Gerard, could you provide some tangible examples of how other safety aspects of Wikimania would be compromised if there is any specific attention paid to the safety of LGBT+ Wikimedians? I cannot imagine how such a thing could be true.
Based on my reading, nobody in this thread has asked for the safety of LGBT+ attendees to be "prioritized" over other safety aspects. Please don't make it appear as if they have. Thanks, Fae On 18 October 2016 at 11:42, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > I do care that everybody can come to places where they are safe. All the > specific LGBT attention to safety is however on many levels problematic > when we prioritise this over other safety aspects. The big picture for me > is that we need to go to places where bringing Wikipedia and what it stands > for the most good. It is why I would go to Russia, to China to India to > South Africa. -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
