spdx-tech  

Messages by Date

• 2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Wheeler, David A
• 2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Wheeler, David A
• 2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
• 2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Tom Incorvia
• 2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
• 2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall
• 2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Wheeler, David A
• 2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
• 2015/10/30 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Kate Stewart
• 2015/10/30 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Schuberth, Sebastian
• 2015/10/30 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/30 [Bug 1326] Inconsistency whether "+" is a valid character in LicenseRef ID strings bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/10/30 [Bug 1326] New: Inconsistency whether "+" is a valid character in LicenseRef ID strings bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/10/30 RE: Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/30 RE: Markup proposal Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/30 RE: Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/30 RE: Markup proposal Sam Ellis
• 2015/10/30 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Schuberth, Sebastian
• 2015/10/29 Re: joint legal-tech call Thursday!! Kate Stewart
• 2015/10/29 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Kate Stewart
• 2015/10/29 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/29 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Schuberth, Sebastian
• 2015/10/28 joint legal-tech call Thursday!! [email protected]
• 2015/10/28 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/28 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Schuberth, Sebastian
• 2015/10/28 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Bill Schineller
• 2015/10/28 Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Schuberth, Sebastian
• 2015/10/27 RE: Markup proposal Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/27 RE: Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/27 RE: Markup proposal Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/27 Re: Markup proposal Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/10/27 RE: Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/27 RE: Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/27 Markup proposal Kris . re
• 2015/10/25 RE: Proposal to post .json files for individual listed licenses Meier, Roger
• 2015/10/23 Proposal to post .json files for individual listed licenses Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/12 [Bug 1317] External links on license list exception pages are broken. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/10/07 Re: Document Namespace as URI Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/10/06 RE: Document Namespace as URI Gary O'Neall
• 2015/10/05 Document Namespace as URI Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/09/29 Tech meeting: new dialin number and screen share Kate Stewart
• 2015/09/22 RE: SPDX document validation Gary O'Neall
• 2015/09/17 Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday Bill Schineller
• 2015/09/17 Re: Feedback on External Identifiers - Debian Example Stefano Zacchiroli
• 2015/09/16 Re: SPDX Legal call this Thursday Philippe Ombredanne
• 2015/09/16 RE: SPDX Legal call this Thursday Gary O'Neall
• 2015/09/16 RE: SPDX Legal call this Thursday Sam Ellis
• 2015/09/15 RE: Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 58, Issue 2 Gary O'Neall
• 2015/09/15 Re: Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 58, Issue 2 J Lovejoy
• 2015/09/15 SPDX Legal call this Thursday J Lovejoy
• 2015/09/15 Re: Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 58, Issue 2 Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/09/15 Re: Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 58, Issue 2 Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/09/15 Minutes Posted for 2015/9/15 Tech Meeting Kate Stewart
• 2015/09/15 Fixed sharing on SPDX External packages proposal Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/09/15 Re: Spdx-tech Digest, Vol 58, Issue 2 J Lovejoy
• 2015/09/15 Feedback on External Identifiers - Debian Example Kate Stewart
• 2015/09/14 [Bug 1319] Escape linebreaks and markup characterers when generating HTML bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/09/14 [Bug 1319] New: Escape linebreaks and markup characterers when generating HTML bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/09/14 RE: HTML generation - escaping line breaks Gary O'Neall
• 2015/09/14 HTML generation - escaping line breaks Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/09/14 [Bug 1318] Creator information appears incorrectly and thrice in HTML output bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/09/14 [Bug 1318] New: Creator information appears incorrectly and thrice in HTML output bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/09/14 [Bug 1317] New: External links on license list exception pages are broken. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/09/10 Announce: Supply Chain Mini-Summit on October 8 in Dublin Kate Stewart
• 2015/09/07 SPDX document validation Steenbergen, Thomas
• 2015/08/29 Snippet info for next Tuesday's tech call Gary O'Neall
• 2015/08/25 External Packages 2.0 Proposal Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/08/25 [Bug 1311] New: Improving the definition of APPLICATION file type bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/25 Re: License List Version in SPDX Tools Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/08/25 RE: License List Version in SPDX Tools Gary O'Neall
