Copy > backup your logs to a another folder, then run ;
sudo apt purge wsjtx
try install again and restore logs.
73
vk4tux
On 24/9/25 19:45, Doug Breault, Sr. via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi All,
Getting an error trying to install 3.0 on Mint
(Reading database ...
(Reading database ... 5%%
(Rea
The cmake compile working directory will show ;
73
vk4tux
On 18/9/25 21:18, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 17/09/2025 02:58, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello,
I attempted to compile the new source WSJTX 3.0.0-rc1 code as always
I did so far, but now cmake is giving
Apart from Uwe's special QT6 test branch, which we gave up on recently
until QT6 is fixed, ... we are building with QT5,
which are the releases yes ? I do not understand the concern with
existing regarding QT6 support ?
73
vk4tux
On 1/5/25 23:03, Charles Suckling via wsjt-devel wrote:
A
That is devastating, let us all beware !
On 14/1/25 14:40, Sam Sjogren via wsjt-devel wrote:
Earlier this evening I downloaded wsjtx-2.7.0-rc8-win64.exe from
SourceForge on a Win10 system. Chrome said a virus was detected. A
Windows Defender scan showed the file infected
with Trojan:Win32/Waca
I don't know if S21DX is setup correct. On 17m last night, I and others
called it on F/H
many times without response, it just kept calling CQ and was never seen
to work anyone I saw.
Seems they were not decoding anyone, perhaps their time sync is bad ..
73
vk4tux
On 17/12/24 10:23, jan0--
Yes just check the contents etc show the same ;
, so that your script procedure works.
I have done it here for hamlib updates.
73
vk4tux
On 6/12/24 12:17, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
Il 05/12/24 20:14, Adrian via wsjt-devel ha scritto:
Just substitute the extracted hamlib
Just substitute the extracted hamlib component with that of github, in
the same path.
Then compile.
73
vk4tux
On 6/12/24 06:19, Marco Calistri via wsjt-devel wrote:
If I want to to build hamlib from GIT and keep using the classic
method to compile WSJT-X, how to proceed?
Or better: how ca
Well said Gary, Many forget that they are always listening/looking on
their TX frequency besides the rest in the 3KHz or so RX passband.
Just because you do not see/hear a signal at a certain pan point does
not mean you are not receiving there.
If you were not receiving there, then you would
Thankyou, Is it possible to package Uwe's 'improved' versions too please ?
73
vk4tux
On 27/11/24 00:49, Hibby wrote:
You can see them directly at [1] - I've put that up temporarily, I meant to put
the plumbing in place to get that on the website proper, I'll do that later
today as I'm movi
I did not see wsjtx in your github packages list, Where are the packages
offered listed please ?
73
Adrian ... vk4tux
On 27/11/24 00:06, Hibby wrote:
that looks right - you should be able to 'apt install wsjtx' and be on
the latest with hamlib also installed.
What did your cmake run say about audio ?
Did you use cmake ?
73
vk4tux
On 30/8/24 23:09, Pino Zollo wrote:
Hi,
I have found a solution
I have installed *libqt5multimedia5 *and recomplied.
The strange is that configuration and compilation do no complain for
the absence of *libqt5mu
Run the real thing ; Debian
On 29/8/24 01:33, Pino Zollo wrote:
I just made a fresh installation of Mint 22 MATE
Then I have compiled both WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc6 and wsjt-x improved 2.7.1
version 240814.
Both present the same problem the list of audio devices is empty
so none can be sele
It would be SFF at their end yes ? I left FB a while back, if you have
another link for the pic ?
Or copy pic here ? Thankyou.
73
vk4tux
On 28/8/24 03:47, Charles Suckling via groups.io wrote:
Hi All
If you were wondering what SFH looks like at SF end, check out their
Facebook page! They
Took about 5 attempts to work them on 30m today, with them not seeming
to copy Rxx report to return RR73
Also noticed same on 17m, My time sync is perfect on time.is ;
081215 Tx 1109 ~ CY9C VK4TUX QG62
081300 -12 0.4 755 ~ VK4TUX CY9C -11
081315 Tx 1109 ~ CY9C VK4TUX R-12
081330 -12 0.4 75
Will look out for you Alan, will you use the same SF frequencies as K8K ?
