Axil, I always like your responses because you always get me thinking deeper.  
Anyways, I feel there are a few errors in your logic.

First, you need to realize that the body - cells, DNA, etc. that form the human 
physical attributes exist in only 4 dimensions (length, width, height, and 
time).  The soul on the other hand, comes from God and imparted by God and 
hence is "Spiritual" - metaphysical.  A Soul is a "hyper-dimensional" entity.  
It exists beyond the 4 dimensions of our physical existence.  That is why it 
survives our physical death.  Your presupposition that a single fertilized egg, 
being small and non-functionalized, therefore can not "contain" the soul is a 
faulty premise.  The soul is not bound by the size nor the non-functionality of 
a single egg.

Second, you presuppose that the soul is "bound" to the cells and DNA.  IOW, you 
say that by destroying a fingernail, you are "killing" a living entity.  That 
is in fact is a faulty understanding.  The soul is not bound to any cell or 
DNA.  It exist 'with' our physical cells, DNA and body; not exist 'because of' 
our physical cells, DNA and body.  The cells does not contaiin "part of a soul" 
that you kill when you trim your fingernail.  The source of your 
(mis)understanding is the ancient occultic religion of animism, which 
presupposes that everything has a "soul", including inanimate objects like 
rocks and fingernails.

Third. The creator of our being, clearly says that life starts in the womb.  
That means, conception is the time He imparts the living soul.  The Bible 
teaches that God breathed into Adam and Adam became a Living soul.  Before 
God's breathe, Adam was just a collection of dirt.  God imparted the life.  
Before conception, the female egg is not alive, hence, when a woman experiences 
a menstrual cycle, that is not murder.  Immediately at conception, God breathe 
into that union of egg and sperm a life.  From that point on, that cells 
contains a living soul.  That life is alive until such time as God decides to 
separate that living soul from that body, hence physical death occurs.

Fourth, Putting human DNA to animal or vice versa has nothing to do with life 
or the soul.  Man can do this all day long but until God breathes into that 
creation, it is not a lviing soul.  As mentioned above, the soul is not bound 
to a cell or single DNA that you carry along with it when you transfer DNA to 
another animal.  The soul is software.  A computer is dead without software.  
You do not transfer software when you transfer a single resistor of a PC into 
another circuit.

Last, my understanding is not of my own origin.  I have no intellect to extend 
"my" theology, since it is not "my" theology to begin with.  If you want to 
understand man and his soul, you have to study the software manual that comes 
with it.  You need to study the Bible.




Jojo


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:17 AM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul?


  Some believe that the soul comes into being when the human egg is fertilized; 
aka the moment of conception.

  In this way of thinking, with DNA as the software of the soul, the human DNA 
has the potential to form a complete person, but at the time of conception no 
organ is yet formed to contain the soul.

  With current technology, any cell in the body can be transformed into a 
omnipotent cell that can produce a human.

  So human spiritual characteristic is inherent in any DNA present in the human 
body.

  If this is true, do you commit murder when you cut your hair or trim your 
finger nails?

  If a mouse is given flawed disease carrying human DNA to simulate human 
disease or a goat is given human genes to produce human insulin, have these 
animals become human with a soul.

  If a geneticist copies human DNA, and puts it into a animal cell, does the 
animal become human? What parts of human DNA define the soul?

  Please extend your theology into the domain of genetic manipulation in your 
quest to define the soul.





  On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:

    You've made my point better than I.  For when you are studying the ones and 
zeros wherever they may persist, you are in fact studying the software.  The 
ones and zeros are not hardware, they're software.

    Much like the soul.  We can spend a hundred lifetimes studying neuron 
chemical reactions, electrical impulses, cellular structure of brain cells and 
other psychological theories and mumbo-jumbo; we will never understand how 
Human consciousness works.  To understand the human soul, one needs to 
understand its creator.  Much like studying the software requires an 
understanding of Microsoft Software Engineer's design methods and techniques, 
in fact, a understanding of the man himself. 

    Tell me, can you reverse engineer the entire windows operating system from 
the ones and zeros of machine code?  Doesn't understanding windows require 
understanding of its design at a higher level? not at the machine code level?  
possibly by interviewing the designer and studying his work?  Why would one 
think he can understand the human soul by studying the individual ones and 
zeros of the neurons?

    You see, this issue goes deeper than just discussions about the human soul. 
 This issue involves our humanistic prederilection to avoid acknowledging the 
creator.  We try our best to understand ourselves without studying the human 
blueprint.  Such efforts are always doom to fail, much like the fallacies of 
Darwinian Evolution.



    Jojo


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Patrick Ellul 
      To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
      Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:43 PM
      Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul?


      If I studied close enough the inside of a computer that has MS Windows 
installed on it, without ever switching it on, I can still see and understand 
the expected behaviour. The software program is persisted as ones and zeros on 
a memory device.


      On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:

        Any psychological/psychiatric/philosophical attempt to understand the 
soul is doom to failure from the onset.

        Let says you're a hardware/ASIC/Electronics/IC engineer who designed 
the Pentuim chip.  Without understanding of the software, can you discern the 
operation of a PC from your understanding of the hardware/Chips/IC/CPU/GPU/etc? 
 At best, you understanding would be severely incomplete and faulty.  Software 
is the intangible thing that controls the behavior of the computer.  Software 
controls the hardware.

        On the same token, experts in 
Psychology/Psychiatry/Philosophy/Sociology/Humanism/etc, can never hope to 
completely understand the Human Soul.  It is that intangible entity - the soul, 
that controls the hardware consisting of your brain cells/neurons, etc.  The 
Software soul is what needs to be understood for us to understand the behavior 
of man.  You need to study the soul, not the brain.  The brain is simply a 
mechanism that the soul controls much like the CPU chip is the mechanism that 
MS Windows controls.  The analogy is apt and accurate.

        Hence, one is wasting their time trying to study all the ideas of these 
philosophers/psychologists/psychiatrists/etc.  They are at best severely 
incomplete, at worst gravely misleading.

        If you want to understand the spiritual soul, go to the one who wrote 
the software soul.  Study his book - the Bible to have a better understanding 
of human behavior.


        Jojo








        ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <hohlr...@gmail.com>
        To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
        Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:15 PM
        Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul? 




          I think Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have the best explanation of
          consciousness to date.  It's called Orchestrated Objective Reduction,
          or Orch-OR.  The two actually developed the idea separately, Sir
          Penrose being a physicist and Hameroff being a physician who
          specialized in anesthesia and cancer research.  Roger was seeking a
          model of the brain that did not require computation.  Hameroff wanted
          to know how anesthesia worked and where the conscious went when under.
          Penrose theorizes that spacetime is granular at the size of the
          Planck length and that quantum superposition is linked to the
          curvature.  Orchestrated Reduction is the collapse of the
          superposition.

          Hameroff brought in the neuron microtubles which provide the
          structure.  He sees a synchronous oscillation in neural MT can
          influence other neurons.  Together they see these electrons as a sea
          embedded in the geometry of spacetime.

          Needless to say, they have many critics.  :-)










      -- 
      Patrick

      www.tRacePerfect.com
      The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect!
      The quickest puzzle ever! 



Reply via email to