On 14 Jan 2011, at 18:40, Richard R. Hill wrote:
Yet, the W3C validation tolls never flag a missing default CSS language
declaration as an issue when validation XHTML.
The W3C Validation Service is a generic SGML/XML validator, not an HTML
conformance checker. It doesn't check for things
Update:
IE6 needs vertical-align:text-top in order for the image aligns with text
whereas IE7 requires extra vertical-align:top declares in the LI. IE8 doesn't
need any of these so I guess IE9 will be the same which I don't have a way to
test as the beta version wiped out my IE8 so I can't
Tee,
Just a quick test I came up with this:
li {
padding-bottom: 5px;
clear: both;
list-style-type: disc;
padding-left: 75px;
margin-bottom: 50px;
position: relative;
}
li img {
position: absolute;
top: 0; left: 0;
Tim,
Thanks! This won't work very well though because not all LIs have image and I
can't foresee which one will not have.
Your example gave me an idea to remove the float, and it seems to be working.
See the test page again!
vertical-align:top makes the image aligns with the text.
tee
On
I think this page can help you:
http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/metatags.detail.html
Best Regards,
ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸
,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸
°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes `°º¤ø,¸¸,
http://sapiensdc.com.br | http://eopen.com.br
Desenvolvedor Web - Padrões W3C, Drupal, Acessibilidade
I've personally never had to use that Bob. There's an explanation here...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2025786/why-use-meta-tag-content-style-type-for-external-css
But personally I dont feel it's at all necessary
Ed
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, designer
Thanks Gentlemen - I thought so!
Bob
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
On 17 February 2010 03:42, c...@fagandesign.com.au wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering about best practice, accessibility and practical
implementation of a print stylesheet.
I have been asked to place a different header image in my HTML templates
specifically for print (only shows when printed
You seem to be on the right track, Oliver.
Matthew's response regarding targeting media types is also helpful. One of the
implementations I've used before is described below.
Note that:
- The print-only version of the logo is the near-last element in the page. I
assume that someone will read
Lucien wrote:
Hi there,
I need to write a web style guide for our web site. Does anyone know
of
any good examples I could draw inspiration from?
You'll find a lot of government guides online, such as
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/
or
Hi Lucien,
I don't have any style guides of my own to share, but I have two links you
may want to review:
A List Apart: Writing an interface style
guidehttp://www.alistapart.com/articles/writingainterfacestyleguide/(
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writingainterfacestyleguide/)
Government of
And a couple more links:
http://www.pebbleroad.com/articles/view/Creating-Maintaining-a-Web-Style-Guide/
http://delicious.com/maish/styleguide
2009/12/3 kris wright kcwri...@gmail.com:
Hi Lucien,
I don't have any style guides of my own to share, but I have two links you
may want to review:
Thanks everyone.
Some great resources there. I have plenty to read now :)
Lucien.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Nick Cowie cowie.n...@gmail.com wrote:
And a couple more links:
http://www.pebbleroad.com/articles/view/Creating-Maintaining-a-Web-Style-Guide/
Just some recent blog posts on style guide to add to your reading list:
http://www.purecaffeine.com/2009/11/style-guides-and-ui-implementation/
http://www.purecaffeine.com/2009/11/style-guides-and-ui-implementation-part-2/
Cheers,
Nathanael Boehm
Web user interaction designer
user experience
2008/12/13 tee weblis...@gmail.com
I have two list items that must display horizontally. Wanting to use
list-style instead of background image, but in IE 6 and 7, the circle style
refuses to show up even I adjusted padding left (or margin).
ul.add-to li{ padding: 5px 10px 5px
On Dec 13, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
2008/12/13 tee weblis...@gmail.com
I have two list items that must display horizontally. Wanting to
use list-style instead of background image, but in IE 6 and 7, the
circle style refuses to show up even I adjusted padding left (or
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Maben
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 4:11 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Ive had to work on macs
On 1 Aug 2008, at 16:22, Michael Horowitz wrote:
but this does not
.small {
font-size:8x;
}
x isn't a unit.
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
***
List Guidelines:
From: Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting this works
select style= font-size: 8px name=cruiseline
but this does not
select class=small name=month
.small {
font-size:8x;
}
8x is a typo?
--
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Automated Menu Systems | Galleries |
Michael Horowitz wrote:
Interesting this works
select style= font-size: 8px name=cruiseline
but this does not
select class=small name=month
.small {
font-size:8x;
}
Interesting how? Typos usually /don't/ work, in my experience :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder -
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hassan Schroeder
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 1:47 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
Michael Horowitz wrote:
Interesting this works
David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Come on everyone don't give Michael too hard a time, we ALL typo from time
to time and wonder why it won't work...