I imagine you just need the Fox Id.
regards
Adrian ... vk4tux
On 3/8/24 11:37, Alan McDonald via wsjt-devel wrote:
I will be in Timor-Leste end August and as I usually do, try to run
some radio. I always attract a lo
"CARD:"
On 24/7/24 02:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Those don't have "CODE:" in there -- we're talking an exact match to
those 5 characterscolon included...
It's being implemented in WSJT-X improved and will both sort entries
and remove the CODE: ones -- there are two checkboxes f
Ok, I am interested if there is a log in wsjtx linux that shows devices
detected as I cannot show a screenshot with choice expansion open.
73
vk4tux
On 23/7/24 13:57, Black Michael wrote:
That is going be a case-sensitive removal of any sound card that has "CARD=" in
it.
On Monda
I thought you said ' CARD'
73
vk4tux
On 23/7/24 13:41, Black Michael wrote:
I'm only looking for anybody using a sound device with "CODE:" in the name.
Mike W9MDB
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.source
For Pipewire
Also ;
adrian@debian:~$ pw-cli list-objects | grep card
device.name = "alsa_card.pci-_01_00.1"
device.name =
"alsa_card.usb-C-Media_Electronics_Inc._USB_Audio_Device-00"
device.name = "alsa_card.pci-_00_1b.0"
73
vk4tux
_
Cannot get a screenshot of those in wsjtx settings, however
adrian@debian:~$ arecord -l
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC3220 Analog [ALC3220 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 2: Device [USB Audio Device], device 0: USB A
Mike, Yes plenty of those in list here, and I never use those, so great
idea to lighten the list to relevant, thankyou.
73
vk4tux
On 23/7/24 07:38, Mike Black W9MDB via groups.io wrote:
Only removing devices with "CARD=" entries.
Do you have some of those in your audio list?
Mike W9MDB
I do ;
Hopefully the alsa def will be retained.
Debian Trixie
73
vk4tux
On 23/7/24 07:29, Mike Black W9MDB via groups.io wrote:
On Linux or any other Unix flavor
Does anybody use the ALSA sound devices for their rig interface?
We're trying to minimize the listed sound devices and wa
Kari, ok, I thought you have have just built without install if you run
differrent wsjtx versions like I do,
running from the build folder.
I had that type of error in my case, but it also said it could not find
sfrx.
Sorry I could not help more.
73
vk4tux
On 13/07/2024 5:20 pm, Kari Sill
If you compiled from source ; In your
wsjtx-2.7.0/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib
path, copy the superfox/arm (or whatever matches your OS) in superfox
folder sub OS type folder section files (3) to the
other wsjtx program executable's path, eg where wsjtx is...
usually these will be
foxchk
sfr
This is indicating an audio level drop. At 1999 Hz can you increase
audio level for the same alc level as 1500, to verify you get the same
power as expected ?
In Data-U FT8 100% modulation should occur at slight indication of alc,
however above should confirm that the audio level is changing,
I do not have a FT-991a, however I use other Yaesu's incl a FTDX-101MP
and FT-897d etc.
On all these and others I set alc for a slight lift off rest point ~2%,
with audio feed level (wsjtx TX pwr) and sound level set,
at desired drive power at ext power meter.
I use rig split and find the m
I do not have a FT-991a, however I use other Yaesu's incl a FTDX-101MP
and FT-897d etc.
On all these and others I set alc for a slight lift off rest point ~2%,
with audio feed level (wsjtx TX pwr) and sound level set,
at desired drive power at ext power meter.
I use rig split and find the m
Richard, Can you tell us the alc meter indication on each of these 1500
-1999 power levels that you describe ?
