How come the Windows video codecs don't buffer before playing? If
youtube videos stutter, I hear about it. Is there a video buffering
software you use and recommend? The algorithm to figure out
buffering would be trivial. I have speedbit installed but am less than pleased.
Mike
I wish it was that easy ... When I right click in youtube on the
video window (or is that what you meant?) I get a tan box with
Settings, and About Adobe Flash Player 10. Settings only sets
privacy settings. Do you have something else running? I am running Vista.
MIke
At 10:28 PM 10/15
what? She's one of my most vocal and
supportive customers and is almost 12 miles away.
Mike
At 08:44 AM 10/16/2009, Marlon wrote:
Is that a bigger or smaller antenna size than what you have now?
If you moved up by 10' and increased your signal levels, what 1000% or so,
I'd REALLY say
spectrum they use, or the problems it is causing existing
spectrum users. But, such are the perils of part 15 spectrum.
Mike
At 09:57 PM 10/16/2009, you wrote:
Well, our conglomerate of dealers isn't too ad to work with, but in our area
they are running right at 4 watts EIRP. I got them
is the ones I've seen posted seemed to be used and
overstock items offered to other list members. Most would attract at
least a portion of the list members. I've seen no bald faced pitches.
Mike
At 09:29 PM 10/17/2009, you wrote:
But your concern is a very valid one. I agree that For Sale should
as it crimps the connector in place. Maybe not a time
saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver. I've not miswired an
Ethernet plug since I started using this system.
Mike
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http
They DO sell shielded. Part PLT-100020-050
Look further down the list at: www.ezrj45.com
At 11:13 AM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
Yeah, those are awesome. I wish they had shielded connectors as well.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless
. I put the inventor of this crimp system in the same league
as the geek who came up with sticky notes.
Mike
At 07:27 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
I don't care how much they cost. One crimp, gone.
Phil
WISPA Wants
what: wonderpole 40' fiberglass push up pole
where: http://www.wonderpole.com/wp640_630.html
why:It is easy to take a telescoping pole to a site survey and
put a panel up in air for testing. I don't push mine out to 40'
often, and not for long, but regularly push it up 26' or so to do a
Rick:
Why did it solve the problem? Better side lobe attenuation? 'Splain Lucy.
Mike
At 08:42 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
I fixed a nasty multipath issue for one of my subs by using a yagi.
Here are some good sources for info:
http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1121691
...@wispa.org. He squared me away.
Mike
At 08:32 PM 10/18/2009, you wrote:
That is what I expected, but I don't see a forgot link.
Josh Luthman wrote:
Click login then forgot password.
On 10/18/09, Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net wrote:
I was going to suggest that. Wanted to look
steel one. That is a Rohn, right?
Mike
At 09:16 AM 10/19/2009, you wrote:
Can it go 40' unguyed? How hard it is to push it up? I've got a similar
30' that came from Radio Shack I think, but I can't get it to 30' unguyed.
But, it was a LOT less cost than this one.
-Original Message
/antenna/how_to_pick_the_right_antenna.htm
They are all different. But the worst ones to use, by far, are grids.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New install driving
shape, $2500 or so would be a fair price. A case of
Rustoleum cold galvanized and it will look like new.
So, if you want to brag (or take your knots) what did you pay?
Mike
At 08:24 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
What is a good price to give for a standard Rohn SSV tower, 100'
with sections 7N, 6N, 5N
; IF you could see microwaves. :-)
It looks like Mark is rapidly answering his own question.
Mike
At 10:30 AM 10/21/2009, you wrote:
Feed length is based on dish size; where does the parabola focus.
Nothing to do with frequency, everything reflects the same.
Size of the feed horn isn't always
VERY Useful! I am going to make a sign and go visit my local
landfill lady real soon.
Thanks for a great idea.
Mike
At 10:35 AM 10/21/2009, Robert West wrote:
Scottie,
I've had some minor success by talking to a local metal scrap yard. It's a
pretty good sized one, they put up a small sign
VERY Useful! I am going to make a sign and go visit my local
landfill lady real soon.
Thanks for a great idea.
