Hi Alex and all,
We should rationalize our calls to subroutine grid2deg() to make them
acceptable to the increasingly fussy versions of gfortran. This will
not be done in time for WSJT-X 2.5.4, which will be released very soon,
but probably in the next release after that.
-- 73,
Hi Ton,
The crash you observed is caused by setting Rx frequency to a value so
high that the highest tone of the mode in use would be above 5000 Hz.
In general, WSJT-X is designed to work with maximum Rx passbands up to
5000 Hz, but not beyond. Best to stay within that limit.
--
Hi all,
If you have seen a bug that can cause WSJT-X 2.5.3 to crash when
callsigns like W9YOY/M or K0VQM/4 are involved, please help us to
isolate and fix it. What we really need is a sequence of steps that
will reliably reproduce the crash.
If you have seen this bug, please let us know.
Hi Mike,
Have you had any success duplicating the problem some have seen with
calls like W9YOY/M or K0VQM/4 ? I have been unable to make v2.5.3
crash, using any of these recipes.
-- Joe
On 12/20/2021 2:21 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
There's a problem duplicating this
Hi Stephen,
The window-size behavior has been discussed on this list before. I have
nothing new to add.
On your "+.055" frequency-setting issue, please send me a copy of the
file WSJT-X.ini in your log directory.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 12/17/2021 11:44 AM, Stephen Mitchell via wsjt-devel
Hi Stephen,
The window-size behavior has been discussed on this list before. I have
nothing new to add.
On your "+.055" frequency-setting issue, please send me a copy of the
file WSJT-X.ini in your log directory.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 12/17/2021 11:44 AM, Stephen Mitchell via
Hi Al,
Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, as shown in the attached screen
shot, I can't seem to reproduce the bug here, by using your recipe.
We have not yet found a reliable way to trigger this fault, or to
diagnose it.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 12/17/2021 10:43 AM, Al via wsjt-devel
Thanks to Chet Fennell, KG4IYS, installation packages for WSJT-X 2.5.3
on Debian-based (Debian, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, ...) and Fedora-based (Fedora
34, RedHat, ...) flavors of Linux have been posted on the WSJT-X web page:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
Versions installable
Hi Claude,
It seems likely that you need to do a --clean-first, to ensure that the
packjt77 module is compiled before save_dxbase.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 12/14/2021 1:58 AM, Claude Frantz via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 12/8/21 7:25 PM, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to build
Uwe Risse, DG2YCB, has kindly prepared a 32-bit Windows installation
package for WSJT-X 2.5.3. A download link has been posted on the WSJT-X
web page here:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
-- 73 from Joe, K1JT; Steve, K9AN; and Nico, IV3NWV
Hi Eric,
Answers to your specific questions:
1. Is the jt9 program trying to parse the file name? What is the expected file
name format?
Yes. Filenames used by jt9[.exe] are expected to have the form
YYMMDD_HHMM.wav (for T/R sequence lengths 60 s and longer) or
YYMMDD_HHMMSS.wav (for
T
73,
John
WA1EAZ
On Dec 13, 2021, at 9:37 AM, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
wrote:
John Nelson, G4KLA, has kindly prepared a macOS installation package for WSJT-X
2.5.3. A download link has been posted on the WSJT-X web page:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
We hope that i
John Nelson, G4KLA, has kindly prepared a macOS installation package for
WSJT-X 2.5.3. A download link has been posted on the WSJT-X web page:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx.html
We hope that installation packages for other OS varieties and the
source-code tarball can be
Many thanks to all who have volunteered to help with building and
distributing WSJT-X 2.5.3 (and future revisions) on various platforms,
after the tragic loss of Bill Somerville.
We will, of course, make sure that source code for released versions is
available on SourceForge -- and that
Dear WSJT-X Users:
As most of you know, we are mourning the recent death of our friend and
colleague Bill Somerville, G4WJS, who since 2013 has contributed so much
to the WSJT project.