The alc indication, may provide clues as to whether audio(modulation)
level is a factor ?
73
vk4tux
On 7/7/24 03:50, Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 12:
Just regarding my last post 1 is clearly a typo and should read 1999.
Thankyou
73
vk4tux
On 7/7/24 03:32, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
>This does make me wonder though, why only jump in 0.5KHz increments? Not
that the logic is difficult but wouldn't it be simpler to just allow
I think Richard does understand that, and is asking for a tighter audio
frequency control window to maintain his tested & expected power output.
The weird thing here is how he sees such differrence over a 500Hz audio
range.
I would be connecting a calibrated constant level audio generator fee
Built fine here on latest Debian.
I keep the build simple & executed from build folder, as I use different
versions.
I did get a sfrx missing & Fortran cmd error, and had to manually copy
wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/lib/superfox/linux/sfrx
to
wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx-build/sfrx
for it to play nic
No, frequency change whilst in ptt, was the option. Looks ok rhen. I use
that.
73
vk4tux
On 2/6/24 14:47, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
This only disables PTT on band change. Are you saying you need cross-band
continuous PTT?
On Saturday, June 1, 2024 at 11:16:14 PM CDT, J
Also try a terminal aplay list > aplay -l
adrian@debian:~$ aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC3220 Analog [ALC3220 Analog]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 1: HDMI [HDA ATI HDMI], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
Subdevices: 1
Also set the output device whilst sending a test from wsjtx, It only
shows in Volume control (pavucontrol) when active sending
then you can set device and level.
On 18/5/24 01:12, Adrian wrote:
sudo apt install pavucontrol
if you don't have it already ?
See https://forums.linuxmint.com/vi
sudo apt install pavucontrol
if you don't have it already ?
See https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=327359
i run the same interface on Debian here.
Use pulse in wsjtx audio select choices and then select the wsjtx
assigned audio in pavucontrol (Volume Control) for pulseaudio.
It
Usually on click ok, the Config pane pops up on radio tab so you can
reconfigure , so you don't see that then, ok ?
It would be interesting to confirm a program interface like FLrig,
Commander or HRD works,
or rigctld/Hamlib interface , rather than actual radio choice.
73
vk4tux
On 21/3/2
Re below ; If you click 'ok', and then are shown the wsjtx radio
settings tab, does 'Test CAT' restore the cat connection ?
73
vk4tux
On 21/3/24 09:52, Scott Armstrong via wsjt-devel wrote:
The Rig Control Error pop-up message is not raised.
image.png
When CAT is restored by turning on th
It did show that many differrent linux as well as main Debian advanced
flavours were affected.
Some source code errors may only affect a limited number of branches,
this showed it as widespread.
73
vk4tux
On 13/3/24 00:43, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi all,
On 3/11/2024 11:02 PM,
Building on Debian Trixie ;
Error:Symbol ‘ncand’ at (1)is USE associated from module ‘q65’ and
cannot occur in COMMON
/home/adrian/Downloads/wsjtx-2.7.0/build/wsjtx-prefix/src/wsjtx/qmap/libqmap/q65c.f90:93:3:
build abort at 95%
73
vk4tux
___
The new code number system send at set period/timestamps by H40WA on FT8
verified at website, looks good for the job.
73
vk4tux
On 27/2/24 23:33, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Jon,
On 2/26/2024 7:50 PM, Jon Anhold KM8V via wsjt-devel wrote:
231900 16 0.4 909 ~ BG2AUE -25 Aruba
2325
I went back to windows and using DXlab Commander as radio interface have
everything ok now.
Rigsplit etc, and no frequency mess on wsjtx.
It seems to be the only software supporting the FT-747GX properly.
73
vk4tux
On 29/1/24 23:40, Black Michael wrote:
What version of Hamlib are you runn
Is there a way to disable cat polling in wsjtx config ini file etc?
This is on a Catalina Macbook.