Mike
At 10:35 AM 10/21/2009, Robert West wrote:
Scottie,
I've had some minor success by talking to a local metal scrap yard. It's a
pretty good sized one, they put up a small sign
sections not bent or damaged much might
bring more cash. They get really careful if they think they might make an
extra 50 cents.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:06 PM
Rockwell Collins, over in Cedar Rapids apparently finally got the
retro encambulator perfected. It works way better than Canopy, and
makes a laughing stock of WiFi.
How many should I buy?
Mike
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVVKEsPeLtIhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVVKEsPeLtI
69 is 800 MHz. Some of the talk I've seen
about enormous antennas in the white space is ludicrous.
Give me ANY part of it and the radios to use it and I
will. Propagation would be superior to anything we're using now.
Mike
At 07:46 PM 10/22/2009, you wrote:
What equipment are they using
is 7 inches long. A 6 element
log periodic for this range would be a little over a foot long.
Think along the lines of a 900 MHz antenna NOT a VHF TV antenna.
Mike
At 12:20 AM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
A VERY good guide to the whitespaces antenna sizes... are the millions of TV
antennas we've
.
For what it's worth, my personal record for distance on UHF is around
44,000 miles. REALLY!
Mike
At 12:20 PM 10/23/2009,Cameron wrote:
It is not ludacrous. Sure you can receive with a small yagi or panel
or heck, even a set of rabbit ears. It's the uplink that will be the
major issue. If you
for all frequencies. Maybe I am missing
something here. Perhaps a newly revised rules of physics?
Mike Hammett, I am not just trying to be contrary but am willing to
learn. UHF antennas are *MUCH* smaller than VHF antennas.
Mike
At 01:50 PM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
Mike,
You are correct. I'm
in their
yards? Ever lived next door to a ham? :-)
Friendly Regards,
Mike Gilchrist
At 02:08 PM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
Mike, you are certainly correct about the propagation characteristics.
This is both good and bad depending on how people plan to deploy. I
think that a lot of people are thinking
. If the goal is to allow such use in an
urban setting, the modulation technique would have to be able to
survive severe multipath. I'll have to think about the AP on the
ground and the client on the roof. Does that make sense? It would
certainly keep interference to the AP down.
Mike
At 02:22 PM 10
Thanks Jack. I am looking forward to your insight.
Mike Hammett was already so kind by referring to a wiki in a previous
post. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_spaces_(radio)
Mike
At 02:31 PM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
Mike,
I'm just finishing up work on WISPA's Spectrum for Broadband FCC
WISPA as a voice of the industry.
Thanks again and best regards,
Mike
At 04:41 PM 10/23/2009, you wrote:
Hi Mike,
We just finished our work on WISPA's Spectrum for Broadband filing
and it goes to the FCC today.
The following is a Commercial Message Those WISPs who enjoy using
this list but who
That made me smile. I have customers WAY out in the boonies I
have a hard time finding 2 or 3 years after the install.
Mike G
At 09:17 PM 10/25/2009, Mike Hammett wrote:
That's why I don't understand the aversion to sharing coverage, frequencies,
locations, even customer counts. Someone
That is a great attitude. Are you also a local politician? :-)
At 09:17 PM 10/25/2009, you wrote:
I work quite well with my competition. ;-) They scratch my back, I scratch
theirs.
WISPA Wants You! Join
Bureaucrats, with ALL of their agendas have a knack for obfuscating
the rules; it's self serving. I really like the idea of having 300
MHz with which to work. I hope WISPA comments help make that a
reality. Nice work.
Mike
At 08:38 PM 10/25/2009, Jack wrote:
Mike,
300 MHz is an estimate
mixing at uhf (or VHF) going on in the microwave radio
cards? I can't find specs that even speak of intermediate
frequencies. Gotchas? Hints? Comments?
Thanks!
Mike G
At 06:38 PM 10/26/2009, you wrote:
My 24 hours is expiring and I don't want to pull this unit down.
Mikrotik's site wants
don't have any cat5 running.
I appreciate the heads up on the climbing liability. We have an hour
to get the equipment ready, end crimped, and coax laid out before MY
climber arrives.
Regards,
Mike
At 08:34 AM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
Mike,
I have many Rohn 25G, 45 55 towers with HAM
is the medical examiner, another a prominent
attorney, so the good will this will generate is invaluable.
Thanks for your input!
Mike
At 09:37 AM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
In my experiences with 2 meter ham gear that is around Ethernet there is a
lot of interference from the Ethernet to the ham guys stuff
we are using has a built-in
cavity so the same coax and antenna can be used for transmit and
receive at the same time. There is a 6MHz separation between
transmit and receive frequencies.
