Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
On 10/21/07, Sergiy Kolodka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can confirm that it works now and I was able to do LiveUpgrade from U3 to U4 > with zones. Not much sense to do that, as you have to install kernel from U4 > first > anyway, but hope that for next releases we'll be able to LiveUpgrade with > minimal > downtime. I tried a 10U3 to 10U4 LU last week. The system is a Netra-T1/AC200 with 2 GB RAM. Two internal disks. The LU was to a second mirrored pair of slices on the same disks. There is one NG-zone. During the installation of the patches from 72099, I got many errors for installing a patch into the NG-zone, but these were patches that were for code that is inherited (this is a sparse zone). After the reboot, shutting down NG-zones, and the final reboot I was ready to attempt the LU. During the LU I ran into the SUNWiiim bug ( 6509956 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=e2aefd5c036e736e919176bb284?bug_id=6509956 ). After the LU completed I had two packages that could not be upgraded (SUNWiiim which I expected, and SUNWcsr... but since that had already been upgraded by the last patch I tried booting to the new BE anyway). The new BE booted fine, but I am concerned about doing this on much larger (with many more services and NG-zones) since we don't know *why* we got the errors. Has anyone else seen this type of behavior ? We really *need* some of the NG-zone and routing and ZFS and Samba fixes in 10U4. -- Paul Kraus ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Guys, I can confirm that it works now and I was able to do LiveUpgrade from U3 to U4 with zones. Not much sense to do that, as you have to install kernel from U4 first anyway, but hope that for next releases we'll be able to LiveUpgrade with minimal downtime. Good job ! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Mary Thanks for this Enda mary ding wrote: > Enda and Richard: > > It will work and you need to get infodoc 72099 to see the list of > patches you need in order for this to work. > > > > Enda O'Connor wrote: > >> Richard Weatherley wrote: >> >>> Hi Enda >>> >>> Any progress on this one? >>> >>> Thanks >>> -- Richard >>> >>> >>> This message posted from opensolaris.org >>> ___ >>> zones-discuss mailing list >>> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >>> >>> >> Hi Richard >> I didn't work on this project, but as far as I'm aware it should all go, >> ie Lu from U3 to U4 a system with zones. >> You will have to apply the U4 packages and a list of patches ( including >> 120011/120012, that 8/07 KU as far as I'm aware ) >> Other people might be able to add more info here >> Enda >> > > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Enda and Richard: It will work and you need to get infodoc 72099 to see the list of patches you need in order for this to work. Enda O'Connor wrote: > Richard Weatherley wrote: >> Hi Enda >> >> Any progress on this one? >> >> Thanks >> -- Richard >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> ___ >> zones-discuss mailing list >> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >> > Hi Richard > I didn't work on this project, but as far as I'm aware it should all go, > ie Lu from U3 to U4 a system with zones. > You will have to apply the U4 packages and a list of patches ( including > 120011/120012, that 8/07 KU as far as I'm aware ) > Other people might be able to add more info here > Enda ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Richard Weatherley wrote: > Hi Enda > > Any progress on this one? > > Thanks > -- Richard > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > Hi Richard I didn't work on this project, but as far as I'm aware it should all go, ie Lu from U3 to U4 a system with zones. You will have to apply the U4 packages and a list of patches ( including 120011/120012, that 8/07 KU as far as I'm aware ) Other people might be able to add more info here Enda ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Enda Any progress on this one? Thanks -- Richard This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote: > Richard Weatherley wrote: >> Hi Enda >> >> What is the ETA for 119255 (> -42) that addresses the problems with deferred >> activation patching for ZFS and VxFS when trying to install 120012-14? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> ___ >> zones-discuss mailing list >> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > Hi > I will try and get some preliminary dates ( it will not in 43 is all I > can say ) > I have added some people how are working on resolving these issues ( > well it one issue really ) > > Enda > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Hi Also meant to say, sorry for the hassle incurred here, but we are working towards getting a fix for this out soon. Enda ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Richard Weatherley wrote: > Hi Enda > > What is the ETA for 119255 (> -42) that addresses the problems with deferred > activation patching for ZFS and VxFS when trying to install 120012-14? > > Thanks. > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Hi I will try and get some preliminary dates ( it will not in 43 is all I can say ) I have added some people how are working on resolving these issues ( well it one issue really ) Enda ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Enda What is the ETA for 119255 (> -42) that addresses the problems with deferred activation patching for ZFS and VxFS when trying to install 120012-14? Thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