Its just part n parcel of the coding world...
True enough, but when something doesn't work running it through a
validator (or even an intelligent
:27 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Come on everyone don't give Michael too hard a time, we ALL typo from time
to time and wonder why it won't work...
Its just part n parcel of the coding world...
True
I use Bluefish under Linux, my every day system. In Windows, I use
phpDesigner 2008.
Gregorio Espadas
http://espadas.com.mx
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, David Fuller - magickweb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Speaking of intelligent editors... What do you all prefer?? Myself I am a
I'm not sure if this has already been addressed (the original subject of the
email), but have you tried using something like firebug in firefox and
tracing the css hierarchy?
As for editors Aptana is my editor of choice for any open source web project
(http://www.aptana.com/). It even does Ruby
David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Speaking of intelligent editors... What do you all prefer??
This is probably veering OT, but I use jEdit -- feature-rich, easily
extensible, runs on anything with a JVM. And free/open source :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL
://www.magick.com.au
Tel: 0434 728 267
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hassan Schroeder
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 3:31 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Hassan Schroeder
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 2:27 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Come
PROTECTED]
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Turnwall
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 3:46 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
If you are on a mac, Textmate is the best choice.
--
Michael
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Ive had to work on macs in the past – I wouldn’t wish them on my
enemy – sorry Michael :P
And the relevance of this comment to the subject at hand, or web
standards in general, is what exactly?
Andrew
:11 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Inline style works but css does not
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:03 PM, David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
Ive had to work on macs in the past - I wouldn't wish them on my enemy -
sorry Michael :P
And the relevance of this comment
I know typos kill me. Sorry about bothering people with that.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
561-394-9079
David Dorward wrote:
On 1 Aug 2008, at 16:22, Michael Horowitz wrote:
but this does not
.small {
font-size:8x;
}
x isn't a unit.
On 5 Feb 2008, at 09:43, Web Man Walking wrote:
Hello
I remember seeing a few years ago a presentation done (in HTML)
about Web
Standards. It had a whole load of Super hero / Roy Lichtenstein style
graphics. Anyone have a link, I really would appreciate it?
Is this what you mean?
Hurrah! Thank you.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Dorward
Sent: 05 February 2008 10:02
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Hero Style Presentation
On 5 Feb 2008, at 09:43, Web Man Walking wrote:
Hello
I remember seeing a few
Generally speaking, my advice would be to use print styles as part of
the main stylesheet setup (possibly but not necessarily a separate CSS
file)
By tying your print-friendly styles to a script of any kind, you are
forcing the user to find that link and be able to use it, in order to
gain the
On 6/7/07, Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'd written a print style sheet for a site I'd done (
http://www.swin.edu.au/ads/ltshowcase/inspire/presentations.html ),
but the feedback I got was that nobody knew it was there (unless they
printed the page).
So I hit google for
On 31/01/2006, at 4:59 PM, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox wrote:
Let's say I have my global style sheet where I style my ph1
etc. but on one page I have a div with id #editableArea
I want that div to have no style applied that is defined in the
style sheet, is that possible?
You would have to
On 1/31/06, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to specify in CSS that a certain area is to have no style
at all.
All browsers have a default style sheet, and there's differences
between the default styles in different browsers, so there's no such
thing as 'no
Practically speaking, it's a good idea to reset font-size, padding and
margin on * at the start of your CSS file. This does help improve
consistancy somewhat.
* {
padding:0;
margin:0;
font-size:100.01%;
}
Then, obviously, you can style individual elements from that, and you
know what the default
, 1 February 2006 1:33 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] No style
On 1/31/06, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to specify in CSS that a certain area is
to have no
style at all.
All browsers have a default style sheet, and there's
On 31/01/06, Taco Fleur - Pacific Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to
specify in CSS that a certain area is to have no style at
all.
Let's say I have my
global style sheet where I style my ph1 etc. but on one page I
have a div with id #editableArea
I want that div to
have
That's still going to be 1em of whatever 1em becomes by the time you
get down to #editableArea (i.e. 1em of (x) on #editableArea of (y) on
#body of (z) on #html), isn't it?
On 2/1/06, Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One possible solution would be not so much to have 'no style' but to
On 01/02/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's still going to be 1em of whatever 1em becomes by the time youget down to #editableArea (i.e. 1em of (x) on #editableArea of (y) on#body of (z) on #html), isn't it?
Hmm... good point. Might need some tweaking, but I'm not sure how.
