Matthew Cruickshank wrote:
Huh? So you're saying both servers don't return a Content-Type? What's
the url? (and in the meantime complain to the admins of the boxes)
The content-length of the first one seems a little small. 10677 bytes
is only about a second of audio.
also as a side note, when
Btw, this is something that I would definitely avoid having in my
javascript files:
function pasuser(form) { //password form
if (form.pass.value==support)
{location=referrals2.htm}
else {alert
(The password you entered is incorrect. Please try again. For more
information call
Helmut Granda wrote:
Here are the site tests that I am doing
Doesnt work on IE or FF:
IE- Fails Server 1
http://www.hamsterballstudios.com/extrafiles/vo/volaunch2.html
Ok... this site is producing vastly different to the headers you
previously posted. There's now - perhaps magically - a
Matthew,
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond and help. Your links
are great resource!
One thing is for sure that the server www.multimedia.net will play in IE
and FF because it has the mp3 headers correct, while
www.hamsterballstudios.com has the headers incorrectly.
So to
Helmut Granda wrote:
So
to recap.
1. headers in multimedia247.net are set up properly
2. headers in hamsterballstudios.com are not set up correctly
3. code does not validate
- solution
1. fix the headers in hamsterballstudios.com
2. fix HTML
So my fears that
Title: RE: clear:both vs br clear=all
ha! Cancel this, I just fixed it...
FYI
br class=clr /
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Mason
Sent: 24 February 2005 11:35
To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org'
Subject: clear:both vs br clear=all
In Firefox, this;
HTML
div class=clrnbsp;/div
Interesting, I thought I had replied to this. But no, it is no longer
an issue. I just changed my margins on 'div#header p' into padding and
now it is all good. Thanks for the help.
Rosemary Norwood wrote:
Is this still an issue?
Looking in my FF 1.0 it's nicely up there against the top (I
Sorry, I forgot to include the link: http://www.cgemery.com/new
-Alan Trick
Alan Trick wrote:
I've been working on redesigning a website and I have a bug where
there is a bit of space at the top of the body that won't go away.
I'm not sure it it's padding or margin or what, but I tried setting
Is this still an issue?
Looking in my FF 1.0 it's nicely up there against the top (I assume
you mean the nav links back - login - privacy - contact us.)
Rosemary Norwood
Blackwork Web Intelligence
**
The discussion list for
As I did some of my own poking around, I went ahead and increased the width of
the disc-list and found that I could then eliminate the short wrap that is
inherited from the menu list. So does that mean that I need to have a width
declaration for every other list style - I thought if I was using
Oops... WRONG LIST. PLease ignore this and the other message.
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:49:44 +, Jorge Laranjo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
please unsubscribe me from this list.
thank you
take care.
- --
Atentamente,
Jorge Laranjo
site
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Sorry, ended up being a cyclic argument, but you see what I mean...and
*that's* what Andy meant (if I may be so bold as to make an educated
guess)
That's exactly what I meannt.
Go for your life :-)
Andy Budd
http://www.message.uk.com/
Ian Fenn wrote:
Thanks for that, Douglas. Unfortunately my client has accessibility
guidelines that insist the pages are built in XHTML Strict.
So what do they believe the accessibility advantages of XHTML Strict
are? As far as I'm aware valid and semantically correct HTML is just as
accessible
Hi Andy,
So what do they believe the accessibility advantages of XHTML Strict
are? As far as I'm aware valid and semantically correct HTML is just as
accessible as XHTML strict. And I'm guessing they probably aren't
serving their pages up as XML so strictly speaking they are serving
their
Andy Budd wrote:
So what do they believe the accessibility advantages of XHTML Strict
are? As far as I'm aware valid and semantically correct HTML is just as
accessible as XHTML strict. And I'm guessing they probably aren't
serving their pages up as XML so strictly speaking they are serving
Geoff Deering wrote:
There are a number of advantages to using HTML/XHTML Strict.
[...]
