Re: [WSG] Help with navigation

On 17 Aug 2005, at 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't see the currenttopic i.e. introduction being highlighted.. remove :link or adding :link:visited from the following declaration: #navCircle a.currenttopic:link becuause when it is the current page it becomes a visited page. kind re

RE: [WSG] Help with navigation

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I can't see the currenttopic i.e. introduction being highlighted.. > Ahhh, Now I see what you mean. You're missing the class="currenttopic" from the item you want highlighted as the current position. Your example page has: Introduction Your real page has: Introd

RE: [WSG] Help with navigation

; cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with navigation

RE: [WSG] Help with navigation

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > The subnav in my site: > http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/background/introduction.html > > should look like this: > http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/tog/navtest.html. > > but I cannot get it to work. Helen, It is working nicely for me in IE6/Win and FF1.06/Win. Wh

Re: [WSG] help with colour switcher

It's on-topic as a js question. No guarantees but I think you need to link to both stylesheets in the document head and give them the titles you use in your javascript. And finally turn off the alternate stylesheet. so the code should look something like: title="ifsmain" /> title="ifsmain-re

Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:14:13 -0700, tee wrote: > Forgive me Russ, while I was writing this email, your THREAD CLOSED > came in but I have an urge to finish my message. > Hello Tee, Thank you for your heart-felt message to the group. I'm so glad you squeezed it in. It reflects my sentiments, too.

Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED

a damn. tee > From: russ - maxdesign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:06:18 +1000 > To: Web Standards Group > Subject: Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED > >> Maybe enough said on this > > THREAD CLOSED >

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

Please don't forget, while forking, to build a third mediocres/average list, for those who squint at being a guru and tend to forget the years they were soo newbie. or, alternatively: Raise the level of the input in this list by more quality postings and answers. The quality of the answer

Re: [WSG] help or web - THREAD CLOSED

> Maybe enough said on this THREAD CLOSED There has been a lot of good input here, so thanks for bringing it up and for the following discussion... I think we can wrap it up now. A few points to recap: 1. At this stage we will not be going to two or more lists. 2. Please use a subject line t

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

Joshua Street wrote: There's a minor problem with this, though I agree with your core argument. "Newbie" posts requesting site reviews can't very easily bear a "descriptive" subject line when all they want is advice on semantics/markup and best practises. There isn't a core "problem" they want

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:02 +1000, Jason Foss wrote: > But I don't even open "Help Needed" type subject > lines. A descriptive subject line is all that's needed; you can > quickly decide if you want to read or get involved in the thread. There's a minor problem with this, though I agree with your

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

> But I don't even open "Help Needed" type subject > lines. And I never read HTML/RTF email either. Text is too small. Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

On 7/11/05 4:51 PM "Lea de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I think the flip side is that a) newbies need to see the 'advanced' > stuff to learn by osmosis and b) its really good for gurus to see the > newbie questions (and maybe occasionally answer them? Hint, hint > people ;)) to kee

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

Jason Foss wrote: If I can chip in too - I don't have a problem with newbie posts, nor more advanced posts. But I don't even open "Help Needed" type subject lines. A descriptive subject line is all that's needed; you can quickly decide if you want to read or get involved in the thread. My 2c, a

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

> It's a huge "Help" when the Subject line clearly defines the topic, that > way you can quickly identify threads where you may want to participate. > It also helps when browsing archives. Russ has covered this in the > intro, and most lists do, but people still persist with "Help Needed" > and eq

RE: [WSG] help or web standards group?