Thank you both very much!
I did set the list-style-image as a background and it worked like a charm.
The only difference
was instead of setting the positioning using left center, I used 0 40%, which
placed the image
pefectly inline with the text.
I'll take a look at the artile cited below, and
I agree with Patrick - I'd use background-image instead of list-style-image
as you have far more control over the placement of the image using the
background-position property.
Russ
Alternatively, you could try and add left-hand padding and place the
star as a non-repeating background image
Terrence Wood wrote:
display:inline prevents your bullet from displaying.
Try float:left; and adjust your margins to suit.
Alternatively, you could try and add left-hand padding and place the
star as a non-repeating background image
#topnav ul li {
display: inline;
padding-left:
In fact, you could put the background image in the anchor to achieve a
rollover affect by adjusting the background position, or changing the
the image.
Here's a good article on single background images and positioning:
http://superfluousbanter.org/archives/2004/05/navigation_matr.php
kind
I would try youngpup.net and may be shaun innman
atb Sam
Peter Ottery wrote:
i really like this accordion show/hide script...
http://openrico.org/demos.page?demo=ricoAccordion.html
.. and am thinking it might be useful for a really long list of FAQ's on a page.
this particular example relies
Hi Peter,
...also, in Jeffrey Zeldman's book, Designing with Web Standards,
there's some material which covers this in his chapter on working with
DOM based scripts.
On 6/24/05, Peter Ottery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i really like this accordion show/hide script...
Hi,
Solved it, a typo.
On Monday, April 18, 2005, at 02:36 PM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
The following: ((http://www.ckimedia.com/c/print.css)) works when
tested locally in firefox 1.0 on mac os 10.2.8, but when uploaded to
the server it fails. What did I goof?
CK
Dunno if you already fixed this but I would try:
Change media for print.css to screen see if its still no show.
Try not using @import for it?
Or possibly, ref the @import css files from root - eg /c/print.css, not
c/print.css
Cheers :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think its because html {width: 100%} is not the
right way of doing it... have you tried body {width:
100%}? This works fine with my work.
Cheers
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:18:39 -0500, Rob McCormack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. Anyone know of a nice style guide (or guidelines)for
writing xHTML/HTML
..
Rob
New York Public Library Online Style Guide
http://www.nypl.org/styleguide/
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Rob,
Let's rework your example:
divpabc/p/div
You really ought forget about nesting tables, in fact you might want to read
up on using containers - divs - to create elements in the markup and CSS to
control their display.
Not what you want to hear, I know but take a long, determined look at
. Anyone know of a nice style guide (or guidelines)for
writing xHTML/HTML.
I think what you're asking about is a best practices guide, and most
development departments have them. One example is here:
http://developer.apple.com/internet/webcontent/bestwebdev.html
--
Susan R. Grossman
Mordechai,
I can't speak for everybody, but as the person responsible for designing and
creating websites whose sole purpose is to bring new business into the
company; my main focus is the majority that comes to our sites. The
overwhelming majority (about 70%) of visitors use MSIE 5/6. If I have
As a person, you can of course say fuck you to IE, but as a web
professional I find it impossible to ignore it. [ Ben de Groot -
http://mathibus.com/archives/2004/10/02/phpss/#comment-3 ]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:52:46 -0600, Collin Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mordechai,
I can't speak for
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:46:56 +0100, Mathias Bynens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a person, you can of course say fuck you to IE, but as a web
professional I find it impossible to ignore it. [ Ben de Groot -
http://mathibus.com/archives/2004/10/02/phpss/#comment-3 ]
It's totally true. IE is a
If you make commercial sites you must live with the fact that it is mainly
for IE.
Loudest f. you I can tell to IE is Firebar:
http://hpstudios.homeip.net/Firebar.html
Usually I don't have to trash the code with conditional comments.
* html {}
and
* {}
css hacks are enough.
I try to make pages
Collin Davis wrote:
I can't speak for everybody, but as the person responsible for designing and
creating websites whose sole purpose is to bring new business into the
company; my main focus is the majority that comes to our sites.
As I though I explained before, and as I'll try to clarify some
: [WSG] Why style to IE?
I don't believe Mordechai was suggesting anyone ignore IE -- rather
that, instead of bashing our heads against the proverbial brick wall
trying to make our standards-compliant sites work in IE, it may be a
workable option to use an alternative to said head bashing and css
Right on, Vicki. Additionally, conditional comments are not blocked in IE
--as is JavaScript-- if the user has her Security setting at High.
