Unless you have your own EPC. In which case you don't use the LGW. IPs are
then assigned by the EPC and you should be able to assign a Static IP and
route a subnet to it just fine.
Best Wishes,
Jayson A. Baker
Peak Internet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2017, at 6:18 AM, Josh Luthman via WISP w
1 person on each end with a small hand-held mirror. Flash the person on the
other tower.
When it's sunny out, you'd be surprised how far away you can see that.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
> Well in my area if its e-w about a turn, n-s 2 or 3. But what do I
> know, T
Wanted to go. Registered. Went there. They never took the money. So I
used it to gamble instead. :-)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Matt Larsen - Lists
wrote:
> Anyone here going to this show?
>
> http://www.ftthconference.com/FTTH10/public/enter.aspx
>
> Still deciding whether I should
Yeah, they rock. Although, the last two times we RMA'ed Loco2's they sent
us Nano2's.
We told them. They said "you sent us Nano2s" I said no, we didn't. They
said "there's nothing more we can do"
Ok. Fine. I'll keep the more expensive product. Thanks!
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Rober
Shame on you for picking on the old lady!
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 7:55 PM, wrote:
> Like
> Sent from my BlackBerry®
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Robert West"
> Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 21:52:08
> To: WISPA General List
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
I've never seen shielded cable with no drain wire. But I suppose it could
exist.
Get better cable, with a drain wire.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> What if there is no drain wire?
>
> On Aug 14, 2010 6:09 PM, "Jayson Baker" wrote:
>
&
Shielded cable that is not attached properly to the RJ45 will do nothing but
pick up MORE static.
We solder the drain wire onto the edge of the RJ45 connector after we crimp
it on the wire.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:49 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> We've had
ning the most recent version of 5.2 firmware.also
> you need to be running then in AP-WDS and CPE-WDS mode.
>
> Faisal
>
> On Jun 24, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jayson Baker wrote:
>
> > I didn't quite follow all of that, it must be too early.
> > But I can tell you we
I didn't quite follow all of that, it must be too early.
But I can tell you we have 4 of the PtP UBNT links using their M-series. 3
of those OSPF fine. The other won't OSPF for the life of me. All same
config and firmware on all units.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Scott Lambert wrote:
> We
gt;
> Greg
>
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Jayson Baker wrote:
>
> > What will any radio do when it's channel gets jammed with noise.
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would
What will any radio do when it's channel gets jammed with noise.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would still like to know what it's going to do when an entire
> polarization gets jammed with noise? Will the radio still pass traffic?
> Or will there be so many
We do this as well. Have for quite some time.
No contract--that's all electronically done and accepted by our activation
system once the system is online.
But when we arrive we discuss with customer how it's going to work, where
it's going to be mounted, etc.
They sign a one-page "authorization
to put up a radius server and control them all from the billing
> >> system. Lots of work but we need easy access to see who's causing what
> >> in the towers, MT provides for that Ubiquiti doesn't.
> >>
> >> On 4/19/2010 1:28 PM, Jayson Baker wrote:
> &
If you have to use MT as the AP, yes go with the UBNT cards.
MT cards are "ok" for CPE stuff. Certainly not tower stuff.
But I was moreso saying don't use MT as the AP.
Use the UBNT Rockets or Nano's as APs.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Mark Dueck wrote:
> On 04/19/2010 01:41 PM, Josh Luth
”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Jayson Baker >wrote:
>
> > True. But it doesn't take much. We have a bunch of P4 2.4GHz/1GB RAM
> > machines that are "old" by todays standards, but run Asterisk just fine
> > with
MIMO/802.11N on MT sucks. Use UBNT.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Mark Dueck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a small WISP and I've been using only Tranzeo till now. I
> would like to start using something that support MIMO. What should I
> consider? Been reading a lot on this list about UBN
You can telnet into the unit and run vconfig to do whatever kind of VLAN'ing
you want. This is what we do, via an rc. script put in the /etc/persistent
directory.
Check the forum.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Tracy Tippett <
tracytipp...@swiftwireless.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone had experien
We have hundreds of legacy 802.11a/g UBNT equipment deployed in Colorado and
Costa Rica.
In Colorado we offer 12Mbps/6Mbps service over 802.11g--it works great. We
use NS2 and PS2 as AP, MT behind that to do things like QoS/routing.
Latency does spike and is not consistent. We have seen no issues
45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
> that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Jayson Baker >wrote:
>
> > PRI is something like $600/mo. On one particularly busy site we
Weird. We use the Rocket APs and Nano5M CPE's heavily and for a TON of
VoIP. No problems.