• 2015/08/24 Re: License List Version in SPDX Tools Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/08/24 [Bug 1309] ListedLicenses.getListedLicenses().getLicenseListVersion() returns illegal version. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/24 [Bug 1309] New: ListedLicenses.getListedLicenses().getLicenseListVersion() returns illegal version. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/24 RE: License List Version in SPDX Tools Gary O'Neall
• 2015/08/24 License List Version in SPDX Tools Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/08/24 Re: License name character set Gobeille, Robert
• 2015/08/21 Revisiting the APPLICATION file type Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/08/19 Re: License name character set Kate Stewart
• 2015/08/19 Re: License name character set J Lovejoy
• 2015/08/17 SPDX Bakeoff today - info for those attending in person Kate Stewart
• 2015/08/16 [Bug 1306] New: Missing newline in tool help. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/16 [Bug 1305] New: VerificationCodeGenerator.java sorts data twice. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/12 Re: Put recent proposals all in one place Kate Stewart
• 2015/08/11 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/11 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/11 Put recent proposals all in one place Bill Schineller
• 2015/08/11 RubyGems License ID Validation Kyle E. Mitchell
• 2015/08/11 Joining late today Scott Sterling
• 2015/08/10 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/10 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/10 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/09 [Bug 1303] New: Encoding errors in converting tag/value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/08/05 RE: External/Internal Package Cardinality Comparison Gary O'Neall
• 2015/08/04 Re: External/Internal Package Cardinality Comparison Kate Stewart
• 2015/08/04 External/Internal Package Cardinality Comparison Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/30 RE: Proposal: Security and Asset Management Identifier Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/28 Re: Proposal: Security and Asset Management Identifier kate.stewart
• 2015/07/28 [Bug 1298] Proposal for specifying external package relationships bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/28 [Bug 1298] Proposal for specifying external package relationships bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/28 RE: Proposal: Security and Asset Management Identifier Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/28 Proposal: Security and Asset Management Identifier kate.stewart
• 2015/07/28 Proposal: Security and Asset Management Identifier Kate Stewart
• 2015/07/23 SPDX 2.0 Bakeoff at Linux Con NA - August 17 9am - Virginia Room kate.stewart
• 2015/07/16 [Bug 1302] Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/15 [Bug 1302] Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/15 [Bug 1302] Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/15 [Bug 1302] Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/15 [Bug 1302] New: Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix J Lovejoy
• 2015/07/15 [Bug 1302] Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/14 RE: Will miss the meeting Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/14 Draft Package External Identifier spec proposal Bill Schineller
• 2015/07/14 [Bug 1295] formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/13 Re: Will miss the meeting Kate Stewart
• 2015/07/13 Will miss the meeting Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/07/13 [Bug 1302] New: Apache 2.0 license text includes appendix bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/10 RE: Follow-up on RDF byte range Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/10 [Bug 1300] New: typos in SPDX 2.0 Spec bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/10 Re: Follow-up on RDF byte range Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/10 Re: Follow-up on RDF byte range Philippe Ombredanne
• 2015/07/09 RE: Follow-up on RDF byte range Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/09 RE: Updad versions for examples to use Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/07/09 Re: Updad versions for examples to use Jeremiah Foster
• 2015/07/08 Re: Follow-up on RDF byte range Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/08 Re: Follow-up on RDF byte range Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/08 Follow-up on RDF byte range Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/07 Release 2.0.2 Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/07 Re: Proposal for addressing dependencies on external components Kate Stewart
• 2015/07/06 Proposal for addressing dependencies on external components Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/07/06 [Bug 1298] New: Proposal for specifying external package relationships bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/07/02 Updad versions for examples to use Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/07/02 RE: Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Gary O'Neall