If you use transitional, that is exactly what you are doing, and you may
need to do it, strict may not work for your design because of current lack
of support and other things, but you are using a DTD that is
Can I just offer an opinion here.
When thinking of semantics it sometimes helps to go back 20 years and use
pen and paper.
If you were writing a big list (numbering each item) in a small notepad you
would, on successive pages, keep the numbering going. So on the second page,
the first item may
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
I think what Andy meant (as I've got a feeling he's well in the know
when it comes to css and separation of content and presentation) is what
the advantages are if you can effectively write strict code while still
declaring a transitional doctype. Yes, transitional
Hey, I'm new here :-)
In response to Geoff's email,
XHTML is the web standard of the future. If we implement it now, we
are just helping move it along faster. A friend of mine recently
created a php script that makes your XHTML into HTML for browsers that
cannot support it. You can check it out
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:49:55 +1100, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain why you would use a transitional DTD where a Strict one is
valid and works just as well?
Depends on the client and how they'll be maintaining their site; I've
handed sites over to clients before who were
Geoff Deering wrote:
That is a misconception. There are differences to the way a rendering
parsing engine will work with the different doctypes.
Ok, let's narrow down the field to the core issue: what are the
rendering differences between XHTML1.0 Transitional and XTHML1.0 Strict?
Ok, now the
On 9 Feb 2005, at 00:49, Geoff Deering wrote:
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
There are *no* inherent benefits to tableless, css
driven layouts in XHTML strict versus tableless, css driven HTML
(strict
or transitional) or even XHTML transitional.
That is a misconception.
Provided the XHTML document has
Geoff Deering wrote:
That is my
point, not all these other arguments about where to or where not to use
transitional or strict.
However, that *was* the point of the original question. To recap:
something can't be done in strict which is not presentational, but
nevertheless has been dropped from
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:50:56 +1100, Geoff Deering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have a document that validates as doctype Strict, then why declare it
as transitional? For what reason are such decisions made? That is my
point, not all these other arguments about where to or where not to use
Ian,
Why not switch to XHTML Transitional for the page that you
want to use the start= attribute on?
I outline this technique on my website. You don't have to be
using PHP to do this, you can simply cut and paste the correct
DTD.
http://loadaveragezero.com/vnav/labs/PHP/DOCTYPE.php
Doug
Douglas wrote:
Why not switch to XHTML Transitional for the page that you
want to use the start= attribute on?
Thanks for that, Douglas. Unfortunately my client has accessibility
guidelines that insist the pages are built in XHTML Strict.
All the best,
--
Ian Fenn
Chopstix Media
But at least it looks like they were. It is better than that crowded
horrible page that they used to have.
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 17:55:56 +0100, Raffaella Biscuso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Timberlake Scrive:
I like it, but it leaves room to improve. They are a large company
and
Actually, it's kind of ironic that they would even consider trying to use
standards when those very standards are so poorly executed on their own
product(s). Maybe there's hope...I just won't hold my breath. I'm sure after
this experience, they'll add a few of their own new standards buried deep
I've never used a snapshop service, but it seems an un-necessary
expenditure. You can easily test all PC variations. I've got the latest
versions of Opera, Firefox (and Mozilla); all flavors of Netscape (4.x
- 7.0); and IE 4 - 6 on my PCs at home and work.
There is a handy tutorial for how to
BUT - for development purposes wrapping is far more readable. Same
way that code indenting is a nice thing to do but serves no practical
purpose.
Of course, if you're very concerned about page size (kb wise) the
wrapping, indenting etc are just pointless wastes of space.
Most of my pages are
Andreas, David, Boss, et al:
Thank you for taking the time to respond. Your comments have certainly helped.
Had forgotten about the invisible load associated with adding those popup menus
and the need for an alternate navigation system is JavaScript is turned off.
Cheers!
¤ devendra ¤
Hello, John,
What do you think? First of all, can this be done in CSS? Secondly, is
this even proper with (X)HTML documents?
Not with CSS, unless you have all periods or sentences surrounded by a
tag. And about being proper, I see it as a typography convention, not
anything X/HTML related.