Occasionally we'll see PPPoE re-connect, but since we VLAN the VoIP straight
through, it's unaffected.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:10 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> Upgra
ity. Way too much work and cost in my opinion...
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
> that counts.”
> --- Winston
Roll you own.
We have PRI's at our tower sites (at least the primary sites), and redundant
Asterisk switches.
The switches have a VLAN, which is common throughout the entire network down
to the ATA/IP Phone.
VoIP doesn't touch any router. The ATA at customers house is on the same
VLAN as the sw
We do this now. From NOAA weather stations. All our backhaul links are
polled every 60 seconds for just about everything they spit out (i.e. bits
in/out, signals, errors, temperature, etc.) as well as NOAA weather info
(temp, humidity, pressure, etc.) for the nearest station. It's all
available
Why would you use this in rural deployment, as opposed to something like a
cheaper UBNT MIMO system, which will give you better penetration?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
> Indeed MIMO does help through trees according to people I trust, but
> again we default to the "but
That's what we did. $24.95/mo gets you 12Mbps/6Mbps. $49.95/mo gets you
20Mbps/6Mbps.
We guarantee minimums--not just an "up to" speed. A lot of people really
like that too.
Our packages: www.peakinter.net
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, MDK wrote:
> One of the things you have to keep in mi
Actually, at the Vegas conference UBNT said you should *never* specify MACs.
I don't remember why, but you may want to check into it first!
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Depends on what you're using.
>
> If they're both AP and you want them both to broadcast, AP WDS is wh
How weird. We need exactly this too. A building we're in that used to be
two, but were combined, and each have their own service drops. There's a
difference in ground potential.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I've seen a telephone (copper pair) optoisolator which had a s
> Otherwise, we at least have a chance to talk to them and see if we can
> fix it _before_ they switch.
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> Jayson Baker wrote:
> > Oh yeah--that helps too. We flat-rate everything.
> > $24.95/mo for your Internet includes your taxes, your fees,
Bassturds!
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Marlon K. Schafer
wrote:
> Gotta offer higher speeds.
>
> Better service (customer service especially).
>
> Get a REAL bill from one of your customers. It won't be for $15. They'll
> have taxes, usage fees, modem rental etc. tacked on there.
>
> I'v
rus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jayson Baker
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 11:26 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to
We offer something the telco never will...
A local business with local, friendly support staff. All calls are answered
and handled locally.
We promote this heavily--and a lot of people are willing to pay more for it.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Steven G McGehee wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
>
> What w
We use a lot of Loco2's - as you mention, they work great.
We're starting to deploy a lot of AirMax 5GHz stuff - it works even better.
We regularly see customers getting speedtest of 80Mbps (down and up).
Latency is good. We're in a very heavily crowded 5GHz area, and it doesn't
seem to affect
They've met with our datacenter folks and been on the roof numerous times.
To me, that says they're getting ready to make some sort of move.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> Interesting. They are installing equipment on towers in our area (after
> having leases for 4+ year
I haven't seen their site, but I know they've been sniffing around Colorado
Springs quite a bit the last year. I think they're getting ready to make a
move.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> In looking at Clear's web site, they have a green for areas that are
> covered now a
I wouldn't use a dish on the NS2, maybe the NS2L is ok. NS2 has two patch
antennas internally, which will cause a really screwed up pattern out of a
dish. Even though people claim to do it, I would not. NS2L has only a
single patch, and should be better, but still not perfect. Keep in mind
thes
Troy, OH 45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
> that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
>
> > So what's the latest with this?
> >
> > We es
y said they're doing IPTV over the new M
stuff. But... I still run into that little issue of 6Mbps multicast rates.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:56 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net <
jree...@18-30chat.net> wrote:
>
>
> Jayson Baker wrote:
> >> I will need to test that. The se
You're wanting to go on a family vacation? I thought this was to be a WISP
conference. Like, for WISP operators.
I, personally, have no intention of spending that much for airline tickets,
and going to play with Mickey Mouse while I'm at a conference.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Dylan Bouter
3.5 is for legacy products
5.1 is the latest for N products
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Jerry Richardson
wrote:
> Thanks,
> It's not an M - Ubiquity's firware site makes 3.5 the highest available
> version.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireles
I'm down with Denver, since it's about an hour away. But really, Vegas is
usually the cheapest to fly into, and cheap to stay at; with plenty to do
with a short walk from your hotel. I've been in every casino in Vegas and
never taken a cab or had to drive. Denver... ehh, not so much.