I totally concur with Lea (which happens with amazing regularity). We have discussed this matter in the past (along with creating online fora to move some of the newbie stuff off the list) but the general consensus was that this was and still is the best way to do it to cover all levels. If you'd

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

Lea de Groot wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:22 +1000, Richard Czeiger wrote: Perhaps there should be two lists - one for discussing standards/accessibility/best practice and one for "how do I fix my float/site check please". Having multiple lists also starts lots of flame threads on

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:26:22 +1000, Richard Czeiger wrote: > Perhaps there should be two lists - one for discussing > standards/accessibility/best practice and one for "how do I fix my > float/site check please". I like the concept, but my experience of multiple lists for the one group is that

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

grown significantly (thanks to the fine efforts of the moderators and members themselves). Perhaps it's time to evolve the list? Just a thought :o) Richard - Original Message - From: "Lea de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:07 AM Su

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:30:24 +0100, Mike Whitehurst wrote: > is this mailing list for anything other than helping novice designers > with their hacks? This is definitely a mailing list for discussing all aspects of web standards. Any technical list is going to have a large proportion of 'newbie'

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

Mike Whitehurst wrote: is this mailing list for anything other than helping novice designers with their hacks? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a pretty much catch-all for web/html/php/sql/asp/apache.javascript/flash help. sign up. http://www.evolt.org ***

Re: [WSG] Help Me Switch From Tables to CSS Divs

See if this is what you are looking for http://www.neuroticweb.com/recursos/2-columns-layout/ On 5/31/05, Olajide Olaolorun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know so many people have asked for this and at one point i left the emails > on the topic in my inbox but then i deleted them. I need to know

Re: [WSG] Help Me Switch From Tables to CSS Divs

Hi, deconstruct and redo: http://www.456bereastreet.com/lab/developing_with_web_standards/ csslayout/2-col/ G/L C On May 31, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Olajide Olaolorun wrote: I know so many people have asked for this and at one point i left the emails on the topic in my inbox but then i dele

Re: [WSG] help, please!!

Rachel Campbell schrieb: The problem is that the header doesn't always display at all on some pages, such as http://www.ely.anglican.org/parishes/camgsm/new_site/activities/music/index.html. There isn't a problem if you set IE's options to refresh on every visit to the page, but that's not goin

Re: [WSG] help, please!!

Rachel Campbell wrote: I've been developing a site based on the Ruthsarian layouts and it's working ok except in IE 6.0, where there's a problem which is leaving me baffled, so I'm hoping that someone will be able to help. ... There isn't a problem if you set IE's options to refresh on every visi

RE: [WSG] help, please!!

Hi, Rachel I've took a look at all available pages with IE 6.0.2800 on a windows 2000 PC and the background image displays ok. cheers! Angela -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rachel Campbell Envoyé : lundi 2

RE: [WSG] help, please!!

> -Original Message- > From: Rachel Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 25 April 2005 7:50 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: [WSG] help, please!! > > Hello all, > > I've been developing a site based on the Ruthsarian layouts and it's > working ok except in IE

Re: [WSG] help with css round corners.

and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead I know I'm not answering directly to your problem, but take a look at ALA: Mountaintop Corners ALA: CSS Design: Creating Custom Corners & Borders

Re: [WSG] help with css round corners.

Hi Tee, I saw the imageless example to, but it dosn't work in ie5 mac. Even though some people don't develop for this browser anymore i still use it somethimes. Also the roundbox im working on has a drop shadow on either side. thank you -Kevin > Hi Kevin, I found this nifty corners the other d

Re: [WSG] help with css round corners.

> > Hi everyone, > > I got this cool roundbox code from http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/4corners > and am trying to adapt it for use in a more complex wrapper with a masthead, > body and footer...But im havin a proble with one of the side drop shadows. > > > check out the page at > > > http://m

Re: [WSG] help with IE 3-pixel bug

I can't see what you mean. But what I do is, give the container a height of 1%. eg: div { height: 1% } and that DIV will no longer be effected. I cant tell if thats the problem though. Gallagher, Robin wrote: Hi As you can see on the test page I've put up here: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/fin

Re: [WSG] help with IE 3-pixel bug

Gallagher, Robin wrote: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/test.html The background image in the floated right column is being affected by the IE 3-pixel bug. I would go for the simplest solution: #rightColumn {_width:202px;_margin-left: -2px;} ...that'll fix IE6. Then I would try a proper d