Hello, all.
Multi-message comments follow:
David R:
AFAIK, the all the non-markup specific entities (ie: the ones that
aren't: quot;, amp;, lt;, gt;) have been depreciated, if not
removed, from XHTML2.0 since being based on XML means Unicode should
be used.
While the W3C says should not be
I was referring to wrapping text on the markup site:
Like so:
pHello, this is
wrapped, like so,
do you see?/p
rather than:
pHello, this is wrapped, like so, do you see?/p
In both cases, UAs will render the content exactly the same... I was
wondering if there were any advantages to the former... I
In both cases, UAs will render the content exactly the same... I was
wondering if there were any advantages to the former... I heard
something about some obscure UAs ignoring content beyond the 80th Column
or something
myth.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:23:58 -, Kornel Lesinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In both cases, UAs will render the content exactly the same... I was
wondering if there were any advantages to the former... I heard
something about some obscure UAs ignoring content beyond the 80th Column
or
Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote:
snip Unfortunately, I can't recommend any sites or books at this
time -- I don't have many beginner sites bookmarked, and my beginner
books are all quite old at this point! ...
One of the best sites I have seen is W3Schools, they have a lot of
tutorials and working
Christoph Herrmann wrote:
Well, many blogs are! I am just writing an article about blogs and how
they can be used to create search engine friendly content. Think about
it:
And yes, I have successfully built sites this way and they are at the
very top of Google rankings for their targeted
I was just at dreamweaver website. Templates. No doctype, tables,
imagemaps and javascript. God forbid. Randomly choosing four of them and
viewing source showed me quite enough. Lets go backwards??? Font face
font size the whole works of what we are trying to get rid of. Someone
new would be
Bruce wrote:
I was just at dreamweaver website. Templates. No doctype, tables,
imagemaps and javascript. God forbid. Randomly choosing four of them and
viewing source showed me quite enough. Lets go backwards??? Font face
font size the whole works of what we are trying to get rid of. Someone
I definitely like the new look of your page. No question.
I am not a big fan of those dropdowns, though. Why do I have to click on the
primary item to get the dropdown? It forces the user to make an additional
click that is not really necessary. The good old mouseOver would do the job
much
My apologies for the _very OT_ topic. I got my lists mixed up... :-P
If you happen to have any insight on this however, off-list replies are
welcome.
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello all,
Can
Title: Re: stylesheet switching in IE6
Ijust cracked it, IE was chocking on the lang=en statement inside div lang=en class=en (in the XHTML code) in combination with this statement div:lang(en) in the style sheet.
I remembered that IE doesn't suppport pseudo classes on anything but an anchor.
Erwin Heiser wrote:
Ijust cracked it, IE was chocking on the lang=en statement inside div
lang=en class=en (in the XHTML code) in combination with this
statement div:lang(en) in the style sheet.
I remembered that IE doesn't suppport pseudo classes on anything but an
anchor.
For what it's
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:36:26 +, Patrick H. Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erwin Heiser wrote:
Ijust cracked it, IE was chocking on the lang=en statement inside
div lang=en class=en (in the XHTML code) in combination with
this statement div:lang(en) in the style sheet.
I remembered that IE
I am on holiday !!
Back on the 10th of Jan.
Contact Adrienne Foley for urgent stuff.
__
This message contains information, which is confidential and may be subject to
legal privilege.
If
I've been using the TEN format as a navigation aid for screenreaders in
my Web Design Update Newsletter for over two and a half years now. All
user feedback has been positive.
Some comments from subscribers regarding what they like about the TEN
format:
- Attention to accessible-friendliness
Ignore my last message - I realised I'm putting a block level div in an
inline p Duh! :-)
But I don't know how to get around it . . . .
http://www.treyarnon.fsworld.co.uk/imagesintext.html
Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
Use span instead of div.
That seems to give a more pleasant outcome.