OK, few more details, just in case someone steps in with useful advice. Here's actual command and error: #lucreate -c update3 -C /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 -m /:/dev/md/dsk/d40:ufs -m /var:/dev/md/dsk/d50:ufs -n update4 Discovering physical storage devices Discovering logical storage devices Cross referencing storage devices with boot environment configurations ERROR: luzonevfs failed on BE path : ERROR: You must install the Zones tool patches to use this set of Live Upgrade packages to manipulate the boot environment at . ERROR: cannot determine file system configuration for boot environment ERROR: cannot cross reference device list with file systems for boot environment ERROR: cannot cross reference available devices with system configurations ERROR: cannot determine physical and logical storage device availability ERROR: please review all file system configuration options ERROR: cannot create new boot environment using options provided I've installed new packages with liveupgrade20 and then installed all patches mentioned in 72099, before one patch was removed. I just verified that all patches mentioned in 72099 are installed, including withdrawn one. The are. Any ideas would be nice, this stuff now drives me crazy. Thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Oh, last time I tried to do LiveUpgrade there were no withdrawn patches in Solaris 10 for SPARC with non-global zones section. I' guess I should wait for that patch and try it again, although I have that 120012-14 already installed and I'm confused if I can do LiveUpgrade now or not. To be short - it fails on lucreate stage after I upgraded SUNWlu* packages (installed SUNWlucfg to be specific, as I don't see any changes in SUNWluu and SUNWlur). Before I installed SUNWlucfg - lucreate created second BE without any complains about running zones, but luupgrade refused to went further with exactly the same message - you should install Zones patches, take a look at 72099. And I don't see any reasonable way to see which patch it's missing, and that's annoying. So I killed second BE and tried to update SUNWlu* packages first and create BE then and now lucreate fails instantly. Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote: > Clay, > > Samething when you withdraw a tire off your Cadillac, because it had a > flat tire and needs fixing. > I do agree, you can't drive the car but still its a Cadillac ! :-) > > As far as zones on ZFS file systems, you will have to face some > patching and upgrade problems. > That has been known for sometime, check > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#zfsboot Hi Ihsan actually the patching of 120011-14 to a system with zones on zfs or VxFS failing, is due to a bug in patchadd tools 6604923 with 119255-42 applied ( DAP ) zones on VxFS can no no longer be patched with KU 120012-14 6581814 Deferred Activation patching needs to support zfs file systems we are planning to fix this in the coming week hopefully. Enda > > Ihsan > > Clay McClure wrote: >> On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >>> you can not use LU on systems with zones >>> Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it >>> >>> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >>> you can not use LU on systems with zones >>> Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this >>> >>> The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. >>> >> >> Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That >> seems counter-productive :) >> >> We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the >> application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that >> 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked >> patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still >> having trouble applying 120012-14. >> >> Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. >> This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to >> loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under >> /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would >> be a relatively simple problem to work around. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Clay >> > > -- > > > > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Clay McClure wrote: > On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it >> >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this >> >> The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. >> > > Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That > seems counter-productive :) > > We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the > application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that > 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked > patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still > having trouble applying 120012-14. > hmm, I know this is painful, but editing pkginfo to fool system in thinking a required patch is installed can have very dire consequences, as the requirement is there in order to deliver a either required libraries or required functionality. > Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. > This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to > loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under > /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would > be a relatively simple problem to work around. > A fix for zones on zfs and VxFS is under way, we hope to release a fix (119255 rev higher than 42 ) in the coming week. I have not tried to workaround this problem yet, but I can have a look tomorrow, sounds like running a patchadd -a which would fail, then manually lofs mounting the missing zfs mount under the /var/run directory, then rerunning pathadd might just succeed, but beaware this is currently no more than a guess till I try this myself, do not try this on any vital system :-). i work in Ireland so won't be back in office till tomorrow. sorry for all the inconvenience caused by this. Enda > Thanks, > > Clay > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Clay, Samething when you withdraw a tire off your Cadillac, because it had a flat tire and needs fixing. I do agree, you can't drive the car but still its a Cadillac ! :-) As far as zones on ZFS file systems, you will have to face some patching and upgrade problems. That has been known for sometime, check http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/faq/#zfsboot Ihsan Clay McClure wrote: On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released you can not use LU on systems with zones Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released you can not use LU on systems with zones Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That seems counter-productive :) We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still having trouble applying 120012-14. Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would be a relatively simple problem to work around. Thanks, Clay -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Clay McClure wrote: > On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it >> >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this >> >> The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. >> > > Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That > seems counter-productive :) > Hi Clay the Ku 120011-14 was released prior to it's requirement being withdrawn, so it was installable when it was released. In hindsight the SMA patch should not have been withdrawn, but warning attached to the README toindicate the problem and resolution. Enda > We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the > application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that > 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked > patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still > having trouble applying 120012-14. > > Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. > This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to > loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under > /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would > be a relatively simple problem to work around. > > Thanks, > > Clay > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released > you can not use LU on systems with zones > Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it > > The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released > you can not use LU on systems with zones > Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this > > The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That seems counter-productive :) We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still having trouble applying 120012-14. Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would be a relatively simple problem to work around. Thanks, Clay ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote: > Enda, > > If you go over the 72099 carefully, here is what it says now: > > *The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is > released you can not use LU on systems with zones* > Solaris 10sparc 120272-12 > SMA > Patch . 120011-14 > depends > on it > > > *The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is > released you can not use LU on systems with zones* > Solaris 10x86 120273-13 > SMA > patch . 120012-14 > depends > on this > > > > The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. > Reason: Adding patch 120272-12 or 120273-13 corrupts the > /etc/sma/snmpd.conf file causing the snmpd services not to come up > after patching. > > That is what I am trying to convey. That is the confusion right here ! > Its affecting the JP Indeed this is the current problem, the plan is to release the fixed SPARC SMA patch end of this week, unfortunately x86 SMA patch is delayed till next week at the earliest I suspect. Enda > > Ihsan > > Enda O'Connor wrote: >> Hi >> Appears there is some confusion here, what is the patch that is missing, >> I though the patch list was complete by now, 9 thre were issues with the >> u4 Ku not being available due to a requirement being uprev'ed. >> I could be wrong, but as u4 is finished all patches are now cut. >> >> Enda >> >> Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote: >> >>> Hi Enda, >>> >>> What is the status of the NOTE in 72099 ? Are you saying that the >>> list is complete and that whatever is there is final and it should >>> work now ? >>> *Should the info doc be revised then ? Please advise >>> * >>> NOTE: *This patch list is currently incomplete for Solaris[TM] 10 >>> systems running zones. * >>> One patch that impacts patching zones is not available for either >>> SPARC or x86 platforms. >>> *If you are not using Live Upgrade on a system involving zones, the >>> patch list below is complete.* >>> >>> Ihsan >>> >>> Enda O'Connor wrote: >>> Hi This should work, are you using the latest released rev's of the patches listed, are you using the packages from 8/07? So what are the exact steps you followed, and the step where the error occurs. Enda Sergiy Kolodka wrote: > Guys, > Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade > from Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? > > I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, > but lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches > in order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already > have all them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are > in fact. Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's > not what I'm looking for. > > So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? > > Thanks ! > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > > > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >>> -- >>> >> >> ___ >> zones-discuss mailing list >> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >> > > -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Enda, If you go over the 72099 carefully, here is what it says now: The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released you can not use LU on systems with zones Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12 SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released you can not use LU on systems with zones Solaris 10 x86 120273-13 SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. Reason: Adding patch 120272-12 or 120273-13 corrupts the /etc/sma/snmpd.conf file causing the snmpd services not to come up after patching. That is what I am trying to convey. That is the confusion right here ! Its affecting the JP Ihsan Enda O'Connor wrote: Hi Appears there is some confusion here, what is the patch that is missing, I though the patch list was complete by now, 9 thre were issues with the u4 Ku not being available due to a requirement being uprev'ed. I could be wrong, but as u4 is finished all patches are now cut. Enda Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote: Hi Enda, What is the status of the NOTE in 72099 ? Are you saying that the list is complete and that whatever is there is final and it should work now ? *Should the info doc be revised then ? Please advise * NOTE: *This patch list is currently incomplete for Solaris[TM] 10 systems running zones. * One patch that impacts patching zones is not available for either SPARC or x86 platforms. *If you are not using Live Upgrade on a system involving zones, the patch list below is complete.