Helmut Granda wrote:
Jay,
Thanks for your explanation and your recommendation, I didn't think of using
IE7 as SA (I didn't even knew it was available). I am aware that I'm running
a Beta and all of the technical difficulties that could come with using Beta
software. But I'm not too concerned sin
Jay,
Thanks for your explanation and your recommendation, I didn't think of using
IE7 as SA (I didn't even knew it was available). I am aware that I'm running
a Beta and all of the technical difficulties that could come with using Beta
software. But I'm not too concerned since I don't use IE as my
Wow that was fast!
Thanks I had been looking for this for days now.
...helmut
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Christian Montoya
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:30 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Stand alone I
Helmut Granda wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a stand alone IE6 installer anywhere?
Similar to IE4 and IE5. I am running IE7 and I really don’t want to
uninstall just to test couple of sites on IE6.
...helmut
Helmut,
What you are running is a preview release of IE7 Beta 2 not eve
On 3/17/06, Helmut Granda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if there is a stand alone IE6 installer anywhere? Similar
> to IE4 and IE5. I am running IE7 and I really don't want to uninstall just
> to test couple of sites on IE6.
http://browsers.evolt.org/?ie/32bit/standalone
the las
Does anyone know if there is a stand alone IE6 installer
anywhere? Similar to IE4 and IE5. I am running IE7 and I really don’t want
to uninstall just to test couple of sites on IE6.
...helmut
Richard Czeiger wrote:
Can I get a consensus that this is actually the right way to do it?
It feels right, but I'd like the opinion of my venerable peers :o)
Looks right to me. Note that in a large site with a lot of form pages
(online banking, for example) putting meaningful IDs for all the
I fear not, I have to admit.
Mostly, I've been following the mailing list for the last year or so
and, while nobody states this explicitly (most of the messages are about
server config issues for the WALL thing), everybody with a live site
seems to talk and behave like this was the case. Server
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi ben,
> one more thing.
> i have a big project on the horizon, i have to reformat this site with
> webstandards
> http://www.donegaldirect.com/
>
> As you can see there is a lot of feeds and lists,
> Would you consider tables for any of the conte
hi ben,
one more thing.
i have a big project on the horizon, i have to reformat this site with
webstandards
http://www.donegaldirect.com/
As you can see there is a lot of feeds and lists,
Would you consider tables for any of the conten on this site?
There are a lot of pages that have content th
Title: Out of Office AutoReply: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office, returning 21 March. Please contact Brian Milne or Catherine McLeavey for assistance.
A new monthly electronic newsletter covering all aspects of MED's work is
No worries. You might find some useful articles at
www.aspnetresources.com. Milan is _the_ man when it comes to ASP.NET
and web standards.
Agreed, Peter. ASP.NET 2.0 is a big step forward in the right direction.
On 3/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great i
Thanks Peter, and Ben, for great insight.
I will try to a collaborative aproach with the developer.
I know that a in a previous situation with another developer we used
repeaters to output standards code,
i would like to be able to stick css possitioning into a form repeater for
him. im not ev
Dejan Kozina wrote:
[...] phone owners just do not upgrade their browsers. They're far
more likely to buy a new phone that to mess with the handset's
preinstalled software. [...]
Very interesting and informative reply Dejan, thank you. We've been
discussing mobile content publishing for (ironic
> Me.
I think this would have to go down in WSG history as the best answer EVER!
That aside, the original question was probably a little off topic (and
highly subjective) and should probably be answered off list directly to
Robert.
Russ
**
T
Hi Peter
Its pleasing that my suggestion seems to be making
sense, given that i am a stand alone developer in a small company and its my
first .net role!
I think you are absolutely right, Peter, and your clear
example illustrates that collaboration wins every time!
Lets all wish Kevin t
Grant Bissett wrote:
Me.
I agree. Indeed, to coin a phrase, me too!
- mark
(who's not even Australian)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting t
Thanks Ben
ASP.NET 2.0 makes this so much easier!
ATB
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Wong
Sent: 17 March 2006 10:38
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] .net question
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Peter Goddard wrote:--> I would even suggest that you--> consider picking up the basics of aspx page development, not the code,--> but the web controls that are available in .net and see if you can
--> suggest how you can work more closely ...a great informative post Peter.Another vote here for the
Me.
On 14/03/2006, at 11:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is an extremely subjective question to ask... However...
Does anyone have an opinion (ha!) regarding who they believe to be
the most
creative/impressive standards-based Web interface designer/s in
Australia
(preferably
on 17/03/06 23:46 Rene Saarsoo said the following:
As much as I have tested, this only seems to work in Opera.
Maybe you should just try to force page-break after every third
office-div (it seems that three of those fit nicely on one page...
especially when you remove the header). Probably addin
On 3/17/06, Peter Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm an ASP.NET programmer, so I know. I actually have the reverse
> problem. The designer I work with doesn't have the faintest idea about
> standards and I'm the one cleaning out the layout tables.
>
> Nice one Ben! Sack the designer!
>
Aw
>> I'm an ASP.NET programmer, so I know. I actually have the reverse
problem. The designer I work with doesn't have the faintest idea about
standards and I'm the one cleaning out the layout tables.
Nice one Ben! Sack the designer!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Dear Kevin
I'm a .net developer, working entirely in web standards and producing
semantically correct xhtml output from server side code. There is little
or no exra effort required to produce output on a web page (in ASP.NET -
a web form) that meets web standards. Your developer can output data to
Jack Pivac wrote:
on 17/03/06 15:04 R Walker (RMW Web Publishing) said the following:
Try "page-break-inside: avoid;" on your divs.
Yeah am using that at the moment but it doesn't seem to do anything...
As much as I have tested, this only seems to work in Opera.
Maybe you should just tr
25 matches
Mail list logo
