directives
themselves added in 2003. The *warning* about them was added in 2004.
The configuration to *disable* them appears to have been added in 2005.
What the hell docutils was doing turning this feature on by default...
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:00 am, Richard Jones wrote:
> I'm migrating our 2.7-developed Product to 2.8. The following change has me
> puzzled. In 2.7, AccessControl.ZopeGuards guarded_getitem has the
> following code:
OK, Tres made the change, with the relevant bit of the log
0
security.setDefaultAccess(_checkAccess)
which obviously doesn't work any more, since "name" is never a item name, it's
always None.
Richard
pgpj6UDo2aBsA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-
ose only exposure
to Zope 3 has been through two sprints. I've not actually tried to develop
any sort of application using it. My day job is very firmly fixed in Zope 2,
and isn't likely to change for a long time. So I'm definitely speaking from
ignorance of real-world application
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 05:26 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
> That is, there's no acquisition context on the simple string. To "fix" the
> problem, I changed secure_url to be a ComputedAttribute which looked up the
> instance attribut
url. This then gave the value a valid acquisition
chain and everything "works" now.
I'm really sorry I can't be more helpful and produce a useful test case, but
I've a bazillion deadlines falling on the floor. Maybe in a few months. For
now I just needed a work-around
e work - but note I know practically nothing about SOAP -
I just want to be able to use it.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBv2oRrGisBEHG6TARAgCuAJ0fVQoVsme1ShzPYT3rpw6mE6etXgCfb6Uf
sp8baNmBJP1rV7yF/
code...
Actually, this is a point I wanted to make a long time ago. I believe there
would have been less confusion all around (and some still lingers) if there
had have been more information in the checkin message than "DWIMy code". DWIM
only really has meaning to certain sets of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:03 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Richard Jones reported an issue with the patch, but couldn't give us a
> simple case. Users who *have* such weird applications can reverse the
> patch, find workarounds, or whatever,
f this
sort.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBdcksrGisBEHG6TARAvDvAJ4oHmYvLcZG+ltfW7+CIyemzVHimACfc3lP
0g5TiJFRGSB5LFEn2qK27hM=
=KedN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED
is that my code does that
invokes the DWIM'y code.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBdLffrGisBEHG6TARAlEZAJ46betsryQklXpFxPFK1EuxozGZxwCghtGG
+XdZTjWsgdahMh6qqGrwPL4=
=v/LZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-
olks using the beta
Yep, fair enough.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBUffArGisBEHG6TARAni2AJ91sSfjNfzMQcEoG4U6zeiAc7GJ9wCeMzY4
10Ol8uSnIojUvCWbl4c9Mqg=
=cWQn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
__
allout, I have a huge backlog of work to catch up on ;)
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBUVJorGisBEHG6TARAkPXAJ9ZPiTqzqwWT9ziPsobk0PzMm1eRACbB6ah
gHxjiD/alPSmQiTzENXJCeA=
=Ly80
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/2004, at 1:00 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just stick the code back in there for now and we'll see what Tres
says.
No word from Tres, 2.7 branch release coming up...
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2
oken. I'll be testing for the rest of today, and if all
goes well I'll get the 2.7 branch installed tomorrow.
Thanks for all your help and support, Chris!
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBR7vhrGisBEHG6TARAi59AKCAXYGiOWm5vVek8YJrWeKls0Uhd
or the patch to have this effect.
> I'm not even sure why it does have this effect; the "validate" function
> is just too byzantine to understand without taking it through the
> debugger.
You can say that again. My head hurts every time I need to look into
validate() and friend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:15 pm, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 21:18, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On the "proposals" object though, we don't have any delaration for the
> > "secure_url&quo
t to filter
acquired-but-not-aceessible results from 'guarded_getattr'." and I'm not sure
what that means :)
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBR5hnrGisBEHG6TARAuucAJ42D8pU6kuPQ+mBwadqJq8uQbG12gCggN2u
AzBBhs5eCekTdl6bYtyBrCk=
=
'm
not sure it'll tell me any more than fsrefs.py though.
- From my reading of the fsrefs.py output, it looks like the corruption is the
result of a single transaction.
I'm more than happy to look into this further, and also to supply the Data.fs
(200Mb unpacked, 20Mb packed) to
ll you what would
be or is currently acquired.
The code is attached. We mix it in with every object. A sample output is also
attached.
