bakhtiar a hamid wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:17, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>>Yes. Let's make a procedure for that:
>>
>>* find the document you think would be good to have
>>
>>* propose it on this list
>>
>
>
> http://www.jrandolph.com/blog/?p=23#comment-324
>
> has a good comment
On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:17, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
> Yes. Let's make a procedure for that:
>
> * find the document you think would be good to have
>
> * propose it on this list
>
http://www.jrandolph.com/blog/?p=23#comment-324
has a good comment with good links.
http://zissue.berlios.d
> Something like http://plone.org/products?
Why not? If it fits the bill.
>
> > zope.org should not be a member login based site IMNSHO.
>
> Why not have a members.zope.org that is a community site, with wikis and
> the lot, where the community can play their games, and a zope3.org and/or
On Feb 9, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Why not have a members.zope.org that is a community
> site, with wikis and the lot, where the community can
> play their games, and a zope3.org and/or a zope.org
> that is the outward facing part of the community,
> much more tightly controlled fo
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:28:22 -, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:09 +0100, Max M wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
If we cannot make it work in Zope 2 or 3, maybe we should use rails ;-)
I know Max is kidding; but to comment to Chris. One of the main
prob
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:00:43 -, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Tonico Strasser wrote:
IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity,
is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and
the whole TTW content management system.
I think
On 2/9/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:28 +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > But other than that, I think we should
> > focus on having a zope3.org.
> A zope.org and zope3.org?
Yup.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 00:05 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi Martijn,
>
>
> I would say, let's not bite off more than we can chew. Getting a punch
> web-site is not easy. The hard part is reducing the amount of content, not
> creating it. I'd say focus on Zope 3 for now - it's what we want t
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:09 +0100, Max M wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>
>
> If we cannot make it work in Zope 2 or 3, maybe we should use rails ;-)
>
I know Max is kidding; but to comment to Chris. One of the main
problems to avoid is 'kruft' and bit-rot. zope.org suffers this to the
point o
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:28 +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> But other than that, I think we should
> focus on having a zope3.org.
A zope.org and zope3.org?
Andrew
> ___
> Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zo
On 2/9/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still hopeful we can at least swap out zope.org's frontpage and
> initial pages with something better that describes both Zope 2, Zope 3,
> and its relationship. Quite a bit of text is already written that
> attempts that which is in codes
Chris Withers wrote:
Tonico Strasser wrote:
IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design
complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log
in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system.
I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN. (This
Tonico Strasser wrote:
IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity,
is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the
whole TTW content management system.
I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN. (This would
also effectively
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Besides brochure-style information, I'm less confident about presenting
up to date documentation on Zope 2, however. If we get people to edit
the Zope 2 documentation for inclusion, then I'm all for it. I have my
doubts that we'll get enough community interest in doing so
On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Mark Pratt wrote:
[snip]
If the idea is to deliver the message that Zope 3 is great,
clutting the message with Zope 2 cruft (not the same as if we
have some really great zope 2 documentation, but what's there
has rotted quite a bit) is
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Martijn,
* are we going to target Zope 3 only with this site, or Zope 2 as
well? I wrote text to cover both, as Zope 2 is currently the
breadwinner of most of us. I think we can get enthusiasm more
easily for Zope 3 however; nobody is going
Mark Pratt wrote:
[snip]
If the idea is to deliver the message that Zope 3 is great, clutting
the message with Zope 2 cruft (not the same as if we have some really
great zope 2 documentation, but what's there has rotted quite a bit)
is not likely to help. Maybe we can (and should) get there
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Martijn,
* are we going to target Zope 3 only with this site, or Zope 2 as
well? I wrote text to cover both, as Zope 2 is currently the
breadwinner of most of us. I think we can get enthusiasm more easily
for Zope 3 however; nobody is going to write Zope 2 tutorials
Hi,
Just one point.
On Feb 9, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:17:25 -, baiju m
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we can have these kind of documentation:
Documentation
-
- Zope 3 Tutorial
- Zope 2 Tutorial (Using Five and so lead the user to
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:17:25 -, baiju m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we can have these kind of documentation:
Documentation
-
- Zope 3 Tutorial
- Zope 2 Tutorial (Using Five and so lead the user towards Zope3)
- What's new in {Zope2|3|CMF|Five} releases
- ZopeBook (Zope 2
On 2/9/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * we need start collecting Zope 3 documentation we can put online. We
> > need to mine what's there online right now, approach the creators with a
> > proposal for a new home (we could even have a mockup of it all in the
> > grand new design,
Hi Martijn,
* are we going to target Zope 3 only with this site, or Zope 2 as well?
I wrote text to cover both, as Zope 2 is currently the breadwinner of
most of us. I think we can get enthusiasm more easily for Zope 3
however; nobody is going to write Zope 2 tutorials. What do we do?
I w
Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I have created http://del.icio.us/zope3 to collect bookmarks of
>> zope3 docs, tutorials and packages/applications.
>>
>> I'd like to share that account with interested persons
>> (contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
> Is it okay if I just 'for' a lot of those links I have al
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
[newsletter]
I'm preparing to run a zope newsletter from the planetzope.org site. If
needed it could be (re)integrated with the new zopeweb at any time.
Sounds like a good plan. You're willing to do the work, and we have a
venue (planetzope.org). We can integrate i
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I started work on a new layout with Andrew Sawyers a few months ago.
I'm more than happy to continue.
http://modscape.com/zope
http://www.modscape.com/zope/homepage_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/download_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/products_html
The design
On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Tonico Strasser wrote:
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I started work on a new layout with Andrew Sawyers a few months
ago. I'm more than happy to continue.
http://modscape.com/zope
http://www.modscape.com/zope/homepage_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/download_html
h
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I started work on a new layout with Andrew Sawyers a few months ago. I'm
more than happy to continue.
http://modscape.com/zope
http://www.modscape.com/zope/homepage_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/download_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/products_html
The designs
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I started work on a new layout with Andrew Sawyers a few months ago.
I'm more than happy to continue.
http://modscape.com/zope
http://www.modscape.com/zope/homepage_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/download_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/products_html
The desig
I started work on a new layout with Andrew Sawyers a few months ago.
I'm more than happy to continue.
http://modscape.com/zope
http://www.modscape.com/zope/homepage_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/download_html
http://www.modscape.com/zope/products_html
The designs are standards based. Ple
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
In order to get some sense of progress, here I'l list a status report of
what we've been up to. Most importantly I will list some stuff we need
to do. Since I've been busy I'm probably out of the loop on some stuff,
so please post your bits in this thread.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
* does anyone know a good web designer who can design a solid looking,
serious, but still exciting website for zope?
Whether a site is exciting or not is purely subjective I think. I find
w3.org very exciting, but I guess many here don't ;)
Making a solid design should
On Monday 06 February 2006 19:43, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In order to get some sense of progress, here I'l list a status report of
> what we've been up to. Most importantly I will list some stuff we need
> to do. Since I've been busy I'm probably out of the loop on some stuff,
> so p
32 matches
Mail list logo