Regards,
Gary
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:10:35 -, designer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignore my last message - I realised I'm putting a block level div in an
inline p Duh! :-)
But I don't know how to get around it . . .
G'day
Ignore my last message - I realised I'm putting a block
level div in an inline p Duh! :-)
But I don't know how to get around it . . . .
Close the paragraph before you open the div and start a new paragraph after
the div.
Putting the image with alt and caption inline (with span as
I just downloaded and installed netscape 7.2 and everything looks fine. It
probably was just a 7.0 thing.
Ted Drake wrote:
***
I noticed some problems with Netscape 7 and Safari 1.2 and I wanted to know
if anyone had any ideas.
Here is the browsercam public page to look at the screen shots:
So, I've been sitting here blaming my legend for the page falling apart and I
think I need to apologize.
I'm sorry legend, I may have been wrong. Do you forgive me?
Well, that makes me feel better, but it doesn't solve my problem. I threw some
borders on my divs and elements and
Title: Message
I
have
Adobe
Creative Suite
Dreamweaver
Homesite
Flash
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
12 November 2004 21:34To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: digest for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi peoples
I'm desperate for
Title: Message
Hmm...wonderful non-sequitur...
Oh...I
like bread by the way.
Patrick
-Original Message-From: Laurie Keith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 12 November 2004
12:04To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] RE:
digest for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
have
Adobe
Taking a stab in the dark, I'd guess that all you did was change the
content type meta to it. Well...that's not the way to do it.
It may not be the way to do it but it's the way it's taught at the
article you reference:
Oldie but goldie on the subject:
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 20:28, Alan Milnes wrote:
So does anyone have a link to an article which can tell me how to
properly serve up application/xhtml+xml using PHP?
Jeroen Visser shared
http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mimetypes/ as a link
before... that tells you how. The
From: Alan Milnes
It may not be the way to do it but it's the way it's taught at the
article you reference:
Oldie but goldie on the subject:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html
Aeh...where exactly?
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster /
It may not be the way to do it but it's the way it's taught at the
article you reference:
Oldie but goldie on the subject:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html
Aeh...where exactly?
It's in the section Accommodating legacy browsers and the PHP code
is:-
?php
if (
Alan Milnes wrote:
So does anyone have a link to an article which can tell me how to
properly serve up application/xhtml+xml using PHP?
Jeroen Visser shared
http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mimetypes/ as a link
before... that tells you how. The datestamp on the message was Thu, 11
Alan Milnes wrote:
Why is the content-type not sent? What errors or warnings does PHP
display? What content-type _is_ sent? What problems does Firefox have?
Some possible reasons for this script not to work:
- headers are already sent out by PHP;
- one ore more conditions are too narrow or wide
Thanks to everyone for all the help, suggestions and links.
I've amended the code from
http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mimetypes/ to send IE
XHTML 1.0 and if anyone wants to borrow it then it can be found at:-
http://www.college.gameplan.org.uk/wsg/mimetype.txt
Alan
-
From: Alan Milnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:24 AM
Subject: [WSG] Re: It's all in the MIME
Thanks to everyone for all the help, suggestions and links.
I've amended the code from
http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mimetypes/ to send IE
XHTML 1.0
Many thanks for the help. Problem is now
solved.
The site's authorresponded greatly relieved
(as is the coder!):
But yes! You have identified the problem! It's the font size, which I
hadreduced to 12.
For your info, the author was using the
following:
Verdana? yesIE: 5.1.7OS:
9.2.2
I
Some references:
http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/navigation#menus
Laura
___
Laura L. Carlson
Information Technology Systems and Services
University of Minnesota Duluth
Duluth, MN, U.S.A. 55812-3009
http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/
Thanks all for your responses. I left off tackling the final navigation til
last because I knew it was going to be an issue that needs a lot of thought.
My current thinking, after reviewing the responses, is to break the
navigation down by each section. If I make the nav section an editable part
Monday, November 8, 2004, 10:10:04 PM, Ron wrote:
The main issue there will be trying to balance easy access to nested
information without frustrating the user with unusable navigation.