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

Thanks Bert > In quirks mode, that means the footer is only a total of 698px > wide (with the padding subtracted to get inside width). > > In standards mode (as with Firefox and Opera), left and right > padding is added to that figure, for a total width of 728px. I have removed the left and ri

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

Hi Bert Thanks for your suggestion. > I tested that by removing all the floats, positioning and > display:inline (with the web developer toolbar in Firefox) and it > made no visible difference to the layout. I have included these elements for a couple of other pages, namely:

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

Ah, OK, it's not "perfectly" centered. I didn't notice at first. You have put MSIE into quirks mode by adding the xml prolog at the top of the source. MSIE thus uses the old box model, making the paragraphs narrower. Since you're floating them to the left, there's extra space on the right.

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

Hi David > It's centered in XP_SP2 IE6.0. Can you please confirm that the image in the footer is also centered. I have XP_SP2 IE6.0 and it does not appear centered to me. The image sits too far to the left by a considerable margin. Does anyone else have this problem? Thanks Sarah -- XERT Com

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

G'day I would very much appreciate any help unraveling why IE6 does *not* center my footer (have checked on other browsers and all appears OK). The page is validated for XHTML and CSS. Link: It's centered for me in IE6 on Windows 2000 Pr

Re: [WSG] Help centering footer IE6

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:00:30 +1100, Sarah Peeke (XERT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks I would very much appreciate any help unraveling why IE6 does *not* center my footer . Sarah It's centered in XP_SP2 IE6.0. David -- de gustibus non est disputandum http://www.dla

Re: [WSG] Help on bug

On Sat February 12 2005 12:53, ::dotcompals:: wrote: > Well my dear boy. In order to fix this "bug" you will need to upload the image to the Geocities server. In your account directory and change the src part of the image so that it points to the uploaded file. http://127.0.0.1 means that th

Re: [WSG] help with mystery IE padding

Ted Drake schrieb: ... http://tdrake.net/cruise/index.html The "space" is the inherited line-height:1.2em from body. #header h1{line-height: normal} or 1em should fix that. Ingo ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://

Re: [WSG] Help on file extensions used

Hi, I think the only advantages of these extensions are dis-advantages. The must-read on this topic is from Tim Berners-Lee "Cool URIs don't change": http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.html If you must use any extension at all - please consider something that anyone finds meaningful. The str

Re: [WSG] Help on file extensions used

dotcompals wrote: Dear friends, Can any one help me with the extension used these days in some we pages. For example .gne (flickr.com) .pyra & .do (blogger.com). How can these extensions be created & what are its advantages? regards Its a server side thing. There are no advantages for th

RE: [WSG] Help - newbie text editors

: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie text editors > BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You name > it, it's got it. I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allo

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie text editors

> BB does XHTML, PHP, CSS etc.. built in FTP, HTML Tidy, FTP etc... You name > it, it's got it. I use one called Editpad Pro. It has downloadable syntax for a number of different languages, a dictionary, tabs which allow you to work on multiple items at once, a "project" feature that allows to sa

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Even Dreamweaver's code editing mode does this (context-sensitive syntax highlighting). There's been a good deal of derogatory commentary about Dreamweaver recently, but as a web IDE I think it's fantastic. Where people get into trouble is by relying solely on WYSIWYG mode. I rarely use WYSIWYG mod

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Sorry going to have to stop you there again... Alan Trick wrote: 1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice things like the built in HTML/CSS Validator. I dont get what that means...??? Maybe you mean its redundant? Maybe so, but its a feature never the less... 2) Besides syntax highlighting, i

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Actually that's nothing new. Many of the better editors will do that. The reasons I switched were 1) I was using PHP and so many of the nice things like the built in HTML/CSS Validator. 2) Besides syntax highlighting, it doesn't really support PHP (as in being able to parse it on the fly) 3)

