nd Ethernet that
>>pass through POE?
>
>Not to my knowledge.
>
>I've always done two lines up the tower. Usually MT APs so I can do
>tons of troubleshooting but an NS2 works
Robert West wrote:
>Thanks for the gumball, Popeye.
>
>Thanks for the gumball.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Scott Piehn
>Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 6:35 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Cc: i...@jcwifi.com
>S
And if I were your client, and you told me $10 for an IP address, I would find
a new ISP. The most I have ever seen charged was $5 a month.
John
Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>Everything i keep coming up with to make this work "ideal" according to the
>customer is I"m gonna have to sell them a publi
g 2, 2010, at 8:46 PM, "Mike" wrote:
>
>> Simple analysis might expose that customer to be one you'd rather let go.
>> Or not.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf
2010, at 7:31 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
>
>> True. Sounds like a bandwidth hog to me.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 8:46 PM, "Mike" wrote:
>>
>>> Simple analysis might expose that customer to be one you'd rathe
eless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of John Thomas
>Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1:28 AM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] XBOX live, NAT, and UPnP
>
>Robert, what upstream is charging $15 per month? If that is true, I have a
Zack, is there something *wrong* with your Cisco gear? If you already
have Cisco 123x or 124x access points, you can certainly look at reusing
them. Fixing this may be as simple as changing antennas and settings. I
wonder if someone set the channels to fixed? The radios can be set to
pick the b
You would use LDAP when you need directory services. An example might be
using RADIUS to contact an LDAP server for Authentication. Another use
may be to have single sign on across multiple servers.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> Someone asked why I didn't use some sort of directory system like eDi
Unless you have a H.323 compliant firewall, 1 to 1 NAT will generally
break H.323 (Netmeeting)
Also, some VPN clients default config doesn't work properly through NAT.
John
Ugo Bellavance wrote:
> Jason Hensley wrote:
>
>> Even if you buy your own from ARIN, if you're that big, then the costs
I've done Cisco, but it was a small install, just 4 1500 series
John
Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc wrote:
> Mesh is a four letter word to most!
>
>
>
> Dennis M. Burgess
> Mikrotik Certified Consultant
> Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
> --WISP/Network Support Services--
> +1
G.711 *can* support FAXing, otherwise g.729 is very common for voice.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I know. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM (the GSM for wireless is the same as the
> GSM VoIP codec). I dunno if the CDMA operators translate to anything in the
> VoIP world or not.
>
> I've tested with
Have you considered $19/mo for 1 Gig, $39/mo for 5 Gig and $59/mo for 10
Gig +$x per gig over what they normally pay?
Another thought is do the tiers, and throttle them after they hit a
point, after 1 gig, then you get throttled to 64k for the rest of the month.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> So
Cisco 851 router + Smartnet.
Cisco 871 router if you need VLANs
John
Rogelio wrote:
> Ron Wallace wrote:
>
>> to All,
>>
>> I have a small Medical practice that has requested a firewall for their LAN.
>> Which would you all recommend? Price rane below $1000, Doc woule prefer $500.
>>
>
Have you called Barracuda Support? They are good to work with and may be
able to help you-you could have something weird going on in the box that
needs to be fixed. We don't generally sell the 200's, but I have had
300's that handle 60,000 + emails a day and aren't bre
you for 3 years. I have a BIG problem with any
business that operates like that. In this instance, the cleint is now
stuck with Frontbridge for 2 1/2 years, and their attitude when asked
about a refund was "tough, you agreed to a 3 year term, and we have your
money."
John Thomas
Unless you know something I don't, all the quotes we have received from
Postini require a 3 year commitment, with a minimum of 1 years payment
up front.
For my client that has 60,000 + emails coming into his Barracuda, his
Exchange 2003 server is happily running along.
John Thomas
If you have a Netflow compatible router at the edge, you can use
http://manageengine.adventnet.com/products/netflow/network-bandwith-monitoring.html
John Thomas
Eric Rogers wrote:
> I have a company that would like to track real-time and summary
> information of internet activity o
o the Internet for $399, others are doing SDSL at $250-299 per
month, so if you are in the neighborhood, that should be expected.
Anothe thing to think about is tiering your pricing
4 Gigs$49
10 Gigs $99
50 Gigs $299
or something like that.
John Thomas
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982
Having a 4xT as a backup is better than no connection.
John
John Scrivner wrote:
Maybe it is very costly to do? Charter Pipeline service in my market
is not multi-homed either. Neither am I at this point. I used to be
multi-homed in the days when 2 T1s did the job. It is not easy to
swing
This site has some DECT products...
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/dect/
John
John Scrivner wrote:
$50K up front and 50 cents a device to control an entire band in the
US sounds like a pretty cheap deal to me. I am surprised nobody jumped
on that. I do not see that as too much to pay and I am ve
Let's be fair here, it is unlikely that certification would make them
cost $1000.
John
Charles Wu wrote:
Honestly,
Would you buy RB112/532/whatever boards if they cost $1k vs $100 each?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near Y
Pete, you hit on an interesting idea. What if the FCC were to pay the
ISP say $500 each year to fill out the 477? Would more ISP's participate?
John
Pete Davis wrote:
12000, 6000, 2000, or whatever number of WISPs is mainly hard to
quantify because there are LOTS of 2 and 3 customer private wi
EA or know that they need to comply.
So $500... it would probably get you about 400 more, but who will pony
up the $200k?
Peter
John Thomas wrote:
Pete, you hit on an interesting idea. What if the FCC were to pay the
ISP say $500 each year to fill out the 477? Would more ISP's
If the radios are smart enough, you could use VLANs.
John
Travis Johnson wrote:
My personal concern would be turning over my IP block to my
competition. They would have to have enough control to allow BGP
routes from their upstream. Technically they could misconfigure a
router accidentally an
You could still use Mikrotik as a Hotspot, but not as an AP with radio
installed.
John
Mark McElvy wrote:
I am getting ready to expand my network by adding a couple of new
towers. The decision I am trying to make is what equipment to buy. My
plan was to use Mikrotik for a BH/AP, but with all t
For people that run Netequalizers, they are helping you comply
As promised, NetEqualizer is now offering the utilities necessary to
meet requirements set forth this month by CALEA, or the Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. This law oversees telecommunication
security and has no
If you want something a little easier on the pocketbook, managed HP
Procurves work well.
John
Mark Price wrote:
Matt wrote:
Does anyone reccommend a good switch that supports this and is rack
mount? Hopefully available at newegg.com. Putting together a Linux
server is easy but my luck a g
Also, most HP Procurves have lifetime warranties.
John
John Thomas wrote:
If you want something a little easier on the pocketbook, managed HP
Procurves work well.
John
Mark Price wrote:
Matt wrote:
Does anyone reccommend a good switch that supports this and is rack
mount? Hopefully
http://www.sonicwall.com/us/Content_Security_Management.html
George Rogato wrote:
I thought that content filtering happened by way of dns.
George
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Do you have a content filtering service?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)C
Cisco AP1242's have been doing this for at least 6 months.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
Redline has a certified product released. Orthogon is about to have theirs
out. Anyone else?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@
ino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 12:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.4 Ghz
Cisco AP1
101 - 200 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