On Fri, Fe
Why would you not have it at Vegas, like most other conventions? Most days
we can fly there and back for under $100 total round-trip. Rooms are cheap,
and there is plenty of other stuff to do. Oh, and free booze. :-)
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Blake Bowers wrote:
> I have never had a pr
We get outs from Sean at CTI. It's dual-jacketed, shielded, has a drain
wire, and the outer jacket is UV resistent. Plus, it's cheaper than the
other stuff, and excellent quality.
Let him know I sent you. :-)
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> I seen some cat5e once that
iPhone has all that
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Do any of the mobile phone platforms support VPN at all from the phone
> itself? Any have a Remote Desktop client?
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
>
>
That's not a good idea. You will create multipath interference, which will
have an overall negative impact.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
> You may have to rotate your cpe to get a lower signal from the tower.
> I have one that is pointed at a 45 degree angle away from th
Wait until you see the next release of firmware for the Ubiquiti MIMO
equipment.
Built-in spectrum analyzer, 1x better than Mikrotik, and almost as good
as our $30k HP analyzer.
Runs on the unit itself, while it's installed, in place, connected to the
antenna.
Can even run while the radio is in
True. All our links are redundant and have multiple diverse paths.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
> No critical link should ever be standalone whether using expensive
> equipment or using lower cost equipment. Always a good idea to put a second
> redundant link in running so
I'll second that. Or is it 3 now? We have MT links that have been in
places for years running dual-nstreme and get 70Mbps out of them all day,
everyday.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> This guy.
>
> Out of every backhaul in the network the most reliable has been the
> rb3
Oh, yeah, that's a requirement too. You can't bridge without WDS.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> 2010/1/12 Jayson Baker :
> > Broadcast, I guess. Whatever is default on MT.
>
> Default is broadcast. I think I may have resolved the issue by sett
Broadcast, I guess. Whatever is default on MT.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> 2010/1/12 Jayson Baker :
> > Make sure you have "Multicast Data" enabled or whatever on the Advanced
> tab.
> > Pulled my hair out over this for a couple day
Make sure you have "Multicast Data" enabled or whatever on the Advanced tab.
Pulled my hair out over this for a couple days, then realized if it's not
checked, you get one-way OSPF.
Checked it, rebooted, and everything has been happy since.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> I
MikroTik firewall filter rule using the all-p2p matcher and drop as action?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Roman wrote:
> Dear readers,
>
> Do you have any experience with successful blocking of P2P (eDonkey,
> Torrents etc.) traffic in your wireless networks?
>
> Any user who uses torrent cli
So lie to them, and tell them you're standing there and the DSL light is
blinking. Or whatever they want to hear.
That person is probably a $10/hr individual paid to follow a flow chart, and
doesn't know what to do if your answers don't fall in-line with that chart.
I've done this many times. Eve
Isn't that fraud?
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Robert West wrote:
> Gives me an idea old lightning zapped cpe's find a house
> fire. Offer owner of house "free installation" of 6 or 7 or whatever
> number
> messed up units one may have, after the fact of course...
>
> "
to
> be
> helpful and to get helped. It would be helpful to know who you are, your
> business model, and how you do it. My first question would be, how much are
> you paying for bandwidth?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> -RickG (KyWiFi)
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Jayson B
gt; Travis
> Microserv
>
> RickG wrote:
> > Jayson,
> >
> > You dont offer speed packages?
> > I cant find your website at www.spectrasurf.com?
> >
> > -RickG
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
> >
> >
n of your AP?
> How many customers do you typically have per AP?
>
> mc
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
> > All users get limited at 12Mbps. Most are capable of 8-10ish.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert West >wrote:
>
All users get limited at 12Mbps. Most are capable of 8-10ish.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Robert West wrote:
> What's your average speed tier? Maybe it's more noticeable by those who
> offer slower speeds sue to lack of affordable bandwidth? Just a guess.
>
> Yes, I know, bandwidth is band
Weird. Ours is completely the opposite. We keep adding customers by the
truck load, but bandwidth only slowly climbs.
*knock on wood* Never said I minded, though!
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:55 PM, MDK wrote:
> I'm seeing the same thing.
>
> I can literally track it month to month and show the
If you're looking to monitor only, check these out:
http://www.theenergydetective.com/index.html
They talk to Google. Yes, Google is now tracking your power consumption as
well. Who knew.
http://www.google.org/powermeter/
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I just installed
t; On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
> > Us too. We have used a lot of the 2' and 3' PacWireless dishes. Work
> fine.
> > Used a couple 4' RadioWaves dishes and those worked fine too. Although
> the
> > feedhorn mount is kinda flimsy
Us too. We have used a lot of the 2' and 3' PacWireless dishes. Work fine.
