spdx-tech

Messages by Date

2016/04/18 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Gary O'Neall
2016/04/18 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Schuberth, Sebastian
2016/04/16 RDF rules for conjunctive, disjunctive licenses. Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/16 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Gary O'Neall
2016/04/15 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Schuberth, Sebastian
2016/04/14 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Gary O'Neall
2016/04/14 [Bug 1350] Change line endings for generated JSON licenses bugzilla-daemon
2016/04/14 [Bug 1350] New: Change line endings for generated JSON licenses bugzilla-daemon
2016/04/14 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Gary O'Neall
2016/04/14 Re: Git repository for JSON license files Schuberth, Sebastian
2016/04/14 RE: Git repository for JSON license files Gary O'Neall
2016/04/14 Git repository for JSON license files Schuberth, Sebastian
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 RE: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 RE: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 RE: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Bill Schineller
2016/04/13 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/13 RE: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/04/12 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/01 RE: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile Nuno Brito
2016/04/01 Re: For review - SPDX 2.1 Model Jeremiah Foster
2016/04/01 RE: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Gary O'Neall
2016/04/01 Re: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/01 RE: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Gary O'Neall
2016/04/01 Re: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Yev Bronshteyn
2016/04/01 RE: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Gary O'Neall
2016/04/01 For review - SPDX 2.1 Model Gary O'Neall
2016/03/30 RE: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/03/30 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Kate Stewart
2016/03/30 Re: SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Bill Schineller
2016/03/30 SPDX: Many tags should NOT be mandatory for the "developer assertion" use case Wheeler, David A
2016/03/30 Re: [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf Yev Bronshteyn
2016/03/30 [Bug 1349] New: Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf bugzilla-daemon
2016/03/30 [Bug 1349] Change RDF Ontology Relationship_datafile to Relationship_datafileOf bugzilla-daemon
2016/03/30 [Bug 1348] Update the example SPDX documents that ship with the tool bugzilla-daemon
2016/03/30 [Bug 1348] New: Update the example SPDX documents that ship with the tool bugzilla-daemon
2016/03/30 SPDX 2.1 candidate walkthrough: 9-12 in Monument Peak room at Collab. Kate Stewart
2016/03/14 Draft of Appendix for Using SPDX short license identifiers in Source Files. Kate Stewart
2016/03/08 SPDX Tech concall TODAY CANCELED Bill Schineller
2016/03/02 Re: Updated templates J Lovejoy
2016/03/01 RE: Updated templates Kris . re
2016/03/01 RE: Updated templates Gary O'Neall
2016/02/29 Updated templates Kris . re
2016/02/19 RE: SPDX Expressions on npmjs.com Gary O'Neall
2016/02/19 SPDX Expressions on npmjs.com Kyle E. Mitchell
2016/02/18 Beta version of JSON license formats available on spdx.org/licenses Gary O'Neall
2016/02/09 Request for project ides for 2016 Google Summer of Code Gary O'Neall
2016/02/09 Reminder: joint call on matching/markup in 2 hours time. kate.stewart
2016/02/07 XML source files Kris . re
2016/02/04 [Bug 1341] Clarify which licenses follow Open Source Definition (OSI Approved), and not refer to all the licenses in the license list as open source licenses. bugzilla-daemon
2016/02/04 [Bug 1341] New: Clarify which licenses follow Open Source Definition (OSI Approved), and not refer to all the licenses in the license list as open source licenses. bugzilla-daemon
2016/02/01 Re: Update on matching markup/joint call J Lovejoy
2016/01/31 Re: Update Kate Stewart
2016/01/31 Re: Update Bill Schineller
2016/01/31 Update Kris . re
2016/01/19 Re: Joint tech & legal call: License templates - today J Lovejoy
2016/01/19 Joint tech & legal call: License templates - today Kate Stewart
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Gary O'Neall
2016/01/15 Re: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Josiah Krutz
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Gary O'Neall
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Gary O'Neall
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Wheeler, David A
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Manbeck, Jack
2016/01/15 Re: Relationships and Dependencies Matt Germonprez
2016/01/15 RE: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Manbeck, Jack
2016/01/15 RE: Relationships and Dependencies Gisi, Mark
2016/01/15 Re: Relationships and Dependencies Matt Germonprez
2016/01/14 Re: Machine representation of deprecated licenses Henri Yandell
2016/01/14 RE: Relationships and Dependencies Manbeck, Jack
2016/01/14 RE: Relationships and Dependencies Manbeck, Jack
2016/01/14 Machine representation of deprecated licenses Gary O'Neall