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

No Problemo Jason! The code validator is odd, when you click on a HTML element in the source, it will show up in the status bar if its valid etc as well. I havn't really used the validators much, but i know they are there because before I wrote up teh little snippet, i was looking through the se

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

I haven't even heard of TSW coder before - but it looks pretty good. The built-in code validators look really handy - especially for bug-hunting. Thanks for the link! On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:35:31 +1100, Chris Stratford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glad to help! > > It honestly is the best ever

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Glad to help! It honestly is the best ever coder I have used. It is true that for Server Side Scripting - it isn't as helpful as it is for HTML. But is is really advanced in that, when you have a document - for example a PHP document, like below: css css css css css css css css css css css c

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for t

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Chris Stratford wrote: Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan, ... I LOVE TSW WebCoder. Built in FTP is Excellent! Built in Project Manager - with Status reports, To Do Lists, Full Project Upload Built in Server Mapping. Preview in IE and Mozilla - only for HTML coding, or if your server mapping... HTML Tid

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:41:40 +1000, Lea de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :), > I'd suggest you just start validating your pages. > Figuring out those fixes will teach you a lot, and from there you can > move on to Accessibilit

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

On 1/19/05 3:55 PM, "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then > perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a > good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without > being limited by s

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

I have always recommended not using an editor, learn it manually, then perhaps use one for shortcuts. Reliance on html editors and such isn't a good idea. That will go a long way toward learning on your own, without being limited by some software. Notetab or notepad is fine. Bruce Prochnau www

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for t

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for ti

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Wow,wow,wow slow down Alan, ... Alan Trick wrote: 1) TSW Webcoder: Not bad for newbies. It requires regristration to get rid of the popup things which is anoying. It is basically for HTML/CSS coding only. It has no support for server-side scripting like PHP or ASP besides serverside scriptin

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

True, provided your editor isn't WYSIWYG. Brian Cummiskey wrote: Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web st

RE: [WSG] Help - newbie

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Cummiskey Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:12 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Help - newbie Paul wrote: > I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to > realize > how ina

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul wrote: > is there a better editor I can use for web > standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for tips on > accessibility and standards compliance. Rather than changing editors, or at least, rather than going to DW! :), I'd suggest you

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Paul wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) and where should I start for ti

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

Hi, Here's a bit of what I've learned jumping from editor to editor. 1) Don't pay for and editor, unless your filthy rich or can freeload one off a company you work for. There are free alternatives that are at least as good as the one's you pay for. 2) WYSIWYG (point and click) is pure evil. I

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

standards ( like Dreamweaver MX ? ) Eh, I won't suggest it to beginner - skilled coder knows all the gotchas, but beginner may just stuck with the WYSIWYG and do it badly. Everebody in our workshop works with PSPad on almost everything. If you want to try WYSIWYG I'd suggest trying NVU... and whe

Re: [WSG] Help - newbie

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:05:03 -0330, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been writing html code for awhile now and and starting to realize how inaccessible and non-web compliant my pages are. I have always hand written code in Edit Plus 2, is there a better editor I can use for web standards ( li

Re: [WSG] Help with border

Thanks for the suggestion! :) On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:29:35 +1100, Jixor - Stephen I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jixor - Stephen I wrote: > > > Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The > >> prototype's URL is h

Re: [WSG] Help with border

Jixor - Stephen I wrote: Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote: Hello, I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo. My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has a border that doesn't stretch all the way

Re: [WSG] Help with border

Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan wrote: Hello, I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo. My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has a border that doesn't stretch all the way down to the length of the

Re: [WSG] Help with border

On 1/13/05 11:03 PM "Regnard Kreisler C. Raquedan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I have a little problem with a border with a site I'm doing. The > prototype's URL is http://www.raquedan.com/quickinfo. > > My 3-column lay-out has a bit of a snag. The left-most sub-column has > a border tha