Mike
At 12:29 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
Can you please explain 2 meter ham gear?
Josh Luthman
Office
the 5 and 10 MHz
channels of 802.11x operation :)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
Josh:
Amateur operators, besides talking world wide on HF frequencies, have
primary allocations in various slots in the spectrum. Besides 440
(UHF) there is 144 MHz (2 meter
.
The rest of the ham bands go way on up from there, including 5650 -
5925, and can use ANY frequency above 275 GHz.
Mike
At 01:05 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
Operates from 144 to 148 MHz. When you convert the frequency into
wavelength you find that one wavelength is approximately 2 meters.
jack
Yeah, and the new Deliberant radios will do 1/2 and 1/4 channels. I
have had good luck with a mix of them. The new ones with the Atheros
chip set seem to be more sensitive too.
mike
At 05:05 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
There is no magic number.
I have had MT based APs that with the customer
Cool! Gino, when I try to embed a pic I get EMACS instead of a
pic. I can attach one OK, but how do I embed one like you did?
Mike
At 06:21 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
Do you like this one?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original
. That piece is lashed
to the tower with stainless hose clamps. Should keep it from
whipping in the wind.
Mike
At 02:01 PM 10/27/2009, you wrote:
Now if only I had my radio anymore... oh, and I got off my butt and got a
license.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
. The upper dishes were
10' and the lower were 6'. I think the separation was 20'. BTW,
that was in 1999, and the link is still running.
Mike
At 08:20 AM 10/28/2009, you wrote:
I have a 23 mile link completely over water that I cannot get stable.
One end is approx 200ft AGL, 220ft ASL
Cameron:
Your prowess as an antenna designer is well known. Define a decent
splitter, and where one might find one. I think that solution would
be usable to a wide group on this list.
Mike
At 12:05 PM 10/29/2009, you wrote:
That is not really an omni. It is three sectors meant to be fed
Are the tops smooth glass? Just use a single edged razor held at a
shallow angle and some elbow grease.
Mike
At 03:51 PM 10/29/2009, you wrote:
I have a couple solar panels on a water tank. A few months ago the
water company painted the tank, and obviously didn't cover our panels
the whole
.
If both feeds are exactly the same, half the power would go to
each. Receive should be symmetrical, and only slightly attenuated
from a single antenna deployment. But, a point of failure, and may
be false economy.
Mike
At 02:13 PM 10/29/2009, you wrote:
There are several manufacturers like
done anything like this? Can't seem to find any on the net.
Am I mad? Mike
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
radio in a DIFFERENT enclosure.
Mike
At 09:07 PM 10/29/2009, you wrote:
I think the concept of combining functionality into single units and fault
tolerant redundancy are mutually exclusive.
I believe more people have had problems with more complicated installs than
more simple ones vs. failed
in
a row. Even threw me out of bed when that happened.
Yeah, it would be more expensive initially, but the peace of mind
might be worth it. It would still cost less than single radio
deployments cost me four years ago.
How about those dual band sectors. Anybody use any they would recommend?
Mike
Have you ever used diplexers at each end of a coax run? I am liking
that idea for a couple repeater sites. One LMR 900 would be half the
price of two. All the repeater sites have antennae at different frequencies.
Mike
At 09:30 PM 10/29/2009, Marlon wrote:
How high is the tower this is all
Chuck,
Have you written any scripts to automate those din relays based on
input from another application? Like if a radio or router becomes
unreachable, throw relays to take the bad one out of line and put the
backup one in? You've gotten me thinking ...
Mike
At 10:20 PM 10/29/2009, Chuck
another
company's content? I guess a metered paradigm is in my future. Is
that the 'NEW digital divide? The whole thing gives me heartburn.
Mike
At 01:12 PM 10/30/2009, you wrote:
I have one of these it does pandora too I love it
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x102
On Oct 30
Fine business using the diodes to drop the voltage. Many silicon
diodes will show a higher voltage drop as the current
increases. Depending on the circuit you were measuring, one with
higher current would show a larger drop.
That is an innovative use of diode voltage drop.
Mike
At 04:57 PM
to noise is about 47 on both ends.
Which dish would you wag first based on these readings?