One of Bill's many WSJT-related tasks was creating installation packages
for Win32, Win64, Linux (Debian,
I am very sorry to convey the sad news that Bill Somerville, G4WJS, died
suddenly and unexpectedly a few days ago. He was only about 65 years old.
Bill was a dear friend and very close colleague, though (as is often the
case with worldwide ham radio friendships) we had met in person only a
Hi John,
Thanks for the suggested enhancement. Before we get to more detailed
review, perhaps you can describe how you handle 4-character locators
that span include more than one US state.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 11/18/2021 1:12 PM, John Korpal via wsjt-devel wrote:
Grid Locator to
We are pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) release of
WSJT-X version 2.5.2. This is mostly a bug-fix release. A full list of
changes can be found in the Release Notes:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/Release_Notes.txt
IMPORTANT: If you expect to use the JT65 or Q65
Hi Lance,
I cannot confirm the behavior you describe. As far as I can see,
double-clicking on an average decode appearing in the Average Decodes
window behaves just as it did before, and as intended.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 10/23/2021 8:44 AM, Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel
We are pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) release of
WSJT-X version 2.5.1. This release mainly contains improvements and
defect repairs related to Q65 and JT65 modes when used with non-standard
and compound calls. Also included is a new feature for microwave
aircraft scatter,
Hi Conrad,
I think you need to work on your Linrad configuration to reduce the
total latency in data being sent to MAP65. I used a Linrad ==> MAP65
configuration for many years with excellent results, taking advantage of
(among other things) the Linrad noise blanker. Latency was well under
Hi Conrad,
What is the status of the FO/W7GJ expedition? Is Lance making 6m EME
QSOs as planned? I am concerned that he may not have adequately tested
use of a compound callsign in JT65 and Q65 modes with WSJT-X 2.5.0.
We have identified four problems that are likely affecting Lance's
Hi Lance,
On 10/17/2021 12:05 AM, Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel wrote:
As I am currently on an EME DXpedition without any access to internet or
a reliable GPS puck that runs on Windows 10, it occurred to me that it
should be very easy to add a very helpful item to the Astronomical Data
Dear W. Halstead,
Two months ago you asked questions on this email list about the
planetary ephemeris used by program WSJT-X for astronomical
calculations. I set your query aside to be answered later -- and
somehow "later" has not arrived until now. Sorry for the delay.
Some details about
Hi Lance,
On 10/1/2021 10:47 AM, Lance Collister, W7GJ via wsjt-devel wrote:
On 10/1/2021 14:38:24, Lance Collister, W7GJ wrote:
Hi guys! TNX for the new version! I ran Q65-60A for 8 hours Thursday
on 6m EME to test out my DXpedition setup. I am going to try to use
Q65-60A for both my 6m EME
We are pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) release of
WSJT-X version 2.5.0. New features are described in the WSJT-X User
Guide here:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.5.0.html#NEW_FEATURES
and also Release Notes:
Hi all,
In case you had wondered about the following post from K1HTV:
On 9/14/2021 1:55 PM, Rich - K1HTV via wsjt-devel wrote:
After this past weekend's ARRL VHF contest, one of the top SOHP scorers,
Mike, W3IP, posted a note to the PVRC reflector along with the breakdown
of his score. In his
Dear WSJT-X Users,
Recently posted Windows installers for WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc6 include a build
of hamlib that inadvertently does not include libusb support.