Re: [WSG] Help with centering - jumps horizontally depending on presence of vertical scrollbar

Hi Mani, Try using mozscroll in your CSS: #mozscroll { position: absolute; top: 0px; bottom: -1px; visibility: hidden } then, in your code:   (I usually put mine at the bottom of the page). HTH Bob McClelland, Cornwall (U.K.) www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk - Original Messa

Re: [WSG] Help with centering - jumps horizontally depending on presence of vertical scrollbar

I use this code: html { min-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 1px; } It forces the vertical scrollbar on all pages. /Anders Mani Sheriar skrev: Hi All, I’m working on a project which can be seen here: http://www.manisheriar.com/qualitymine The page is centered using a wrapping around a "wrapper" div th

Re: [WSG] Help, why doesn't it work...

Because they are floated objects - their heights are not being recognised by their parent container, so it does not extend below them. You need to clear after them so that their container will wrap around them. More here: http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/floatsample.htm Russ > Please he

Re: [WSG] Help with a layout

Matt wrote: 1. If I add content to the left or right columns, the footer doesn't push down, and the content overlaps - the layout breaks. I would like for all 3 columns to be the same height, no matter which one has more or less content. All you need is to add "clear: both;" to #Footer. That is nee

Re: [WSG] help with CSS

On 1 Dec 2004, at 11:39 AM, Kym Parry wrote: Hi,   I am a new member to WSG and am hoping someone can help me with a problem I'm having. I'm only new to web design and CSS, and am learning as I go along.   I'm trying to create a site but it is displaying differently in Firefox and IE and I'm not

RE: [WSG] help with CSS

27; where applicable. Hope this helps. Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] help with CSS Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 11:09:46 +1030 >Hi, > >I am a new member to WSG and am hoping someone can help me with a >problem I'm having. I

Re: [WSG] help with CSS

Sounds like double margin bug: http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html > In Firefox, the left nav displays correctly, but in IE, the nav is moved > further to the right than it is supposed to be, so I've had to make the image > narrower than it should be to fit into the r

Re: [WSG] Help with a layout

Sorry, Here is the screen shot of IE Mac: http://220.233.11.63/Misc/dev/Mac-IE-screenshot.gif You can view all of the files here: http://220.233.11.63/Misc/dev/ Cheers, Matt On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:05:49 +1100, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I am new to XHTML/CSS, an

Re: [WSG] Help with suggestions

I visited your site. I understand it is a work in progress. There are too many comments I could make. I limited myself to those that need most attention first: 1. Why is there a doorway or front page? Such pages make me want to leave - not enter. It is downright unfriendly to expect me to waste my

RE: [WSG] Help With a weird link style

Hi Genau Jr, The first step when asking for help is always to get the page code valid first. See http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://novo.meucarronovo.com.br/ Most of your problems seem to stem from unescaped ampersands (&) in links (I haven't looked too far down as there are 153 errors).

Re: [WSG] Help With a weird link style

sorry. The correct link is http://novo.meucarronovo.com.br without www Kim Kruse wrote: First of all... you have I don't know how many instances of the same _javascript_s all over the place. You don't have a doctype. You have 2 start tags for style. You have your bodytag before the closing

Re: [WSG] Help With a weird link style

First of all... you have I don't know how many instances of the same javascripts all over the place. You don't have a doctype. You have 2 start tags for style. You have your bodytag before the closing headtag. I suggest you fix that first. Kim Genau Junior wrote: Hello All, Im finishing a websit

Re: [WSG] Help With IE Jog Bug...

al Message - From: "Chris Stratford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:00 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] Help With IE Jog Bug... Hey Bryan, Sorry but that didn't help?? I added position: relavite; and line-height: 100% to both the #

Re: [WSG] Help With IE Jog Bug...

Hey Bryan, Sorry but that didn't help?? I added position: relavite; and line-height: 100% to both the #content, and to the table... Neither worked on its own, or both together... :( Any other advice?? Bryan Davis wrote: Chris The usual way to bypass these kind of bugs is either declare "position

Re: [WSG] Help With IE Jog Bug...