* Ihsan Enda O'Connor wrote: Hi This should work, are you using the latest released rev's of the patches listed, are you using the packages from 8/07? So what are the exact steps you followed, and the step where the error occurs. Enda Sergiy Kolodka wrote: Guys, Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm looking for. So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? Thanks ! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Appears there is some confusion here, what is the patch that is missing, I though the patch list was complete by now, 9 thre were issues with the u4 Ku not being available due to a requirement being uprev'ed. I could be wrong, but as u4 is finished all patches are now cut. Enda Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote: > Hi Enda, > > What is the status of the NOTE in 72099 ? Are you saying that the > list is complete and that whatever is there is final and it should > work now ? > *Should the info doc be revised then ? Please advise > * > NOTE: *This patch list is currently incomplete for Solaris[TM] 10 > systems running zones. * > One patch that impacts patching zones is not available for either > SPARC or x86 platforms. > *If you are not using Live Upgrade on a system involving zones, the > patch list below is complete.* > > Ihsan > > Enda O'Connor wrote: >> Hi >> This should work, >> are you using the latest released rev's of the patches listed, are you >> using the packages from 8/07? >> >> So >> what are the exact steps you followed, and the step where the error occurs. >> >> >> Enda >> >> Sergiy Kolodka wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from >>> Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? >>> >>> I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but >>> lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in >>> order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all >>> them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. >>> Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm >>> looking for. >>> >>> So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> >>> >>> This message posted from opensolaris.org >>> ___ >>> zones-discuss mailing list >>> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> zones-discuss mailing list >> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org >> > > -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi Enda, What is the status of the NOTE in 72099 ? Are you saying that the list is complete and that whatever is there is final and it should work now ? Should the info doc be revised then ? Please advise NOTE: This patch list is currently incomplete for Solaris[TM] 10 systems running zones. One patch that impacts patching zones is not available for either SPARC or x86 platforms. If you are not using Live Upgrade on a system involving zones, the patch list below is complete. Ihsan Enda O'Connor wrote: Hi This should work, are you using the latest released rev's of the patches listed, are you using the packages from 8/07? So what are the exact steps you followed, and the step where the error occurs. Enda Sergiy Kolodka wrote: Guys, Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm looking for. So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? Thanks ! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Hi This should work, are you using the latest released rev's of the patches listed, are you using the packages from 8/07? So what are the exact steps you followed, and the step where the error occurs. Enda Sergiy Kolodka wrote: > Guys, > Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from > Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? > > I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but > lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in > order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all > them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. Whey > I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm > looking for. > > So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? > > Thanks ! > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Sergiy, The info doc 72099 is clear about LU with zones still, here is the NOTE: NOTE: This patch list is currently incomplete for Solaris[TM] 10 systems running zones. One patch that impacts patching zones is not available for either SPARC or x86 platforms. If you are not using Live Upgrade on a system involving zones, the patch list below is complete. I guess, we still need to wait for the list of patches to be finalized Ihsan Sergiy Kolodka wrote: Guys, Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm looking for. So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? Thanks ! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org -- ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] S10 U3 Live Upgrade with zones
Guys, Can someone please confirm or deny if it is possible to do LiveUpgrade from Solaris 11/06 with zones installed to Solaris 8/07 ? I've tried to apply all patches mentioned in 72099 doco from SunSolve, but lucreate keep complaining that I need to install all required patches in order to do upgrade with zones, and I'm pretty sure that I already have all them installed, actually I checked that five times and they are in fact. Whey I deattached zones process went pretty smooth, but that's not what I'm looking for. So, am I missing something or LiveUpgrade with zones still doesn't work ? Thanks ! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