I have found it invaluable when debugging permissions problems.
Would this be a useful thing to add to 2.8?
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SI
ian stable
...why aren't you running on Python 2.3?
Currently running zope 2.6.2 but in the middle of upgrading dev server
to zope 2.7 and python 2.3 to see if this helps.
Thanks for your help with this.
Richard.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
your help on this as I am lost at what steps to take next.
Thanks,
Richard.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/ma
is certainly more, but this is a start... ;-)
That's quite a list.
> One could start from Eclipse/PyDev (http://pydev.sourceforge.net/) and
> add features.
Or start with IDLE which already has a lot of Python support (duh :)
Richard
-BEGIN P
hasn't
already come up with a good system that templates SQL, CSS, email, etc
nicely.
There's an awful lot of templating systems there...
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbTr0rGisBEHG6TARApGiAJ4z7ZTRh/hsg87UnUP1yaoePpil0ACfTtrH
t
y". I could be wrong though :)
> For Zope 2.8 it might be reasonable to consider also making the case
> where accessing objects that have been removed without uncataloging is
> also an exception.
I think this is a good policy.
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
rors. So I blame some mechanism
failing under load. I also often see ReadConflictErrors, but I understand
they're going away soon :)
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/ma
king Zope go faster - it might help.
http://zope.org/Members/richard/docs/zope_optimisation.html
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts o
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:45:43AM +1300, Richard Waid wrote:
How about something along the lines of:
- Development team only disclosure for the first x days (2 to 7 days is
the maximum here I would think), in order to develop a workaround/patch.
- Full disclosure after that
hat _all_ the available
security holes are available to a user who cracks the Zope collector site?
--Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lis
hen Zope is first started, and thus increase the
chances that product authors will modify their products (or be coerced
to do so :)), without actually breaking them?
--Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:25 pm, Richard Jones wrote:
> 1. request comes in which modifies ZODB
> 2. code handling request replies with REQUEST.RESPONSE.redirect()
> 3. redirected page uses data input at step 1 (specifically, it's auth info)
>but that info hasn't been co
hts? Is there some way to hold the redirect off until after the
transaction is committed normally?
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cro
viously be bad places for things to go wrong :)
Best regards,
Richard Waid
Network/Software Engineer
http://iopen.net
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Re
t should work when you test it.
4. Set to content-type text/xml -- you will get a security
violation when you test it (Unauthorized: You are not allowed to
access 'id' in this context).
-
Any help tracking down this problem would be very greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Ri
so I can't really comment on how it works in
practise...
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
to
be able to::
tal:repeat="user,files here/listFilesByUser"
or similar. Currently we would have to use a python: expression to manually
unpack the tuple. Kinda yucky.
Any comments?
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, July 5, 2003, at 04:50 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Richard Jones wrote at 2003-7-1 12:03 +1000:
...
PageTemplateFile (via Script and SimpleItem) inherits Item. This class
has an attribute "id" set to '' by default. Pag
Id() method:
def getId(self):
name = self.id
if callable(name):
return name()
if name:
return name
if hasattr(self, '__name__'):
return self.__name__
raise AttributeError, 'This object has no id'
_w__name__ mixin was created for pretty much this
situation. Any objections to adding that mixin to PageTemplateFile by
default instead of the vanilla SimpleItem.Item?
Also, is there a reason why Item_w__name__ doesn't define getId() when
it does define _setId()?
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
t; > > it looks like it does a lot of things Right.
> >
> > Sorry, I haven't really been paying attention so this might be completely
> > OT. It *sounds* like it's being suggested that we replace "make" (given
> > the above statement). Has anyone used S
paying attention so this might be completely OT.
It *sounds* like it's being suggested that we replace "make" (given the above
statement). Has anyone used SCons? http://www.scons.org/
Richard
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
ands. Even on a powerful machine the ZEO clients can take
quite some time to start up. Does anyone know why this might be? I'm
talking here about a brand-new ZEO server with practically empty ZODB.
No additional Products.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (
t;dumb", point-n-click) users to know that they need to install product
X in their ZEO server but not product Y? Dieter's solution of some
configuration variable controlling this sounds like a really good idea,
if possible.
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
critical change is the way that the macros are handled. The
ComputedAttribute stuff just doesn't make sense (and is horribly complicated)
when you're not using acquisition. The good news is that TAL requires no
changes if you implement a dummy zLOG. I ended up removing the dependency.
