Gary Poster wrote:
While reasearching Ajax technology, I stumbled across this site:
http://www.backbase.com/
I doubt we'll agree as a community on a non-open-source platform.
I wouldn't dream of suggesting that. It was the approach I found
interresting.
What I meant was that we could deve
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 17:16, Craeg Strong wrote:
> Would the Twisted integration work with Twisted Web2?
Yes.
> I understand Twisted supports SSL out of the box,
> which would seem to obviate the need for virtual hosting underneath Apache.
The branch runs happily the Twisted SSL servers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Florent Guillaume wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>
>>>
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role
On Sep 7, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Craeg Strong wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Does this have anything to do with cocoon2-style pipelines and
XSLT?
As you see in the PEP, yes, it could be used for such a thing.
Well, only *very* loosly. WSGI lets you create course-grained
static p
Craeg Strong wrote:
...
Gary Poster wrote:
...
Does this have anything to do with cocoon2-style pipelines and XSLT?
As you see in the PEP, yes, it could be used for such a thing.
Well, only *very* loosly. WSGI lets you create course-grained
static pipelines. Cocoon is much more flexi
Oops, back on list, with updated subject line.
Thanks so much for the info, it is really good news!
Count me as another person interested in these upcoming Zope 3.2 changes.
Maybe in a few weeks I will be savvy enough to help out in some way.
Would the Twisted integration work with Twisted Web2
On Sep 7, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Max M wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
The use case for this tool is to allow rich view components, such
as form widgets (but there are many other examples), that rely on
JS and CSS to work in a more componentized, drop-in way.
While reasearching Ajax technolog
Gary Poster wrote:
The use case for this tool is to allow rich view components, such as
form widgets (but there are many other examples), that rely on JS and
CSS to work in a more componentized, drop-in way.
While reasearching Ajax technology, I stumbled across this site:
http://www.backb
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/7/05, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It means a test failed and you should go to http://buildbot.zope.org and
find out more.
Somebody who understands that display is welcome to write
documentation for it, because I can't find it, and it's not exactly
obvious
Martijn Pieters wrote:
As soon as my current project winds down (end of this week) I'd love to
set up a few buildbot instances here at Pareto
That would be great, especially because we don't have any Debian slaves yet.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
On Sep 7, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.org/
>> Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ResourceLibrary.
>>
>> WARNING: zope.org exhibiting some
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object tha
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
While the browser:page directive can take a content class for its 'for'
attribute (instead of an interface), the browser:defaultView directive
doesn't accept this. I tried changing the interface of the defaultView
directive so it also accepts classes, but that
Hi there,
While the browser:page directive can take a content class for its 'for'
attribute (instead of an interface), the browser:defaultView directive
doesn't accept this. I tried changing the interface of the defaultView
directive so it also accepts classes, but that by itself does not appe
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
But a schema is useful for more than "specifying the values of an
object". All notions of schemas I've encountered (CPS Schemas, XML
Schemas, Archetypes) use the schema to constrain or validate an
existing object, yes, but also to create new objects
I'll note that I think this overlaps with Roger's pagelet system.
Dealing with resources needed by multiple page components seemed to
be a major motivation for pagelets.
Jim
Gary Poster wrote:
Benji posted this last week and we don't have any feedback yet. We
would really like some, even if
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object tha
Gary Poster wrote:
On Sep 7, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object that provides the sche
Jim Fulton wrote:
But a schema is useful for more than "specifying the values of an
object". All notions of schemas I've encountered (CPS Schemas, XML
Schemas, Archetypes) use the schema to constrain or validate an
existing object, yes, but also to create new objects from scratch
(even in the
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object that provides the schema.
An initial value doesn't constrain or specify
This is very interesting to me as well.
I am starting a project with the goal of producing a zope3-based web
application that makes heavy use of AJAX.
--Craeg
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.or
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> I've added a proposal for Zope 3.2. Read at http://www.zope.org/
>> Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ResourceLibrary.
>>
>> WARNING: zope.org exhibiting some serious caching strangeness, so
>> please comment on the
Gary Poster wrote:
> We think this will allow for a much nicer rich sub-view (i.e., rich
> widget, among others) story. We're eager to get some feedback,
> including ideas for improvements.
+1; I'd rely on this. But the next 5 weeks I have no bandwidth to give
the proposal much attention due to e
Awhile ago, someone brought up the fact that Australian timezones
were not options in the locale object; I also mentioned that the
locale database thought that en_US and en_AU (all en_*, in fact)
included Tokyo and Casablanca. I looked at the ICU information, and
they suggested that develo
Benji posted this last week and we don't have any feedback yet. We
would really like some, even if it is to ask us to clarify what the
heck it is about. Some of our other code that we want to contribute
depends on this.
The use case for this tool is to allow rich view components, such as
On Sep 7, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Janko Hauser wrote:
...
But actually this started with the observation that if we keep
default, we need something like a dynamic default, not only a fixed
value in the schema definition. This happens for example if one
wants to set the current date as the default
On 9/7/05, Uwe Oestermeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dedected another problem: bin/runzeo doesn't start ZEO.