This omission has been corrected. If you are using Windows and your rig
model is missing in the "Settings->Radio->Rig" list (but was there
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
We are pleased to announce that a public Release Candidate WSJT-X
2.5.0-rc6 is now ready for download by beta testers. On Windows the
installation package also includes MAP65 3.0.0-rc6. See the Release
Notes for changes since WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc5:
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc4 has a bug that prevents normal use of messages that
include compound or nonstandard callsigns. For this reason we are
making a public Release Candidate WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc5 after an unusually
short interval. The RC5 release candidate is now ready
Hi Matsunami-San,
Thanks for your report. We are aware of the problem with compound and
nonstandard callsigns in WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc4. It will be fixed in the next
release.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 8/3/2021 6:18 AM, 松波〈Matsunami〉 via wsjt-devel wrote:
Hello
I used WSJT-X WSJT-X
The problem in WSJT-X 2.5.0-RC4 noted by Jerry, WA3ZSC, affects the
handling nonstandard callsigns in a number of circumstances. The bug
has been identified and fixed. Normal and expected behavior will be
restored in the next release.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 8/1/2021 10:04 PM, Gerald
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your careful report. I confirm that something is amiss, and
I will look into it.
-- Joe
On 8/1/2021 10:04 PM, Gerald Smith via wsjt-devel wrote:
Good evening all,
Today I installed WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc4 and I had a situation today that I
had never had before and I
On 8/1/2021 2:32 PM, Rory Bowers K5CKS via wsjt-devel wrote:
H... I don't see and rc-4 available for download
Better do some self diagnosis, then -- it's there, and around 150 people
are using it on the air, already.
Maybe do a "Reload this page" on your browser?
Scroll down to where
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
We are pleased to announce that a public Release Candidate WSJT-X
2.5.0-rc4 is now ready for download by beta testers. On Windows the
installation package also includes MAP65 3.0.0-rc4. See the Release
Notes for changes since WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc3:
If you want your Tx frequency to change to that of the CQ caller, hold
CTRL down when you double-click on the CQ message.
On 7/17/2021 4:44 PM, Rory Bowers via wsjt-devel wrote:
I just noticed that rc3 is behaving the same as rc1 did with respect to
double clicking a station calling CQ TEST in
thought.
Thanks Joe!
73,
Rory, K5CKS
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:40 PM Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote:
Rory --
Release candidates for WSJT-X 2.5.0 are now up to -rc3, released two
weeks ago. RC4 will be out soon.
When i
Rory --
Release candidates for WSJT-X 2.5.0 are now up to -rc3, released two
weeks ago. RC4 will be out soon.
When involved in beta testing, please keep up with new releases. We are
always especially interested in comments on the latest one.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 7/17/2021 3:20
Tnx Mike -- I will fix this flaw.
-- Joe, K1JT
On 7/10/2021 11:38 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Somebody noted that EA3A came up with grid JN12.
The logic in void MainWindow::lookup() doesn't look for any exact match.
It finds the first call that matches EA3A which is
Hi Al,
As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to
5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands
on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 7/9/2021 11:54 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
We are pleased to announce that a public Release Candidate WSJT-X
2.5.0-rc3 is ready for download by beta testers. On Windows the
installation package also includes MAP65 3.0.0-rc3. See the Release
Notes for changes since WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc2:
Hi Roger,
On 7/4/2021 8:17 PM, Roger Rehr W3SZ wrote:
With 2.5.0-rc2 the Q65 Decode Normal and Decode Deep settings no longer
stick when shutting down the program while in Q65 mode and then
restarting; WSJT-X always starts with Decode Fast.
This is with the windows 64 bit version, both
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
We are pleased to announce that a public Release Candidate WSJT-X
2.5.0-rc2 is ready for download by beta testers. On Windows the
installation package includes MAP65 3.0.0-rc2. See the Release Notes
for changes since WSJT-X 2.5.0-rc1:
Hi Jim,
It's a good idea include your callsign when posting to lists like this one.
On 6/25/2021 6:22 PM, Jim Pennino via wsjt-devel wrote:
I will be buying a new (Windows) machine soon and in anticipating the
future I have the following questions:
1. Are any of the WSJT programs currently
y first message, the F7 pop-up was
the issue I should have specified. Also, the same results are obtained
using 2.4GA.
