Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
And I have a quick and dirty view implementation for local
role/sharing. Reimplementing it based on formlib would be a lot of
work, so maybe I should just check in my code.
As I'm not even sure what it does I'd defi
Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
[-] means that we don't want/need to convert this
[?] means that we still have to decide if and how this should be
converted
[/] means unfinished
Regarding RSS: you've written
[/] ISyndicatable @@rss.xml (not hooke
Hi Yuppie,
Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
[-] means that we don't want/need to convert this
[?] means that we still have to decide if and how this should be
converted
[/] means unfinished
Regarding RSS: you've written
[/] ISyndicatable @@rss.xml (not hooked up):
--
Am 07.09.2012, 09:01 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
I have additional data, but still have to verify it and merge it into
the CMF trunk todos. Just updated the todo for 'content' and added one
for 'skins'.
[-] means that we don't want/need to convert this
[?] means that we still have to decide if
Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 06.09.2012, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
There are the (incomplete) todo lists for browser views. I'd also
like to revisit the names we did choose for the views and make them
the default target of Actions.
hm, I drew up the lists from the existing Scripts/
I always like the solipsism of replying to myself! ;-)
Am 06.09.2012, 16:58 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark
:
hm, I drew up the lists from the existing Scripts/Templates and thought
it was complete. I've just checked again and can only find the following
as not done:
- [?] viewThreadsAtBotto
Am 06.09.2012, 16:24 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
These changes provide better backward compatibility for code using CMF
tools/utilities and better forward compatibility for running CMF on Zope
4. (*If* the proposed changes become part of Zope 4.)
As you say, if.
We don't have to wait for the Zo
Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 06.09.2012, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
What is, in your view, missing from a final release?
Laurence proposed some changes for the utilities:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2012-September/030381.html
If we agree that's the way to go, I'd lik
Am 06.09.2012, 15:29 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
We're hoping for a Zope4 alpha by the end of the year. I'm currently
running CMF 2.2 / Plone 4.3 on my branch with only a couple of minor
changes. Its really only the RequestContainer aq rewrapping which
causes a problem. With my branch that beco
On 6 September 2012 15:06, Charlie Clark
wrote:
> Hiya Laurence,
>
> Am 06.09.2012, 14:46 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
>
>
>> I think the downsides from leaving it out are:
>
>
>> * Another branch of five.localsitemanager to maintain.
>
>
>> * Incompatibility between CMF 2.3 and Zope 4 once the pa
Hiya Laurence,
Am 06.09.2012, 14:46 Uhr, schrieb Laurence Rowe :
I think the downsides from leaving it out are:
* Another branch of five.localsitemanager to maintain.
* Incompatibility between CMF 2.3 and Zope 4 once the parent pointer
changes go in.
What's the timescale for that? I don
On 6 September 2012 14:06, Charlie Clark
wrote:
> Am 06.09.2012, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
>
>
>> Good.
>> What is, in your view, missing from a final release?
>> Laurence proposed some changes for the utilities:
>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2012-September/030381.html
>
>
>> If
Am 06.09.2012, 13:11 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
Good.
What is, in your view, missing from a final release?
Laurence proposed some changes for the utilities:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2012-September/030381.html
If we agree that's the way to go, I'd like to have his changes in CMF
Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 05.09.2012, 09:07 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable
syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view.
Tests landed yesterday and I also ran them with the oldstyle
implementation.
Good.
What is, in
Am 05.09.2012, 09:07 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable
syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view.
Tests landed yesterday and I also ran them with the oldstyle
implementation.
What is, in your view, missing from a final release?
Hi Charlie!
Charlie Clark wrote:
* is there an easy way to write the test for something that requires a
tool and some content?
The setup of your doctest looks fine, you just have to enable
syndication for the folder (app.site) to get the view.
* backporting the changes to the PythonScript
Yuppie recently pointed out that I'd completely forgotten about the RSS
output of my changes to syndication which was broken. While I was fixing
this I was struck by two things:
* is there an easy way to write the test for something that requires a
tool and some content?
* backporting the
17 matches
Mail list logo