Used a couple 4' RadioWaves dishes and those worked fine too. Although the
feedhorn mount is kinda flimsy and was bent on arrival.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> I've been happy with both pairs o
Why would you want the connector on the bottom? So it can fill up with
water?
Being on the top, the water will run over the connector and not fill it.
Makes sense to me.
Of course, we still seal them up.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> No, but they could have put the conn
me Depot.
>
> Bob-
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jayson Baker
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:46 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] I'm an idiot
>
> We
Wear latex gloves. Keeps the wind off your fingers and actually makes a BIG
difference.
When I climb, I wear latex and then some brand they sell at Home Depot as
"Handyman" gloves with velcro, but I got them from Tessco and they're
"sticky" on the palms. They were like $40.
When I take the other
Sean at CTI probably has them.
svanwor...@cticonnect.com
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:29 AM, wrote:
> Just need two.
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --
MT can tell you who they sold the board to by the license key.
Of, if you're "cool" and have a login to their site, you can request the key
to be added to your account, and it'll tell you where it came from.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Robert West wrote:
> Turned out to be
>
> The 411
Maybe the wind is blowing the 1's away before they get to the other end. I
think 0's are good up to about 100MPH.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
> Windy today, supposed to have gusts up to 50mph before days end. I was
> monitoring some backhaul links, had one bouncing from -
Lanyards and such... Tessco.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Robert West wrote:
> Looking for a source for lanyards with rebar hooks but for a decent price,
> as in cheap but not so cheap I'll kill myself using it.Yeah, I can
> Google all day looking, and lots of times I do, but thought if so
Depends on what the customer will be using. NanoM? BulletM? What kind of
antenna?
As a rule, should be fine. Rocket M -> Nano M should work at that range
decent.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Forbes Mercy
wrote:
> We want to put up an "M" Rocket in 5gig frequency range and have four
> cus
;
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Robert West >wrote:
> >
> >> Plastic next to the antennas??? CRAZY! So the radios pretty much talk
> to
> >> themselves a lot, huh. Hearing voices in their heads.
> >>
> >>
> >&g
Interesting. I don't doubt it, but have to think about that for a bit to
wrap my head around it.
Anyway... we use the PacWireless DCE enclosures for 90% of things (we use
411-form-factor boards in almost everything). We bought like 100 of them,
and still have a few around for this or that.
If yo
Chuck,
This: *http://tinyurl.com/ycrnc2f ??*
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
> I am very satisfied with the Hanns-G monitor from costco.com 28" 1080 wide
> screen $300.00
>
> <
>
> http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?Prodid=11503005&cm_mmc=BCEmail_475
> -_-FOCUS-_-27-_
I have to laugh at one of our competitors who uses PLASTIC enclosures next
to their antennas on the tower. Even on the most RF-jam packed sites. One
site in particular you can almost get a fluorescent light to glow just
holding it in your hands. And there they are with their plastic
enclosures.
ally, really having a hard time getting my head around using $90
> radios for "must work" links.
>
> Maybe I'm being obstinate, I don't know.
>
> Just seems wrong somehow.
>
> Jerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.o
Re: [WISPA] 20 mile link
>
>
>
> I guess if you don't need a reliable, stable product, this is the answer.
> However, I have MT backhaul links that have been up solid for over 3 years
> now. No ethernet issues, no heat issues, no firmware issues.
>
> Travis
> Micros
If this is their install truck, I don't think you have to worry about much.
[image:
?ui=2&view=att&th=1254ad61273873f9&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=ii_1254ad61273873f9&zw]
LOL
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Mike wrote:
> My primary competition for the past few years has been Iowa
> Telecom
(2) Rocket5M @ $90/ea
(2) RocketDish @ $145/ea
$470
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> I would agree. Except the 411ah is overkill in my testing, the regular
> 411 shows as much throughput as the 411ah. So, here's the list:
>
> 2 x RB411
> 2 x PacWireless 2ft dishes
Just saw this. Sorry.
http://www.provantage.com/cyberpower-systems-cs24c12v2-e~7CYPR047.htm
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> Jayson,
>
> Do you have the model numbers on these? I need 48v output.
>
> Regards
> Michael Baird
> > APC and Cyberpower makes some. 12V or 48V o
the interface, I vastly prefer this to UBNT's products.
>
> Now, mind you, I'm not really putting them down, but this is an excellent
> infrastructure tool...Routing and other capabilities that vastly exceed
> some better known...
>
>
>
> ----
Is there really much need for this, given the new AirMax product line?
I'm just saying...
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:19 PM, MDK wrote:
> What would you call a totally proprietary, TDMA based protocol, without
> ACK
> or CSMA?