*George J Molnar
College Park, Maryland*
*KF2T | FM19ma*
On Jun 24, 2021, at 12:05 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
Hi George,
On 6/24/2021 11:47 AM, George J Molnar KF2T wrote:
I run 2
Hi George,
On 6/24/2021 11:47 AM, George J Molnar KF2T wrote:
I run 2.5rc1 on a Mac M1 machine. Q65 averaging is usually not
available, with the menu option grayed out. On the occasion I can select
it (usually upon startup), no traffic populates the averaging window.
Didn’t mention it
Click on https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel , which
appears at the bottom of every message here.
On 6/22/2021 11:26 AM, Pierre wrote:
Please remove me from yout maillimg list
Zs4pf
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
Tnx Mike -- Joe
On 6/16/2021 5:09 PM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote:
Working on it...seems unique to K3/K3S but one other Icom user is
complaining too...
Mike W9MDB
On Wednesday, June 16, 2021, 03:32:19 PM CDT, Joe Taylor
wrote:
Hi Mike,
I assume these recent complaints about
Hi Mike,
I assume these recent complaints about "Tx start delay" are the result
of hamlib changes affecting certain rigs. Is this correct? Do you
understand just what changes caused the problem, and do you have a fix
in preparation? Let me know...
-- Joe, K1JT
On 6/15/2021 6:08
Hi Roger,
On 6/15/2021 5:06 PM, Roger Shultz via wsjt-devel wrote:
As an EME operator I find a couple things that is lacking when using WSJT-X.
Comparing a missing feature to WSJT10 for example, it is very nice to
have the ability to see the Astronomical Data panel. Not everyone will
want
Hi Dennis,
On 6/9/2021 7:59 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I wrote:
Hello,
My apologies if this has been covered before. Is there a reason that View,
Astronomical Data has a grayed out "X" in the upper right corner. The only
way to close that window is to go back to View and uncheck that item.
n the error MessageBox is closed, WSJT-X shuts down as is
appropriate.
Thanks again for this great software! I am really enjoying its amazing
capabilities, and the above issue does not detract at all from my use
and enjoyment of it!
73,
Roger Rehr
W3SZ
On 6/2/2021 05:34 PM, Joe Taylor
Dear WSJT-X and MAP65 Users,
We are pleased to announce that a public Release Candidate WSJT-X
2.5.0-rc1 is ready for download by beta testers.
WSJT-X in this release is nearly identical to that in WSJT-X 2.4.0. The
Q65 decoder has been enhanced to measure and compensate for linear
Hi Frode,
Thanks for your proposed corrections to the WSJT-X User Guide, and
please accept my apology for failure to publish your Norwegian
translation of the v2.3 Guide. With concurrent work on Q65, WSJT-X 2.4,
Hamlib 4.2, and MAP65 3.0, some required tasks have been on hold for too
long.
We are pleased to announce the General Availability (GA) release of
WSJT-X version 2.4.0, which includes the new digital mode Q65.
Q65 is designed for two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation
paths including ionospheric scatter, troposcatter, rain scatter, TEP,
EME, and other types
Hi Phil,
There was no generator polynomial, as such. Rather, the sync vector was
chosen for its good autocorrelation properties simply by looking at a
very large number of randomly generated bit patterns of the required
length and weight.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 5/16/2021 3:53 AM,
Hi Onno,
On 5/14/2021 1:29 AM, Onno Benschop wrote:
Have just compiled v2.3.1 from source. When I run allsim, I get the
following output:
Usage: allsim snr [isig]
Examples: allsim -10 #Include all signal types
allsim -10 6 #Include FT8 only
isig order:
ng the use of
'configurations' an easy sell.
as always, thanks to you and the team for the work you put in to make
WSJT-X possible.
Regards,
Peter, vk5pj
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:30 AM Joe Taylor <mailto:j...@princeton.edu>> wrote:
Hi Rex,
The general policy in WSJT-X i
Hi Rex,
The general policy in WSJT-X is that we don't try to "remember" user
settings by mode, band, or whatever.