Richar
was happening while I was doing my port, so I don't have
any of that. I also can't just update from the ZPT CVS any more.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross p
on within Zope am I missing in my wrapper?
Hurm. I can't answer this directly, but I have done the same as you and
divorced ZPT completely from Zope for Roundup. See http://roundup.sf.net/ in
the roundup.cgi.[PageTemplates|TAL|ZTUtils] packages.
Richard
_
d I ran out of tuits before the 2.6 release. I believe
the final integration was simply lost somewhere between Anthony and Brian -
but they'd know what the exact situation is.
> PS: Richard, I'm CCing this to you because you mentioned you're
> accepting patches an
it was the example rST PEP posted in comp.lang.python.
> So that would explain it. I read stuff like the below as being part of
> rST, when presumably they are a PEP thing.
You are correct - the formatting restrictions have been carried over fro
tp://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/rst/quickstart.html
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
27;s ambiguities in stx that the rest parser might
not interpret in the same manner as the stx parser. The docutils/rest project
has an analysis of the stx format:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/spec/rst/problems.html
Richard
___
Zope-
I recently managed to lock myself out of zope. Is there a way to
recover/copy the database containing the DTML documents/ZSQL methods etc. to
a new installation? I have had no success in logging into zope with the new
superuser I created..
Thanks,
Richard
ram Files\TestZope\bin>python "C:\program files\testzope\zpasswd.py"
>access
but after entering username/password, specifying cleartext and hitting n or
return at the domain restrictions - the user does not appear to get created.
Any advice on
ted Identity support.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.
At 17:52 23/04/2002 -0700, Jason Spisak wrote:
>It would appear that their FTP implementation is not working
>correctly, when connecting to a Zope FTP system behind a
>firewall.
>
>Zope is running on port 8880 and ftp service works fine from
>inside the firewall on port 8821. From outside the fir
Someone out there might like to sanity check my thinking on a possible
security hole that arises if some form of cookie authentication, the
CookieCrumbler for instance, is used with Zope.
The scenario of concern is when cookie authentication is being used and
Zope is accessed by a browser via
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:27, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shou
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:29, Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:30:56 +1100, Richard Jones
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I'm investigating why our product ZODB is growing when it shouldn't. I've
> >found that the undo log has entries in
ave any ideas why we're seeing this behaviour?
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
framework that Zope 3 could with greater ease than most CMSs
be made compliant or at least capable of sustaining.
Maybe someone can offer an opinion about this?
Thanks in anticipation.
Richard Volpato
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
isn't addressed there, I'm
sure the author of ReST would love to hear about it!
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists
ff in my delerious state... :)
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http:
it include the (very simple) calls to the
profiler instead?
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/lis
hink the performance hit is really quite minimal for two if statements at
the entry and exit point(s) of a function to turn the behaviour on and off.
Richard
ps. don't forget Anthony, our first reaction when we both thought of this
approach was *shudder* :)
___
> approach.
That's my opinion too, but I have had no feedback from zope-coders...
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists
tion was asked on zope-coders, and got no
response. I figure if no-one answers within a week of my original posting,
I'll just check it in as a product.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org
on.
That's only during parsing - the result of the ZPT parse is a highly
optimised rendering structure.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 21:42, seb bacon wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 21:58, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote:
> > > I wrote:
> > > > I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the
> > > > zope
e refresh if you ask me...
Yeah, as the README states - the profiling data is memory-only - I'm going to
look into a post-publish hook that stuffs the result from a single run into
the ZODB.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAI
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:53, seb bacon wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
> > announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise
> > them :) ( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfil
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:10, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> >>> Richard Jones wrote
> >
> > I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
> > announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise
> > them :) ( http://www.zo
I've just announced our Call Profiler product on zope.org and the zope
announce list (waiting for people in different timezones to authorise them :)
( http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/CallProfiler/ for the impatient)
In a nutshell, it patches the rendering guts of DTMLMethod, ZSQL
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 04:01, Chris Withers wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://roundup.sf.net/
> >
> > ... is in heavy development, but is also being used right now.
> >
> >
>
> Well, it's written in Python, so pr
http://roundup.sf.net/
... is in heavy development, but is also being used right now.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Rel
is a dedicated zope list about 'applications'
(under which all kinds of "Zapplications" might be discussed thus giving
direction to developers and users alike).