2016/01/14 Relationships and Dependencies Matt Germonprez
2016/01/05 [Bug 1289] Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 980] Signed SPDX dataset bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 632] tag-value format should be register as a mime media type bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 632] tag-value format should be register as a mime media type bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 1248] Enhancement: Add ArtifactOf to Packages bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 1248] Enhancement: Add ArtifactOf to Packages bugzilla-daemon
2016/01/05 [Bug 1295] formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/27 RE: Spdx-tools RdfToHtml Gary O'Neall
2015/12/22 [Bug 1311] Improving the definition of APPLICATION file type bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1289] Any reason "NONE" and "NOASSERTION" are not valid licenses as per Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1295] formally capture External Identifiers (e.g. Maven GAV, NIST CPE) by which a Package is known in SPDX bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1298] Proposal for specifying external package relationships bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1298] Proposal for specifying external package relationships bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1300] typos in SPDX 2.0 Spec bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1311] Improving the definition of APPLICATION file type bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1311] Improving the definition of APPLICATION file type bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1311] Improving the definition of APPLICATION file type bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1326] Inconsistency whether "+" is a valid character in LicenseRef ID strings bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1326] Inconsistency whether "+" is a valid character in LicenseRef ID strings bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1329] Clarify in specification the file suffices to use for SPDX tag:value and RDF/XML files. bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/22 [Bug 1329] Clarify in specification the file suffices to use for SPDX tag:value and RDF/XML files. bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/21 RE: Spdx-tools RdfToHtml Gary O'Neall
2015/12/21 Spdx-tools RdfToHtml Janusz Kwasny
2015/12/16 RE: Using markdown for the SPDX Specs Zavras, Alexios
2015/12/16 Re: Using markdown for the SPDX Specs Philippe Ombredanne
2015/12/15 Re: Using markdown for the SPDX Specs Kate Stewart
2015/12/15 Using markdown for the SPDX Specs Manbeck, Jack
2015/12/15 [Bug 1335] We use an obsolete URI spec for definition of Document Namespace and do so incorrectly bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/15 [Bug 1335] We use an obsolete URI spec for definition of Document Namespace and do so incorrectly bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/14 [Bug 1335] New: We use an obsolete URI spec for definition of Document Namespace and do so incorrectly bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/13 Proposed changes for external document references in Snippet proposal Gary O'Neall
2015/12/08 Re: SPDX 2.1 Best Practices Google Doc Yev Bronshteyn
2015/12/08 SPDX 2.1 Best Practices Google Doc Yev Bronshteyn
2015/12/08 Minutes from 12/8 call posted kate.stewart
2015/12/08 [Bug 1334] Simplify grammar in Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/08 [Bug 1334] New: Simplify grammar in Appendix IV? bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/08 [Bug 1332] ABNF bug? bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/08 [Bug 1333] New: SPDX SPEC fails to discuss whitespace bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/08 [Bug 1333] SPDX SPEC fails to discuss whitespace bugzilla-daemon
2015/12/08 [Bug 1332] New: ABNF bug? bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker J Lovejoy
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker J Lovejoy
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Kevin P. Fleming
2015/11/24 AW: Prototype spdxify codewalker Fendt, Oliver
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/24 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Kevin P. Fleming
2015/11/24 RE: Machine-readable form of license list? Gary O'Neall
2015/11/24 AW: Prototype spdxify codewalker Fendt, Oliver
2015/11/23 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker J Lovejoy
2015/11/23 Re: Machine-readable form of license list? Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/23 RE: Bug and issues in SPDX grammar (Appendix IV)? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/23 Bug and issues in SPDX grammar (Appendix IV)? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/23 Re: Machine-readable form of license list? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/23 RE: Prototype spdxify codewalker Branden Robinson (brarobin)
2015/11/23 RE: Prototype spdxify codewalker Wheeler, David A
2015/11/23 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/23 RE: Prototype spdxify codewalker Wheeler, David A