Mike
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
That helps. No, it is not passing traffic. I'll generate some. Thanks. Mike
At 12:49 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very
inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
Mike wrote:
I just put up a new repeater site
10.6 miles. 5.8. I'm looking for a -65 dBm Rx on the link. It's
about 6 dB off. Fresnel zone is clear p2p. Each can see a flashing
beacon on top of the other. What I want to know which one to wag
first, or flip a coin?
Mike
At 12:46 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
What is the distance
5.8. Yes, -71 each way. Most 5.8 noise here is P2P, but is low.
Which one shall I wag Josh? I'm thinking the higher side, which is
actually easier to access. If I can tweak without a bucket truck I'll
save some expense.
Mike
At 12:51 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
Ignore noise floor/CCQ
10.6 miles. 23dBi antennas at both ends. Low power radio. 17 dB or
lower. I know one end is out; has to be. I just thought the numbers
might be obvious to someone.
Mike
At 01:29 PM 11/4/2009, you wrote:
-71 on a 10 Mile link is kind of high for say R52H/23dB antenna...What
type of radios
Now I will definitely file that one where I can find it. I have used
cringe Scotch locks in an attic before.
Mike
At 11:52 AM 11/5/2009, Scott wrote:
This cable stretcher is only $2.75.
https://www.visionaryweb.com/secure/techdoctor/product_info.php?products_id=323osCsid
Nick, Don't even stake a portion of your business on USB clients.
Too many issues make them unreliable in my opinion.
At 12:18 PM 11/5/2009, you wrote:
So it seems that more often then not I run into the person that is right on
the edge of our hotspot coverage. Normally they hear us pretty
Sheraton South Beach. Nice grounds and excellent food. Beautiful people.
At 05:36 PM 11/7/2009, you wrote:
Hi,
My flight plans just changed for the cruise trip, so I will need a hotel
for tomorrow (Sunday) night in Miami. Any suggestions?
Travis
Microserv
I have unlimited water; 380 foot well. Unlimited heat; lots of dead
trees. Working on the unlimited electricity thing. There is
unlimited natural gas on this list.
Mike
At 10:53 PM 11/7/2009, you wrote:
I have unlimited water in my home. $40 per month.
Travis
RickG wrote:
For $100
to
sell tiered service with escalating minimum guarantees, I had few takers.
Most of my customers are rural, unsophisticated, and bursty
users. The business customers pay more and expect that to be the
case. There seems to be a pain threshold of $45.00 for rural
residential users.
Mike
I have (hopefully) all the speedtest ips in the allow list. They run
speedtest real fast, but download video for an hour and it will
throttle you. Find those speedtest IPs and let em run. Perception
is everything. Give them the perception they get that all the time.
Mike
At 12:25 PM 11/8
the universal gym home with you. They
comprehend this ideology and play along. I usually get them to sign
a 2 year contract by telling them I can't raise their rates for 24 months.
MIke
At 02:24 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
I've always provided the CPE to the end user and retained ownership
which were borne in cash by
the company, I incur no debt and am profitable. I deduct REAL
capital expenditures (tools, APs, computers, routers ...)
Mike
At 03:52 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
What do you mean you dont keep CPE on the books?
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com
Oh heck no. My balance sheet looks awesome; no debt; positive cash flow.
Mike
At 03:56 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
Do you feel it has a negative affect on your companies value if you dont own
the CPE?
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
You don't have to pay
Huh? I do capitalize tower equipment; just NOT CPE.
Mike
At 08:43 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
Yeah, till you have to forklift entire towers at a time. Then what? No
more install fees, but you could easily have to replace thousands of dollars
in hardware within week or months.
marlon
not
looking to build and sell. I want a steady income so I can age and
enjoy gracefully. I have no illusions I will get rich at this;
merely comfortable.
Mike
At 10:26 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
Mike, Fortunately our balance sheet looks awesome too. Let me ask the
question a different way: Do you think
will
increase by then and that paying more taxes becomes a high class problem.
Mike
At 09:35 PM 11/8/2009, you wrote:
Let me ask you this though...