David
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 01:15:12 +0800, Vicki Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe Mordechai was suggesting anyone ignore IE -- rather
Mordechai Pellar wrote:
So you limit yourself to what NN4.x and can handle? It was NN4.x and
older browsers that the phrase unstyled or lightly styled was
directed, unless you consider CSS dumb down to IE standards (admittedly,
that usually amounts to no more than a slight margin, but a
Mordechai Peller wrote:
I know there's a certain degree of revulsion to using JavaScript, but
that's because it wasn't used properly. It's a very powerful language,
and when combined with the DOM, and used responsibly, it can do many
wonderful things.
--
I agree with you
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 11:15 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Why style to IE?
I don't believe Mordechai was suggesting anyone ignore IE -- rather
that, instead of bashing our heads against the proverbial brick wall
trying to make our standards-compliant sites work
Collin Davis wrote:
The bashing of head against the proverbial brick wall comes from trying to make
my standards-compliant sites work the same in FF/Opera/NN/Safari as they do in
IE. I first make sure the sites look and perform the way I want in both MSIE 5
and 6. After that is successful, I
Collin Davis wrote:
Since IE doesn't recognize :hover apart from anchor tags, I only use :hover on anchor tags.
As I have done as well. Though now I'm wondering why not just use an
onmouseover, hidden by either conditional comments or conditional
compilation, as well?
However, if NN4.x was
I think it is important *not to* buildtest in IE first.
You have to avoid building your code on top of some IE bug/quirk.
It is much less work to force IE to behave well,
than making all other browsers misbehave like IE.
For that matter I build and test pages for Firefox and Opera7 first
(having
Mordechai Peller wrote:
And there's your mistake. As has been discussed many times on this list
and elsewhere, it's much easier and faster to first code to standards
and then correct for IE.
I may be a duck out of water here, but I don't find it to be so. I've done
it both ways, and marking
You have to avoid building your code on top of some IE bug/quirk.
The only bug/quirk with IE that I've come across that needed my attention
was the big one: box model. I prefer to use the box in a box sort of
workaround, rather than tantek, SBMH, modified SBMH or alternate BMHs,
simply because I
The only bug/quirk with IE that I've come across that needed my attention
was the big one: box model. I prefer to use the box in a box sort of
workaround
This needs excessive divs and without IE support for '' selector requires
them additionally messed with lots of id/classes.
Why serve any
re: and even not all stylesheets are 'pure', take this one:
Name: Lim Yuan Qing
Age: 14
DOB: 25th January 1990
Location: Singapore
Yuan Qing is an alumnus of Temasek Secondary and Ngee Ann Primary. Come
2005 he will attend school at Temasek Junior College in its Integrated
Programme (IP).
On
Title: RE: [WSG] Why style to IE?
Thanks for the Dean Edwards link!
ByteDreams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mordechai Peller
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 2:01 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Why
Title: RE: [WSG] Why style to IE?
One other thing... Have you not used this method yourself for any particular reason, other than the opportunity just didn't present itself? Just curious.
ByteDreams
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Chris Stratford wrote:
1)
Printing IGNORES all background attributes...
This is understandable - but I didn't realise this until just now...
So my LI background elements weren't printing (or showing in Print
Preview which is how I check what it looks like)
A small
From: Chris Stratford
I dont know if I explained it correctly - or if you
understoood what I
meant.
But the problem I am having is the LIST BULLET are printing
in IE, but
not FF...
Ah ok, I thought you had used trickery with background images.
Fair enough, it looks like a wrong-ish
Chris Stratford wrote:
1)
Printing IGNORES all background attributes...
This is understandable - but I didn't realise this until just now...
So my LI background elements weren't printing (or showing in Print
Preview which is how I check what it looks like)
A small consolation: you can set your
Again no disrespect - I too am all for easier maintenance on the server
side, but don't fall into the trap of thinking that your files will be
cached just because the URL doesn't change.
I have just made several requests to your site all the (index page) and each
time your CSS was downloaded
Sorry if the last part of that didn't make sense.
When it echos the default CSS to the browser - I just meant.
It is irrelivant what page you are on.
Becuase its global CSS...
This is what the CSS looks like in the PHP:
body
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0 0 150px 0;
background: #?=$BODY_COLOUR?
I use a style switcher on my site although it works a bit differently.
$dxstyle = $_COOKIE[dxstyle];
$replace_strings = array(../ , ..\\ , /.., \\.., .); $dxstyle =
str_replace($replace_strings, , $dxstyle);
style type=text/css media=screen
?php echo @import url(;
if
Hey Michael,
Sorry my title is a little off - the post isn't so much about the cookie
and the style switcher.