2015/11/23 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/23 RE: Prototype spdxify codewalker Wheeler, David A
2015/11/23 AW: Prototype spdxify codewalker Fendt, Oliver
2015/11/23 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/23 Re: Prototype spdxify codewalker Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/23 Re: Machine-readable form of license list? Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/23 RE: Machine-readable form of license list? Schuberth, Sebastian
2015/11/22 RE: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Wheeler, David A
2015/11/22 Re: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Kate Stewart
2015/11/22 [Bug 1330] consider SPDX-License-Expression as an alternate for SPDX-License-Identifier for use source files bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 [Bug 1330] New: consider SPDX-License-Expression as an alternate for SPDX-License-Identifier for use source files bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 RE: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Wheeler, David A
2015/11/22 RE: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Wheeler, David A
2015/11/22 Re: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Kate Stewart
2015/11/22 [Bug 1329] New: Clarify in specification the file suffices to use for SPDX tag:value and RDF/XML files. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 [Bug 1303] Encoding errors in converting tag:value files to RDF or Spreadsheet bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 Re: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Kate Stewart
2015/11/22 Prototype spdxify codewalker Eric S. Raymond
2015/11/22 RE: Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Wheeler, David A
2015/11/22 RE: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Wheeler, David A
2015/11/22 RE: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Gary O'Neall
2015/11/22 [Bug 1328] Link to download spdx-tools results in page not found error. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 Re: Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Sam Ellis
2015/11/22 [Bug 1328] Link to download spdx-tools results in page not found error. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/22 [Bug 1328] New: Link to download sped-tools results in page not found error. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/21 Proposed *SHORT* SPDX tutorial Wheeler, David A
2015/11/21 Re: Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Nuno Brito
2015/11/21 RE: Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Gary O'Neall
2015/11/21 [Bug 1306] Missing newline in tool help. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/21 RE: Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Wheeler, David A
2015/11/21 [Bug 1305] VerificationCodeGenerator.java sorts data twice. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/21 Canceling spdx-tech meeting on 11/24 and 12/1 Kate Stewart
2015/11/20 Re: Machine-readable form of license list? J Lovejoy
2015/11/20 Re: Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Kate Stewart
2015/11/20 Proposal: "SPDX-LICENSE" file convention Wheeler, David A
2015/11/20 RE: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? (Ben Balter) Gary O'Neall
2015/11/19 RE: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? (Ben Balter) Wheeler, David A
2015/11/19 Re: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? (Ben Balter) Kate Stewart
2015/11/19 [Bug 1327] Clarify case sensitivity of Short Form licenses - for list and tools. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/19 [Bug 1327] New: Clarify case sensitivity of Short Form licenses - for list and tools. bugzilla-daemon
2015/11/19 Re: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? (Ben Balter) J Lovejoy
2015/11/17 draft proposals status for SPDX 2.1 Bill Schineller
2015/11/16 Re: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/16 Re: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Ben Balter
2015/11/16 Re: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Ben Balter
2015/11/16 Re: Extracted text for dual license Orestis Ioannou
2015/11/16 RE: Extracted text for dual license Sam Ellis
2015/11/16 RE: Extracted text for dual license Zavras, Alexios
2015/11/16 Extracted text for dual license Orestis Ioannou
2015/11/16 RE: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Zavras, Alexios
2015/11/13 RE: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/13 RE: Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Gary O'Neall
2015/11/13 Are SPDX license identifiers case-sensitive? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/10 material for tech call later today Kate Stewart
2015/11/03 Running a couple mintes late / link to Snippets proposal Gary O'Neall
2015/11/03 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Kate Stewart
2015/11/03 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/03 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Wheeler, David A
2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/02 Re: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Philippe Ombredanne
2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall
2015/11/02 RE: Is "+" a valid character of a LicenseRef idstring? Gary O'Neall