I have a FT-747GX that poll reads +08 tail to set frequency > red freq
band shows OOB etc but sets fine,
basically the poll read frequency adds 08 to the tail of the number.
28.074 000 become
Check RTS is not set high in program comport settings ?
73
vk4tux
On 27/1/24 01:59, kgross jensalt.com via wsjt-devel wrote:
I’m very confused. I have 2 different XGGcoms digimode 4’s for two
different models of Kenwoods. They work fine with the GA version but
with 2.7.0RC as soon as th
I saw a call from North Korea from the same locator tonight. Someone
playing silly games perhaps with MW DXCC.
73
vk4tux
On 27/1/24 03:32, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Glenn, congrats about a nice false decode. The 'a3'
tells that the decoder tried as the known information
your ca
When running pipewire on Debian PC where you use browser, music etc,
using JamesDSP to handle the sound, it makes for a better
music experience, with quality sound, same or better than previous ;l
https://flathub.org/apps/me.timschneeberger.jdsp4linux .
However the allow-list app # feature s
See https://wiki.debian.org/PipeWire
73
vk4tux
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Saw mention of this issue, with newbies calling a DX target on same
timeslot by just enabling a call without clicking
a received report from the target.
If a sent call can be detected in software to be on same timeslot as the
target, then could a auto stop possibly
with error message be iss
I accept it is not practical regarding the relevant coding team
response. However it is not as trivial as below. In VK 60m operation is
not legal.
Another hams callsign used for operation on 60m and then reported by
another for illegal operation is a bit beyond 'hurt feelings'
73
On 10/10/2
improve it to
some extent.
73
vk4tux
On 5/10/23 19:28, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 05/10/2023 09:33, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
of a digital Mode database setup & registered to , with license proof
etc, similar to QRZ.
Hmm... Nice idea.
Are you going to set up, main
As a victim of another local foundation ham (caught) unlawfully using my
callsign on 20m FT8 recently, and reports
heard of other fake and unauthorized callsign use, I wonder about the
possibility
of a digital Mode database setup & registered to , with license proof
etc, similar to QRZ.
A
I disagree with the progam/documentation change request.
Split is the radio function invoked for 'rig split', and it is
documented well online,
how the system uses rig split to control the audio frequency best use
window.
I feel; 'TX Shift' would cause more confusion, as it still does not
Well it is not a bad thing, USA does not own 'America' and only part of it.
73
vk4tux
On 17/5/23 19:09, Uwe, DG2YCB via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi all,
Some users complain that "U.S.A." is displayed as "U.S.A. of America".
The reason for this is that the maintainers of the CTY.DAT file have
sud
I agree on Uwes position over '''Rejnos, certainty...
On 13/5/23 22:59, Tom M0LTE via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hey Reino
I fully understand your concerns. Clearly this idea has been
considered. Conceptually I believe a slightly different approach might
overcome some of those difficulties, however I
Hope you have had your vaccine boosters and get well soon Joe.
We all make mistakes, just some do not admit to them.
Thankyou & the team for the new development work
73
Adrian Fewster
vk4tux
On 13/5/23 03:15, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
Too many mistakes, this morning.
At the bo
Reino failed to supply an accurate factual answer to Allan, perhaps it
is not 'so funny' now, however ;
"
*On 20m at 400 TX marker, my FTDX101MP in 'rig split' has TX Sub vfo set
(by wsjtx) at 14.072.500, and uses an audio frequency of 1900Hz (1500
-2000 Hz being the target passband window) *
Obviously The concept is not simple enough to grasp for any licensed
amateur.
Many do not understand the shift of CP VFO frequency to cater for a
passband friendly audio frequency to comply for TX marker set.
The split function is activated in the radio via wsjtx CAT control
The wsjtx progra
On 9/5/23 02:49, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote:
#1 is hardly a benefit,
Why not, utilizing a gap at 100Hz or 2900Hz is very useful and effective
with split.
#3 is bogus.