Oopps, this has got 10x bigger than I had expected. Hope length of argument
is matched by breadth of relevance and heigh
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 19:49, Danny William Adair wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:41, Richard Jones wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 16:34, Danny William Adair wrote:
> > > As from what I know (leaving aside for a moment that I basically know
> >
ou know when or where this "switch" to nobody is performed?
in z2[s].py (lines 831 onwards in z2s.py)
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML enc
that's all I can see.
If the server is run as nobody, that user probably won't have permission to
write the compiled bytecodes to disk.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
, which you haven't supplied. A full traceback of the
error will go a long way to helping you.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Re
Under python 2.1.1, zope 2.4.1, long in properties get truncated by exactly
one character each time they are saved. This most likely results from the
Good Old Days when long int representations had a trailing 'L', which no
longer exists.
Richard
ps. how's the collect
he .pyo as well?
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.o
gt; My understanding is that the zope hotfix is not required for version
> 2.4.1 and higher.
Zope 2.4.1 includes the hotfix. The hotfix does not fix the "too many open
files" problem. I don't believe there's any compatibility problems (we're
using both OK here).
Ric
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=105470&func=detail&aid=231249
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related l
ched (but not in python
2.1.1). There's a patch on sourceforge for it in any case.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=105470&func=detail&aid=231249
No fiddling with max open files required.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist
ation data lives and how it looks.
OK, I've joined that list. I did not realise the worm can was this big :)
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
I've just created the follwing fishbowl proposal:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BatteriesIncludedDistribution
Please read and comment.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/lis
the idea's still very young :)
Fishbowl proposal has been created - I'm announcing it in another thread.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encodin
stuff is targetted at.
I'd say that adding a multi-instance ability would be possible - we'd just
have to be able to handle multiple config files. We're just not sure how it
should be handled in the UI :)
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist
useful.
So does that mean they have different names in the service manager? How do
you configure the instances?
Richard
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
e all things we've addressed, but it'd be good to note them
somewhere. We've tried to make the process of using Zope (and hence our
product) as painless to the average Windows user (and Mac user) as possible.
Richard
___
Zope-Dev mail
well-known in the windows
community originally from O'Reilly: http://www.oreilly.com/software/index.html
... and since Zope is a fairly distinctive name ...
Richard
ps. happy to put this up as a project if required.
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
open-source
components of our product. We cannot distribute the source code of our
product - that would be sheer foolishness. We've invested about 2 man-years
in the code, and we're not about to just give that away. Our investors would
string
//www.zope.org/Members/anthony/BarewordExcepts
Feel free to find the bad except: and submit a patch...
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [
ore limited
>than the Python stack limit. When the thread's stack overflew,
>the process was killed by Solaris.
>Python did not have any chance to raise an exception
>as the death was immediate.
>
> We may need to ask the Python maintainers to increase the
>
ception is.
> I seem to remeber some ExessiveRecursion or some such error that popped up
> on me a year or two ago, has that left for happier hunting fields?
Again - try that code in an interactive interpreter if you really want to
find out what's going on...
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[
We're currently using python 2.1 to run zope 2.3.2 with no ill effects. We
have written our own product that uses some OFS stuff, Catalog and ZPT. Not
much else...
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
___
pletely failed to build anything using extensionbuilder :(
Has anyone had any luck? We're going to try to build the Components
directory by hand tomorrow.
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
_
Phil Harris wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> Try search for extensionbuilder.py, this is the magic.
>
> If you can't find it let me know and I'll send it to you.
>
> Be warned though that there are some things it doesn't cope with, the new
> btree stuff spri
Are there plans for building a python 2.1 compatible Zope 2.3.2 binary
release for windows?
If not, could someone please let me know what the magic is for building it?
I did a search on zope.org, but found little of use...
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software
C++ hell trying to get freetype2 and the python ft2_interface
compiled for windows. Argh.
Oh yeah, another thing I noticed is that the Zope profiling seems to break
if an xmlrpc call is invoked. Just hangs when it hits the call. Any clues?
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
> in Python 2.1. It should speed it up dramatically.
I wish we had the luxury of moving to python 2.1 :(
Richard
--
Richard Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Developer, Bizar Software (www.bizarsoftware.com.au)
___
Zope-Dev maillist
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