If you want parameters in reset to previously selected values according
to band or mode, you should define a Configuration for each frequently
used combination, and give it a
Look at the current Guide. FST4 and FST4W have no submodes with larger
tone spacings.
On 4/19/2021 3:41 PM, Alan Hopper wrote:
Hi Reino,
thanks but nope, I mean the submodes that have larger tone spacings, A
standard, B x 2, C x 4, D x 8, that were mentioned in one of the quick
start
Many of you have been using WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4 to test the new mode Q65 on
the EME path. Especially on the bands 144, 432, and 1296 MHz, we know
that some users would like also to be able to use MAP65 for Q65. Here's
a brief update on the development status of Q65 in MAP65.
I have now used my
Hi Sandro,
Thanks, as always, for your careful reporting of several anomalies in
the behavior or documentation of WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc4.
I am working now on removing references to "JT9+JT65+ mode in the User
Guide. As you know, this mode is no longer useful and therefore not
supported in
Hi Dave,
So far, we have not been able to reproduce your problem.
As a general matter it may not be a good idea to start your spectral
display at 0 Hz. What happens if you increase the "Start" setting on
Wide Graph to (say) 100 or 200 Hz?
When you get a chance, start WSJT-X (using your
Please try RC4 and report back.
On 3/26/2021 2:16 PM, Kevin McQuiggin wrote:
Hi All:
Thanks to Joe et al for RC4. Looking forward to giving it a run here.
I am running MacOS version 10.14.6 Mojave.
I note that in Q65 30A with Q65_Sync selection on the waterfall that the
spectrum at the
We are pleased to announce two new releases of program WSJT-X: a General
Availability (GA) release of version 2.3.1, and release candidate RC4 of
version 2.4.0. Please read this announcement and relevant sections of
the Release Notes carefully.
1. WSJT-X 2.3.1 is a bug-fix release. It
Hi Andy,
On 3/25/2021 10:22 AM, Andy Durbin wrote:
WSJT-X ver 2.3.0 Win 64:
I saw a JT65 signal on 40 m so I decided to change to that mode and work
the QSO for nostalgia.
My messages had to be manually selected for each transmission and there
was no "Auto Seq" selection displayed. Is
Hi Dave,
On 3/20/2021 2:01 PM, David Schmocker KJ9I wrote:
This seems maybe a bug? On my WSJT-X, the Q65_Sync only gets up to
1,000 Hz. Unable to attach screenshot (even compressed) due to
email reflector attachment size limits; could email to anyone directly
off-list..
Changing
Hi Yukio-san,
Thanks for reporting this issue, and for the fix! It will be correct in
the next release.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 3/18/2021 9:22 PM, Yukio JG1APX wrote:
Hello wsjtx development team,
I reported the behavior of FT4 VFO split operation at "VHF and
submode features"
Hi Mike,
On 3/18/2021 5:55 PM, Mike Cizek W0VTT wrote:
Using Split Operating > Rig seems to work fine on FT8. I can’t find
anyone on meteors right now to test it split on MSK144.
"Split" is not used (and not relevant) in MS144 mode.
-- Joe, K1JT
Hi Mike,
Was running 2.4.0-rc3 tonight testing with another station We made some
contacts I was on RC1 and he was on rc2 on submode B. We both upgraded
to rc3. We decided to see what would happen on Submode C. I was on
T/R=15sec and left it there so the Tx Freq box turned red, no surprise
We are pleased to announce release candidate WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc3, which
includes the new digital mode Q65.
Q65 is designed for two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation
paths such as ionospheric scatter, troposcatter, rain scatter, TEP, EME,
and other types fast-fading signals. Details
-- Joe, K1JT
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021, 15:51 Joe Taylor <mailto:j...@princeton.edu>> wrote:
On 3/13/2021 5:44 PM, halst...@gmail.com <mailto:halst...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> *steps carefully*
>
> Because the source of the -RC was released under GP
On 3/13/2021 5:44 PM, halst...@gmail.com wrote:
*steps carefully*
Because the source of the -RC was released under GPL 3, it is my
understanding that they *can* use the code.