How would you know ? You lack the technical ability..
#2 is a side benefit, but VERY secondary, and not the fund
10:51:17 AM CDT, Adrian via wsjt-devel
wrote:
No, leave the split rig/fake checkpoints, as is, but place within a
field/box titled 'Signal Optimization' ,
which should be an easy ui update ?
No need to remove rig split or fake split, because that is what is
activated via CAT.
The RX frequency = Set band frequency & pan marker sent > received. If I
send you a 1900Hz audio modulated signal at split Sub TX vfo set
14.072.500 = 14.074.400 usb freq,
Your RX on 14.074.00 band standard RX will see it at 400Hz marker.
73
vk4tux
On 9/5/23 01:46, Alan via wsjt-devel wrot
Reino, "Signal Optimization" is a better field name , we control the
audio passband frequency window for the best modulation results = Signal.
73
vk4tux
Sam just sent his proposal how to remove the split word in the relation of the
local split usage. There may be no need for a 'two level'
I think I suggested something similar much earlier in the thread.
However with that new name rig and fake it don't mean anything so I'd
suggest change to hardware and software respectively.
Alan G0TLK, sent from my mobile device
On 8 May 2023 16:37:35 Adrian via wsjt-devel
wrote:
ng the use of the word
SPLIT.
73,
Sam W2JDB
-Original Message-----
From: Adrian via wsjt-devel
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Adrian
Sent: Mon, May 8, 2023 10:17 am
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles
Consistent TX level control, making alc m
Consistent TX level control, making alc minimum set easier for whole pan
TX usage.
73
vk4tux
On 9/5/23 00:08, Björn Ekelund via wsjt-devel wrote:
So what more does it do?
Björn SM7IUN
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:43 PM Black Michael wrote:
That's not the only thing it does so that's not
On 8/5/23 17:00, Reino Talarmo wrote:
Sent: sunnuntai 7. toukokuuta 2023 23.29
Why would i talk about non wsjtx usage on a wsjtx group ?
It is important to use commonly used words in the same meaning in the ham
community. There are many radio amateurs that have used other modes, some even
ten
Certainly, but did you test the quality of the signal ?
On 7/5/23 18:19, alan2--- via wsjt-devel wrote:
The indicated frequency on a counter will not change as you are
transmitting a 50Hz wide signal within a frequency range defined by
the upper sideband width. The position of your 50Hz wide t
wide transmission
will vary within that sideband width but you will need a good spectrum
analyser to see it.
Alan G0TLK
On 07/05/2023 04:35, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
But the one you tune in by moving green marker is your receiving frequency.
Same way you tune your transmitter by moving red
The fact that you try to compare a voice split qso to a FT 8 qso is stupid..
You look for the vacant slot in the pan and then select that, of not
easy then look for a gap irrelevant of width.
73
vk4tux
On 7/5/23 15:41, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi Adrian,
This start to be reall
Also on the subject of "split" The radio CP frequency point change on
the vfo display is required,
to obtain the best pass-band frequency required to suit and sum to the
tx marker set.
The radio is shifting its CP frequency between TX and RX to achieve this.
In "rig splt" the 'split' radi
Reino, Your comments are not addressing mine, but rather what you assume.
The decoder decodes the entire pan RX bandwith, the green marker filter
just separates that traffic within that mark, for separate "visual"
display,,
there is no difference in sensitivity other than the radio RX perform
But the one you tune in by moving green marker is your receiving frequency.
Same way you tune your transmitter by moving red marker.
*No, The green marker is just a decode filter for that mark to place
that traffic in the right pane for view.The receive frequency covers the whole 3 -4 KHz ba
On 2/5/23 23:33, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi,
Having followed this thread from the beginning and being a small part
of it (in the beginning) I do have some questions regarding the use of
the
word SPLIT as it pertains to WSJT-X versus its classical meaning on
the HF Bands in CW and SSB
Experts ?