Would you rather
1) Buy $5,000 worth of Canopy equipment per month at 25 installs per
month (new $1,250 in revenue at $50/mth)
- Or -
2) Obtain
1) put it high enough the dog(s) can't reach
2) bury it with a piece of sheet metal over it so they can't chew
3) 45 ACP (not a head shot)
Mike
At 09:13 AM 11/9/2009, you wrote:
I've had several customers that have had their dog chew on the Cat5 going
from the house to the TV tower and some
Rick:
Maybe rural existence has its advantages; I've never been taxed by
the county on anything but towers. And I'm not asking any questions either!
Mike
At 09:58 PM 11/9/2009, you wrote:
Also note that many leases pass the property taxes on to leasee, so you may
not escape it that way either
development and keep me posted. I'd even be a beta
tester on a select repeater site.
Regards,
Mike
At 10:44 PM 11/12/2009, Butch wrote:
... The fact is, that a GOOD bandwidth manager will
allow traffic to flow as fast as possible. One thing to bear in mind,
with regard to my QOS system
idea?
Mike
At 11:58 PM 11/17/2009, you wrote:
Phone line is twisted pair and normally 2 pair. Transmit and receive. Can
easily do 100mbps. You could even get it to do gigabit with not much
effort. No PoE though, no pair for that. HOWEVER, the problems come from
the nasty connections everyone
Most Atheros radios I've seen can have an AP and a virtual AP. I
have one set up in my office. One SSID leads to WEP encryption and
different router rules. The other is WPA, virtual, and privileged;
for full network access. Some of our devices don't do wpa nicely.
Mike
At 04:12 PM 11/19
Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
Most Atheros radios I've seen can have an AP and a virtual AP. I
have one set up in my office. One SSID leads
Pull a service loop at the lowest point on the CAT5. Without cutting
the conductors, slice through the jacket. Does water come out?
At 09:08 PM 11/20/2009, you wrote:
I have a backhaul feed that completely flips out when it rains.But, only
when it rains heavy, and only for a short time.
Josh:
I thought that too. I have a handful of customers on a 5 MHz
sector. Winbox shows this:
Emacs!
Mike
At 07:32 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:
I believe when you half the channels the rates also get halved - from 54mbit
to 27mbit max (that is from 20mhz to 10mhz channels).
I also can't
LOL, I guess my little image didn't get embedded. Some connections
are 12, some 48, and the closest 54.
Mike
At 08:13 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:
It is very weird isn't it?
Vi is better the Emacs.
On 11/22/09, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
Josh:
I thought that too. I have a handful
Of Mike
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 10MHz, 5MHz - unstable for voice?
LOL, I guess my little image didn't get embedded. Some connections
are 12, some 48, and the closest 54.
Mike
At 08:13 PM 11/22/2009, you wrote:
It is very weird isn't
might have to play with the Mobile NS2's settings for it to play nicely.
OT: What is CCQ?
-Israel
Josh Luthman wrote:
It is very weird isn't it?
Vi is better the Emacs.
On 11/22/09, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
Josh:
I thought that too. I have a handful
a ham radio metaphor, its like a
500 Hz CW signal can make the path when a 3 kHz
SSB signal can't -- signal to noise; it can be your friend.
Mike
At 12:19 AM 11/23/2009, you wrote:
However, if the noise is outside of the 10mhz
channel size (say 5mhz on each side), the 10mhz
link will work
In a way, yes. There are some adaptive
modulation techniques that are smarter than
802.11g, MIMO being one. What breaking the
channel into separate sub carriers accomplishes
is being able to send coherence through selective fading and cross talk.
Mike
At 07:22 AM 11/23/2009, Greg wrote
. The transmitter isn't adapting per se.
Mike
At 08:12 AM 11/23/2009, I wrote:
In a way, yes. There are some adaptive
modulation techniques that are smarter than
802.11g, MIMO being one. What breaking the
channel into separate sub carriers accomplishes
is being able to send coherence through
, I hope they get it figured out for you guys soon. If you're
anything like me, all hairs are already gray.
Mike
At 01:54 AM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
Some kind of combination of failure between Charter and Qwest has left
tens of thousands of people in Nebraska without Internet and has
disrupted
Scott,
We are a little over 100 miles west of the Quad Cities, close to hwy
30, just east of central Iowa. Your thoughts?
Mike
At 08:00 AM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
How far away from Illinois are you?
-
Scott Piehn
- Original Message -
From
ducting.
I would be curious what you come up with.