I don't see anything in the GPL license that covers seperate rights for
alpha, beta, candidate, or final releases of
This message is addressed to Хрисимир Христов (Christo Hristov), LZ2HV,
the author of software program MSHV.
I am also copying the message to several relevant public forums. Users
of WSJT-X and MSHV should be aware of the repeated and flagrant misuse
of WSJT-X source code in MSHV, contrary
:
Are you stating this as a personal opinion, or as the moderator of the
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> mailing list?
--
Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:38 PM Joe Taylor <mailto:j...@prince
Hi all,
Several people have asked recently about relative sensitivities of the
two-tone shorthand messages in JT65, which have been widely used for EME
QSOs for nearly 20 years, and the "q3" decodes in Q65.
Facts relevant for EME on VHF bands are summarized in the attached plot.
The
Hi all,
Perhaps it's time to move discussion of "update_wsjtx_log.py" onto
another email list. Other WSJT-related software, including derivative
programs (JTDX, MSHV, JS8Call, ...) as well as cooperative programs
(JTAlert, ...) have their own lists, and these distinctions serve all
users
Hi Claude,
On 3/6/2021 11:05 AM, Claude Frantz wrote:
For any reason unknown to me, the doc generated from
./doc/user_guide/en/ is different from the doc found here:
https://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.4.0-rc2.html
There is not only this image missing,
We are pleased to announce release candidate WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc2, which
includes the new digital mode Q65.
Q65 is designed for two-way QSOs over especially difficult propagation
paths such as ionospheric scatter, troposcatter, rain scatter, TEP, EME,
and other types fast-fading signals. Details
Is anyone here running WSJT-X 2.4.0-rc1 on macOS Mojave 10.14.6? If so,
please contact me off list.
-- Joe, K1JT
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
On 2/22/2021 2:41 PM, MIKE LAVELLE wrote:
I read that FT4, FT8, FST4, FST4W use Gaussian FSK.
Is it correct that all the other modes use unshaped keying?
Specifically, does Q65 use gaussian or unshaped keying?
Thanks,
Mike K6ML
Q65 uses continuous phase frequency-shift keying (CPFSK) without
On 2/21/2021 4:50 PM, Black Michael W9MDB via wsjt-devel wrote:
Playing with Q65 decoding and anything over "Fast" mode takes a long
time to decode.
Example at Deep decode taking 24 seconds to decode.
Is this expected?
Yes.
As advised in "Quick-Start Guide to Q65", Use Decode | Fast with
Hi Jeff,
You could answer all your questions, learning much more while doing so,
by experimenting on your own. No need for RF; just use audio between
two computers or two instances of WSJT-X on one computer.
Having said that, I'll provide a few short answers:
On 2/20/2021 8:38 AM, jeff
ports, would you please reconsider supporting WFD with
a future release of WSJT-X?
Thank you for your consideration.
--
Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:17 AM Joe Taylor <mailto:j...@princeton.edu>> wrote:
Hi Dave,
The si
Hi Reino,
Thanks for the information -- I'm delighted to hear it!
We have received very little feedback about use of EU VHF Contest mode,
so we are somewhat in the dark.
-- Joe, k1JT
On 2/19/2021 11:24 AM, Reino Talarmo wrote:
As it turns out, supporting EU VHF contests has not
Hi Dave,
The simple answer is that when designing our 77-bit message payload we
chose to implement support for a few contests particularly relevant to
the WSJT-X modes.
WSJT and its sister programs were motivated for VHF/UHF weak-signal work
and have had a strong VHF+ influence from the
athers “ of adaptive polarization” the fierce
defenders of the JT protocol, of the technology innovation for years
against the stagnation of the dinosaurs (CW) we are TIRED to invoke,
talk, write, beg, plead Joe Taylor to do something for our small,
insignificant and irrelevant group of EME
Dave --
There is no problem using WSJT-X v2.4.0-rc1 under macOS. Many are doing
so; all needed instructions have been posted on this reflector. If you
need help, just ask.
