JMJM,
You wrote:
>Aha Bill, Interesting. Sorry that I disappointed you. This
>discussion typifies the problem of communicating in words. I believe
>you use words precisely. Your terms are well-defined.  Yes, and
>no. Wrong and right. You and me. While I believe every meaning
>is relative and every opinion is partial and incomplete.  That's
>our difference. Would you agree?
I think we do have real, fundamental differences that are not explained
away by our communication styles. But for the most part I agree with
your statement above.
>Is Maya Zen/Chan?
I think of it as
Zen/zen/Chan/Christianity/Islam/good/bad/hot/cold/karma are all
illusary, and a Buddhist (and maybe originally Hindu?) term for
illusary is maya.
...Bill!
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