> This script calls ZEO/runzeo.py which has a main function but no
>
> if __name__ == "__main__" :
> main()
>
> at the end. Has this already been fixed in the mentioned internal
On 9/7/05, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It means a test failed and you should go to http://buildbot.zope.org and
> find out more.
Somebody who understands that display is welcome to write
documentation for it, because I can't find it, and it's not exactly
obvious.
__
Am 07.09.2005 um 15:42 schrieb Tres Seaver:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really
don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>> I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
>> see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
>>
>> A schema is a specification for an object that provides
On Sep 7, 2005, at 9:13 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really
don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object that provides the schema.
An initial valu
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think that sources are different than initial value. I really don't
see any role that "initial value" has in an object specification.
A schema is a specification for an object that provides the schema.
An initial value doesn't constrain or specify the object. If anything,
i
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 08:41, Chris Withers wrote:
> I know Zope 2 has the bizarre need for a dual "Zope DA" and "Python DB"
> set of things, but do we have to support this pattern in Zope 3?
>
> Is there any reason the Zope 3 RBD machinery can't just work with ANY
> Python DBAPI 2.0 (or wh
I know Zope 2 has the bizarre need for a dual "Zope DA" and "Python DB"
set of things, but do we have to support this pattern in Zope 3?
Is there any reason the Zope 3 RBD machinery can't just work with ANY
Python DBAPI 2.0 (or whatever..) compatible database library?
cheers,
Chris
Florian
Benji York wrote:
> All you have to do is let us know what version(s) of Zope 3
> (trunk/branch) you are willing to test and what version(s) of Python
> you want to test against; install BuildBot (http://buildbot.sf.net);
> and connect to the master.
As soon as my current project winds down (end o
Hi
> Behalf Of Stephan Richter
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 2:10 PM
> To: zope3-dev@zope.org
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] buildbot warnings in Zope3 trunk 2.4 remy
>
> On Wednesday 07 September 2005 07:16, Benji York wrote:
> > > I agree. The info could really have some more details,
> li
Tim Peters wrote:
>Zope3 3.1's
>bin/mkzeoinstance seems to work now,
I dedected another problem: bin/runzeo doesn't start ZEO.
This script calls ZEO/runzeo.py which has a main function but no
if __name__ == "__main__" :
main()
at the end. Has this already been fixed in the mentioned intern
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 07:16, Benji York wrote:
> > I agree. The info could really have some more details, like what tests
> > failed and their exceptions.
>
> We can include the complete log of the failing test. That is currently
> several hundred lines. Perhaps if we turned down the ver
On 9/7/05, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to disable the ability for anyone on the Internet to
> force a build; I know I wasn't comfortable with that option being turned on.
Indeed. Even turning it off doesn't prevent it from displaying a
(non-working) "Ping Builder" butto
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
it's funny that you were setting up a builbot at the same time as me for
CPS (which is Zope2-based):
You might want to disable the ability for anyone on the Internet to
force a build; I know I wasn't comfortable with that option being turned on.
Also: I'm only testin
Chris Withers wrote:
I'd be up for doing this for Windows, not really surewhat it entails
though...
This is what you need:
* a machine that is always on and has connectivity
* Subversion so you can check out the source
* Python (2.3 or 2.4)
* BuildBot
* Twisted (a BuildBot dependency)
Whe
Hi guys,
it's funny that you were setting up a builbot at the same time as me for
CPS (which is Zope2-based):
http://buildbot.nuxeo.org/
I'm sorry that I can't provide slaves for Zope3, because we already have
a shortage of slaves for CPS.
Also: I'm only testing on Linux (Debian and Mandri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
>> | Sidnei appears to be broken :-(
>> | | Any idea how to reach him?
>>
>> Odd. I've been receiving email normally.
>
>
> Yeah, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
>> | Sidnei appears to be broken :-(
>> | | Any idea how to reach him?
>>
>> Odd. I've been receiving email normally.
>
>
> Yeah, but I
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 04:26, Chris Withers wrote:
Can someone explain exactly what this means? ;-)
It means a test failed and you should go to http://buildbot.zope.org and
find out more.
I agree. The info could really have some more details, like what tests
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 04:26, Chris Withers wrote:
> Can someone explain exactly what this means? ;-)
I agree. The info could really have some more details, like what tests failed
and their exceptions.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (P
I'd be up for doing this for Windows, not really surewhat it entails
though...
cheers,
Chris
Benji York wrote:
As a result of the sprint last week, we now have a BuildBot master
running (http://buildbot.zope.org/) and are ready to take willing slaves
(that is the BuildBot terminology, don't
Can someone explain exactly what this means? ;-)
Chris
zope3-dev@zope.org wrote:
The Buildbot has finished a build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 remy.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by '':
Build Source Stamp: None
Blamelist:
Buil
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
| Sidnei appears to be broken :-(
|
| Any idea how to reach him?
Odd. I've been receiving email normally.
Yeah, but I've seen this before. The enfold mail server is configured to
receive TLS mail but doesn
49 matches
Mail list logo