• 2015/07/01 Re: Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/06/30 [Bug 1297] ClassCastException with data licenses where restricted to local licenses only bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/30 [Bug 1297] New: ClassCastException with data licenses where restricted to local licenses only bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/30 [Bug 1292] What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/29 [Bug 1296] HTML generation broken with Mustache 0.7.9 bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/29 [Bug 1296] New: HTML generation broken with Mustache 0.7.9 bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/25 RE: Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/25 Re: Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/06/24 RE: Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/24 Making enums consistent with conventions and best practices Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/06/23 [Bug 1295] formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/23 Proposal: formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX Bill Schineller
• 2015/06/23 [Bug 1295] formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/23 [Bug 1295] New: formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/23 [Bug 1292] What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/23 Updated the examples wiki page Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/06/19 RE: Suggestion to Update Java Version Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/18 RE: Suggestion to Update Java Version Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/18 Re: Suggestion to Update Java Version Yev Bronshteyn
• 2015/06/18 Suggestion to Update Java Version Ryan O'Meara
• 2015/06/17 RE: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Wheeler, David A
• 2015/06/17 Re: SPDX 2.1 - proposal for snippets Sam Ellis
• 2015/06/16 [Bug 1289] Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/16 Re: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Kyle E. Mitchell
• 2015/06/16 RE: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Gisi, Mark
• 2015/06/15 Re: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Kyle E. Mitchell
• 2015/06/15 RE: [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? Sam Ellis
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1289] Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1292] New: What is the correct license expression for a project with an additional patent license? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1290] SPDXTools does not accept WITH operator in tag file LicenseConcluded field. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1291] SPDXTools does not accept exceptions in PackageLicenseInfoFromFiles tag. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1291] New: SPDXTools does not accept exceptions in PackageLicenseInfoFromFiles tag. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/14 [Bug 1290] New: SPDXTools does not accept WITH operator in tag file LicenseConcluded field. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/13 [Bug 1289] New: Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/06/10 Re: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Wolfgang Denk
• 2015/06/10 RE: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Gisi, Mark
• 2015/06/10 Re: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Wolfgang Denk
• 2015/06/09 RE: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Gisi, Mark
• 2015/06/09 SPDX 2.1 - proposal for snippets kate.stewart
• 2015/06/09 Re: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers J Lovejoy
• 2015/06/09 RE: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Meier, Roger
• 2015/06/08 Re: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Henri Yandell
• 2015/06/08 RE: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/06/08 Re: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Wolfgang Denk
• 2015/06/08 RE: SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Gisi, Mark
• 2015/06/06 SPDX Identifier in licenses/source headers Henri Yandell
• 2015/06/04 RE: Snippets Proposal Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/03 Re: Snippets Proposal Nuno Brito
• 2015/06/02 Upcoming Meetings - WIKI page for tracking. kate.stewart
• 2015/06/02 Snippets Proposal Gary O'Neall
• 2015/06/01 [Bug 1287] SPDXTools help lists PrettyPrint option that does not exist bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/31 [Bug 1287] New: SPDXTools help lists PrettyPrint option that does not exist bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/30 [Bug 1286] Add line numbers to errors when parsing SPDX tag files. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/30 [Bug 1285] Odd error when LicenseListVersion appears before Creator in SPDX tag file. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/30 [Bug 1286] New: Add line numbers to errors when parsing SPDX tag files. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/30 [Bug 1285] New: Odd error when LicenseListVersion appears before Creator in SPDX tag file. bugzilla-daemon
• 2015/05/28 Re: SPDX 2.0 database schema Thomas T Gurney
• 2015/05/28 RE: SPDX 2.0 database schema Manbeck, Jack
• 2015/05/28 Re: SPDX 2.0 database schema Thomas T Gurney
• 2015/05/27 RE: SPDX 2.0 database schema Gary O'Neall
• 2015/05/22 SPDX 2.0 database schema Thomas T Gurney
• 2015/05/19 JavaScript and Snippets Michael Herzog
• 2015/05/18 Example of combined JavaScript code Gary O'Neall
• 2015/05/18 Re: JSON version of License List Kyle E. Mitchell
• 2015/05/18 RE: JSON version of License List Gary O'Neall
• 2015/05/18 Re: JSON version of License List Bill Schineller
• 2015/05/16 Re: JSON version of License List Kyle E. Mitchell
• 2015/05/12 SPDX 2.0 announcement published. kate.stewart
• 2015/05/08 UNO SPDX Projects Matt Germonprez

• Later messages