>
> Doesn't look a whole lot like 802.11x, but if you wish to say it i
Rocket 5M w/ Rocket Dish (or whatever it's called)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:22 PM, RickG wrote:
> Planning my first 20 mile PTP link. Path analysis shows clear. Customer is
> building a 100' tower just for this therefore the equipment I choose must
> work. I'm free to use whatever I want. Sugge
series) I don't see Multicast
Rate, just "Allow all"
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:20 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net <
jree...@18-30chat.net> wrote:
> I will need to test that. The setting lets you use any valid modulation for
> the
> RF mode your in. I will also test with my B5M
CableCARD's don't accept Ethernet...?
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 8:11 AM, David E. Smith wrote:
> Out of idle curiosity, have any of you IPTV folks priced CableCARDs?
> There's
> a certain appeal in having customers provide their own equipment.
>
> David Smith
> MVN.net
>
>
>
>
features as the low end unit, will be more
> cost
> effective. I am still researching about the licensing requirements of
> securing
> the data stream for non OTA channels.
>
>
> Jayson Baker wrote:
> > I seem to remember the low-end ones were around $130/ea. Not sur
I seem to remember the low-end ones were around $130/ea. Not sure about the
others. Price will vary based on where you buy and in what quantity I
assume.
Remembered that standard 802.11 will only multicast at around 1Mbps. So
that's why we were having the problem with the multicast over AirMax
gt; 4) Content stream from Avail or Echostar
>
> Missing anything?
>
> Costs for the others?
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Jayson Bake
We've been buying it from CTI without issue.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:14 PM, MDK wrote:
> the UBNT stuff is just not available, and doesn't appear to be until
> sometime perhaps in February.
>
> the prices are very good, the gain and having nice sector widths is great,
> but, the distributors
Doesn't matter. If the interference is there, it's there. If your radio
has no where to spread out the signal and "avoid" that interference, you're
dead.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Right but you have another 6db to get a stronger sig
Yes, you get more signal, but you have much less spectrum for your spread
spectrum radio to operate in.
Spread spectrum doesn't always use the full 20MHz, it will skip around --
that's the "spread" part of it.
So if you lower that to 5MHz, then you have virtually no "spread" and
anything that may b
IIRC, 5MHz and 10MHz is more sucepstible to interference than 20MHz.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS <
ilopezli...@sandboxitsolutions.com> wrote:
> I'm gonna have to set up the environment again. Only thing I cant
> simulate right now is distance.
>
> As long as it wasnt some
ms to indicate that this can be done)
> 3) VoD
> 4) Content stream from Avail or Echostar
>
> Missing anything?
>
> Costs for the others?
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> ---
quot;in just a couple of weeks" for at least the last two months.
>
>
>
> Jayson Baker wrote:
> > UBNT Bullet M2?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, pat wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only do
UBNT Bullet M2?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:59 PM, pat wrote:
> I have one small group on an old Cisco Aironet 350, which only does
> 802.11b.
>
> 1) I want to have at least a b/g mix, n capable a bonus.
>
> 2) Must support WEP encryption, but be able to handle a mix of WEP and
> WPA simultaneou
Interestingly enough, I've had a project lying on my desk for a couple weeks
now which requires streaming live content to a large group of people in a
neighborhood (think of it as a neighborhood association wanting to broadcast
their meetings to their residents). I don't know why I didn't see the
to STBs
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Jayson Baker"
> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 1:09 AM
> To: "WISPA General List"
&g
s. Now if you could
> throw in a SIP ATA as well with battery backup, it would be perfect!
>
> Linksys only sells the VoIP routers to the big boys and I have no idea
> why we can't get them. (New, not hacked)
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
>
We got OK to do it over MT equipment in unlicensed bands.
Their concern was that A) they didn't want it going over any sort of public
network (i.e. WiFi Hotspot) and B) encryption remained in-tact from the
headend to the STB.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Blake Covarrubias wrote:
> I've read
; That would be amazing. Never seen any device like this provide power,
> wonder why.
>
> On 11/16/09, Jayson Baker wrote:
> > What we *really* want, and would buy a *lot* of is an indoor router with
> PoE
> > OUTPUT (or passthru, whatever you want to call it).
> > i
gt; > reliably.
> >
> >
> > -
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From: "Jayson Baker"
> > Sent:
Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:19 PM, RickG wrote:
> Jayson,
>
> Can you elaborate on the contracts and the system you have in place to
> provide this?
>
> -RickG
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Jayson Baker >wrote:
>
> > Actually, you're completely wrong.
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