Mike
At 09:22 PM 11/30/2009, you wrote:
Planning my first 20 mile PTP link. Path analysis shows clear. Customer is
building a 100' tower just for this therefore the equipment I choose must
work. I'm free to use whatever I want. Suggestions
I appreciate the gesture. Iowa does have a lot of options; just not
in my area which is very rural. Qwest has fiber to the home
northwest of me. I am trying to engineer another backhaul from a
point there back to my tower. The wheels of progress sometimes turn slowly.
Mike
At 08:27 AM 12
analysis are based mostly on use of
their wired facilities. DSL, phone service are primary, and their
wireless offerings, with phone and Dish, have been secondary.
Should I expect the same from Winstream?
Mike
AM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
My primary competition for the past few years has been Iowa
Telecom. They have been purchased by Windstream. I knew what to
expect from Iowa Telecom, but don't now.
Have any of you had experience with Windstream? Should I be bracing
for some real
Oh heck no! I'd NEVER live through it the second time!
At 12:52 PM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
I dunno about that, Butch. I had a lot more fun in my late teens\early
20s... before I came down with the WISP illness. Sometimes I wish I could
go back in time. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
Have you had any issues with putting 3 radio cards in the same
spectrum in the same box? I've thought about that but wondered if
there would be desense issues where one transmitting desensitizes
another one listening.
At 08:38 AM 12/2/2009, you wrote:
Yep, looks like you're hitting the wall.
better specs. Wouldn't having
multiple 411 cards in the same box possibly have desense issues too?
Mike
At 09:41 AM 12/2/2009, you wrote:
Forgot to add, if you're concerned with any RF collisions inside the box,
the other thing I talked about earlier, having just 3 411 cards in their own
box
nema box to try some of this, where should I look?
Mike
At 10:33 AM 12/2/2009, you wrote:
I have a somewhat large NEMA box (1'x2.5'x3') with 4x RB411AHs with an XR5
in each. At the bottom of the tower, I have a box with an RB493 and all the
PoE business.
Each RB411 is mounted with self adhesive
Is your logic to save tower space? Do you still run multiple
cat5? What sort of box/where do you get them?
I love the innovation I've gleaned from this list. Makes me feel
small sometimes.
Mike
At 10:45 AM 12/2/2009, you wrote:
The most I have done so far, is to put 7 cards in one box
, and an old friend who must be a facebook stalker
INSTANTLY added me as her friend.
Holy crap, what have I done?
Mike, add me, I can't seem to find you. Besides, you'll want to see
the pic of the woman who added me as her friend. :-)
Mike Gilchrist. I want to see those pics.
OK, maybe
on this. There is just too much cross talk. I put all
radios
in the same band in their own METAL enclosure nowadays. I try to keep
them
at least 3 or 6 feet apart too. Life is much much nicer.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List
Cool stuff. Hey Robert, I have a basic stamp programmer and a couple
modules. Look in your junk box and trade me something.
Mike
At 07:16 PM 12/5/2009, you wrote:
This is the sort of thing I was thinking of:
http://tuxgraphics.org/electronics/200904/embedded-webserver-equipment-control.shtml
a larger pair of
gloves with Thinsulate in them over them when you don't need the dexterity.
I don't mind the cold. Wind and wind blown snow are my bane.
Mike
At 01:07 AM 12/7/2009, you wrote:
It's cold. I spent all day and most of the night working on a tower and my
feet are frozen. Time for new
Don't use steel wool. You will never get all the steel back
out. Clean them with warm soapy water and let them dry well. The
black you are seeing is probably silver oxide on the silver
plating. Silver oxide conducts RF just fine. They can be really
black and still work just fine.
At
. Neither of them is hurt by the patina.
Mike
At 03:29 PM 12/7/2009, you wrote:
2009/12/7 Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com:
If it were me?
Toss em and start over.
Not worth the trouble. Once corrosion starts it's hard to stop it.
marlon
He could always solder new N connectors
changes than the nickle silver ones. Get em tight!
Mike
At 03:55 PM 12/7/2009, you wrote:
I never would have guessed silver though. Someone mentioned that earlier
too. At first it looked like rubber tape residue but it had me scratching
me head since boy never put any cables on them. Makes
like.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 5:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cleaning N Connectors
Bob:
The fingers are gold plated and won't corrode either. When
1 - 100 of 3607 matches
Mail list logo