But more about the PHP code being very efficent in presenting the CSS to
the browser.
So you only load the CSS you are using on that page...
And you have 1 file, for every page, and for
Sounds pretty cool.
I'm curious though, what's the file size of all that php in the css, as opposed
to actually handling 4 separate css files for color that can @import the main
body/text styles from a fifth master file?
It sounds really big and fancy, but for a style switcher I'm just wondering
Hi ted,
This information from
[http://www.codestyle.org/css/media/braille-BrowserSummary.shtml] may be
helpful:
Test case results for media types aural, braille, embossed, handheld, tty
and tv are equivalent in all the mainstream browsers tested to date,
none of which support these media.
I
It's tabular data, so you should use a table. It displays reliably, it's
semantically correct and if implemented correctly it's usable for screen
readers. It's best to use all of the semantic table elements (th, tbody, thead,
summary, caption) if you can.
Jake
Quoting Ryan Sabir [EMAIL
Ryan, this is tabular data, just what tables are built for. Go for it!
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ryan Sabir
Sent: Tuesday, 5 October 2004 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Table-style admin layouts
Hi all,
Is there
On 10/4/04 11:22 PM Ryan Sabir [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Name Price Quantity EditDelete
Apple $5.0025 [edit] [delete]
Pear $4.00 3 [edit] [delete]
Banana $12.00 5 [edit] [delete]
But without cluttering the HTML
Is
there a best-practice way to build an item
display
with multiple columns, but without using tables?
Name Price
Quantity Edit Delete
Apple $5.00
25 [edit]
[delete] Pear
$4.00
3 [edit]
[delete] Banana $12.00
5 [edit]
[delete]1 vote for "thats table data - use a
table"and your
At 07:48 on Tuesday, 05 Oct 2004, Peter Ottery wrote:
Is there a best-practice way to build an item
display with multiple columns, but without using tables?
Name Price Quantity EditDelete
Apple $5.0025 [edit] [delete]
Pear $4.00 3 [edit]
Anura wrote:
What happens is that once the page has loaded, if you scroll down and
then scroll up again, the styles are then displayed. Hit refresh, and
they disappear again. Also, I notice that hitting the ALT key makes
those styles disappear.
I haven't checked, but it sounds a lot like the
I had seen the Peerkaboo bug but discounted it because (1) I'm using
IE5 but the article mentions IE6. I can't get the claimed bug to work,
and (2) it doesn't really match my situation.
However, in tinkering with different forms of layout (absolute widths
for columns, relative widths for columns,
Friday 13 August 2004 was my last day with the Commission. I have taken
up a new position with the State Emergency Service in Wollongong.
If you need assistance with the Working With Children Check please call
9286 7219 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need assistance with a Information
: [WSG] applying style to the 3rd column of a table?
You may want to look at COLGROUPs
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/tables.html#h-11.2.4
Patrick H. Lauke
Justin French wrote:
Hi Folks,
Is there any way (without ids or classes) to target the 3rd (for
example) column of a table to apply
On Aug 13, 2004, at 3:31 pm, scott parsons wrote:
you can but only in IE due to IE having some weirdness occuring in the
way they layout the page.
BUT
if you style the columns using the IE method, and style the third td
(td+td+td etc) which will be understood by most modern browsers you
should
On 13/08/2004, at 4:31 PM, scott parsons wrote:
you can but only in IE due to IE having some weirdness occuring in the
way they layout the page.
BUT
if you style the columns using the IE method, and style the third td
(td+td+td etc) which will be understood by most modern browsers you
should be
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of scott parsons
Sent: Friday, 13 August 2004 4:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] applying style to the 3rd column of a table?
you can
Hi Justin,
Not well supported by IE but you can do with adjacent sibling selectors:
td+td+td { background: red;}
Only the third column would display a red background
Sample:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/jobs/css/adjacent.htm
Russ
Hi Folks,
Is there any way (without ids or classes) to
You may want to look at COLGROUPs
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/tables.html#h-11.2.4
Patrick H. Lauke
Justin French wrote:
Hi Folks,
Is there any way (without ids or classes) to target the 3rd (for
example) column of a table to apply styles?
What I'm hoping for is something like...
, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Friday, 13 August 2004 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] applying style to the 3rd column of a table?
You may want to look
Subject
Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
05/31/2004 05:47
PM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the site is http://creekside.dpsnc.net and the CSS is located at
http://creekside.dpsnc.net/print.css and
http://creekside.dpsnc.net/creekside.css\
I take it you didn't try to validate? If you did, you probably would
have found the extra quotation mark in the link/.
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