I suggest that you have a high-level menu for main (section
contents?) pages, and a fine-detail menu for
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
I would like to get comments on my site.
It looks fine in winXp ie and firefox, the code is all valid and
accessible (though it could use a
Hi Bennie,
Nice site. Good to see a change from three column layouts with a banner at
the top! :-)
However, looking at your markup, I see you've got a certain amount of
classitis and divitis! You have, e.g., got lots of li tags, all classed
as menu [ li class=menu]. Could you not incorporate
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
Yes -
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
Labels are an accessibility feature. The WSG has an example of an
accessible form at
is this a language declaration? html lang=en xml:lang=en
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
Yes -
and also not sure what the lables are for the form pages.
Labels are an accessibility feature. The WSG has an example of an
accessible form at
apologies to bother thee crew...
was just an extra float in the center column that was throwing it out.
have a great sunday night!
Benvlio
p.s. the silent is the master of the hasty
Ben Webster
Conversant Studios
Hi,
I'm having difficulties with that IE shift bug thing.
The one where the content moves when you hover over a link.
I've tried adding _height:100%; _line-height:100%; _width:100% To every element in the
div to no avail.
Example here: http://www.websemantics.co.uk/workshop/sessions/session2/
Thank you all, so very much!
I gess I'll have a long study night, it won't be as
easy as I first thought it would (gess it was kind of naif), but all this info
you shared is valuable.
I gess, if we can put standard code, to work
properly, in a cross platformand browser maner, including pda
I still keep getting these digest emails even though I unsubscribed. Please
take me off your list. Thank you.
Jim Trick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14, October, 2004 13:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: digest for [EMAIL
Hi,
just do this. Send an email from your subscribed account to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with set mode digest wsg (no quotes) as
the BODY (not subject) and it will be so. And you will just receive one
email every few days or so containing every mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still keep getting
hi Natalie,
just delete the height rule from the .floatleft div. that way the
divs will expand to contain the text.
in fact, Mozilla and Firefox are behaving exactly as the standards say
they should - it's IE that is getting it wrong by expanding the div
beyond your stated height.
On Fri, 15
ARGH;
http://pole.uwaterloo.ca/cpadev/engtest/bugs/callingcssthatisthere.html
http://pole.uwaterloo.ca/cpadev/engtest/bugs/callingcssthatisnotthere.html
- messed up
On 10/13/04 12:12 PM, J Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pole/cpadev/engtest/bugs/callingcssthatisthere.html - should
Thanks to Russ this is now fixed - a missing end tag - I should have
validated before posting.
Thanks
Lyn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Ian Hickson is _not_ saying XHTML is harmful, he is saying that
serving up XHTML with the wrong MIME type is bad.
I've read the article and what I don't understand is that if it is so
bad why is it acceptable to the Validator?
I write my pages in XHTML with a XHTML 1.1 doctype and send the
From:Of Alan Milnes
Ian Hickson is _not_ saying XHTML is harmful, he is saying that
serving up XHTML with the wrong MIME type is bad.
I've read the article and what I don't understand is that if it is so
bad why is it acceptable to the Validator?
I write my pages in XHTML with a XHTML
Title: RE: [WSG] OL or UL? It´s rigth?
I would discourage anyone from keeping with old mark-up habits where tags are left open. It is a legacy from browsers that ignored such semantics. Don't count on a browsers 'interpretation' of the DOM to get it right, feed the browser good code and it
Try putting them in a dl
This isn't semantic, but could work.
dtABN 72797798055 /dt
dda href=http://validator.w3c.org/check/referer;XHTML/a/dd
dda href=http://validator.w3c.org/check/referer;XHTML/a/dd
dda href=http://validator.w3c.org/check/referer;XHTML/a/dd
dda
Try using a dl. It wouldn't be semantic, the objects are not that related, but it
would offer you the style flexibility
dl
dtABN 72797798055/dt
dda href=http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer;CSS/a/dd
dda href=/accessibility/Accessibility/a/dd
/dl
dl {width:100%;}
dt {display:inline;
Thank you everybody.