On 2/5/23 15:13, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel wrote:
Jim, Mike and all experts,
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
mobile device
On 1 May 2023 12:18:59 Adrian via wsjt-devel
wrote:
Too funny, as the rx of both stations covers the entire pan bandwidth,
the fact they are transmitting on a different pan slice within,
does not qualify as 'audio split' in my book. If both were running 300Hz
rmonics. WA1SXK and I
have been on the warpath for over 3 years helping clean up all these
harmonic generators...it's pretty rare to see them now as we have
contacted hundreds of operators and have a paper on my QRZ page
explaining how to set up your audio to avoid it.
Mike W9MDB
On
All the online definitions I find for 'split' operation are ;
Split means transmitting on one frequency and listening on another.
referring to your own station, without reference to anyone else.
FT8 is not a 'listening' mode. It is visual receiving 3 - 4 Khz wide
including wherever you are TX.
Too funny, as the rx of both stations covers the entire pan bandwidth,
the fact they are transmitting on a different pan slice within,
does not qualify as 'audio split' in my book. If both were running 300Hz
rx filters then it might qualify on matching tx/tx placement between two
stations
n
There is no 'audio split' in WSJTX' TX audio is determined by mode, RF
frequency and the TX marker.
RX audio decode covers the pan bandwidth, with the RX marker filtered
for the right pane display.
vk4tux
On 1/5/23 14:45, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote:
audio split in WSJTX
_
here.
73
vk4tux
On 1/5/23 13:55, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 4/30/2023 4:30 PM, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
Reino, this is where we disagree, as my point is if the vfo frequency
changes, then the 'radio frequency' which I consider the same also
changes.
Adrian,
Reino is righ
vk4tux
On 1/5/23 13:55, Jim Brown via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 4/30/2023 4:30 PM, Adrian via wsjt-devel wrote:
Reino, this is where we disagree, as my point is if the vfo frequency
changes, then the 'radio frequency' which I consider the same also
changes.
Adrian,
Reino is right
Reino, this is where we disagree, as my point is if the vfo frequency
changes, then the 'radio frequency' which I consider the same also changes.
We do not see the vfo frequency display in sync variance with the
modulation frequency. It remains static at the carrier point, which I
consider the
Setting a fixed TX mark should be default behavior in wsjtx. Having
default set users jumping on the target mark together with their TX is
not beneficial,
rather than spaced tx calls forming a better decoded cue for the target
to then work. TXing on a clear space and RX the target on the targe
I disagree with below.
Sam explained it well. Keeping the same Pan TX location the RF frequency
is shifted to maintain and audio frequency suitable for the best
passband performance and level
continuity. It is split. The TX VFO adjust to 500, 1000 below the RX RX
VFO frequency when pan TX ma
I find below statement odd. as the Pan audio mark is sent exactly as
you set it. Only the RF frequency shifts to suit the audio > bandpass
sweetspot.
It is indicative that you do not realize how it works.
73
vk4tux
On the other hand I don’t support of the idea that WSJT-X would
randomly
I recommend someone sane start a new wsjtx group and we all migrate.
73
vk4tux
On 24/4/23 22:36, K9RX via wsjt-devel wrote:
Not to belabor the point…. I too was rejected although I’m still able
to see posts – just can’t respond. My failing? I posted a comment
saying how I had 92 decodes i
The moderator there 'Roger' is a control freak, and very self sensitive.
Last week a poster had trouble decoding, and I referred him to time.is ,
however Roger completely misunderstood the relevance and arrogantly told
me to try the website myself,
if i wanted to know what result it gave
adrian@debian:~$ ps ax | grep wsjt
57603 ? Sl 1:11 /usr/bin/wsjtx
62851 pts/3 S+ 0:00 grep wsjt
adrian@debian:~$ sudo pkill wsjtx
adrian@debian:~$ ps ax | grep wsjt
63624 pts/3 S+ 0:00 grep wsjt
adrian@debian:~$
It is process wsjtx rather than wsjt, but your grep shou
I see this from time to time, rectified with 'sudo pkill wsjtx' and
then no problem to start a new session.. If linux > wsjtx ran a startup
script killing first,
then there would never be an issue.