Release candidates are published and updated when they are ready. At
this stage of development we can't predict
Hi Mike,
On 2/16/2021 2:47 PM, Mike Lewis K7MDL wrote:
I just finished a Q65 contact on 2M and after the QSO completed, no more
decodes arrived since the other party stopped (confirmed) but the
initial call to me keep popping up on the right panel. I thought he was
running a 2^nd time to
Hi Serge,
On 2/16/2021 11:07 AM, Serge Szpilfogel VE1KG wrote:
Very true Uwe I am on EME & if I go from JT65 to Q65 there is always an issue with
configuration. So very few people use Q65 or if they do there is often an issue. Result
they stay on JT65 & do not use Q65 which is a pity
This
Hi Uwe,
On 2/16/2021 10:51 AM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
Hasan, I’m sorry, but I totally disagree. Configurations are there to
switch e.g. between 2 completely different hardware setups, but not
between two modes (or bands). Come on! That is the most basic task of a
multi-mode program itself.
Hi Dave,
I don't think you have sent us any .wav files for EME QSOs on 6 meters.
It would be very useful to have some indication of your on-the-air
experience with Q65 for 6m EME.
Have you at least studied the example files for 6m EME mentioned in the
Quick-Start Guide to Q65? Or read the
Serge --
On 2/7/2021 2:34 PM, ve...@eastlink.ca wrote:
When testing WSJTX 2.4.0-rc1 on Q65. The decode starts at 56 Second & stop
decoding 01 or 02 May be my Window 7 is too slow
Serge VE1KG
Decode starts when it's suppose to start.
Evidently you are trying one of the 60-second submodes.
On 2/6/2021 6:58 PM, Max Mucci, N5NHJ (I8NHJ) wrote:
Looks like there is no option available to select JT65 sub-modes.
Just as in all prvious versions of WSJT-X, JT65 submodes B and C become
available if you select "Enable VHF and submode features" on the
Settings | General tab.
Hi Bill,
Please refer to the Quick-Start Guide to Q65:
"Recommended submodes: ...
• Ionospheric scatter on 50 MHz: 30A
• QRP ionospheric scatter on 50 MHz: 120E
• Ionospheric scatter on 144 MHz: 60C
• Troposcatter and rainscatter at 10 GHz: 60D
• Small-dish EME, 10 and 24 GHz: 120E
• Other EME:
We are pleased to announce availability of a release candidate for
WSJT-X 2.4.0, introducing a new digital mode called Q65. Timing of this
release is unusual as it follows so closely the General Availability
(GA) release of WSJT-X 2.3.0. This timing anomaly occurs because
development of new
The WSJT Development Group is pleased to announce the general
availability (GA) release of WSJT-X Version 2.3.0. A summary of new
features can be found in the WSJT-X 2.3 User Guide here:
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.3.0_en.html#NEW_FEATURES
You may also
Kevin --
On 1/25/2021 8:03 PM, Kevin Fisher wrote:
Here is a screen shot of the issue, as you can see the items are not
always in time order.
-Kevin-
*From:*Kevin Fisher [mailto:kevin_fis...@shaw.ca]
*Sent:* January 25, 2021 11:03 AM
*To:* 'Black Michael' ; 'WSJT software development'
The fourth public candidate release of WSJT-X 2.3.0 is now available for
download and use by beta testers. Changes from the third release
candidate are minimal; they are described in the Release Notes here:
https://physics.princeton.edu//pulsar/k1jt/Release_Notes.txt
Links to installation
Hi Gene,
I'm not sure whether someone else has looked into your reported issue.
I have, and did not "fix" anything because I could not reproduce your
problem.
Instead of clicking Tune a second time to stop your Tune cycle, have you
tried clicking Halt? FWIW, either one works as expected
101 - 200 of 1515 matches
Mail list logo