Paul, Torrence, Nick and others .
I understood the semantic order.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Novitski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:54 PM
Subject: Re:_[WSG]_OL_or_UL? _It´s_rigth?
At 05:19 PM 10/4/2004, Parker
.com,.net,.org domains from AUD$20/Year
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Saturday, 18 September 2004 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: Free Editors
And speaking of Macromedia itself how accessible
AUD$20/Year
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Amit Karmakar
Sent: Saturday, 18 September 2004 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: Free Editors
And speaking of Macromedia itself how accessible is
http
Thank you Steven,
I agreed with what Steven said, I got some weird replies
like http://validator.w3.org/ could be a good start, and why its table
based layout, and so on
However, in general the reaction was more than great, but I have few words
Actually I had a list of url that must visit
It works!
Thank you so mutch!
Isabel Santos
- Original Message -
From: Irapuan Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 12:28 PM
Subject: [WSG] Re: broken navigation bar in Opera
At 06:26 9/9/2004 +0100, Isabel Santos wrote:
I'm
Thanks
Hans. I've tried that, it didn't work unfortunately.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hans
NilssonSent: Friday, 10 September 2004 12:06 a.m.To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] Re: delayed rendering of
containing div's
: Friday, 10 September 2004 12:06 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Re: delayed rendering of containing div's background
colour
Hey Richard!
Try and remove the background-color:transparent; from the float's..
the div's default background is transparent anyways...
_
Hans
Well first I'm a goose cos I never turned sessions back on (so the test was
flawed but then I was tired so it evened out I guess hehe).
re: http://www.blog.lindenlangdon.com
a) is proven that the change from relative to absolute url did nothing to
cure the problem - even though at one point
James Ellis wrote:
There is a setting in your php.ini file to turn off auto propagation of
your session id's via URLs (enable_trans_sid I believe). This is good
for validation (if you are having amp; problems in URLs) and very good
for security.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but: without trans_sid,
east wrote:
There is an issue with session generation through a web form and
validation. Automatically creating a session that is to be passed
through a POST creates a hidden input field directly after the first
form tag. Since in XHTML, a form requires that a block level
element (like
There is an issue with session generation through a web form and validation.
Automatically creating a session that is to be passed through a POST creates
a hidden input field directly after the first form tag. Since in XHTML, a
form requires that a block level element (like fieldset) enclose
Hi All,
I've just bought the Domain XhtmlandCss.co.uk and wanted to offer
email forwarders to anyone intrested in one?
I know its not what i should really use the list for but i just
wanted to offer it out to y'all
Just email me what you would like and where you would like it
forwarding
Please reply to Mark directly offlist as this is offtopic
Thanks
Russ
Hi All,
I've just bought the Domain XhtmlandCss.co.uk and wanted to offer
email forwarders to anyone intrested in one?
I know its not what i should really use the list for but i just
wanted to offer it out to y'all
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 23:44, James Ellis wrote:
What I've done is probably not done often but it is worth considering.
Firefox ships with its minimum font size turned off.
I also use the very same setting.
It can be a common adjustment for people who use XFree86 or X.org under
unix ( and
I am on holiday between the 30th July and the 14th August. I will reply to your e-mail
as soon as possible on my return the following day.
Thank you for your understanding.
Jay Hills - Ikonik.net
(This is an automated response. Please do not reply to this e-mail as it will simply
send
Title: RE: [WSG] RE: Image replacement techniques for linked elements
James wrote:
I have my minimum font-size set to 12px, so
websites can't set text I can't read (or see for that
matter) - like 6px :D. I think this is rendering your (ed: smh.com.au) plain text headers
to be 12px
websites can't set text I can't read (or see for that
matter) - like 6px :D. I think this is rendering your (ed: smh.com.au) plain
text headers
to be 12px - and they are appearing over the image headers on the
smh.com.au home page ... making both types of headers unreadable.
GOLD medal to
901 - 1000 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