73
Adrian Fewster
On 5/11/22 22:56, leo bistmans via wsjt-devel wrote:
Via strace I saw th
:
Are you thinking of pskreporter.info?
https://pskreporter.info/pskmap.html
Mike W9MDB
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 11:06:40 PM CDT, Adrian via wsjt-devel
wrote:
I noticed pskreporter.de was down for a long time with a database issue.
Now it requires a login ?
Is it now a
I noticed pskreporter.de was down for a long time with a database issue.
Now it requires a login ?
Is it now a subscriber service, I see no info on that site, as any
associated url needs auth access ?
Thankyou for any info.
73
vk4tux
___
wsj
Most issues are with strong nearby stations , The station having issue
to get through, should move tx to any vacant pan space on the fly, and
the rx station should stop and wait.
Quite often stopping enables better rx, than cycling while waiting.
73
Adrian
/The /|/RR73/|/ message should
They should do, the ones i queried via eqsl rejections said they did not
receive my RR73, and then moved on to another station.
Bad op practice by them , I agree, instead of trying or perhaps they did
with no luck on RX,
but sometimes a cheap txcr with poor blocking gets smothered by closed
That may have been a flyover comment for you, but in anycase it get the
ones that you don't hear and really want using 0.12uV sensitivity.
Have worked an amazing amount of DXpeditions in the last 2 months, it
has been great.
Yaesu got it right.
73
vk4tux
Wow, I would hope a $5K radio isn
t to me the software does exactly what it
should do.
Have a good evening.
Fred
N2XK
On Jul 15, 2022 6:04 AM, Adrian via wsjt-devel
wrote:
On 15/7/22 18:03, Fred Price wrote:
> This also might be a good idea as you stated you have a little
station.
Can you point out where I
On 15/7/22 18:03, Fred Price wrote:
This also might be a good idea as you stated you have a little station.
Can you point out where I stated what you claim above ?
My method of using FT8 is fine & effective, and I have method for repeat
RR calls.
My point is that the final 73 comes after
When you send a RR73 and get nothing back, then wsjtx has logged the
call, but you don't know if your RR73 was received,
or if the other party logged you.
Making the log work only on 73 sent or received instead of RR73,
confirms the sig report both ways and the qso both ways.
if the program
It is a good point, wsjtx should not auto log until the 73 is received,
not RR73 sent.
Case in point is the rejected eqsl's from stations in my log, but I am
not in theirs.
This would save that problem.
In the meantime, in those situation's, my TX is set free to change, and
I click a
vaca
Mike Yes Ptt does, but in USB the audio does not flow.
I use a MP3090 PSU underneath and see the current draw only 1.4 instead
of 11 amps on TX ,
and no usual slight alc indication. I never use USB, but rather the
designed Data/pkt wsjtx option,
with radio in DIG mode.
So perhaps that expl
In any-case my 857/897 works with CAT ptt and rear port data audio.
Signal link (waste of money), has an inbuilt ptt setup for its own
design, however a Usb Cmedia or PC/laptop sndcd connected
to the rear data port works fine without any need for vox. Happy to
provide a video to verify.
73
This guy is also using CAT ptt and using rear data port audio as I do ;
https://km1ndy.com/how-to-program-yaesu-ft857d-for-ft8-and-wsjtx/
On 11/7/22 00:22, Nigel Haynes via wsjt-devel wrote:
I have been using the WSJT-X 2.6.0-rc1 without issue on several rigs,
but when I tried to setup an FT
"When using the signalink, the audio goes through the data port. You
must select VOX for the rig to use audio on this port. Using CAT will
not send audio from the data port. It will key the rig, but wont
modulate because its looking for audio on the mic connector only "
Not here;
Mine uses
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