Chris The usual way to bypass these kind of bugs is either declare "position:relative;" or a "line-height" for the containing div. That tends to kick IE into line. Hope that helps, Bryan - Original Message - From: "Chris Stratford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: [WSG] help with z-index?

Thanks for the help, folks. I noticed, however, that when I do that, I lose the line on top of the buttons, and I can't figure out how to keep that *and* but a background in. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net "content without clutter" on 11/18/2004

Re: [WSG] help with z-index?

ul#tabmenu { background: #E6; } should fix things up for you. Or you can add that background declaration to your current #tabmenu specs. -Bryan ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail

Re: [WSG] help with z-index?

sorry, I didnt visit your page before writing. To hide the text, you will need to give the container that holds your tabs a background colour - right now if is transparent. On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:04:14 +1100, Natalie Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You also need to make sure you apply a post

Re: [WSG] help with z-index?

john wrote: Now, I'm having a bit of a "brain fizzle" and I can't figure out how to prevent the text from being seen inbetween the buttons when I scroll. Once the text reaches the bottom of the buttons, I want it to disappear...but for the life of me, I can't figure out. Perhaps I've been working

Re: [WSG] help with z-index?

You also need to make sure you apply a postion: to the parent. eg: position:relative; z-index:0; On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:25:17 +, john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! Firstly, I want to thank everybody who has helped me so far, > including all the wonderful feedback I had once I asked fo

Re: [WSG] Help with position: fixed;

hi again Peter, I made it that way http://shevtsov.fanstvo.com/tests/fixed-header2.html looks cool, glad it helped! BTW, how does it look in MSIE? umm, it technically works, but the scrollbar covers the whole side of the page instead of only the #main div. the fusion of the #toc div and the heade

Re: [WSG] Help with position: fixed;

Thanks Thorsten I made it that way http://shevtsov.fanstvo.com/tests/fixed-header2.html BTW, how does it look in MSIE? I'm using Firefox 1.0PR on Linux and the page works okay (a bit buggy in Konquerer)... It isn't very necessary this page works perfect in MSIE, because I'm developing the interna

Re: [WSG] Help with position: fixed;

hi Peter, I have a page with fixed header and a set of internal links (anchor identifiers). The problem is in that when I follow the link the heading "hides" under the fixed header. my idea would be to put the #main div right below the fixed header (using "margin-top" instead of "padding-top") a

RE: [WSG] Help with position: fixed;

That's what should be happening. The browser is putting the section at the top of the page as the fixed header and table of content aren't influencing the positioning of #main. A quick and dirty solution is to have this #one, #two, #three {padding-top:100px;} instead of padding the top of #mai

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .edu.au> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE:

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

>In a page where there is only one form and one semantically linked set of form controls is a fieldset necessary/desirable? I think while desirable it is not necessary, unless you have a radio button or checkbox group. But why not use the fieldset element to structure the form instead of putting

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

Yes, my use of the word legend should have read label. D'oh! P > > However in relation to legend, a whole bunch of labels and > inputs can be > presented within one legend. > > Roger > > > I notice that some people nest the input within the legend > whereas I don't:

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

Sent by: Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:20:54 +1000, Peter Firminger wrote: > Does it make any difference? The ID ties them together anyway so I think > not. As I understand it, these are the 2 alternate, valid, ways of putting a label on a field. Note that if you wrap the label around the input, you don't need t

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Firminger Sent: Friday, 29 October 2004 10:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li I notice that some people nest the input within the legend whereas I don't: Example: Name: or mine: Name: Does it mak

RE: [WSG] Help with fieldset in a li

ility can be found at http://www.usability.com.au/resources/forms.cfm Hope this is helpful Roger -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Susan R. Grossman Sent: Friday, 29 October 2004 1:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with fieldset

<    1   2   3   4   >